Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

LLMs Simulate Big Five Personality Traits: Further Evidence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.01765 v1 pith:KEK2KTQS submitted 2024-01-31 cs.CL cs.AI

Aleksandra Sorokovikova , Natalia Fedorova , Sharwin Rezagholi , Ivan P. Yamshchikov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords personalitytraitsllmsfivemodelssimulateanalyzebroader
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

An empirical investigation into the simulation of the Big Five personality traits by large language models (LLMs), namely Llama2, GPT4, and Mixtral, is presented. We analyze the personality traits simulated by these models and their stability. This contributes to the broader understanding of the capabilities of LLMs to simulate personality traits and the respective implications for personalized human-computer interaction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PTEI: Integrating Personality Traits to Enhance Emotional Intelligence in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Personality-aware prompting plus contrastive retrieval of aligned scenarios measurably lifts LLM accuracy on EmoBench emotional-understanding tasks, especially for GPT models with CoT.

  2. On the Adaptive Psychological Persuasion of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An adaptive preference-optimization method helps LLM persuaders choose among 11 psychological strategies, improving persuasion success on counterfactual facts while preserving general capability.

  3. Can LLMs Generate Behaviors for Embodied Virtual Agents Based on Personality Traits?

    cs.HC 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM prompting can steer both speech and nonverbal cues of virtual agents toward intended extraversion levels, with human observers detecting the difference.

  4. Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models to Simulate Personality

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLMs prompted with Big Five trait scores can respond consistently to personality questionnaires but generate free text that often fails to express the prompted trait, especially Neuroticism.

  5. Evaluating Personality Traits in Large Language Models: Insights from Psychological Questionnaires

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Across five questionnaires, five LLMs consistently self-report high Agreeableness, Openness, and Conscientiousness and low Neuroticism, but reported trait dominance is sensitive to how questionnaire scales are combined.

Pith tools