REVIEW 6 cited by
Beyond Privacy Trade-offs with Structured Transparency
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Successful collaboration involves sharing information. However, parties may disagree on how the information they need to share should be used. We argue that many of these concerns reduce to 'the copy problem': once a bit of information is copied and shared, the sender can no longer control how the recipient uses it. From the perspective of each collaborator, this presents a dilemma that can inhibit collaboration. The copy problem is often amplified by three related problems which we term the bundling, edit, and recursive enforcement problems. We find that while the copy problem is not solvable, aspects of these amplifying problems have been addressed in a variety of disconnected fields. We observe that combining these efforts could improve the governability of information flows and thereby incentivise collaboration. We propose a five-part framework which groups these efforts into specific capabilities and offers a foundation for their integration into an overarching vision we call "structured transparency". We conclude by surveying an array of use-cases that illustrate the structured transparency principles and their related capabilities.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Talking to an AI Mirror: Designing Self-Clone Chatbots for Enhanced Engagement in Digital Mental Health Support
Self-clone chatbots that mirror a user's support style showed higher emotional and cognitive engagement than a generic counselor chatbot, but only among the subgroup who found the clone believable.
-
Asymmetry by Design: Boosting Cyber Defenders with Differential Access to AI
A policy framework for shaping access to AI cyber tools to favor defenders, with three access approaches and implementation guidance.
-
GPAI Evaluations Standards Taskforce: Towards Effective AI Governance
The paper proposes an EU GPAI Evaluation Standards Taskforce to develop adaptive standards for AI evaluations, based on four desiderata: internal validity, external validity, reproducibility, and portability.
-
AGI, Governments, and Free Societies
AGI could force societies toward either authoritarian control or weakened state authority, so institutions need new safeguards to preserve liberty.
-
Position Paper: Model Access should be a Key Concern in AI Governance
Model access decisions should be studied and coordinated through a dedicated research field, with recommendations for evaluators, companies, governments, and international bodies.
-
AI Safety Frameworks Should Include Procedures for Model Access Decisions
The paper introduces Responsible Access Policies as a recommended component of frontier AI safety frameworks for governing model access.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.