pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08114 · v1 · pith:KO5WZSJ6new · submitted 2026-06-06 · 🪐 quant-ph · stat.AP

Robust applicability of continuous dynamical decoupling to decoherence reduction in longitudinal and transverse-noise settings: The role of anisotropy

S. Afonso , J.M. Gomez Llorente , J. Plata This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 19:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph stat.AP
keywords continuous dynamical decouplingdecoherence reductionqubit noiselongitudinal fluctuationstransverse noiseanisotropyLandau-Zener transitionsunitary transformations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Continuous dynamical decoupling curbs decoherence from both longitudinal and transverse noise when control parameters reshape the effective noise spectrum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper evaluates how well continuous dynamical decoupling works when qubits face not only longitudinal noise but also transverse fluctuations and anisotropic inputs. It applies a sequence of unitary transformations to rewrite the noise as effective stochastic terms whose frequency content depends on the driving-field parameters. Tuning those parameters allows the impact of the fluctuations to be reduced. This generalization matters because practical devices encounter mixed noise sources that earlier CDD studies largely set aside. The same mapping also handles fluctuations that arise while the control field ramps up and dresses the qubit states.

Core claim

By applying a sequence of unitary transformations, the noise in the qubit system is recast into effective stochastic terms whose spectral properties depend on the parameters of the continuous driving field. This mapping permits the design of control strategies that mitigate decoherence by adjusting the effective noise characteristics. The method demonstrates that CDD remains effective against transverse noise and anisotropy in addition to longitudinal dephasing, including effects from fluctuations during the dressing of the qubit states via Landau-Zener transitions.

What carries the argument

The sequence of unitary transformations that converts the original noise into driving-parameter-dependent effective stochastic terms.

If this is right

  • Decoherence reduction strategies can be designed by making controlled changes in the properties of the effective noise.
  • CDD applies to generic qubit setups that contain both longitudinal and transverse noise sources.
  • Significant robustness against the inclusion of transverse fluctuations and anisotropy is obtained through suitable choice of driving parameters.
  • Fluctuations that occur while the driving field dresses the qubit states can be treated inside the same effective-noise description.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Device calibration could include direct characterization of noise anisotropy to select optimal drive parameters.
  • The approach suggests that ramp times and amplitudes in real hardware can be tuned to suppress decoherence beyond what longitudinal-only models predict.
  • Multi-qubit extensions might use similar unitary mappings to handle cross-talk noise whose spectrum is also reshaped by shared control fields.

Load-bearing premise

The noise can be represented as effective stochastic terms after a series of unitary transformations whose properties depend on the driving parameters.

What would settle it

A measurement of the qubit coherence time versus driving amplitude or ramp duration that shows no improvement for the parameter values predicted to optimize the effective noise spectrum would falsify the robustness claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08114 by J.M. Gomez Llorente, J. Plata, S. Afonso.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spectral densities of the input fluctuations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Dephasing resulting from anisotropic (a) and isot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Results of the numerical simulation of the dephasi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Bare energy levels (dashed lines) and dressed coun [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectral densities of the fluctuations δω0(t) (a), χa(t) (b), and χd(t) (c), normalized to the maximum of S(δω0; ω). In the left, the input fluctuations correspond to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We analytically evaluate the efficiency of continuous dynamical decoupling (CDD) to curb decoherence in generic qubit setups where diverse sources of noise can be present. Previous theoretical approaches to CDD have mainly focused on its potential to cope with longitudinal fluctuations. Here, the basic scenario tackled with CDD is generalized. Apart from dealing with pure dephasing induced by diagonal noise, we consider the impact of transverse fluctuations, usually present in the practical arrangements. In particular, the implications of anisotropic noisy inputs are studied. Additionally, we analyze the role of the fluctuations in the dressing of the qubit by the CDD field of control: since the driving field is usually switched on through linear ramps of its characteristic parameters, the associated dressing of the original states can be described in terms of noisy Landau-Zener transitions. In our approach, based on a sequence of unitary transformations, the noise entering the system is cast into effective stochastic terms whose spectral characteristics are dependent on the driving parameters. This description allows the design of strategies to mitigate the impact of the fluctuations using controlled changes in the effective-noise properties. Significant robustness of CDD against the generalization of the basic scenario can be achieved through an appropriate choice of the parameters of control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper analytically evaluates the efficiency of continuous dynamical decoupling (CDD) to curb decoherence in generic qubit setups with longitudinal, transverse, and anisotropic noise, plus ramp-induced Landau-Zener dressing. It generalizes prior CDD work (focused on pure dephasing) by using a sequence of unitary transformations to recast the input noise into effective stochastic terms whose spectral properties depend on the driving parameters, thereby enabling mitigation strategies that achieve significant robustness via appropriate control-parameter choice.

