pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05656 · v1 · pith:KTDAG2HFnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.DG· math.MP

On Quantum Aspects of 1-Form Symmetries I: BV-BRST Cohomology and Anomaly Polynomials

Weizhen Jia , Yi-Nan Wang , Yi Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 00:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.DGmath.MP
keywords 1-form symmetriesBV-BRST cohomologyanomaly polynomialsU(1) gerbesCourant algebroidsČech-de Rham complexhigher gauge theoryMaxwell theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

The local Čech data of a U(1) gerbe together with its exact Courant algebroid supplies the full BV-BRST complex for the 2-form gauge field and a natural setting for anomaly descent of the associated 1-form symmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a geometric realization of the BV-BRST quantization for a U(1) 2-form gauge field by starting from the local Čech cocycle data that define a gerbe. This data is used to build a Lie 2-algebroid for the infinitesimal symmetries, which combines with an exact Courant algebroid to generate the complete field-ghost tower and the associated differential complex. The same bicomplex yields the higher Russian formula relating the connective structure, curving, and 3-form curvature, and then serves as the arena for anomaly descent equations. The construction is illustrated in Maxwell theory, where the 1-form symmetry anomalies appear directly from the gerbe data. A reader would care because the method ties higher differential geometry to the quantization and anomaly structure of higher-form gauge theories without introducing extra auxiliary fields.

Core claim

Starting from the local Čech data of the gerbe, the authors construct the infinitesimal symmetry structure in terms of a Lie 2-algebroid; together with the associated exact Courant algebroid this provides a natural geometric framework for the BV-BRST complex of the higher-form gauge theory, in which the field-ghost tower is encoded directly in the local gerbe data and the resulting Čech-de Rham bicomplex furnishes a setting for anomaly descent for U(1) 1-form symmetries.

What carries the argument

The Čech-de Rham bicomplex built from the gerbe's local Čech data and the exact Courant algebroid, which directly encodes the field-ghost tower and the anomaly descent chain.

If this is right

  • The higher Russian formula for the 3-form curvature arises directly from the relations among the gerbe's connective structure and curving.
  • Anomaly descent equations for U(1) 1-form symmetries are realized inside the Čech-de Rham bicomplex.
  • The same construction reproduces the known anomaly structure of Maxwell theory as a concrete example.
  • The framework applies to the quantization of continuous 1-form global symmetries that are gauged.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same gerbe-based bicomplex might be used to organize anomaly calculations for other abelian higher-form symmetries without re-deriving the ghost tower each time.
  • Because the construction is local and Čech-based, it could extend to manifolds with nontrivial topology where global gerbe data are needed.
  • If the method works for U(1), it supplies a template for checking whether non-abelian 2-form gauge theories admit analogous Courant-algebroid realizations.

Load-bearing premise

The local Čech data of the gerbe together with the associated exact Courant algebroid directly encodes the full field-ghost tower and supplies the BV-BRST complex without additional choices or data.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the ghost spectrum required by standard BV-BRST quantization of a U(1) 2-form field in which the degrees and transformation rules fail to match those generated from the gerbe Čech data would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

We investigate the quantum aspects of gauging continuous 1-form global symmetries. In this paper, we study the BV-BRST quantization of a $U(1)$ 2-form gauge field, described geometrically by a $U(1)$ gerbe. Starting from the local \v{C}ech data of the gerbe, we construct the corresponding infinitesimal symmetry structure in terms of a Lie 2-algebroid, and show that, together with the associated exact Courant algebroid, it provides a natural geometric framework for the BV-BRST complex of this higher-form gauge theory. In this formulation, the field-ghost tower is encoded directly in the local gerbe data, and the higher Russian formula arises naturally from the relations among the connective structure, the curving, and the 3-form curvature. We further show that the resulting \v{C}ech-de Rham bicomplex provides a natural setting for anomaly descent for $U(1)$ 1-form symmetries, and illustrate the construction with explicit examples in Maxwell theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims to investigate the quantum aspects of gauging continuous 1-form global symmetries by studying the BV-BRST quantization of a U(1) 2-form gauge field described geometrically by a U(1) gerbe. Starting from the local Čech data of the gerbe, the authors construct the corresponding infinitesimal symmetry structure in terms of a Lie 2-algebroid, and show that, together with the associated exact Courant algebroid, it provides a natural geometric framework for the BV-BRST complex of this higher-form gauge theory. In this formulation, the field-ghost tower is encoded directly in the local gerbe data, and the higher Russian formula arises naturally from the relations among the connective structure, the curving, and the 3-form curvature. The resulting Čech-de Rham bicomplex is claimed to provide a natural setting for anomaly descent for U(1) 1-form symmetries, illustrated with explicit examples in Maxwell theory.

