Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

ManipDreamer: Boosting Robotic Manipulation World Model with Action Tree and Visual Guidance

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Representing instructions as verb-preposition action trees and conditioning the diffusion model on depth, semantics, RGB, and a dynamic mask lets a robotic manipulation video generator follow instructions more faithfully and render more…

desk verdict A load-bearing evaluation flaw (future-frame mask) undermines the central claim; the action-tree idea is small but salvageable. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.16464 v1 pith:KOVVDX45 submitted 2025-04-23 cs.RO cs.AI

Ying Li , Xiaobao Wei , Xiaowei Chi , Yuming Li , Zhongyu Zhao , Hao Wang , Ningning Ma , Ming Lu
show 1 more author
Shanghang Zhang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ROcs.AI
keywords roboticworldmodelvideogenerationactiontreeinstructionfollowingvisualguidancediffusionControlNetadapterRLBench
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that robotic manipulation world models—video generators that predict how a scene changes under a language instruction—can be made substantially more instruction-faithful and visually consistent by two additions. First, instead of decomposing an instruction into independent sub-actions, the authors encode it as a verb-preposition action tree and use the node embeddings along the instruction's path to condition the diffusion model, capturing relations such as 'pick ... from ...' in a single forward pass. Second, they feed depth maps, SAM semantic features, RGB, and a dynamic mask through a multi-modal ControlNet-style adapter, layering geometric and semantic constraints into the video-diffusion UNet. On the RT-1 benchmark the paper reports PSNR rising from 19.55 to 21.05 on unseen tasks, SSIM from 0.7474 to 0.7982, lower flow error, and a roughly 2.5% higher average success rate over the RoboDreamer baseline across six RLBench tasks.

What carries the argument

The action tree is a fixed hierarchy of alternating verb and preposition layers; each instruction's word embeddings are collected along its path, concatenated, zero-padded to a fixed length, and fed to the UNet, so relationships between sub-actions are present in one conditioning vector instead of being generated through separate model forwards. The visual-guidance machinery consists of four 2D ControlNet branches (depth, SAM-2 semantic features, RGB, dynamic mask) that emit pyramid features, a patch-level router that scores each modality per patch per layer, and a spatial-temporal adapter with spatial and temporal convolutions plus spatial and temporal cross-attention that fuses the features into guidance injected every three decoder layers. The temporal cross-attention and temporal position embeddings are what supply temporal coherence, and Appendix C reports that the router consistently assigns the highest weight to depth across layers.