Significance. If the unitary mapping is complete, the work extends CDD applicability to realistic multi-axis noise scenarios common in experiments and supplies a parameter-tuning design principle for decoherence suppression. The analytic framing could directly inform control protocols, provided the effective-model predictions are validated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / approach description] Abstract and approach paragraph on unitary transformations: the central claim that noise is recast into effective stochastic terms with tunable spectra rests on the completeness of the transformation sequence; non-commuting transverse/anisotropic components plus ramp dressing may generate surviving cross terms or higher-order commutators that are not eliminated, undermining the predicted robustness.
  2. [Generalized scenario / effective spectra] Section describing the generalized scenario and effective-noise spectra: no explicit derivation, error bounds, or comparison to full numerical integration of the original Hamiltonian is referenced, so it is unclear whether the effective model preserves all relevant dynamics for anisotropic inputs.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states an analytic approach but does not mention any numerical validation or parameter ranges; adding a brief statement on the domain of validity would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of rigor in the unitary transformation approach and validation of the effective model. We address each point below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / approach description] Abstract and approach paragraph on unitary transformations: the central claim that noise is recast into effective stochastic terms with tunable spectra rests on the completeness of the transformation sequence; non-commuting transverse/anisotropic components plus ramp dressing may generate surviving cross terms or higher-order commutators that are not eliminated, undermining the predicted robustness.

    Authors: We agree that demonstrating the completeness of the transformation sequence is essential, particularly for non-commuting transverse and anisotropic noise components together with ramp-induced Landau-Zener effects. The manuscript constructs the sequence to eliminate leading noise terms and modulate the remainder via driving parameters, but we acknowledge that explicit verification of vanishing cross terms and higher-order commutators would benefit from additional detail. We will add an appendix providing the full step-by-step transformation, commutation relations, and suppression arguments to order relevant for the effective spectra. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Generalized scenario / effective spectra] Section describing the generalized scenario and effective-noise spectra: no explicit derivation, error bounds, or comparison to full numerical integration of the original Hamiltonian is referenced, so it is unclear whether the effective model preserves all relevant dynamics for anisotropic inputs.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes the absence of explicit derivation details, error bounds, and numerical benchmarks in the current version. While the effective spectra follow directly from the unitary mappings, we will revise the manuscript to include the complete analytic derivation of the effective noise operators, quantitative error estimates for the approximation, and direct comparisons against numerical integration of the original time-dependent Hamiltonian for representative anisotropic noise strengths and ramp profiles. This will confirm preservation of the relevant dynamics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses standard unitary mapping to effective noise without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper's central approach is a sequence of unitary transformations that recast input noise (longitudinal, transverse, anisotropic, plus Landau-Zener effects) into parameter-dependent effective stochastic terms. This is a conventional technique in open quantum systems and dynamical decoupling literature; the abstract and described method do not define any quantity in terms of itself, fit parameters to a target and then relabel the fit as a prediction, or rely on load-bearing self-citations whose validity is internal to the present work. The robustness claim follows from the tunable spectra of the effective noise under control-parameter variation, which remains an independent calculation once the transformation sequence is accepted. No equations or steps in the provided text reduce the output to the input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be enumerated from the text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5754 in / 1110 out tokens · 12807 ms · 2026-06-27T19:44:38.709367+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    [23] and [55], it is shown that, for t ≫ τc, the evolution of the coherences is given by ⟨ρm,m ′(t)⟩ ∝ e− (m− m′)2πS (χ a; ω =0)t

