Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Kondo overscreening in the presence of superconductivity

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A spin-1/2 impurity at the edge of a one-dimensional spin-1 superconductor is shown to be exactly solvable, with four phases governed by an RG-invariant parameter: overscreened Kondo, zero-mode, YSR, and unscreened.

desk verdict Solid Bethe-ansatz machinery for the Kondo phase, but the zero-mode and YSR phases rest on a boundary string that does not satisfy the paper's own Bethe equation. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01924 v2 pith:KCX3NIEG submitted 2024-12-02 cond-mat.str-el hep-thmath-phmath.MPnlin.SIquant-ph

Pradip Kattel , Abay Zhakenov , Natan Andrei This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elhep-thmath-phmath.MPnlin.SIquant-ph
keywords KondooverscreeningsuperconductivityBetheansatzYu-Shiba-RusinovstatesGross-Neveumodelquantumimpuritynon-FermiliquidRG-invariantparameter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a single spin-1/2 magnetic impurity coupled to the edge of a one-dimensional wire whose spin-1 fermions attract each other, generating a superconducting gap. Using the Bethe ansatz, the authors claim to solve the model exactly for any coupling strength and find that the competition between Kondo screening and superconductivity yields four distinct impurity phases. For strong boundary coupling, the impurity is overscreened by a many-body Kondo cloud, leaving a residual entropy of 1/2 ln 2 and a dynamically generated Kondo scale. For intermediate coupling, a novel zero-mode phase appears with a zero-energy boundary excitation, followed by a Yu-Shiba-Rusinov phase where a midgap bound state screens the impurity in an excited state; when the bulk superconducting interaction dominates, the impurity is entirely unscreened.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the nested Bethe ansatz: equations (7)–(8) for the pseudomomenta kj and spin rapidities λα, derived via the functional Bethe ansatz and fusion hierarchy, with the RG-invariant boundary parameter d = sqrt(b² − 2b/c − 9/4) entering through a factor in Eq. (8). All boundary physics is carried by d: when d is imaginary (d = iδ), the Bethe equations admit a purely imaginary boundary string λ = ±i(1/2 − δ), which produces the zero mode and the YSR bound state. The root-density Ansätze (20), (36), (44), and (46) encode the ground states of the four phases and yield the impurity density of states and entropy; the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz equations (54) with boundary conditions (55) give the impurity free energy and the residual entropy.

What would settle it

Solve the Bethe ansatz equations (7)–(8) numerically for finite L on a lattice regularization and compute the lowest excitation energy in the predicted zero-mode window δ ∈ (1/2, 1); if the first boundary excitation does not vanish faster than 1/L while the impurity entropy approaches 1/2 ln 2, the zero-mode phase and the boundary string Ansatz are falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a spin-1/2 Kondo impurity at the edge of an O(3)-invariant (equivalently SU(2) spin-1) Gross-Neveu superconductor is exactly solvable, and that the boundary physics is fully classified by the RG-invariant quantity d(J,g) defined in Eq. (9) (real or purely imaginary d = iδ). The ground state is a sea of two-string Bethe roots together with a propagating spinon, and the boundary string λ = ±i(1/2 − δ) is the key object separating the phases: for δ < 1/2 the impurity is overscreened by a multiparticle cloud with no boundary excitations; for 1/2 < δ < 1 the same cloud coexists with a zero-energy boundary excitation; for 1 < δ < 2 a midgap state of energy m(1 + cos πδ) screens the impurity in an excited state while the ground state is unscreened; and for δ > 2 no screening occurs. In the Kondo phase, the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz gives an impurity entropy of 1/2 ln 2 at low temperature, signalling a non-Fermi liquid, and a Kondo scale TK ≥ m is generated.