Significance. If the results hold, this work offers a promising geometric approach to the BV-BRST quantization and anomaly calculations for theories with 1-form symmetries. By connecting gerbe geometry and Courant algebroids directly to the BRST complex, it could provide new insights into the quantum structure of higher gauge theories and facilitate the computation of anomaly polynomials in a more canonical manner.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract; construction of BV-BRST complex] The central claim that the local Čech data of the gerbe together with the exact Courant algebroid directly encodes the full field-ghost tower and supplies the BV-BRST complex without additional choices or data is load-bearing for the subsequent claim about the Čech-de Rham bicomplex providing a natural setting for anomaly descent. The paper should explicitly show in the relevant section that no auxiliary choices (such as local frames or splittings of the Courant sequence) are needed to identify the 2-form field, curvature, and ghost tower, since the descent procedure is sensitive to the precise BRST differential.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract; construction of BV-BRST complex] The central claim that the local Čech data of the gerbe together with the exact Courant algebroid directly encodes the full field-ghost tower and supplies the BV-BRST complex without additional choices or data is load-bearing for the subsequent claim about the Čech-de Rham bicomplex providing a natural setting for anomaly descent. The paper should explicitly show in the relevant section that no auxiliary choices (such as local frames or splittings of the Courant sequence) are needed to identify the 2-form field, curvature, and ghost tower, since the descent procedure is sensitive to the precise BRST differential.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of auxiliary choices must be made fully explicit, as the descent procedure depends on the precise form of the BRST differential. In Sections 2–3 the construction begins from the Čech cocycle data of the gerbe (transition functions g_{αβ}, connective 1-forms A_α, curving 2-forms B_α) together with the exact Courant algebroid; the graded vector fields and the BRST operator are induced directly from the Lie 2-algebroid structure and the Courant bracket without introducing local frames or splittings of the short exact sequence. Nevertheless, to satisfy the referee’s request we will insert a dedicated clarifying paragraph (and a short lemma) in Section 3 that explicitly verifies the canonical identification of the 2-form field, its curvature, and the ghost tower, confirming independence from any additional data. This revision will be made in the next version. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: construction from Čech data to BV-BRST is self-contained geometric framework

full rationale

The paper starts from local Čech data of the U(1) gerbe, constructs a Lie 2-algebroid and exact Courant algebroid, and uses these to encode the field-ghost tower and higher Russian formula for the BV-BRST complex. This is presented as a direct geometric encoding without any fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to prior inputs by construction. No equations or steps in the provided text exhibit the enumerated circularity patterns; the derivation supplies independent geometric content for anomaly descent.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable. The framework relies on standard notions of gerbes, Lie algebroids, and Courant algebroids from prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5731 in / 1204 out tokens · 26972 ms · 2026-06-28T00:30:46.990006+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On Quantum Aspects of 1-Form Symmetries II: Bordism, Invertible Phases, and Anomalies

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bordism computation for K(Z,3) identifies a new mixed perturbative anomaly in 5D and a new Z2 discrete anomaly in 7D for U(1) 1-form symmetries.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 42 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Generalized global symmetries,

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized global symmetries,”JHEP 02(2015) 172,arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    An introduction to higher-form symmetries,

    P. R. S. Gomes, “An introduction to higher-form symmetries,”SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes74 (2023) 1,arXiv:2303.01817 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Lectures on generalized symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim, “Lectures on generalized symmetries,”Phys. Rept.1051(2024) 1–87, arXiv:2307.07547 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Lecture notes on generalized symmetries and applications,

    R. Luo, Q.-R. Wang, and Y.-N. Wang, “Lecture notes on generalized symmetries and applications,”Phys. Rept.1065(2024) 1–43,arXiv:2307.09215 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Jena lectures on generalized global symmetries: principles and applications,