What would settle it

Re-run the visual-guidance evaluation with the dynamic mask computed from the first frame alone, for example using a learned first-frame-only mask estimator, and compare unseen-task PSNR, SSIM, and flow error against Table 2's values (21.05, 0.7982, and roughly 3.2, versus the no-mask baseline of 19.55, 0.7474, and 3.506); if the metrics fall back toward the no-mask baselines, the mask's future-frame dependence explains the visual gains, and if they hold, the mask is a legitimate single-frame condition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a robotic world model conditioned on both a structured action tree and multi-modal visual guidance produces videos that follow instructions better and look more physically consistent than a linguistic-decomposition baseline. Each instruction is parsed into alternating verb and preposition layers; the CLIP embeddings of the words on the instruction's path are concatenated into a tree embedding that drives the diffusion UNet, so the model sees the whole action structure rather than averaging separately denoised sub-actions. At the same time, four 2D ControlNet branches—depth from Depth Anything v2, SAM-2 semantic features, RGB, and a dynamic mask—produce pyramid features fused by a patch-level router and injected every three UNet decoder layers. The paper reports consistent gains across FID, SSIM, PSNR, LPIPS, and flow error on both seen and unseen RT-1 tasks, plus higher RLBench task success, with the full model reaching 21.05 PSNR and 0.7982 SSIM on unseen tasks.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the dynamic-mask cue can be obtained from just the starting image at test time; the paper's recipe builds the mask by comparing the starting image's segmentation features with all future frames, so if the mask is unavailable at test time, the visual-quality gains are measured with information from the video being predicted.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, structured action-tree conditioning is a viable alternative to per-sub-action denoising for instruction following, achieving better or comparable video quality with fewer model forwards.
  • Single-frame multi-modal conditions obtained from pretrained models (depth, semantics, dynamic mask) can be injected into robotic video diffusion without expensive manual annotation or per-frame control signals.
  • The higher RLBench success rates suggest that generated videos carry policy-relevant information, so video-quality metrics and closed-loop task success can improve together in robotic world models.
  • Cross-attention fusion of guidance beats additive fusion, with upper-decoder injection improving motion consistency and lower-layer injection improving visual detail.
  • The 2D ControlNet design shows that frame-repeated single-frame conditions can avoid the memory and latency overhead of 3D ControlNets in video diffusion for robotics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not demonstrate that the dynamic mask is available at test time with only the first frame; a testable extension is to train a first-frame-only mask predictor and retrain the full model, then compare unseen-task metrics to Table 2. If the numbers hold, the mask is a legitimate single-frame condition; if they collapse, part of the reported visual gain came from future-frame leakage.
  • Because the paper keeps the UNet frozen and trains only the tree-embedding pathway and adapters, the same conditioning stack could plausibly transfer to other video-diffusion backbones, but the paper only tests it on the RoboDreamer architecture, so that transfer is conjecture.
  • The action-tree vocabulary is currently tied to RT-1-style verbs and prepositions; extending the ontology to nouns, adjectives, or spatial relations could support open-vocabulary instructions, but the paper does not explore that direction.
  • Given that the router weights depth most heavily at every layer, adding an explicit depth-reconstruction or depth-consistency loss might further tighten geometric consistency; the paper does not test this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. ManipDreamer proposes a robotic manipulation world model that conditions video generation on two novel components: (1) action-tree instruction embeddings, which organize verb and preposition primitives into a hierarchical structure and traverse it to obtain a single conditioning embedding, replacing RoboDreamer's separate decomposition-and-average strategy; and (2) multi-modal visual guidance, in which depth from Depth Anything v2, SAM semantic features, RGB, and a "dynamic mask" are processed by dedicated ControlNets, fused by a patch-level router, and injected into the UNet via additive or cross-attention fusion. The method is evaluated on RT-1 for video quality (FID, SSIM, PSNR, LPIPS, Flow Error) and on six RLBench tasks for policy success, with claims of large quality gains and a 2.5% higher average success rate over RoboDreamer.