Load-bearing premise

The phase classification assumes that the only Bethe-root configurations contributing below the mass gap are the two-string sea, a single propagating spinon, and the single boundary string λ = ±i(1/2 − δ); if additional string or complex-root solutions such as quartets or wide strings enter the low-energy spectrum, the phase boundaries—especially the zero-energy cancellation for δ ∈ (1/2, 1)—could shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The four phases are stable consequences of the exact solution: overscreened Kondo for d real or δ ∈ (0, 1/2), zero mode for δ ∈ (1/2, 1), YSR for δ ∈ (1, 2), and local moment for δ > 2.
  • A dynamically generated Kondo scale TK distinct from the bulk mass gap Δ = 2m governs the overscreened phases, with TK = m at the Kondo–YSR boundary δ = 1.
  • In the zero-mode phase, a boundary-localized excitation and a one-string form a singlet with vanishing energy, making an excited state exactly degenerate with the ground state in the thermodynamic limit.
  • In the YSR phase, a single-particle bound mode of energy m(1 + cos πδ) lies inside the gap and screens the impurity, while the ground state remains unscreened.
  • The zero-temperature impurity entropy in the overscreened Kondo phase is 1/2 ln 2, a non-Fermi-liquid signature, regardless of the real value of d.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the zero-mode phase survives beyond the strict string Ansatz, it provides an exact example of a boundary zero mode coexisting with a fractional-entropy Kondo fixed point, which could be probed by exact diagonalization or tensor-network methods on a lattice regularization.
  • The RG-invariant parameter d can be read as a ratio of the two couplings' bare strengths, so the phase boundaries might be re-expressed directly in terms of J/g; a numerical check of the δ = 1 boundary transition in a lattice version would be a sharp test.
  • The YSR midgap state here is always an excited state, in contrast to the classical-impurity BCS case where it exists throughout phase space, suggesting that quantum fluctuations suppress the YSR regime; this could be tested by increasing the impurity spin S.
  • The same methods may extend to larger impurity spin or SU(N) bulk symmetries, where overscreening and superconductivity would interplay with different residual entropies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a one-dimensional O(3)/SU(2) Gross-Neveu model with an attractive bulk interaction and a spin-1/2 Kondo impurity at an open boundary. The authors derive Bethe ansatz equations, identify an RG-invariant parameter d, and propose four boundary phases: an overscreened Kondo phase with low-temperature entropy (1/2)ln 2, a zero-mode phase with an additional zero-energy boundary excitation, a YSR-like phase with a midgap screening state, and a local-moment unscreened phase. The paper presents root-density solutions, density-of-states formulas, a Kondo scale TK, a thermodynamic Bethe ansatz analysis for the Kondo phase, and claims exact integrability of the model.

Significance. If correct, the result would be a rare exact solution of a strongly interacting superconducting wire with a Kondo impurity, and the proposed phase diagram would be a useful benchmark for numerical methods. The manuscript deserves credit for the detailed Bethe ansatz construction in Appendices B-D, for the explicit checks that the g=0 and J=0 limits reduce to known results, and for the fact that the phase boundaries are derived rather than fitted to target phases. However, the most original part of the phase diagram rests on a boundary string solution that is not actually a solution of the Bethe equations as written, and the printed thermodynamic entropy formula contradicts the claimed overscreening limit; these are load-bearing issues that must be fixed before the central claims can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section VI, Eq. (38)] The claimed boundary string solution is not a solution of the Bethe ansatz equations. For d=iδ and lambda=i(1/2−δ), the υ=+ boundary factor in Eq. (8) is (lambda+d+i/2)/(lambda+d−i/2), and lambda+d = i/2, so the denominator vanishes while the numerator equals i; the remaining factors are finite for distinct roots, so Eq. (8) is singular rather than satisfied. Since the zero-mode and YSR phases, the root densities in Eqs. (39), (40), and (46), the zero-energy statement, and the midgap energy m cos(πδ) all rely on this object, the most original part of the phase diagram is not supported by the Bethe equations as printed. The authors should either show that this configuration corresponds to a pole of the transfer matrix rather than a Bethe root, specify a different branch or regularization of the parameter d, or rederive the affected root densities and energies.
  2. [Section IX, Eq. (63)] The low-temperature entropy formula contradicts the claimed overscreening result. As printed, Eq. (63) contains the term (m/4T) e^{m/T}(sqrt(e^{-m/T}+1)+1), which diverges as T→0, so S(T) cannot approach (1/2)ln 2. The expression also does not appear to be the temperature derivative of the impurity free energy in Eq. (59) when η1 is given by Eq. (62). The thermodynamic evidence for overscreening must be rederived; if the numerical curve in Fig. 5 is the intended result, the correct analytic expression and its derivation should be provided.
  3. [Section V, Eqs. (20)-(22)] The ground-state root counting does not close. Substituting ω=0 into Eq. (20) gives ρ_gs(0)=4N+3/4−3/8=4N+3/8, hence 2ρ_gs(0)=8N+3/4, not N as stated in Eq. (21). Moreover, taking M=N as implied by Eq. (21) is incompatible with the spin relation in Eq. (22), which requires M=N/4 for Sz=1/2. This normalization issue affects the state counting on which the subsequent phase assignments and the interpretation of the impurity contribution depend.
  4. [Section VII, after Eq. (46)] The stated root number for the YSR state is internally inconsistent with the printed density. Evaluating Eq. (46) at ω=0 gives ρ_d(0)=4N−1, so 2+2ρ_d(0)=8N, not N as asserted. This affects the spin assignment of the YSR state and the integrated density-of-states argument in Eq. (53), so the counting should be corrected or the definition of ρ_d clarified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section V, opening paragraph] The text states that the overscreened phase includes d=iδ for 0<δ<1, while Table I and Section III assign δ∈(0,1/2) to the Kondo phase and δ∈(1/2,1) to the zero-mode phase; these ranges should be stated consistently.
  2. [Eq. (20)] Eq. (20) uses cos(dω) for real d, while Eq. (36) uses cosh(δω) for d=iδ, and the paragraph after Eq. (20) writes the impurity contribution with cosh(dω); the notation should be unified, and for real d the density should presumably contain cosh(dω) to avoid oscillatory Fourier transforms.
  3. [Section III, Summary] There is a typographical artifact in the sentence ending 'zero-energy boundary excitation,n where' that should be corrected.
  4. [Section IX] The finite-temperature analysis is explicitly restricted to the Kondo phase; the paper should make clear that the phase diagram and boundary-string statements in the other phases are zero-temperature results and that no finite-temperature entropy claim is made there.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the phase diagram and Kondo scale follow from the paper's own Bethe-ansatz equations rather than from fitting to the target phases, and the self-citations to prior exact solutions are not used as unverified premises.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain starts from the Hamiltonian Eq. (1), derives the Bethe-ansatz equations Eqs. (7)-(8) in Appendices C and D via the functional Bethe ansatz and fusion hierarchy, and then solves those equations in the thermodynamic limit to obtain the four phases. The RG-invariant parameter d in Eq. (9) is a combination of the bare couplings, not a quantity fitted to the phase diagram; the phase boundaries are consequences of the root-density analysis rather than inputs. The Kondo scale TK is not fitted either: it is defined by Eq. (34) as the median of the impurity density of states computed from Eq. (20), and f(d) is obtained by solving that integral equation. The entropy claim in Section IX is presented as a TBA calculation from Eqs. (54)-(59), so it is a derived result rather than an assumption. The paper does rely on prior exact solutions of the same group (Refs. [2,27,33]) for the bulk string structure and for the boundary Bethe equations of the underlying spin-1/2 copies, but those are published derivations with independent content and are used as building blocks; no uniqueness theorem is invoked to forbid alternative solutions, and the central new claims are not defined in terms of the conclusions they purport to establish. The algebraic issues raised by the skeptic (the boundary string substituted into Eq. (8), and the apparent divergence of Eq. (63) as T tends to zero) are correctness or consistency concerns rather than circularity: a false or inconsistent step is not the same as a step that reduces to its own input. For the circularity question, the derivation is self-contained with respect to its stated Bethe-ansatz input.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central derivation rests on standard Bethe-ansatz technology rather than on fitted constants; no experimental data are used. The main assumptions are the string hypothesis for the low-energy spectrum, the equivalence of the constructed boundary K-matrix to the physical Kondo coupling, and the bulk scaling-limit relation taken from Andrei and Destri. These are internal consistency assumptions, not externally fitted parameters.