    N. Iqbal, “Jena lectures on generalized global symmetries: principles and applications,” 2024. arXiv:2407.20815 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Introduction to generalized symmetries,

    J. Kaidi, “Introduction to generalized symmetries,”arXiv:2603.08798 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Anomalies in string theory with D-branes,

    D. S. Freed and E. Witten, “Anomalies in string theory with D-branes,”Asian J. Math.3 (1999) 819,arXiv:hep-th/9907189

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  8. [8]

    D-branes in a topologically nontrivial B field,

    A. Kapustin, “D-branes in a topologically nontrivial B field,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4 (2000) 127–154,arXiv:hep-th/9909089

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  9. [9]

    D-brane charge, flux quantization and relative (co)homology,

    J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill and S. Stanciu, “D-brane charge, flux quantization and relative (co)homology,”JHEP01(2001) 006,arXiv:hep-th/0008038

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  10. [10]

    Twisted K theory and K theory of bundle gerbes,

    P. Bouwknegt, A. L. Carey, V. Mathai, M. K. Murray, and D. Stevenson, “Twisted K theory and K theory of bundle gerbes,”Commun. Math. Phys.228(2002) 17–49, arXiv:hep-th/0106194

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  11. [11]

    Gerbes, M5-brane anomalies and E(8) gauge theory,

    P. Aschieri and B. Jurco, “Gerbes, M5-brane anomalies and E(8) gauge theory,”JHEP10 (2004) 068,arXiv:hep-th/0409200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  12. [12]

    Higher gauge theory: 2-connections on 2-bundles,

    J. Baez and U. Schreiber, “Higher gauge theory: 2-connections on 2-bundles,” arXiv:hep-th/0412325

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    An invitation to higher gauge theory,

    J. C. Baez and J. Huerta, “An invitation to higher gauge theory,”Gen. Rel. Grav.43(2011) 2335–2392,arXiv:1003.4485 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  14. [14]

    Mean string field theory: Landau-Ginzburg theory for 1-form symmetries,

    N. Iqbal and J. McGreevy, “Mean string field theory: Landau-Ginzburg theory for 1-form symmetries,”SciPost Phys.13(2022) 114,arXiv:2106.12610 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Effective brane field theory with higher-form symmetry,

    Y. Hidaka and K. Kawana, “Effective brane field theory with higher-form symmetry,”JHEP 01(2024) 016,arXiv:2310.07993 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Higher-matter and Landau-Ginzburg theory of higher-group symmetries,

    R. Liu, R. Luo, and Y.-N. Wang, “Higher-matter and Landau-Ginzburg theory of higher-group symmetries,”SciPost Phys.18(2025) no. 2, 052,arXiv:2406.03974 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Landau theory for lattice higher-form gauge theories and the Kramers-Wannier duality,

    K. Kawana, “Landau theory for lattice higher-form gauge theories and the Kramers-Wannier duality,”Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no. 7, 074514,arXiv:2507.06555 [hep-th]. 39

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Variational method for interacting surfaces with higher-form global symmetries,

    K. Kawana, “Variational method for interacting surfaces with higher-form global symmetries,”arXiv:2602.08310 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv

  19. [19]

    On quantum aspects of 1-form symmetries II: bordism, invertible phases, and anomalies,

    W. Jia, Y.-N. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “On quantum aspects of 1-form symmetries II: bordism, invertible phases, and anomalies,”To appear(2026)

    2026

  20. [20]

    Gauge algebra and quantization,

    I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky, “Gauge algebra and quantization,”Phys. Lett. B102 (1981) 27–31

    1981

  21. [21]

    Quantization of gauge theories with linearly dependent generators,

    I. Batalin and G. Vilkovisky, “Quantization of gauge theories with linearly dependent generators,”Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 2567–2582. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 30, 508 (1984)]

    1983

  22. [22]

    Henneaux and C

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim,Quantization of Gauge Systems. Princeton University Press, 1992

    1992

  23. [23]

    Antibracket, antifields and gauge theory quantization,

    J. Gomis, J. Paris, and S. Samuel, “Antibracket, antifields and gauge theory quantization,” Phys. Rept.259(1995) 1–145,arXiv:hep-th/9412228

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  24. [24]

