Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Fractional $Q$-curvature on the sphere and optimal partitions

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a symmetric optimal partition problem driven by fractional Q-curvature always has a minimizer on the sphere, and the minimizer consists of ℓ smooth nested shell-shaped regions with sphere-product interfaces.

desk verdict Main theorem likely correct; the new regularity result is solid, but the proof of the strict inequality behind the shell topology has a fixable gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.16882 v1 pith:KX4KKLMS submitted 2025-04-23 math.AP math.DG

Héctor A. Chang-Lara , Juan Carlos Fernández , Alberto Saldaña This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.DG MSC 35B3335R0135R1158J4058J7058J9035S15
keywords conformalfractionalLaplacianQ-curvatureYamabeproblemoptimalpartitionphaseseparationJacobipolynomialscohomogeneityoneactioncriticalSobolevexponent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tackles a variational division of the round sphere $S^N$ into $\ell$ regions, with cost equal to the least energy of the critical fractional Yamabe equation (the conformal fractional Laplacian of order $2s$) in each region. It proves that, once $O(m)\times O(n)$ symmetry is imposed with $m,n\ge2$ and $m+n=N+1$, this optimal partition problem always attains its infimum, and the minimizer has a fully explicit shape: $\ell$ smooth connected regions stacked like nested tubes, with interfaces diffeomorphic to $S^{m-1}\times S^{n-1}$. The interest is that without symmetries, critical nonlocal problems fail to be compact, so existence is not automatic. The proof obtains the partition as the phase-separation limit of least-energy solutions of a weakly coupled competitive system as the coupling strength tends to $-\infty$. A new Hölder regularity theorem for symmetric functions in the fractional Sobolev space on the sphere, proved through Jacobi polynomials and a one-dimensional isometry, is the key step that makes the limit profiles continuous and their supports open.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the isometric isomorphism between the symmetric fractional Sobolev space and a one-dimensional weighted Sobolev space. Every $G$-invariant function on $S^N$ has the form $u=w\circ f$ with $f(x,y)=|x|^2-|y|^2$, so the $G$-orbits are level sets of $f$ parametrized by $[-1,1]$. The Jacobi polynomials $P_i^{(\alpha,\beta)}$ with $\alpha=m/2-1$ and $\beta=n/2-1$, composed with $f$, form an orthogonal eigenbasis for the conformal fractional Laplacian $P^s_g$, with eigenvalues $\varphi_{N,s}(2i(N-1+2i))$; this yields an isomorphism $j:H^s_g(S^N)^G\to H^s_h([-1,1])$ with weight $h(t)=(1-t)^\alpha(1+t)^\beta$. In this one-dimensional model, elements of $H^s_h$ are Hölder continuous for $s>1/2$, and quantitative Jacobi-polynomial estimates give a Hölder bound away from the endpoints, which translates back to continuity of symmetric functions away from the singular set $Z=S^{m-1}\times\{0\}\cup\{0\}\times S^{n-1}$. The second piece of machinery is the variational phase-separation argument: least-energy fully nontrivial solutions of the competitive system are shown to converge, as $\eta_{ij}\to-\infty$, to segregated limit profiles whose supports form the optimal partition.