free parameters (1)
  • Hole rapidity theta = 0 in the ground state
    Introduced in the ground-state root density Eq. (20) and set to 0 to minimize the energy. This choice is part of the ground-state construction and affects the root density of the Kondo and zero-mode phases.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Bethe-string hypothesis: the relevant solutions of the Bethe equations in the thermodynamic limit are strings, specifically a two-string sea in the ground state plus the single boundary string lambda = +/-i(1/2 - delta) in the boundary phases.
    Used throughout Sections V-VII and in the TBA of Appendix E. If other complex-root configurations contribute below the gap, the phase boundaries and the zero-energy cancellation would change.
  • domain assumption The boundary K-matrix K(lambda) = r(lambda + d) r(lambda - d), with K(b) = S^j0, correctly represents the physical spin-1/2 Kondo boundary interaction of Hamiltonian (1) for all J.
    Appendix C constructs the K-matrix and states that expanding the transfer matrix yields conserved charges, but does not explicitly show that the first conserved charge reproduces the full boundary Hamiltonian. This equivalence is load-bearing.
  • domain assumption Bulk scaling-limit relation m = 2D exp(-pi/(2g)) and the bulk mass gap of the O(3) Gross-Neveu model are taken as known.
    Taken from the earlier exact solution [33] and used in Section V and Appendix F to define the physical mass scale and to derive the RG beta functions. The paper does not rederive this bulk result.
  • domain assumption No particle production or annihilation occurs, and the Yang-Baxter and reflection equations are sufficient for a complete N-particle eigenbasis.
    Integrability is established in Appendix C from commutation of transfer matrices, but completeness of the Bethe eigenstates in the presence of the boundary is assumed.
invented entities (1)
  • Boundary string solution lambda = +/-i(1/2 - delta) independent evidence
    purpose: Produces the zero-energy boundary mode in the zero-mode phase and the midgap YSR bound state in the YSR phase.
    It is a solution of the Bethe equations (Eq. (38)), not an arbitrary postulate. Its predicted signatures are a zero-energy boundary excitation when 1/2 < delta < 1 and a midgap state of energy m cos(pi delta) when 1 < delta < 2, both checkable by independent numerical solution of the Bethe equations or by lattice simulations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kondo overscreening in the presence of superconductivity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KCX3NIEG