Significance. The action-tree representation is a reasonable and potentially useful alternative to linguistic decomposition for instruction-conditioned video generation, and the paper is transparent about its training protocol and algorithms. The multi-modal guidance idea is timely, and the qualitative failure-mode analysis is helpful. However, the validity of the visual-guidance claims depends critically on whether the dynamic mask is causally available at inference time; the current paper does not provide such a procedure, and the reported headline numbers do not correspond to the full model. If the leakage concern is resolved, the approach could still make a meaningful contribution, but the present evidence is not sufficient to support the central claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.3.1, Appendix A, Algorithm 1] The dynamic mask is computed from ground-truth future frames: Algorithm 1 takes as input the first frame I_0 and frames I_1 through I_T and returns the average of (1 - Sim(F_0, F_t)) over t. Section 2.2 explicitly states that only the initial frame and a text prompt are available at inference time for robotic world models. No inference-time procedure for obtaining the dynamic mask from the first frame alone is described anywhere. Consequently, the Table 2 results for the four-modality visual-guidance configurations (rows with Mask enabled) may have been generated with access to the target video, making the visual-guidance evaluation partially circular. This is load-bearing because the visual-guidance component of the central claim stands on these numbers. Please either remove the mask condition, provide a causal mask predictor trained only on the first frame, or report all visual-guidance comparisons with a first-frame-only mask estimator.
  2. [Abstract vs. Table 2] The abstract reports unseen-task PSNR of 21.05, SSIM of 0.7982, and Flow Error of 3.201. These values match the Table 2 row with action tree disabled and all four visual modalities enabled (PSNR 21.05, SSIM 0.7982, Flow 3.021), not the full ManipDreamer row with action tree enabled (PSNR 20.98, SSIM 0.7949, Flow 3.178). The abstract's Flow Error value 3.201 also does not match the table's 3.021. Since the full model has worse unseen-task metrics than the visual-guidance-only variant, the paper's headline claim that both components improve performance is not supported by the reported table. Please specify which configuration is the final ManipDreamer model and reconcile the reported numbers.
  3. [§4.2.3 and Table 3] The success-rate claim is inconsistent: the abstract says "2.5% higher average success rate," Table 3 gives 0.503 vs. 0.480 (an absolute difference of 0.023), and the text says "The 5.2% average gain." Please state the exact metric (percentage points vs. relative improvement) and report variance across seeds or episodes. Without confidence intervals or multiple seeds, it is difficult to assess whether the differences on individual tasks such as Close Box (0.95 vs. 0.96) are meaningful.
  4. [Table 2 baseline rows] The baseline configurations are ambiguous. The first row labeled "Vanilla # # # ! #" appears to mark the Mask column as enabled despite being the no-conditioning vanilla model, which is likely a formatting error. More substantively, the ControlNet baseline rows should state whether they use the proposed 2D ControlNet and adapter or the original 3D ControlNet; since Section 3.3.2 argues that the original ControlNet design is suboptimal, comparing against an unmodified ControlNet would not isolate the contribution of the fusion adapter. Please clarify these settings.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typos and duplicated words: "action tree tree" in §3.2.1, "patch-lever" in Eq. (4), "Sigal-modal" in §4.2.2, "Trainging details" in §4.1.2, and "addictive fusion" in §4.3.
  2. [Eq. (2)] The concatenation notation in Eq. (2) is unclear (the expression "n˚ i=1" is not standard). Please define the operator and the padding procedure explicitly.
  3. [Appendix C] The text says "As shown in Table 4" when referring to the modality-weight analysis, but the corresponding figure is Figure 4. Please correct the cross-reference.
  4. [§4.1] Several hyperparameters are not reported, such as the maximum number of action words used for action-tree padding, the exact condition-injection interval, and the router architecture details. Including these would improve reproducibility.
  5. [§4.1.1] The Flow Error metric is only cited to [45]; please state how optical flow is computed and aligned for the metric to be reproducible.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Dynamic mask conditioning leaks target-frame information: Algorithm 1 computes M from I1..IT, and Eq. (3) feeds M into the ControlNet, so the visual-guidance improvements in Table 2 are partly forced by a target-derived input.

  1. self definitional [Appendix A (Algorithm 1); Section 3.3.2 Eq. (3); Section 3.3.3]
    "Algorithm 1 Dynamic Mask Generation: Require: First frame I0 ... Other frames I1, I2, ..., IT ... F0 <- Extract feature vectors from I0 ... St <- Compute pointwise similarity between F0 and Ft ... M <- (1/T) sum_{t=1}^T Mt ... return M. Eq. (3): Pm = ControlNetmask(M). Sec. 3.3.3: 'our framework relies only on single-frame inputs'."

    The dynamic mask M is by definition an average of SAM-feature dissimilarities between the first frame and the ground-truth future frames I1..IT. Equation (3) pipes M into a dedicated ControlNet branch, and Eqs. (4)-(6) fuse it with depth, semantic, and RGB features before conditioning the UNet. The model is therefore conditioned on information extracted from the target video whose PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS/flow-error scores appear in Table 2. The paper claims only single-frame inputs are used, but Algorithm 1 requires all T future frames, and no causal first-frame-only estimator of M is provided. The mask-guided video-quality results are thus not an independent prediction: part of the target video is re-entered as an input, making the visual-guidance evaluation partially circular.

