Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Zero-shot LLM-guided Counterfactual Generation: A Case Study on NLP Model Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.04793 v2 pith:K73RKSA3 submitted 2024-05-08 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords modelscounterfactualgenerationllmszero-shotlanguagetasksblack-box
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the development and proliferation of large, complex, black-box models for solving many natural language processing (NLP) tasks, there is also an increasing necessity of methods to stress-test these models and provide some degree of interpretability or explainability. While counterfactual examples are useful in this regard, automated generation of counterfactuals is a data and resource intensive process. such methods depend on models such as pre-trained language models that are then fine-tuned on auxiliary, often task-specific datasets, that may be infeasible to build in practice, especially for new tasks and data domains. Therefore, in this work we explore the possibility of leveraging large language models (LLMs) for zero-shot counterfactual generation in order to stress-test NLP models. We propose a structured pipeline to facilitate this generation, and we hypothesize that the instruction-following and textual understanding capabilities of recent LLMs can be effectively leveraged for generating high quality counterfactuals in a zero-shot manner, without requiring any training or fine-tuning. Through comprehensive experiments on a variety of propreitary and open-source LLMs, along with various downstream tasks in NLP, we explore the efficacy of LLMs as zero-shot counterfactual generators in evaluating and explaining black-box NLP models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interpreting Language Reward Models via Contrastive Explanations

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Reward model preferences can be explained by generating counterfactual and semifactual answer variations along 15 hand-picked evaluation attributes and measuring which attribute changes flip the model's preference.

Pith tools