@misc{pith2026241201924,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kondo overscreening in the presence of superconductivity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KCX3NIEG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01924}
}
abstract

We consider a model describing a system where the superconductivity competes with the overscreened Kondo effect. The model consists of a single spin$-\frac{1}{2}$ quantum impurity at the edge of a quantum wire where spin$-1$ bulk fermions interact attractively, generating a (superconducting) mass gap. The competition between the Kondo screening and the superconductivity leads to a rich phase structure. We find that for strong Kondo coupling, there is a regime of phase space where the Kondo phase is stable with the impurity \textit{overscreened} by a multiparticle Kondo effect, and a Kondo scale is dynamically generated. When the bulk and boundary interaction strength are comparable, we find that a midgap state appears in the spectrum and screens the impurity, while in the ground state, the impurity is unscreened. This midgap state is akin to the Yu-Shiba-Rusinov (YSR) states that exist in the entire phase space in the BCS superconductor. Moreover, when the bulk superconducting interaction strength is stronger than the boundary Kondo interaction strength, the impurity can no longer be screened. Further, between the Kondo and YSR phases, we find a novel phase where, while the Kondo cloud overscreens the impurity, a boundary excitation exists that has vanishing energy in the thermodynamic limit. Similar phase diagrams that result from competition between different mechanisms were found for other models, too: the dissipative Kondo system, where dissipation competes with screening; the Kondo impurity coupled to spin-1/2 attractively interacting fermions where condensation competes with screening; and the XXX-Kondo model, where the lattice cutoff and the bulk spin interaction compete with screening.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01924 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The weak-coupling RG flow diagram for Hamil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The phase diagram of the spin-1 superconductor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows that irrespective of values of real d in the Kondo phase, the impurity entropy starts from ln√ 2  at T → 0 and asymptotes to ln(2) at high tempera￾ture. This shows that the impurity is overscreened at low temperatures and is asymptotically free at high tem￾perat…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Thermodynamics in a split Hilbert space: Quantum impurity at the edge of a one-dimensional superconductor

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Bethe-ansatz analysis yields the impurity entropy across the four phases and predicts entropy overshoots above ln 2 when a midgap YSR bound state is thermally activated.

  2. Two Channel Kondo behavior in the quantum XX chain with a boundary defect

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A boundary impurity in the spin-1/2 XX chain maps to two Majorana chains, yielding two-channel Kondo physics with impurity entropy ln√2 and a critical coupling at J=√2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Kattel, A

    P. Kattel, A. Zhakenov, P. R. Pasnoori, P. Azaria, and N. Andrei, Dissipation driven phase transition in the non- hermitian kondo model, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.09510 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    P. R. Pasnoori, N. Andrei, C. Rylands, and P. Azaria, Rise and fall of yu-shiba-rusinov bound states in charge-conserving s-wave one-dimensional superconduc- tors, Physical Review B 105, 174517 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    Wang, Exact solution of the open heisenberg chain with two impurities, Physical Review B56, 14045 (1997)

    Y. Wang, Exact solution of the open heisenberg chain with two impurities, Physical Review B56, 14045 (1997)

    1997

  4. [4]

    Kattel, P

    P. Kattel, P. R. Pasnoori, J. Pixley, P. Azaria, and N. An- drei, Kondo effect in the isotropic heisenberg spin chain, Physical Review B 109, 174416 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    Kattel, P

    P. Kattel, P. R. Pasnoori, J. Pixley, and N. Andrei, A spin chain with non-hermitian PT symmetric boundary cou- plings: exact solution, dissipative kondo effect, and phase transitions on the edge, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10334 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Kondo, The physics of dilute magnetic alloys (Cam- bridge University Press, 2012)

    J. Kondo, The physics of dilute magnetic alloys (Cam- bridge University Press, 2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    A. C. Hewson, The Kondo problem to heavy fermions , 2 (Cambridge university press, 1997)

    1997

  8. [8]

    Yosida, Theory of magnetism.: Edition en anglais , Vol

    K. Yosida, Theory of magnetism.: Edition en anglais , Vol. 122 (Springer Science & Business Media, 1996)

    1996

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group: Critical phe- nomena and the kondo problem, Reviews of modern physics 47, 773 (1975)

    1975

  2. [10]

    Krishna-Murthy, J

    H. Krishna-Murthy, J. Wilkins, and K. Wilson, Renormalization-group approach to the anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. i. static properties for the sym- metric case, Physical Review B 21, 1003 (1980)