full rationale

The action-tree component is not circular: it re-encodes text instructions as concatenated CLIP embeddings of verbs and prepositions and is evaluated by RLBench success rate, which cannot be derived from the instruction embedding alone. Depth, semantic, and RGB guidance are computed from the initial frame only and are legitimate conditional inputs. The circularity is concentrated in the dynamic mask, which is computed from the future frames being predicted, making it a self-definitional input for the video-quality evaluation. Because the mask is only one of four fused modalities and the action-tree claim stands independently, the paper is partially circular rather than wholly reducible to its inputs. Separately, the abstract's unseen-task numbers (PSNR 21.05, SSIM 0.7982, Flow Error 3.201) do not match any Table 2 row, but that is a reporting inconsistency, not an additional circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No physically meaningful fitted constants are presented; the learned weights of the diffusion model and adapter are standard. The main unverified premises are the validity of pretrained modality estimators, the availability of the dynamic mask at inference, and the manual action-word extraction procedure.

free parameters (3)
  • Maximum action-word count for tree embedding padding = not reported
    Equation (2) fixes the number of verb/preposition embeddings by zero-padding to the dataset maximum; this length is chosen by hand and determines the text-conditioning dimension.
  • Condition injection interval = every 3 decoder layers
    Action-tree and visual guidance features are injected every 3 UNet decoder layers; this is a hand-chosen hyperparameter that the ablation RQ2 partially explores.
  • Modality router weights = learned
    The patch-level router Phi in Eq. (4) outputs per-modality fusion weights; these are learned parameters fit to the training data and central to the multi-modal fusion.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Pretrained foundation models (Depth Anything v2, SAM-2, CLIP) provide accurate enough depth, semantic, and text features for the generation task.
    Section 3.3.1 relies on these models without error analysis; failure would degrade the visual guidance and instruction embeddings.
  • ad hoc to paper The dynamic mask can be obtained at inference without access to future frames.
    Algorithm 1 computes the mask from future frames I_1 through I_T, but no test-time procedure is described. This assumption is required for the reported results to be valid.
  • domain assumption RT-1 instructions can be parsed into verb-preposition trees without additional linguistic processing.
    Section 4.1.1 asserts seamless integration, but the extraction of action words is not specified.
  • domain assumption The frozen UNet backbone isolates the effect of the proposed components.
    Appendix B.1 states the UNet is frozen; if the adapter interacts with a frozen backbone in unexpected ways, the comparison to fine-tuned baselines may be biased.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ManipDreamer: Boosting Robotic Manipulation World Model with Action Tree and Visual Guidance." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KOVVDX45

@misc{pith2026250416464,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ManipDreamer: Boosting Robotic Manipulation World Model with Action Tree and Visual Guidance},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KOVVDX45}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16464}
}
read the original abstract

While recent advancements in robotic manipulation video synthesis have shown promise, significant challenges persist in ensuring effective instruction-following and achieving high visual quality. Recent methods, like RoboDreamer, utilize linguistic decomposition to divide instructions into separate lower-level primitives, conditioning the world model on these primitives to achieve compositional instruction-following. However, these separate primitives do not consider the relationships that exist between them. Furthermore, recent methods neglect valuable visual guidance, including depth and semantic guidance, both crucial for enhancing visual quality. This paper introduces ManipDreamer, an advanced world model based on the action tree and visual guidance. To better learn the relationships between instruction primitives, we represent the instruction as the action tree and assign embeddings to tree nodes, each instruction can acquire its embeddings by navigating through the action tree. The instruction embeddings can be used to guide the world model. To enhance visual quality, we combine depth and semantic guidance by introducing a visual guidance adapter compatible with the world model. This visual adapter enhances both the temporal and physical consistency of video generation. Based on the action tree and visual guidance, ManipDreamer significantly boosts the instruction-following ability and visual quality. Comprehensive evaluations on robotic manipulation benchmarks reveal that ManipDreamer achieves large improvements in video quality metrics in both seen and unseen tasks, with PSNR improved from 19.55 to 21.05, SSIM improved from 0.7474 to 0.7982 and reduced Flow Error from 3.506 to 3.201 in unseen tasks, compared to the recent RoboDreamer model. Additionally, our method increases the success rate of robotic manipulation tasks by 2.5% in 6 RLbench tasks on average.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.16464 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of ManipDreamer: a world model for robotic manipulation that integrates structured instruction represen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Different from the instruction decomposition man [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. ManipDreamer alleviates multiple common defects in robotic video generation, including instruction misalignment, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of average modality weights across [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Comprehensive Survey on World Models for Embodied AI

    cs.CV 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A unified three-axis taxonomy — functionality, temporal modeling, spatial representation — organizes the world-model literature for embodied AI.