What would settle it

A concrete check is to compute the least energies $c_\Lambda$ and $c_{\Lambda_1},c_{\Lambda_2}$ for nested ring-shaped regions $\Lambda_1\subset\Lambda\subset\mathbb{R}^N$ in the one-dimensional Jacobi-coordinate model, for instance with $N=3$, $m=n=2$, and $s=3/4$; equality $c_\Lambda=\min\{c_{\Lambda_1},c_{\Lambda_2}\}$ would contradict Theorem 7.2 and with it the discrete-layer topology of Theorem 1.2. Another check: exhibit a function in $H^s_g(S^N)^G$, $s\in(1/2,1)$, with an essential discontinuity outside $Z=S^{m-1}\times\{0\}\cup\{0\}\times S^{n-1}$, which would disprove Proposition 1.5.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 1.2. For $N\ge3$, $s\in(1/2,1)$, $\ell\in\mathbb{N}$, and $G=O(m)\times O(n)$ with $m,n\ge2$ and $m+n=N+1$, the $(G,\ell)$-optimal partition problem (1.10) admits a solution $\{U_1,\ldots,U_\ell\}$ consisting of smooth, connected, $G$-invariant open sets that cover $S^N$; after relabeling, $U_1\cong S^{m-1}\times B^n$, intermediate $U_i\cong S^{m-1}\times S^{n-1}\times(0,1)$, and $U_\ell\cong B^m\times S^{n-1}$, with $U_i\cap U_{i+1}\cong S^{m-1}\times S^{n-1}$ and $U_i\cap U_j=\emptyset$ for $|j-i|\ge2$. The route is Theorem 1.4: positive least-energy fully nontrivial $G$-invariant solutions of the critical competitive system (1.14), as the competition parameters tend to $-\infty$, converge strongly in $H^s_g$ to limit profiles whose positivity sets form the optimal partition. Along the way the paper proves the existence of infinitely many $G$-invariant fully nontrivial solutions of that system (Proposition 6.5) and, as the main new analytic tool, Proposition 1.5: every function in $H^s_g(S^N)^G$, $s\in(1/2,1)$, has a continuous representative on the complement of the singular set $Z=S^{m-1}\times\{0\}\cup\{0\}\times S^{n-1}$. Via stereographic projection, the same result yields an optimal partition of $\mathbb{R}^N$ into $\ell-1$ bounded shell regions plus one unbounded region (Theorem 1.3).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that combining two adjacent ring-shaped regions always strictly lowers the least energy of the fractional problem; this strictness is proved with a unique continuation property of the fractional Laplacian, and if it failed the partition interfaces could have positive thickness instead of the sphere-product layers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The infimum in the $(G,\ell)$-optimal partition problem (1.10) is attained for every $\ell\in\mathbb{N}$, so the least-energy cost functional is well posed under this symmetry.
  • The minimizer has the explicit layered topology described in Theorem 1.2: two end pieces are diffeomorphic to $S^{m-1}\times B^n$ and $B^m\times S^{n-1}$, the intermediate pieces are $S^{m-1}\times S^{n-1}\times(0,1)$, and interfaces are $S^{m-1}\times S^{n-1}$.
  • Via stereographic projection the same result gives an optimal partition of $\mathbb{R}^N$ into $\ell-1$ bounded shell-like regions and one unbounded region (Theorem 1.3).
  • The competitive system (1.14) admits infinitely many fully nontrivial $G$-invariant solutions, and its least-energy positive solutions exhibit complete phase separation in the strong limit as coupling tends to $-\infty$ (Theorem 1.4).
  • The regularity theorem Proposition 1.5 shows that $G$-invariant fractional Sobolev functions on the sphere are intrinsically one-dimensional in their regularity: for $s>1/2$ they are locally Hölder continuous away from the two singular orbits.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the proof's only use of $s>1/2$ is the Hölder regularity of limit profiles, a different regularity argument could plausibly extend the same optimal-partition theorem to $0<s\le1/2$; the paper itself leaves this open.
  • The one-dimensional Jacobi-coordinate model suggests that the optimal partition problem is essentially a question about $\ell-1$ ordered transition points in $[-1,1]$, which could be tested numerically by computing least-energy levels of symmetric annular regions and observing where their supports separate.
  • If unique continuation were unavailable for a broader class of nonlocal operators, the same phase-separation construction could produce minimizers with thick interfaces, so the strict nested-annulus inequality is the place where nonlocality shapes the topology.
  • The same strategy may apply to any cohomogeneity-one group action on a closed manifold for which an analogous Jacobi-polynomial basis diagonalizes the operator; the topological type of the partition would be dictated by the orbit space.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a symmetric optimal partition problem on the round sphere for the energy associated with the conformal fractional Laplacian P_g^s, in the range s∈(1/2,1), for the symmetry group G=O(m)×O(n) with m+n=N+1. The main result, Theorem 1.2, asserts the existence of a minimizer among ℓ G-invariant open disjoint sets, with the additional conclusions that the minimizing sets are smooth, connected, cover S^N, and have an explicit shell topology S^{m-1}×B^n, S^{m-1}×S^{n-1}×(0,1), ..., B^m×S^{n-1}. The proof strategy is to pass to R^N by stereographic projection, prove a new Hölder regularity result for G-invariant fractional Sobolev functions (Proposition 1.5), and then analyze the phase-separation limit of least-energy solutions of a competitive fractional system as the coupling tends to −∞ (Theorems 1.4 and 7.1–7.3). The paper also states the existence of infinitely many G-invariant fully nontrivial solutions to the competitive system (Proposition 6.5) and presents a self-contained spectral analysis of the conformal fractional Laplacian in terms of Jacobi polynomials.