    1980

  3. [11]

    Krishna-Murthy, J

    H. Krishna-Murthy, J. Wilkins, and K. Wilson, Renormalization-group approach to the anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. ii. static properties for the asymmetric case, Physical Review B 21, 1044 (1980)

    1980

  4. [12]

    Andrei, Diagonalization of the kondo hamiltonian, Physical Review Letters 45, 379 (1980)

    N. Andrei, Diagonalization of the kondo hamiltonian, Physical Review Letters 45, 379 (1980)

    1980

  5. [13]

    Vigman, Exact solution of sd exchange model at t= 0, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 31, 364 (1980)

    P. Vigman, Exact solution of sd exchange model at t= 0, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 31, 364 (1980)

    1980

  6. [14]

    Andrei, K

    N. Andrei, K. Furuya, and J. Lowenstein, Solution of the kondo problem, Reviews of modern physics 55, 331 (1983)

    1983

  7. [15]

    Tsvelick and P

    A. Tsvelick and P. Wiegmann, Exact results in the theory of magnetic alloys, Advances in Physics 32, 453 (1983)

    1983

  8. [16]

    Affleck and A

    I. Affleck and A. W. Ludwig, The kondo effect, conformal field theory and fusion rules, Nuclear Physics B 352, 849 (1991)

    1991

  9. [17]

    Affleck, Conformal field theory approach to the kondo effect, Acta Phys

    I. Affleck, Conformal field theory approach to the kondo effect, Acta Phys. Polon. B 26, 1869 (1995)

    1995

  10. [18]

    Saleur, Lectures on non perturbative field theory and quantum impurity problems, in Aspects topologiques de la physique en basse dimension

    H. Saleur, Lectures on non perturbative field theory and quantum impurity problems, in Aspects topologiques de la physique en basse dimension. Topological aspects of low dimensional systems: Session LXIX. 7–31 July 1998 (Springer, 2002) pp. 473–550

    1998

  11. [19]

    Krishnan and M

    A. Krishnan and M. A. Metlitski, The kondo impurity in the large spin limit, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12650 (2024). 16

    2024 arXiv

  12. [21]

    M¨ uller-Hartmann and J

    E. M¨ uller-Hartmann and J. Zittartz, Kondo effect in su- perconductors, Physical Review Letters 26, 428 (1971)

    1971

  13. [22]

    L. S. Borkowski and P. Hirschfeld, Kondo effect in gapless superconductors, Physical Review B 46, 9274 (1992)

    1992

  14. [23]

    Steglich and S

    F. Steglich and S. Wirth, Foundations of heavy-fermion superconductivity: lattice kondo effect and mott physics, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 084502 (2016)

    2016

  15. [24]

    Shiba, Classical Spins in Superconductors, Progress of Theoretical Physics 40, 435 (1968)

    H. Shiba, Classical Spins in Superconductors, Progress of Theoretical Physics 40, 435 (1968)

    1968

  16. [25]

    LUH, Bound state in superconductors with paramag- netic impurities, Acta Physica Sinica 21, 75 (1965)

    Y. LUH, Bound state in superconductors with paramag- netic impurities, Acta Physica Sinica 21, 75 (1965)

    1965

  17. [26]

    A. I. Rusinov, Superconductivity near a Paramagnetic Impurity, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoreti- cal Physics Letters 9, 85 (1969)

    1969

  18. [27]

    P. R. Pasnoori, C. Rylands, and N. Andrei, Kondo im- purity at the edge of a superconducting wire, Physical Review Research 2, 013006 (2020)

    2020

  19. [28]

    Kim and M

    K.-S. Kim and M. D. Kim, Kondo physics in the algebraic spin liquid, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 20, 125206 (2008)

    2008

  20. [29]

    Chen and T

    Y. Chen and T. Zhu, Exotic kondo effect induced by spinons in a quantum spin liquid (2022)

    2022

  21. [30]

    Florens, L

    S. Florens, L. Fritz, and M. Vojta, Kondo effect in bosonic spin liquids, Physical review letters 96, 036601 (2006)

    2006

  22. [31]

    Yasui and K

    S. Yasui and K. Sudoh, Heavy-quark dynamics for charm and bottom flavor on the fermi surface at zero tempera- ture, Phys. Rev. C 88, 015201 (2013)

    2013

  23. [32]

    Hattori, K

    K. Hattori, K. Itakura, S. Ozaki, and S. Yasui, Qcd kondo effect: Quark matter with heavy-flavor impurities, Phys. Rev. D 92, 065003 (2015)

    2015

  24. [33]

    Andrei and C

    N. Andrei and C. Destri, Dynamical symmetry breaking and fractionization in a new integrable model, Nuclear Physics B 231, 445 (1984)