  2. MinD: Learning A Dual-System World Model for Real-Time Planning and Implicit Risk Analysis

    cs.RO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dual-system world model shows that a single-step, not fully denoised, video-diffusion latent is enough to condition a real-time robot manipulation policy, reaching 63% on RL-Bench at 11.3 FPS.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Niket Agarwal, Arslan Ali, Maciej Bala, Yogesh Balaji, Erik Barker, Tiffany Cai, Prithvijit Chattopadhyay, Yongxin Chen, Yin Cui, Yifan Ding, et al. 2025. Cosmos world foundation model platform for physical ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03575 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Homanga Bharadhwaj, Jay Vakil, Mohit Sharma, Abhinav Gupta, Shubham Tul- siani, and Vikash Kumar. 2024. Roboagent: Generalization and efficiency in robot manipulation via semantic augmentations and action chunking. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 4788–4795

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Anthony Brohan, Noah Brown, Justice Carbajal, Yevgen Chebotar, Joseph Dabis, Chelsea Finn, Keerthana Gopalakrishnan, Karol Hausman, Alex Herzog, Jasmine Hsu, et al. 2022. Rt-1: Robotics transformer for real-world control at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06817 (2022)

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Peng Chen, Xiaobao Wei, Ming Lu, Hui Chen, and Feng Tian. 2025. Dif- fusionTalker: Efficient and Compact Speech-Driven 3D Talking Head via Personalizer-Guided Distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.18159 (2025)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Peng Chen, Xiaobao Wei, Qingpo Wuwu, Xinyi Wang, Xingyu Xiao, and Ming Lu. 2024. MixedGaussianAvatar: Realistically and Geometrically Accurate Head Avatar via Mixed 2D-3D Gaussian Splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04955 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Xiaowei Chi, Hengyuan Zhang, Chun-Kai Fan, Xingqun Qi, Rongyu Zhang, Anthony Chen, Chi-min Chan, Wei Xue, Wenhan Luo, Shanghang Zhang, et al

    work page

  7. [7]

    Michele Colledanchise and Lorenzo Natale. 2021. On the implementation of behavior trees in robotics. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 6, 3 (2021), 5929–5936

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Chongkai Gao, Haozhuo Zhang, Zhixuan Xu, Cai Zhehao, and Lin Shao. [n. d.]. FLIP: Flow-Centric Generative Planning as General-Purpose Manip- ulation World Model. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

    work page

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    Ruiyuan Gao, Kai Chen, Enze Xie, Lanqing Hong, Zhenguo Li, Dit-Yan Yeung, and Qiang Xu. 2023. Magicdrive: Street view generation with diverse 3d geometry control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02601 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Shenyuan Gao, Jiazhi Yang, Li Chen, Kashyap Chitta, Yihang Qiu, Andreas Geiger, Jun Zhang, and Hongyang Li. 2024. Vista: A generalizable driving world model with high fidelity and versatile controllability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17398 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Razan Ghzouli, Thorsten Berger, Einar Broch Johnsen, Swaib Dragule, and An- drzej Wąsowski. 2020. Behavior trees in action: a study of robotics applications. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGPLAN international conference on software language engineering. 196–209

    2020

  4. [12]

    Pierre-Louis Guhur, Shizhe Chen, Ricardo Garcia Pinel, Makarand Tapaswi, Ivan Laptev, and Cordelia Schmid. 2023. Instruction-driven history-aware policies for robotic manipulations. In Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 175–187

    2023

  5. [13]

    Yuwei Guo, Ceyuan Yang, Anyi Rao, Maneesh Agrawala, Dahua Lin, and Bo Dai

  6. [14]

    Tanmay Gupta, Dustin Schwenk, Ali Farhadi, Derek Hoiem, and Aniruddha Kembhavi. 2018. Imagine this! scripts to compositions to videos. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). 598–613