Significance. If established, this is a substantial contribution: it gives the first existence and topological rigidity result for fractional Q-curvature optimal partitions under symmetries, in a critical-exponent setting where the usual compactness fails. The self-contained spectral approach via Jacobi polynomials, the one-dimensional regularity mechanism in Proposition 1.5 with its explicit singular set Z, and the detailed phase-separation analysis are genuine strengths. The paper is also honest about the role of the assumption s>1/2 and about the places where it relies on results such as the unique continuation principle of [22] and the variational machinery of [17]. However, two load-bearing points in the proof need substantial repair before the main theorem can be considered established; these are described below.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theorem 7.2(i), proof of the strict inequality] The proof of the claim c_Λ < min{c_Λ1, c_Λ2} is not valid as written. If u_1 is a least-energy solution in Λ_1 and u is its zero extension to Λ, then u is not a weak solution of (1.11) in Λ. Indeed, for any nonzero 0≤φ∈C_c^∞(Λ_2), one has ⟨u,φ⟩_{D^s} = −c_{N,s} ∫∫ u(x)φ(y)|x−y|^{−N−2s} dx dy < 0, while ∫ |u|^{2*_s−2} u φ = 0. The most that follows from the equality c_Λ = c_Λ1 is that u belongs to M_Λ and achieves c_Λ; to obtain the contradiction one must additionally prove that minimizers of J_Λ on M_Λ are weak solutions (a standard Lagrange-multiplier step, but not stated) and that the least-energy solution u_1 is bounded, so that q=|u|^{2*_s−2}∈L^∞ satisfies the hypotheses of the cited unique continuation principle [22, Thm. 1.4]. Since the exact ℓ−1-point structure of the complement in Theorem 7.2(i), and hence the shell topology in Theorem 1.2, is deduced from this strict inequality, the gap is load-bearing and must be fixed.
  2. [Theorem 7.3 and Proposition 1.5] The transition from the limit profiles v_{∞,i} to the open partition is not fully justified. Proposition 1.5 gives continuity only on R^N∖Y, where Y=Y_1∪Y_2 is the singular stratum. The proof later asserts that v_{∞,i} is continuous in all of R^N and that Ω_i={v_{∞,i}>0}, but no argument is supplied for positivity or continuity of v_{∞,1} on Y_1 and of v_{∞,ℓ} on Y_2. This matters because Ω_1 and Ω_ℓ are defined to contain Y_1 and Y_2, respectively, and the identity Ω_i={v_{∞,i}>0} is needed to conclude that v_{∞,i}|Ω_i solves (1.11). Moreover, the sentence "Since Ω_i is smooth by Theorem 7.2" invokes Theorem 7.2 before it is known that the sets {Θ_i} or {Ω_i} actually solve the optimal partition problem; the logical order of the argument needs to be reorganized and the missing regularity up to the singular stratum supplied.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Theorem 7.3 statement] In the statement of Theorem 7.3, the coupling parameter is written as λ_{ij}=η_{ij,k}; this should be η_{ij}=η_{ij,k}.
  2. [Proof of Theorem 7.3] In the proof of Theorem 7.3, the notation c_{Θ_i} is used before it is shown that the sets Θ_i are admissible open sets and before c_{Ω_i} is defined; the chain of inequalities involving c_{Θ_i} appears to be intended for c_{Ω_i} after taking interiors.
  3. [Lemma 2.7] The proof of Lemma 2.7 relies on "standard arguments with Lyapunov functions" and cites [24, Lemma 3.2] without giving the details; since the two-sided spectral bound is used in Corollary 2.8 and in the regularity estimates of Section 4, the advertised self-contained derivation is not fully substantiated, although the statement itself is standard via the known formula (2.7).
  4. [Throughout] There are several minor typographical issues, including the spacing in the notation ∥·∥_{H^s_g(S^N)} and the phrase "an interior product" in Section 2.1, which should read "an inner product."