    1984

  25. [34]

    D. J. Gross and A. Neveu, Dynamical symmetry breaking in asymptotically free field theories, Physical Review D 10, 3235 (1974)

    1974

  26. [35]

    Nambu and G

    Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical model of el- ementary particles based on an analogy with supercon- ductivity. i, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961)

    1961

  27. [36]

    Nambu and G

    Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical model of el- ementary particles based on an analogy with supercon- ductivity. ii, Phys. Rev. 124, 246 (1961)

    1961

  28. [37]

    Andrei and J

    N. Andrei and J. H. Lowenstein, Diagonalization of the chiral-invariant gross-neveu hamiltonian, Physical review letters 43, 1698 (1979)

    1979

  29. [38]

    Y. Liu, Z. Wang, T. Sato, M. Hohenadler, C. Wang, W. Guo, and F. F. Assaad, Superconductivity from the condensation of topological defects in a quantum spin- hall insulator, Nature Communications 10, 2658 (2019)

    2019

  30. [39]

    M. Thies, From relativistic quantum fields to condensed matter and back again: updating the gross–neveu phase diagram, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Gen- eral 39, 12707 (2006)

    2006

  31. [40]

    Kalinkin and V

    A. Kalinkin and V. Skorikov, Phase transitions in four- fermion models, Inorganic materials 39, 765 (2003)

    2003

  32. [41]

    P. R. Pasnoori, N. Andrei, C. Rylands, and P. Azaria, Rise and fall of yu-shiba-rusinov bound states in charge-conserving s-wave one-dimensional superconduc- tors, Phys. Rev. B 105, 174517 (2022)

    2022

  33. [42]

    Marino and M

    E. Marino and M. J. Martins, Relativistic two- dimensional field theory with dynamical generation of a superconducting gap, Physical Review D33, 3121 (1986)

    1986

  34. [43]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of ferromag- netism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133 (1966)

    1966

  35. [44]

    Coleman, There are no goldstone bosons in two dimen- sions, Communications in Mathematical Physics 31, 259 (1973)

    S. Coleman, There are no goldstone bosons in two dimen- sions, Communications in Mathematical Physics 31, 259 (1973)

    1973

  36. [45]

    Witten, Chiral symmetry, the 1/n expansion and the su (n) thirring model, Nuclear Physics B145, 110 (1978)

    E. Witten, Chiral symmetry, the 1/n expansion and the su (n) thirring model, Nuclear Physics B145, 110 (1978)

    1978

  37. [46]

    Kattel, A

    P. Kattel, A. Zhakenov, and N. Andrei, Competing color superconductivity and color kondo effect in quark matter, arXiv preprint (2025), arXiv:2507.11617 [hep-th]

    2025

  38. [47]

    Sakurai, Comments on superconductors with mag- netic impurities, Progress of Theoretical Physics44, 1472 (1970)

    A. Sakurai, Comments on superconductors with mag- netic impurities, Progress of Theoretical Physics44, 1472 (1970)

    1970

  39. [48]

    Franke, G

    K. Franke, G. Schulze, and J. Pascual, Competition of superconducting phenomena and kondo screening at the nanoscale, Science 332, 940 (2011)

    2011

  40. [49]

    Zazunov, S

    A. Zazunov, S. Plugge, and R. Egger, Fermi-liquid ap- proach for superconducting kondo problems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 207701 (2018)

    2018

  41. [50]

    Aoi and Y

    T. Aoi and Y. Masuda, Magnetic impurity effects in kondo superconductor, la3al (ce), Journal of the Phys- ical Society of Japan 37, 673 (1974)

    1974

  42. [51]

    M¨ uller-Hartmann and J

    E. M¨ uller-Hartmann and J. Zittartz, Kondo effect in su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 428 (1971)

    1971

  43. [52]

    Matsuura, The effects of impurities on superconduc- tors with kondo effect, Progress of Theoretical Physics 57, 1823 (1977)

    T. Matsuura, The effects of impurities on superconduc- tors with kondo effect, Progress of Theoretical Physics 57, 1823 (1977)

    1977

  44. [53]

    Takano and S

    F. Takano and S. Matayoshi, Kondo effect in supercon- ductor, Progress of Theoretical Physics 41, 45 (1969)

    1969

  45. [54]

    Cuevas, A

    J. Cuevas, A. L. Yeyati, and A. Mart ´ ın-Rodero, Kondo effect in normal-superconductor quantum dots, Physical Review B 63, 094515 (2001)

    2001

  46. [55]

    Tsvelick and P

    A. Tsvelick and P. Wiegmann, Exact solution of the mul- tichannel kondo problem, scaling, and integrability, Jour- nal of Statistical Physics 38, 125 (1985)

    1985

  47. [56]

    Andrei and C

    N. Andrei and C. Destri, Solution of the multichannel kondo problem, Physical review letters 52, 364 (1984)

    1984

  48. [57]

    Bethe, On the theory of metals i: Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the linear atomic chain, zeiu (1931)

    H. Bethe, On the theory of metals i: Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the linear atomic chain, zeiu (1931)

    1931

  49. [58]

    B. Sutherland, An introduction to the bethe ansatz, in Exactly Solvable Problems in Condensed Matter and Rel- ativistic Field Theory: Proceedings of the Winter School and International Colloquium Held at Panchgani, Jan- uary 30–February 12, 1985 and Organized by Tata Insti- tu...