    2018

  7. [15]

    In European Conference on Computer Vision

    Sparsectrl: Adding sparse controls to text-to-video diffusion models. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 330–348

  8. [16]

    Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. 2017. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    Yingqing He, Menghan Xia, Haoxin Chen, Xiaodong Cun, Yuan Gong, Jinbo Xing, Yong Zhang, Xintao Wang, Chao Weng, Ying Shan, et al. 2023. Animate-a- story: Storytelling with retrieval-augmented video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.06940 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Wenyi Hong, Ming Ding, Wendi Zheng, Xinghan Liu, and Jie Tang. 2022. Cogvideo: Large-scale pretraining for text-to-video generation via transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15868 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Jonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, Alexey Gritsenko, William Chan, Mohammad Norouzi, and David J Fleet. 2022. Video diffusion models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 8633–8646

    2022

  12. [20]

    Nan Huang, Xiaobao Wei, Wenzhao Zheng, Pengju An, Ming Lu, Wei Zhan, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Kurt Keutzer, and Shanghang Zhang. 2024. S3Gaussian: Self-Supervised Street Gaussians for Autonomous Driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20323 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Li Hu. 2024. Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video syn- thesis for character animation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 8153–8163

    2024

  14. [22]

    Johanna Karras, Aleksander Holynski, Ting-Chun Wang, and Ira Kemelmacher- Shlizerman. 2023. Dreampose: Fashion video synthesis with stable diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 22680–22690

    2023

  15. [23]

    Stephen James, Zicong Ma, David Rovick Arrojo, and Andrew J Davison. 2020. Rlbench: The robot learning benchmark & learning environment. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5, 2 (2020), 3019–3026

    2020

  16. [24]

    Bohan Li, Jiazhe Guo, Hongsi Liu, Yingshuang Zou, Yikang Ding, Xiwu Chen, Hu Zhu, Feiyang Tan, Chi Zhang, Tiancai Wang, et al. 2024. UniScene: Unified Occupancy-centric Driving Scene Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05435 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Po-Chen Ko, Jiayuan Mao, Yilun Du, Shao-Hua Sun, and Joshua B Tenenbaum

  18. [26]

    Yitong Li, Martin Min, Dinghan Shen, David Carlson, and Lawrence Carin. 2018. Video generation from text. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 32

    2018

  19. [27]

    Han Lin, Jaemin Cho, Abhay Zala, and Mohit Bansal. 2024. Ctrl-adapter: An efficient and versatile framework for adapting diverse controls to any diffusion model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09967 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Leheng Li, Weichao Qiu, Yingjie Cai, Xu Yan, Qing Lian, Bingbing Liu, and Ying- Cong Chen. 2024. SyntheOcc: Synthesize Geometric-Controlled Street View Images through 3D Semantic MPIs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00337 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Guanxing Lu, Shiyi Zhang, Ziwei Wang, Changliu Liu, Jiwen Lu, and Yansong Tang. 2024. Manigaussian: Dynamic gaussian splatting for multi-task robotic manipulation. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 349–366

    2024

  22. [30]

    Hao Lu, Tianshuo Xu, Wenzhao Zheng, Yunpeng Zhang, Wei Zhan, Dalong Du, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Kurt Keutzer, and Yingcong Chen. 2024. DrivingRe- con: Large 4D Gaussian Reconstruction Model For Autonomous Driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09043 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Yue Liu, Xin Wang, Yitian Yuan, and Wenwu Zhu. 2019. Cross-modal dual learning for sentence-to-video generation. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on multimedia. 1239–1247

    2019

  24. [32]

    Tanya Marwah, Gaurav Mittal, and Vineeth N Balasubramanian. 2017. At- tentive semantic video generation using captions. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 1426–1434

    2017

  25. [33]

