Balancing Reconstruction Quality and Regularisation in ELBO for VAEs
read the original abstract
A trade-off exists between reconstruction quality and the prior regularisation in the Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO) loss that Variational Autoencoder (VAE) models use for learning. There are few satisfactory approaches to deal with a balance between the prior and reconstruction objective, with most methods dealing with this problem through heuristics. In this paper, we show that the noise variance (often set as a fixed value) in the Gaussian likelihood p(x|z) for real-valued data can naturally act to provide such a balance. By learning this noise variance so as to maximise the ELBO loss, we automatically obtain an optimal trade-off between the reconstruction error and the prior constraint on the posteriors. This variance can be interpreted intuitively as the necessary noise level for the current model to be the best explanation of the observed dataset. Further, by allowing the variance inference to be more flexible it can conveniently be used as an uncertainty estimator for reconstructed or generated samples. We demonstrate that optimising the noise variance is a crucial component of VAE learning, and showcase the performance on MNIST, Fashion MNIST and CelebA datasets. We find our approach can significantly improve the quality of generated samples whilst maintaining a smooth latent-space manifold to represent the data. The method also offers an indication of uncertainty in the final generative model.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Multipath Adaptive Gated Bottleneck Latent ODE with Raman Data Fusion for Cell Culture Process Forecasting
A gated bottleneck latent ODE with multi-path adaptive fine-tuning and Raman data fusion outperforms a standard latent ODE baseline on forecasting accuracy for 38 bioreactor runs across 14 conditions.
-
A Comprehensive Survey on Network Traffic Synthesis: From Statistical Models to Deep Learning
A survey reviewing statistical and deep learning approaches to synthetic network traffic generation, with comparisons, an AI comparison tool, open challenges, and future directions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.