    1985

  50. [59]

    R. J. Baxter, Exactly solved models in statistical mechan- ics (Elsevier, 2016)

    2016

  51. [60]

    Gaudin, The bethe wavefunction (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2014)

    M. Gaudin, The bethe wavefunction (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2014)

    2014

  52. [61]

    Slavnov, Algebraic Bethe ansatz and correlation func- tions: an advanced course (World Scientific, 2022)

    N. Slavnov, Algebraic Bethe ansatz and correlation func- tions: an advanced course (World Scientific, 2022)

    2022

  53. [62]

    ˇSamaj and Z

    L. ˇSamaj and Z. Bajnok, Introduction to the statistical physics of integrable many-body systems (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2013)

    2013

  54. [63]

    Eckle, Models of Quantum Matter: A First Course on Integrability and the Bethe Ansatz (Oxford University Press, 2019)

    H.-P. Eckle, Models of Quantum Matter: A First Course on Integrability and the Bethe Ansatz (Oxford University Press, 2019). 17

    2019

  55. [64]

    Franchini, Notes on bethe ansatz techniques, Inter- national School for Advanced Studies-Trieste, Lecture Notes (2011)

    F. Franchini, Notes on bethe ansatz techniques, Inter- national School for Advanced Studies-Trieste, Lecture Notes (2011)

    2011

  56. [65]

    Sklyanin, Functional bethe ansatz, in Integrable and superintegrable systems (World Scientific, 1990) pp

    E. Sklyanin, Functional bethe ansatz, in Integrable and superintegrable systems (World Scientific, 1990) pp. 8–33

    1990

  57. [66]

    Wang, W.-L

    Y. Wang, W.-L. Yang, J. Cao, and K. Shi, Off-diagonal Bethe ansatz for exactly solvable models (Springer, 2015)

    2015

  58. [67]

    Mezincescu and R

    L. Mezincescu and R. I. Nepomechie, Fusion procedure for open chains, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 25, 2533 (1992)

    1992

  59. [68]

    Babujian, Exact solution of the isotropic heisen- berg chain with arbitrary spins: Thermodynamics of the model, Nuclear Physics B 215, 317 (1983)

    H. Babujian, Exact solution of the isotropic heisen- berg chain with arbitrary spins: Thermodynamics of the model, Nuclear Physics B 215, 317 (1983)

    1983

  60. [69]

    J. Cao, S. Cui, W.-L. Yang, K. Shi, and Y. Wang, Ex- act spectrum of the spin-s heisenberg chain with generic non-diagonal boundaries, Journal of High Energy Physics 2015, 10.1007/jhep02(2015)036 (2015)

    2015 doi

  61. [70]

    However, at weak coupling, both schemes coincide [14]

    The exact RG equations obtained from the Bethe Ansatz solution are expressed in an unconventional cutoff scheme where the UV cut-off is imposed in the fully interacting theory. However, at weak coupling, both schemes coincide [14]

  62. [71]

    Frappat, R

    L. Frappat, R. Nepomechie, and E. Ragoucy, Complete bethe ansatz solution of the open spin-s xxz chain with general integrable boundary terms, jstat 0709 (2007) p09009 and, arXiv preprint arXiv:0707.0653

    2007 arXiv

  63. [72]

    R. J. Baxter, Partition function of the eight-vertex lattice model, Annals of Physics 70, 193 (1972)

    1972

  64. [73]

    Destri and J

    C. Destri and J. Lowenstein, Analysis of the bethe-ansatz equations of the chiral-invariant gross-neveu model, Nu- clear Physics B 205, 369 (1982)

    1982

  65. [74]

    Ghoshal, Bound state boundary s-matrix of the sine- gordon model, arXiv preprint hep-th/9310188 (1993)

    S. Ghoshal, Bound state boundary s-matrix of the sine- gordon model, arXiv preprint hep-th/9310188 (1993)

    1993 arXiv

  66. [75]

    Skorik and H

    S. Skorik and H. Saleur, Boundary bound states and boundary bootstrap in the sine-gordon model with dirich- let boundary conditions, Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and General 28, 6605 (1995)