    The limit of short correlation time Following Refs. [23] and [55], it is shown that, for t ≫ τc, the evolution of the coherences is given by ⟨ρm,m ′(t)⟩ ∝ e− (m− m′)2πS (χ a; ω =0)t. (30) Hence, this regime corresponds to exponential decay, the ra te being determined by the spectral density of χ a(t) at zero frequency, S(χ a;ω = 0). Note that these result...

  2. [2]

    Combining Eqs

    The static-noise limit The term static noise refers to fluctuations with no time depe ndence: they take a fixed value in each particular realization, that value being randomly distributed for the different runs. Combining Eqs. (12) and (28), the stochastic variableζa(t) can be written in the static limit as ζa(t) = ∫ t 0 [ηx cos(ω dt′) +ηy sin(ω dt′)]dt′ (32...

  3. [3]

    The limit of short correlation time Following the procedure introduced in Ref. [23], one obtain s that, for t ≫ τc, the transfer probability averaged over noise realizations can be approximated as (see Appendix B) ⟨Pm,m ′(t)⟩ = 2 πt [ F (x) m,m ′S(δω 0; ˜Ω d) + F (y) m,m ′S(χ b; ˜Ω d) ] . (36) where ˜Ω d denotes the effective frequency corresponding to the...

  4. [4]

    The static-noise limit In the case of fluctuations with no time dependence, Eq. (34) i s developed to obtain ⟨Pm,m ′(t)⟩ = F (x) m,m ′ ⟨ δω 2 0 ⟩ sin2( ˜Ω dt 2 ) ( ˜Ω d/ 2)2 + 11 F (y) m,m ′ (⟨ η2 x ⟩ + ⟨ η2 y ⟩) [ sin2( Ω +t 2 ) Ω 2 + + sin2( Ω − t 2 ) Ω 2 − ] + (38) F (y) m,m ′ ( − ⟨ η2 x ⟩ + ⟨ η2 y ⟩) [ cos2(ω dt) + cos( ˜Ω dt) cos(ω dt) Ω +Ω − ] where ...

  5. [5]

    Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond , Quantum 2, 79 (2018)

    J. Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond , Quantum 2, 79 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sens ing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Acín et al , The quantum technologies roadmap: a European community vi ew, New J

    ]A. Acín et al , The quantum technologies roadmap: a European community vi ew, New J. Phys. 20, 080201 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    Morong, K.S

    W. Morong, K.S. Collins, A. De, E. Stavropoulos, T. You, a nd C. Monroe, Engineering Dynamically Decoupled Quantum Simulations with Trapped Ions, PRX Quantum 4, 010334 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    Suter and G

    D. Suter and G. A. Álvarez, Colloquium: Protecting quant um information against environmental noise, Rev. Mod. Phys . 88, 041001 (2016)

    2016

  10. [10]

    Baumgart, J.M

    I. Baumgart, J.M. Cai, A. Retzker, M.B. Plenio, and Ch. Wu nderlich, Ultrasensitive Magnetometer using a Single Atom , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240801 (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone , Advances in quantum metrology, Nature Photonics 5, 222 (2011)

    2011

  12. [12]

    Y.-J. Lin, K. Jiménez-García, and I. B. Spielman, Spin-o rbit-coupled Bose-Einstein condensates, Nature 471, 83-86 (2011)

    2011

  13. [13]

    Sugawa, F

    S. Sugawa, F. Salces-Carcoba, A. R. Perry, Y. Yue, and I. B . Spielman, Second Chern number of a quantum-simulated non-Abelian Yang monopole, Science 360, 1429–1434 (2018)

    2018

  14. [14]

