REVIEW 1 cited by
STADEE: STAtistics-based DEEp Detection of Machine Generated Text
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present STADEE, a \textbf{STA}tistics-based \textbf{DEE}p detection method to identify machine-generated text, addressing the limitations of current methods that rely heavily on fine-tuning pre-trained language models (PLMs). STADEE integrates key statistical text features with a deep classifier, focusing on aspects like token probability and cumulative probability, crucial for handling nucleus sampling. Tested across diverse datasets and scenarios (in-domain, out-of-domain, and in-the-wild), STADEE demonstrates superior performance, achieving an 87.05% F1 score in-domain and outperforming both traditional statistical methods and fine-tuned PLMs, especially in out-of-domain and in-the-wild settings, highlighting its effectiveness and generalizability.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Anatomy of Speech Persuasion: Linguistic Shifts in LLM-Modified Speeches
GPT-4o increases emotional lexicon and uses more questions and exclamations when asked to strengthen speeches, but follows a surface style rather than human-like persuasive argumentation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.