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the partition cost is defined independently, the minimizer is obtained by a direct variational phase-separation construction, and self-citations are methodological rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the (G,ℓ)-optimal partition problem (1.10) attains its infimum and that the minimizer has the layered topology of Theorem 1.2. The cost functional is built from the least-energy levels c_U of the Dirichlet Yamabe-type problems (1.9), which are introduced independently of the competitive system (1.14); the system is used only as a construction to reach the partition. No parameter is fitted to data, no 'prediction' is defined in terms of the output it claims to predict, and the phase-separation inequalities in Theorem 7.3 do not assume the desired partition. The key new regularity ingredient, Proposition 1.5, is proved in the paper, and the topological structure of Theorem 7.2 is derived from the strict inequality for nested annuli rather than inserted as an ansatz. The authors cite prior works, including [12] (which shares two authors) and [17], for variational machinery such as the Nehari-manifold homeomorphism and the genus argument; these are published external tools used inside a sketched proof, and the conclusion does not reduce to the mere assertion of a self-citation. The unique continuation principle [22, Theorem 1.4] used in Theorem 7.2 is an external result, not authored by the present authors, and any concern about whether its hypotheses are verified or about the zero-extension step is a correctness and completeness issue, not a circular equivalence. Because the derivation is self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity analysis, the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters fitted to data: the constants c_{N,s}, A_{N,s} and the symbol φ_{N,s} are fixed by the definition of the operator, and the coupling parameters η_{ij} are inputs that tend to -∞. The central argument rests on standard functional analysis and several external theorems (symmetric Sobolev embeddings, unique continuation, Jacobi polynomial bounds, and the Clapp-Szulkin variational machinery), all of which are cited. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Compact Sobolev embedding for G-invariant functions: H^s_g(S^N)^G embeds compactly into L^{2*_s}_g(S^N).
    Quoted from [2, Lemma 4.3] and [28]; restores compactness in critical problems and is used in Lemma 6.2 and Proposition 6.3.
  • domain assumption Unique continuation principle for the fractional Laplacian (Fall-Felli).
    Used in Theorem 7.2 to prove strict domain monotonicity; without it the layered structure of the optimal partition could fail.
  • standard math Standard estimates for Jacobi polynomials (Szego): norm formula, derivative formula, interior asymptotics.
    Underpin the Hölder regularity proof in Section 4.
  • standard math Principle of Symmetric Criticality (Palais).
    Used throughout Sections 5 and 6 to identify G-invariant critical points of restricted functionals with symmetric solutions of the original PDEs.
  • domain assumption Clapp-Szulkin variational theory for weakly coupled competitive elliptic systems.
    Proposition 6.5 is adapted from [17]; Lemmas 6.6 and 6.7 are stated to follow exactly as in that paper.
  • standard math Characterization of fractional Sobolev spaces with zero exterior values (Grisvard).
    Used in Lemma 2.2 to identify D^s(Ω) with functions vanishing outside Ω.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractional $Q$-curvature on the sphere and optimal partitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KX4KKLMS

