Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LLM-Assist: Enhancing Closed-Loop Planning with Language-Based Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.00125 v1 pith:KNRSITMY submitted 2023-12-30 cs.AI cs.CV

classification cs.AIcs.CV
keywords rule-baseddrivingplannerplannersplanningreasoningscenariosapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Although planning is a crucial component of the autonomous driving stack, researchers have yet to develop robust planning algorithms that are capable of safely handling the diverse range of possible driving scenarios. Learning-based planners suffer from overfitting and poor long-tail performance. On the other hand, rule-based planners generalize well, but might fail to handle scenarios that require complex driving maneuvers. To address these limitations, we investigate the possibility of leveraging the common-sense reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT4 and Llama2 to generate plans for self-driving vehicles. In particular, we develop a novel hybrid planner that leverages a conventional rule-based planner in conjunction with an LLM-based planner. Guided by commonsense reasoning abilities of LLMs, our approach navigates complex scenarios which existing planners struggle with, produces well-reasoned outputs while also remaining grounded through working alongside the rule-based approach. Through extensive evaluation on the nuPlan benchmark, we achieve state-of-the-art performance, outperforming all existing pure learning- and rule-based methods across most metrics. Our code will be available at https://llmassist.github.io.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Who Responds When the Driver Is Gone? A Framework for Holistic Passenger Intent Understanding

    cs.HC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Intent2Drive uses a ToM-inspired LLM reasoner on a new holistic intent dataset to infer latent passenger state and planner objectives, improving structured intent metrics while keeping competitive nuPlan closed-loop scores.

  2. Agent-driven Long-tail Simulation for Autonomous Driving

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM agents with structured actions can drive interactive long-tail road users in nuPlan, and SemanticPlan shows current planners still fail safety and semantic completion there.

  3. Knowledge Integration Strategies in Autonomous Vehicle Prediction and Planning: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that categorizes methods for integrating traffic rules and domain knowledge into autonomous vehicle trajectory prediction and planning.

Pith tools