    Bloch, Quantum coherence and entanglement with ultr acold atoms in optical lattices, Nature, 453, 1016 (2008)

    I. Bloch, Quantum coherence and entanglement with ultr acold atoms in optical lattices, Nature, 453, 1016 (2008)

    2008

  15. [15]

    Farolfi, D

    ] A. Farolfi, D. Trypogeorgos, G. Colzi, E. Fava, G. Lampo resi, and G. Ferrari, Design and characterization of a compa ct magnetic shield for ultracold atomic gas experiments, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 115114 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    E. L. Hahn, Spin Echoes, Phys. Rev. 80, 580–94 (1950)

    1950

  17. [17]

    Viola and S

    L. Viola and S. Lloyd, Dynamical suppression of decoher ence in two-state quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 58, 2733 (1998)

    1998

  18. [18]

    Viola and E

    L. Viola and E. Knill, Robust Dynamical Decoupling of Qu antum Systems with Bounded Controls, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 037901 (2003)

    2003

  19. [19]

    G. S. Uhrig, Keeping a Quantum Bit Alive by Optimized π -Pulse Sequences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 100504 (2007)

    2007

  20. [20]

    G. A. Álvarez, A. Ajoy, X. Peng, and D. Suter, Performanc e comparison of dynamical decoupling sequences for a qubit i n a rapidly fluctuating spin bath, Phys. Rev. A 82, 042306 (2010)

    2010

  21. [21]

    M. J. Biercuk, H. Uys, A. P. VanDevender, N. Shiga, W. M. I tano, and J. J. Bollinger, Optimized dynamical decoupling in a model quantum memory, Nature 458, 996 (2009)

    2009

  22. [22]

    Khodjasteh, D

    K. Khodjasteh, D. A. Lidar, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Dyn amical Decoupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 180501 (2005)

    2005

  23. [23]

    F. F. Fanchini, J. E. M. Hornos, and R. d. J. Napolitano, C ontinuously decoupling single-qubit operations from a per turbing thermal bath of scalar bosons, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022329 (2007). 21

    2007

  24. [24]

    J. M. Cai, B. Naydenov, R. Pfeiffer, L. P. McGuinness, K. D . Jahnke, F. Jelezko, M. B. Plenio, A. Retzker, Robust dynamical decoupling with concatenated continuous drivin g, New J. Phys. 14, 113023 (2012)

    2012

  25. [25]

    K. C. Miao, J. P. Blanton, C. P. Anderson, A. Bourassa, A. L. Crook, G. Wolfowicz, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, and D. D. Awschalom, Universal coherence protection in a solid-stat e spin qubit, Science 369, 1493 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    Timoney, I

    N. Timoney, I. Baumgart, M. Johanning, A. Varon, M. B. Pl enio, A. Retzker, and Ch. Wunderlich, Quantum gates and memory using microwave-dressed states, Nature 476, 185 (2011)

    2011

  27. [27]

    Gomez Llorente, I

    J.M. Gomez Llorente, I. Gomez-Ojeda, and J. Plata, Deco herence reduction via continuous dynamical decoupling: An a- lytical study of the role of the noise spectrum, Phys. Rev. A 108, 052412 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Yu-bing Yao, Xiang-Fa Zhou, Zheng-Wei Zhou, and Xing-X iang Zhou, Continuous dynamical decoupling in non-Hermiti an two-level systems, Phys. Rev. A 111, 052622 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Louzon, G.T

    D. Louzon, G.T. Genov, N. Staudenmaier, F. Frank, J. Lan g, M.L. Markham, A. Retzker, and F. Jelezko, Robust Noise Suppression and Quantum Sensing by Continuous Phased Dynam ical Decoupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 120802 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Farfurnik, N

    D. Farfurnik, N. Aharon, I. Cohen, Y. Hovav, A. Retzker, and N. Bar-Gill, Experimental realization of time-depende nt phase-modulated continuous dynamical decoupling, Phys. R ev. A 96, 013850 (2017)

    2017

  31. [31]