    1995

  67. [76]

    Ghoshal and A

    S. Ghoshal and A. Zamolodchikov, Boundary s matrix and boundary state in two-dimensional integrable quan- tum field theory, International Journal of Modern Physics A 9, 3841 (1994)

    1994

  68. [77]

    Corrigan, Boundary bound states in integrable quan- tum field theory, proceedings of non-perturbative quan- tum effects 2000, arXiv preprint hep-th/0010094

    E. Corrigan, Boundary bound states in integrable quan- tum field theory, proceedings of non-perturbative quan- tum effects 2000, arXiv preprint hep-th/0010094

    2000 arXiv

  69. [78]

    Kapustin and S

    A. Kapustin and S. Skorik, Surface excitations and sur- face energy of the antiferromagnetic xxz chain by the bethe ansatz approach, Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- ical and General 29, 1629 (1996)

    1996

  70. [79]

    Kattel, P

    P. Kattel, P. R. Pasnoori, and N. Andrei, Exact solu- tion of a non-hermitian mathscrP T-symmetric heisen- berg spin chain, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.06004 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  71. [80]

    Rylands, Exact boundary modes in an interacting quantum wire, Physical Review B 101, 085133 (2020)

    C. Rylands, Exact boundary modes in an interacting quantum wire, Physical Review B 101, 085133 (2020)

    2020

  72. [81]

    S. Chen, Y. Wang, and F.-C. Pu, The open xxz chain with boundary impurities, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 31, 4619 (1998)

    1998

  73. [82]

    S. Chen, Y. Wang, F. Yang, and F.-C. Pu, Pinning of the sliding collective charge state in a one-dimensional attractive fermion system, Physical Review B 59, 7950 (1999)

    1999

  74. [83]

    Notice that this is in contrast with the model with spin- 1 2 bulk studied in [2] where the YSR state is the ground state for some range of parameters – here the YSR regime is a mid-gap excited state throughout the parametric regime 1 < δ <2

  75. [84]

    Yang and C

    C.-N. Yang and C. P. Yang, Thermodynamics of a one-dimensional system of bosons with repulsive delta- function interaction, Journal of Mathematical Physics 10, 1115 (1969)

    1969

  76. [85]

    Takahashi, Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional Solvable Models (Cambridge University Press, 1999)

    M. Takahashi, Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional Solvable Models (Cambridge University Press, 1999). A. Hamiltonian as SU (2) spin−1 Gross-Neveu model with a boundary impurity Notice that upon performing the unitary rotation Sa = U † ˜τ aU (A1) where U =   − i√ 2 0 i√ 21√ 2 0...

    1999

  77. [86]

    Here Aσ aj a0 are the amplitudes for the jth itinerant fermion with chirality index σ and spin aj scattering off the localized impurity carrying spin a0

    One particle sector Starting with N = 1 fermion and the single impurity, the wavefunction can be expressed as |k⟩ = X aj =↑↓,σ=± Z 0 −L dxeiσkxAσ a1a0 ψ† σ,a1 (x) |0⟩ ⊗ |a0⟩ , (B1) where |0⟩ is the vacuum ψσ,aj |0⟩ = 0. Here Aσ aj a0 are the amplitudes for the jth itinerant fe...

  78. [87]

    As usual, we shall write the wave function as the sum of plane waves with different amplitudes in different regions that are separated by the ordering of the particles i.e

    Two particle sector We shall now consider the two-particle sector where the bulk interaction with coupling strengthg in the Hamiltonian Eq.(A4) comes into play. As usual, we shall write the wave function as the sum of plane waves with different amplitudes in different regions ...

  79. [88]

    We construct eigenstates with eigenvalues E = NX j=1 kj

    N-particle sector Generalization to the N −particle sector is now fairly straightforward. We construct eigenstates with eigenvalues E = NX j=1 kj. (B17) of the form |{kj}⟩ = X Q,⃗ a,⃗ σ Z θ(xQ)A⃗ σ ⃗ a[Q] NY j=1 eiσj kj xj ψ† aj σj (xj)|0⟩ ⊗ |a0⟩, (B18) whereas before the sum ...

  80. [89]

    Our R and r matrices are related to these by Rij s (u) = (u + η)(u + 2η)Rij(u) and Rij σs(u) = u + 3 2 η rij(u), (C11) when the crossing parameter is taken to be η = −i and s = 1

    Bethe Ansatz Equations To make the notations similar to [66, 68], let us introduce the two R−matrices Rij σs(u) = u + η 2 I i,j + η ⃗ σi · ⃗Sj (C9) and Rij s (u) = 2sY j (u − jη) 2sX l=0 ℓY k=1 u + kη u − kη P (ℓ) ij , (C10) where the former represents an R-matrix between part...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.