    Algebraic structure and topological origin of anomalies,

    R. Stora, “Algebraic structure and topological origin of anomalies,” inProgress in Gauge Field Theory, G. ’t Hooft, A. Jaffe, H. Lehmann, P. K. Mitter, I. M. Singer, and R. Stora, eds., pp. 543–562. Springer US, Boston, MA, 1984

    1984

  25. [25]

    Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,”Phys. Lett. B37 (1971) 95–97

    1971

  26. [26]

    Continuum gauge theories,

    R. Stora, “Continuum gauge theories,” inNew Developments in Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Mechanics Cargèse 1976, M. Lévy and P. Mitter, eds., pp. 201–224. Springer US, Boston, MA, 1977

    1976

  27. [27]

    Chiral anomalies, higher dimensions, and differential geometry,

    B. Zumino, Y.-S. Wu, and A. Zee, “Chiral anomalies, higher dimensions, and differential geometry,”Nucl. Phys. B239(1984) 477–507

    1984

  28. [28]

    Cohomology of gauge groups: cocycles and Schwinger terms,

    B. Zumino, “Cohomology of gauge groups: cocycles and Schwinger terms,”Nucl. Phys. B 253(1985) 477–493

    1985

  29. [29]

    Chiral anomalies and differential geometry,

    B. Zumino, “Chiral anomalies and differential geometry,” inCurrent Algebra and Anomalies, pp. 361–392. Princeton University Press, 1985

    1985

  30. [30]

    BRST cohomology is Lie algebroid cohomology,

    W. Jia, M. S. Klinger, and R. G. Leigh, “BRST cohomology is Lie algebroid cohomology,” Nucl. Phys. B994(2023) 116317,arXiv:2303.05540 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Lie algebroids and the geometry of off-shell BRST,

    L. Ciambelli and R. G. Leigh, “Lie algebroids and the geometry of off-shell BRST,”Nucl. Phys. B972(2021) 115553,arXiv:2101.03974 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles,

    M. F. Atiyah, “Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles,”Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.85 (1957) no. 1, 181–207

    1957

  33. [33]

    Higher-dimensional algebra V: 2-groups,

    J. C. Baez and A. D. Lauda, “Higher-dimensional algebra V: 2-groups,” arXiv:math/0307200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Higher-dimensional algebra VI: Lie 2-algebras,

    J. C. Baez and A. S. Crans, “Higher-dimensional algebra VI: Lie 2-algebras,”Theor. Appl. Categor.12(2004) 492–528,arXiv:math/0307263. 40

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  35. [35]

    L∞-algebra connections and applications to string- and Chern-Simonsn-transport,

    H. Sati, U. Schreiber, and J. Stasheff, “L∞-algebra connections and applications to string- and Chern-Simonsn-transport,” inQuantum field theory: competitive models, pp. 303–424. Springer, 2009

    2009

  36. [36]

    Multiple M5-branes, string 2-connections, and 7d nonabelian Chern-Simons theory,

    D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, “Multiple M5-branes, string 2-connections, and 7d nonabelian Chern-Simons theory,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.18(2014) no. 2, 229–321, arXiv:1201.5277 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  37. [37]

    L∞-algebras of classical field theories and the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism,

    B. Jurčo, L. Raspollini, C. Sämann, and M. Wolf, “L∞-algebras of classical field theories and the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism,”Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) no. 7, 1900025, arXiv:1809.09899 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    The insidious bicategory of algebra bundles,

    P. Kristel, M. Ludewig, and K. Waldorf, “The insidious bicategory of algebra bundles,” arXiv:2204.03900 [math.DG]

    arXiv

  39. [39]

    The stringor bundle,

    P. Kristel, M. Ludewig, and K. Waldorf, “The stringor bundle,”arXiv:2206.09797 [math.AT]

    arXiv

  40. [40]

    Gauging the gauge and anomaly resolution,

    H. Chen and F. Girelli, “Gauging the gauge and anomaly resolution,”arXiv:2211.08549 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  41. [41]

    A representation of the string 2-group,

    P. Kristel, M. Ludewig, and K. Waldorf, “A representation of the string 2-group,” arXiv:2308.05139 [math.OA]

    arXiv

  42. [42]

    Higher geometric structures on manifolds and the gauge theory of Deligne cohomology,