    Akerman and R

    N. Akerman and R. Ozeri, Operating a Multi-Ion Clock wit h Dynamical Decoupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 013201 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    G. T. Genov, N. Aharon, F. Jelezko, and A. Retzker, Mixed dynamical decoupling, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 035010 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    Costa Morazotti, A.H

    N.A. Costa Morazotti, A.H. Silva, G. Audi, F. Fernandes Fanchini, R.J. Napolitano, Optimized continuous dynamica l decoupling via differential geometry and machine learning, Phys. Rev. A 110, 042601 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Miao Cai and Keyu Xia, Optimizing continuous dynamical decoupling with machine learning, Phys. Rev. A 106, 042434 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    Salhov, Q

    ] A. Salhov, Q. Cao, J. Cai, A. Retzker, F. Jelezko, and G. Genov, Protecting Quantum Information via Destructive Interference of Correlated Noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 223601 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Pelzer et al , Multi-ion Frequency Reference Using Dynamical Decouplin g, Phys

    L. Pelzer et al , Multi-ion Frequency Reference Using Dynamical Decouplin g, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 033203 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Bermudez, P

    A. Bermudez, P. O. Schmidt, M. B. Plenio, and A. Retzker, Robust trapped-ion quantum logic gates by continuous dynamical decoupling, Phys. Rev. A 85, 040302(R) (2012)

    2012

  38. [38]

    V. J. Martínez-Lahuerta et al , Quadrupole transitions and quantum gates protected by con tinuous dynamic decoupling, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 015013 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Andrew Golter, Thomas K

    D. Andrew Golter, Thomas K. Baldwin, and Hailin Wang, Pr otecting a Solid-State Spin from Decoherence Using Dressed Spin States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 237601 (2014)

    2014

  40. [40]

    Senatore et al , Fast single-qubit gates for continuous dynamically decou pled systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.11821 (2024)

    M. Senatore et al , Fast single-qubit gates for continuous dynamically decou pled systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.11821 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    X. Xu, Z. Wang, C. Duan, P. Huang, P. Wang, Y. Wang, N. Xu, X . Kong, F. Shi, X. Rong, and J. Du, Coherence-Protected Quantum Gate by Continuous Dynamical Decoupling in Diamond , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 070502 (2012)

    2012

  42. [42]

    Trypogeorgos, A

    D. Trypogeorgos, A. Valdés-Curiel, N. Lundblad, and I. B. Spielman, Synthetic clock transitions via continuous dy namical decoupling, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013407 (2018)

    2018

  43. [43]

    Stark, N

    A. Stark, N. Aharon, A. Huck, H.A.R. El-Ella, A. Retzker , F. Jelezko, and U.L. Andersen, Clock transition by continu ous dynamical decoupling of a three-level system, Sci Rep 8, 14807 (2018)

    2018

  44. [44]

    C. J. Patrickson, V. Haemmerli, S. Guo, A. J. Ramsay, and I. J. Luxmoore, Microwave quantum heterodyne sensing using a continuous concatenated dynamical decoupling protocol, Nat Comm. 16, 4380 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    YY Xie, ZM Wang, LA Wu, Noise-resilient Universal Quant um Computing in the Presence of Anisotropic Noise, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.04892 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Bosco, J

    S. Bosco, J. Zou, and D. Loss, High-Fidelity Spin Qubit S huttling via Large Spin-Orbit Interactions, PRX 5,020353 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Chen, Effects of symmetry breaking of the structur ally-disordered Hamiltonian ensembles on the anisotropic deco- herence of qubits, Sci

    H.-B. Chen, Effects of symmetry breaking of the structur ally-disordered Hamiltonian ensembles on the anisotropic deco- herence of qubits, Sci. Rep. 12, 2869 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    Choi and R

    Y. Choi and R. Joynt, Anisotropy with respect to the appl ied magnetic field of spin qubit decoherence times, npj Quant um Inf. 8, 70 (2022)

    2022

  49. [49]