    Chaojun Ni, Guosheng Zhao, Xiaofeng Wang, Zheng Zhu, Wenkang Qin, Guan Huang, Chen Liu, Yuyin Chen, Yida Wang, Xueyang Zhang, et al. 2024. Recon- Dreamer: Crafting World Models for Driving Scene Reconstruction via Online Restoration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19548 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Yifan Lu, Xuanchi Ren, Jiawei Yang, Tianchang Shen, Zhangjie Wu, Jun Gao, Yue Wang, Siheng Chen, Mike Chen, Sanja Fidler, et al. 2024. InfiniCube: Unbounded and Controllable Dynamic 3D Driving Scene Generation with World-Guided Video Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03934 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Maxime Oquab, Timothée Darcet, Théo Moutakanni, Huy Vo, Marc Szafraniec, Vasil Khalidov, Pierre Fernandez, Daniel Haziza, Francisco Massa, Alaaeldin El- Nouby, et al. 2023. Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Yingwei Pan, Zhaofan Qiu, Ting Yao, Houqiang Li, and Tao Mei. 2017. To create what you tell: Generating videos from captions. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM international conference on Multimedia. 1789–1798

    2017

  29. [37]

    Jingcheng Ni, Yuxin Guo, Yichen Liu, Rui Chen, Lewei Lu, and Zehuan Wu

  30. [38]

    David Paulius, Yongqiang Huang, Roger Milton, William D Buchanan, Jeanine Sam, and Yu Sun. 2016. Functional object-oriented network for manipulation learning. In 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2655–2662

    2016

  31. [39]

    Xiangyu Peng, Zangwei Zheng, Chenhui Shen, Tom Young, Xinying Guo, Binluo Wang, Hang Xu, Hongxin Liu, Mingyan Jiang, Wenjun Li, et al. 2025. Open-sora 2.0: Training a commercial-level video generation model in $200 k.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09642 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Corrado Pezzato, Carlos Hernández Corbato, Stefan Bonhof, and Martijn Wisse

  33. [41]

    David Paulius, Alejandro Agostini, and Dongheui Lee. 2023. Long-horizon plan- ning and execution with functional object-oriented networks. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 8, 8 (2023), 4513–4520

    2023

  34. [42]

    Lloyd Russell, Anthony Hu, Lorenzo Bertoni, George Fedoseev, Jamie Shot- ton, Elahe Arani, and Gianluca Corrado. 2025. GAIA-2: A Controllable Multi- View Generative World Model for Autonomous Driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20523 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Md Sadman Sakib, David Paulius, and Yu Sun. 2022. Approximate task tree retrieval in a knowledge network for robotic cooking. IEEE Robotics and Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA Li et al. Automation Letters 7, 4 (2022), 11492–11499

    2022

  36. [44]

    Uriel Singer, Adam Polyak, Thomas Hayes, Xi Yin, Jie An, Songyang Zhang, Qiyuan Hu, Harry Yang, Oron Ashual, Oran Gafni, et al. 2022. Make-a-video: Text- to-video generation without text-video data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics 39, 2 (2023), 1050–1069

    Active inference and behavior trees for reactive action planning and execution in robotics. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 39, 2 (2023), 1050–1069

    2023

  38. [46]

    Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chaitanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma, Haitham Khedr, Roman Rädle, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, et al. 2024. Sam 2: Segment anything in images and videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00714 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Boyang Wang, Nikhil Sridhar, Chao Feng, Mark Van der Merwe, Adam Fishman, Nima Fazeli, and Jeong Joon Park. 2024. This&that: Language-gesture controlled video generation for robot planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.05530 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.IEEE transactions on image processing 13, 4 (2004), 600–612

    2004

  41. [49]

    Zhouxia Wang, Ziyang Yuan, Xintao Wang, Yaowei Li, Tianshui Chen, Menghan Xia, Ping Luo, and Ying Shan. 2024. Motionctrl: A unified and flexible motion controller for video generation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers. 1–11

    2024

  42. [50]