    S. Bunk and C. S. Shahbazi, “Higher geometric structures on manifolds and the gauge theory of Deligne cohomology,”arXiv:2304.06633 [math.DG]

    arXiv

  43. [43]

    Rist,Non-Abelian Gerbes with Connections in Higher Gauge Theory

    D. Rist,Non-Abelian Gerbes with Connections in Higher Gauge Theory. PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt U., 2023

    2023

  44. [44]

    Infinitesimal symmetries of Dixmier-Douady gerbes,

    B. L. Collier, “Infinitesimal symmetries of Dixmier-Douady gerbes,”arXiv:1108.1525 [math.DG]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Higher extensions of Lie algebroids,

    Y. Sheng and C. Zhu, “Higher extensions of Lie algebroids,”Commun. Contemp. Math.19 (2017) no. 03, 1650034

    2017

  46. [46]

    The first Pontryagin class of a quadratic Lie 2-algebroid,

    Y. Sheng, “The first Pontryagin class of a quadratic Lie 2-algebroid,”Comm. Math. Phys. 362(2018) no. 2, 689–716

    2018

  47. [47]

    Atiyah sequence and gauge transformations of a principal 2-bundle over a Lie groupoid,

    S. Chatterjee, A. Chaudhuri, and P. Koushik, “Atiyah sequence and gauge transformations of a principal 2-bundle over a Lie groupoid,”J. Geom. Phys.176(2022) 104509

    2022

  48. [48]

    Lie 2-algebroids and matched pairs of 2-representations: a geometric approach,

    M. Jotz Lean, “Lie 2-algebroids and matched pairs of 2-representations: a geometric approach,”Pacific J. Math.301(2019) no. 1, 143–188

    2019

  49. [49]

    Beyond Poisson structures,

    T. J. Courant and A. Weinstein, “Beyond Poisson structures,” inAction hamiltoniennes de groupes. Troisième théorème de Lie (Lyon, 1986), vol. 27 ofTravaux en Cours, pp. 39–49. Hermann, Paris, 1988

    1986

  50. [50]

    Dirac manifolds,

    T. J. Courant, “Dirac manifolds,”Trans. Am. Math. Soc.319(1990) no. 2, 631–661

    1990

  51. [51]

    Manin triples for Lie bialgebroids,

    Z.-J. Liu, A. Weinstein, and P. Xu, “Manin triples for Lie bialgebroids,”J. Differ. Geom.45 (1997) no. 3, 547–574. 41

    1997

  52. [52]

    Roytenberg,Courant Algebroids, Derived Brackets and Even Symplectic Supermanifolds

    D. Roytenberg,Courant Algebroids, Derived Brackets and Even Symplectic Supermanifolds. PhD thesis, UC, Berkeley, 1999

    1999

  53. [53]

    Courant algebroids,

    P. Bressler and A. Chervov, “Courant algebroids,”arXiv:hep-th/0212195

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds,

    N. Hitchin, “Generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds,”Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser.54(2003) 281–308,arXiv:math/0209099

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  55. [55]

    Gualtieri,Generalized Complex Geometry

    M. Gualtieri,Generalized Complex Geometry. PhD thesis, Oxford U., 2003. arXiv:math/0401221

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  56. [56]

    Brackets, forms and invariant functionals,

    N. Hitchin, “Brackets, forms and invariant functionals,”arXiv:math/0508618

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Lectures on generalized geometry,

    N. Hitchin, “Lectures on generalized geometry,”arXiv:1008.0973 [math.DG]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Generalized complex geometry,

    M. Gualtieri, “Generalized complex geometry,”Ann. Math.(2011) 75–123, arXiv:math/0703298

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    Supersymmetric backgrounds from generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds,

    M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini, and A. Tomasiello, “Supersymmetric backgrounds from generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds,”JHEP08(2004) 046,arXiv:hep-th/0406137

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  60. [60]

    Generalized structures of N=1 vacua,

    M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini, and A. Tomasiello, “Generalized structures of N=1 vacua,”JHEP11(2005) 020,arXiv:hep-th/0505212

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  61. [61]

    T-duality, generalized geometry and non-geometric backgrounds,

    M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini, and D. Waldram, “T-duality, generalized geometry and non-geometric backgrounds,”JHEP04(2009) 075,arXiv:0807.4527 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  62. [62]

