REVIEW 3 cited by
InterAct: Exploring the Potentials of ChatGPT as a Cooperative Agent
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This research paper delves into the integration of OpenAI's ChatGPT into embodied agent systems, evaluating its influence on interactive decision-making benchmark. Drawing a parallel to the concept of people assuming roles according to their unique strengths, we introduce InterAct. In this approach, we feed ChatGPT with varied prompts, assigning it a numerous roles like a checker and a sorter, then integrating them with the original language model. Our research shows a remarkable success rate of 98% in AlfWorld, which consists of 6 different tasks in a simulated household environment, emphasizing the significance of proficient prompt engineering. The results highlight ChatGPT's competence in comprehending and performing intricate tasks effectively in real-world settings, thus paving the way for further advancements in task planning.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Large Model Empowered Embodied AI: A Survey on Decision-Making and Embodied Learning
A review that categorizes large-model-empowered embodied AI into hierarchical and end-to-end decision-making, imitation and reinforcement learning, and world models.
-
Brain-inspired AI Agent: The Way Towards AGI
The paper proposes a brain-inspired agent architecture built from cortical-region modules and functional connectivity networks as a conceptual route to AGI, without empirical validation.
-
AI Agent for Education: von Neumann Multi-Agent System Framework
A conceptual framework that maps large language model based teaching agents onto a von Neumann computer architecture, organizing techniques like chain-of-thought and agent debate into four operation types.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.