    Hajati, I

    Y. Hajati, I. Heinz, and G. Burkard, Crosstalk analysis in single hole-spin qubits within highly anisotropic g-tensors, Phys. Rev. Res., 7, 023277 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    Hendrickx, L

    N.W. Hendrickx, L. Massai, M. Mergenthaler, F. Schupp, S. Paredes, S.W. Bedell, G Salis, and A. Fuhrer, Sweet-spot operation of a germanium hole spin qubit with highly anisotr opic noise sensitivity, Nature Materials, 23, 920–927 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Saez-Mollejo, D

    J. Saez-Mollejo, D. Jirovec, Y. Schell, J. Kukucka, S. C alcaterra, D. Chrastina, G. Isella, M. Rimbach-Russ, S. Bos co, and G. Katsaros, Exchange anisotropies in microwave-driven si nglet-triplet qubits, Nature Communications, 16, 3862 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    D. A. Rower et al , Qubit-state purity oscillations from anisotropic transv erse noise, Phys. Rev. A 111, 032420 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    L. D. Landau, On the Theory of Transfer of Energy at Colli sions II, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 2, 46 (1932)

    1932

  54. [54]

    Zener, Non-Adiabatic Crossing of Energy Levels, Pro c

    C. Zener, Non-Adiabatic Crossing of Energy Levels, Pro c. R. Soc. A 137, 696 (1932)

    1932

  55. [55]

    Brouard and J

    S. Brouard and J. Plata, Dissociation of ultracold mole cules via Feshbach resonances: The effect of magnetic-field fl uctu- ations, Phys. Rev. A 72, 023620 (2005)

    2005

  56. [56]

    Gardiner

    C.W. Gardiner. Handbook of Stochastic Methods. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985)

    1985

  57. [57]

    Stratonovich

    R.L. Stratonovich. Topics in the Theory of Random Noise. (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1963)

    1963

  58. [58]

    Brouard and J

    S. Brouard and J. Plata, Internal-state dephasing of tr apped ions, Phys. Rev. A 68, 012311 (2003)

    2003

  59. [59]

    Paladino, Y

    E. Paladino, Y. M. Galperin, G. Falci, and B. L. Altshule r, 1/f noise: Implications for solid-state quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 361 (2014)

    2014

  60. [60]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryshik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic Press, New York, 1994). 22

    1994

  61. [61]

    Y. Sung, F. Beaudoin, L. M. Norris, F. Yan, D. K. Kim, J. Y. Qiu, U. von Lüpke, J. L. Yoder, T. P. Orlando, L. Viola, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Non-Gaussian noise s pectroscopy with a superconducting qubit sensor, Nature Communications 10, 3715 (2019)

    2019

  62. [62]

    Rogora, R

    C. Rogora, R. Cominotti, C. Baroni, D. Andreoni, G. Lamp oresi, A. Zenesini, and G. Ferrari, Progress toward a zero- magnetic-field environment for ultracold-atom experiment s, Phys. Rev. A 110, 013319 (2024)

    2024

  63. [63]

    C E Carroll and F T Hioe, Transition probabilities for th e three-level Landau-Zener model, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 19 2061 (1986)

    2061

  64. [64]

    Y. B. Band and Y. A vishai, Three-level Landau-Zener dyn amics, Phys. Rev. A 99, 032112 (2019)

    2019

  65. [65]

    Gomez Llorente and J

    J.M. Gomez Llorente and J. Plata, Acceleration of spin- orbit coupled Bose-Einstein condensates: analytical desc ription of the emergence of Landau-Zener transitions, Phys. Rev. A 94, 053605 (2016)

    2016

  66. [66]

    S. N. Shevchenko, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Landau-Zener- Stuckelberg interferometry, Phys. Rep. 492, 1 (2010)

    2010

  67. [67]

    D. T. Gillespie, Exact numerical simulation of the Orns tein-Uhlenbeck process and its integral, Physical Review E 54, 2084 (1996)

    2084

  68. [68]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17602005

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17602005