Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

What's documented in AI? Systematic Analysis of 32K AI Model Cards

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.05160 v1 pith:JXIRRI7E submitted 2024-02-07 cs.SE cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.AIcs.LG
keywords modelcardsmodelsanalysisdocumentationaddingdatafilled-out
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid proliferation of AI models has underscored the importance of thorough documentation, as it enables users to understand, trust, and effectively utilize these models in various applications. Although developers are encouraged to produce model cards, it's not clear how much information or what information these cards contain. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of 32,111 AI model documentations on Hugging Face, a leading platform for distributing and deploying AI models. Our investigation sheds light on the prevailing model card documentation practices. Most of the AI models with substantial downloads provide model cards, though the cards have uneven informativeness. We find that sections addressing environmental impact, limitations, and evaluation exhibit the lowest filled-out rates, while the training section is the most consistently filled-out. We analyze the content of each section to characterize practitioners' priorities. Interestingly, there are substantial discussions of data, sometimes with equal or even greater emphasis than the model itself. To evaluate the impact of model cards, we conducted an intervention study by adding detailed model cards to 42 popular models which had no or sparse model cards previously. We find that adding model cards is moderately correlated with an increase weekly download rates. Our study opens up a new perspective for analyzing community norms and practices for model documentation through large-scale data science and linguistics analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Impact Assessment Card: Communicating Risks and Benefits of AI Uses

    cs.HC 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In an online study of 235 people, a compact 'Impact Assessment Card' for AI systems outperformed a full written report on speed, email quality, usability, and preference.

Pith tools