    Thomas Unterthiner, Sjoerd Van Steenkiste, Karol Kurach, Raphael Marinier, Marcin Michalski, and Sylvain Gelly. 2018. Towards accurate generative models of video: A new metric & challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01717 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Ang Wang, Baole Ai, Bin Wen, Chaojie Mao, Chen-Wei Xie, Di Chen, Feiwu Yu, Haiming Zhao, Jianxiao Yang, Jianyuan Zeng, et al. 2025. Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Xiaobao Wei, Qingpo Wuwu, Zhongyu Zhao, Zhuangzhe Wu, Nan Huang, Ming Lu, Ningning Ma, and Shanghang Zhang. 2024. EMD: Explicit Motion Modeling for High-Quality Street Gaussian Splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15582 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Jinbo Xing, Menghan Xia, Yuxin Liu, Yuechen Zhang, Yong Zhang, Yingqing He, Hanyuan Liu, Haoxin Chen, Xiaodong Cun, Xintao Wang, et al . 2024. Make- your-video: Customized video generation using textual and structural guidance. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer G...

    2024

  46. [54]

    Jinbo Xing, Menghan Xia, Yong Zhang, Haoxin Chen, Wangbo Yu, Hanyuan Liu, Gongye Liu, Xintao Wang, Ying Shan, and Tien-Tsin Wong. 2024. Dynami- crafter: Animating open-domain images with video diffusion priors. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 399–417

    2024

  47. [55]

    Xiaobao Wei, Peng Chen, Guangyu Li, Ming Lu, Hui Chen, and Feng Tian. 2024. GazeGaussian: High-Fidelity Gaze Redirection with 3D Gaussian Splatting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.12981 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Xiaobao Wei, Peng Chen, Ming Lu, Hui Chen, and Feng Tian. 2024. GraphAvatar: Compact Head Avatars with GNN-Generated 3D Gaussians. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13983 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Zhuo Yang and Zhizhou Jia. 2023. Robot Behavior Tree Manipulation Using Language Models. In 2023 IEEE 11th Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference (ITAIC), Vol. 11. IEEE, 1342–1345

    2023

  50. [58]

    Shengming Yin, Chenfei Wu, Jian Liang, Jie Shi, Houqiang Li, Gong Ming, and Nan Duan. 2023. Dragnuwa: Fine-grained control in video generation by integrating text, image, and trajectory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08089 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2023. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. 3836–3847

    2023

  52. [60]

    Lihe Yang, Bingyi Kang, Zilong Huang, Zhen Zhao, Xiaogang Xu, Jiashi Feng, and Hengshuang Zhao. 2025. Depth anything v2. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (2025), 21875–21911

    2025

  53. [61]

    Yezhou Yang, Anupam Guha, Cornelia Fermüller, and Yiannis Aloimonos. 2014. Manipulation action tree bank: A knowledge resource for humanoids. In 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. IEEE, 987–992

    2014

  54. [62]

    Guosheng Zhao, Chaojun Ni, Xiaofeng Wang, Zheng Zhu, Xueyang Zhang, Yida Wang, Guan Huang, Xinze Chen, Boyuan Wang, Youyi Zhang, et al. 2024. Drivedreamer4d: World models are effective data machines for 4d driving scene representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13571 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Siyuan Zhou, Yilun Du, Jiaben Chen, Yandong Li, Dit-Yan Yeung, and Chuang Gan

  56. [65]

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shechtman, and Oliver Wang

  57. [67]

    Shiwei Zhang, Jiayu Wang, Yingya Zhang, Kang Zhao, Hangjie Yuan, Zhiwu Qin, Xiang Wang, Deli Zhao, and Jingren Zhou. 2023. I2vgen-xl: High-quality image-to- video synthesis via cascaded diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04145 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  58. [70]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12377 (2024)

    RoboDreamer: Learning compositional world models for robot imagination. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12377 (2024). ManipDreamer: Boosting Robotic Manipulation World Model with Action Tree and Visual Guidance Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ...

    2024 arXiv

  59. [2018]

    In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 586–595

  60. [2023]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08576 (2023)

    Learning to act from actionless videos through dense correspondences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08576 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  61. [2024]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15461 (2024)

    EVA: An Embodied World Model for Future Video Anticipation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15461 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  62. [2025]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11663 (2025)

    MaskGWM: A Generalizable Driving World Model with Video Mask Reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11663 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.