    Double field theory,

    C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, “Double field theory,”JHEP09(2009) 099,arXiv:0904.4664 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  63. [63]

    Generalized metric formulation of double field theory,

    O. Hohm, C. Hull, and B. Zwiebach, “Generalized metric formulation of double field theory,” JHEP08(2010) 008,arXiv:1006.4823 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  64. [64]

    Generalized geometry and M theory,

    D. S. Berman and M. J. Perry, “Generalized geometry and M theory,”JHEP06(2011) 074, arXiv:1008.1763 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  65. [65]

    Frame-like geometry of double field theory,

    O. Hohm and S. K. Kwak, “Frame-like geometry of double field theory,”J. Phys. A44 (2011) 085404,arXiv:1011.4101 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  66. [66]

    The spacetime of double field theory: review, remarks, and outlook,

    O. Hohm, D. Lüst, and B. Zwiebach, “The spacetime of double field theory: review, remarks, and outlook,”Fortsch. Phys.61(2013) 926–966,arXiv:1309.2977 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [67]

    Exploring double field theory,

    D. Geissbuhler, D. Marques, C. Nunez, and V. Penas, “Exploring double field theory,”JHEP 06(2013) 101,arXiv:1304.1472 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  68. [68]

    K. C. Mackenzie,General Theory of Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005

    2005

  69. [69]

    Jia,Topics in Weyl Geometry and Quantum Anomalies

    W. Jia,Topics in Weyl Geometry and Quantum Anomalies. Phd thesis, Illinois U., Urbana, 2024.arXiv:2407.02695 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Formulation of gauge theories on transitive Lie algebroids,

    C. Fournel, S. Lazzarini, and T. Masson, “Formulation of gauge theories on transitive Lie algebroids,”J. Geom. Phys.64(2013) 174–191,arXiv:1205.6725 [math-ph]. 42

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    Connections on Lie algebroids and on derivation-based noncommutative geometry,

    S. Lazzarini and T. Masson, “Connections on Lie algebroids and on derivation-based noncommutative geometry,”J. Geom. Phys.62(2012) no. 2, 387–402

    2012

  72. [72]

    Topological quantization and cohomology,

    O. Alvarez, “Topological quantization and cohomology,”Commun. Math. Phys.100(1985) 279

    1985

  73. [73]

    Differentiable and algebroid cohomology, van Est isomorphisms, and characteristic classes,

    M. Crainic, “Differentiable and algebroid cohomology, van Est isomorphisms, and characteristic classes,”Comment. Math. Helv.78(2003) no. 4, 681–721

    2003

  74. [74]

    Van Est isomorphism for homogeneous cochains,

    A. Cabrera and T. Drummond, “Van Est isomorphism for homogeneous cochains,”Pac. J. Math.287(2017) no. 2, 297–336

    2017

  75. [75]

    Brylinski,Loop Spaces, Characteristic Classes and Geometric Quantization, vol

    J.-L. Brylinski,Loop Spaces, Characteristic Classes and Geometric Quantization, vol. 107 of Progress in Mathematics. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1993

    1993

  76. [76]

    Bundle gerbes,

    M. K. Murray, “Bundle gerbes,”J.Lond.Math.Soc.54(1996) no. 2, 403–416, arXiv:dg-ga/9407015 [dg-ga]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  77. [77]

    D. S. Chatterjee,On Gerbs. PhD thesis, Cambridge U., 1998

    1998

  78. [78]

    Lectures on special Lagrangian submanifolds,

    N. J. Hitchin, “Lectures on special Lagrangian submanifolds,”AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math.23 (2001) 151–182,arXiv:math/9907034

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  79. [79]

    An introduction to bundle gerbes,

    M. K. Murray, “An introduction to bundle gerbes,” inThe Many Facets of Geometry: A Tribute to Nigel Hitchin, O. Garcia-Prada, J. P. Bourguignon, and S. Salamon, eds., ch. XII. Oxford University Press, 07, 2010.arXiv:0712.1651 [math.DG]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  80. [80]

    On regular Courant algebroids,

    Z. Chen, M. Stiénon, and P. Xu, “On regular Courant algebroids,”J. Symplectic Geom.11 (2013) no. 1, 1–24

    2013

Showing first 80 references.