A rate of convergence of Physics Informed Neural Networks for the linear second order elliptic PDEs
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:KO5C4K32record.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
In recent years, physical informed neural networks (PINNs) have been shown to be a powerful tool for solving PDEs empirically. However, numerical analysis of PINNs is still missing. In this paper, we prove the convergence rate to PINNs for the second order elliptic equations with Dirichlet boundary condition, by establishing the upper bounds on the number of training samples, depth and width of the deep neural networks to achieve desired accuracy. The error of PINNs is decomposed into approximation error and statistical error, where the approximation error is given in $C^2$ norm with $\mathrm{ReLU}^{3}$ networks (deep network with activations function $\max\{0,x^3\}$) and the statistical error is estimated by Rademacher complexity. We derive the bound on the Rademacher complexity of the non-Lipschitz composition of gradient norm with $\mathrm{ReLU}^{3}$ network, which is of immense independent interest.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Posterior Concentration of Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Elliptic PDEs
Bayesian PINNs for elliptic PDEs have posteriors that contract around the true solution at near-optimal rates, with the prior adapting automatically to unknown smoothness.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.