@misc{pith2026250416882,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractional $Q$-curvature on the sphere and optimal partitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KX4KKLMS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16882}
}
abstract

We study an optimal partition problem on the sphere, where the cost functional is associated with the fractional $Q$-curvature in terms of the conformal fractional Laplacian on the sphere. By leveraging symmetries, we prove the existence of a symmetric minimal partition through a variational approach. A key ingredient in our analysis is a new H\"older regularity result for symmetric functions in a fractional Sobolev space on the sphere. As a byproduct, we establish the existence of infinitely many solutions to a nonlocal weakly-coupled competitive system on the sphere that remain invariant under a group of conformal diffeomorphisms and we investigate the asymptotic behavior of least-energy solutions as the coupling parameters approach negative infinity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.16882 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the optimal partition {Ω1, Ω2, Ω3, Ω4} of R 3 given by Theorem 1.3 with ℓ = 4 and m = n = 2. Here Ω1 is the interior of the smallest torus, Ω4 is the exterior of the largest torus, and Ω2 and Ω3 are the spaces inbetween separated by the middle torus. A proof via phase separation. As mentioned earlier, optimal partition problems are hard to solve (even under the presence of symmetries). To show Theore… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The conformal logarithmic Laplacian on the sphere: Yamabe-type problems and Sobolev spaces

    math.AP 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The derivative at zero of the conformal fractional Laplacian yields a conformal logarithmic Laplacian whose spectral, stereographic, and Yamabe-type properties are characterized, including an explicit classification o...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [22]

    M. M. Fall and V. Felli , Unique continuation property and local asymptotics of solutions to fractional elliptic equations, Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 39 (2014), pp. 354–397

    work page 2014

  2. [17]

    Clapp and A

    M. Clapp and A. Szulkin , A simple variational approach to weakly coupled competitive elliptic systems , NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., 26 (2019), pp. Paper No. 26, 21

    work page 2019

  3. [1]

    On the maximum principle for higher-order fractional Laplacians

    N. Abatangelo, S. Jarohs, and A. Salda˜na, On the maximum principle for higher-order fractional Laplacians , arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.00929, (2016)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  4. [2]

    Abreu, E

    E. Abreu, E. Barbosa, and J. C. Ramirez , Infinitely many sign-changing solutions of a critical fractional equation, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 201 (2022), pp. 861—-901

    work page 2022

  5. [3]

    Angeles and A

    F. Angeles and A. Salda˜na, Small order limit of fractional Dirichlet sublinear-type problems , Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis, 26 (2023), pp. 1594–1631

    2023

  6. [4]

    Bucur, Some observations on the Green function for the ball in the fractional Laplace framework, Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 15 (2016), pp

    C. Bucur, Some observations on the Green function for the ball in the fractional Laplace framework, Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 15 (2016), pp. 657–699

    work page 2016

  7. [5]

    Caffarelli and L

    L. Caffarelli and L. Silvestre, An extension problem related to the fractional Laplacian , Comm. Partial Differ- ential Equations, 32 (2007), pp. 1245–1260

    work page 2007

  8. [6]

    Caselli, E

    M. Caselli, E. Florit-Simon, and J. Serra, Fractional Sobolev spaces on Riemannian manifolds, Mathematische Annalen, (2024), pp. 1–66

    work page 2024

Show all 50 references
  1. [7]

    S. B. Catalan and J. Petean , Local bifurcation diagrams and degenerate solutions of Yamabe-type equations , arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10445, (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  2. [8]

    T. E. Cecil and P. J. Ryan , Geometry of Hypersurfaces , Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London, 2015

    2015

  3. [9]

    S.-Y. A. Chang , Non-linear Elliptic Equations in Conformal Geometry , Zurich Lectures in Advance Mathematics, European Mathematical Society, 2004

    2004

  4. [10]

    S.-Y. A. Chang and M. d. M. Gonz ´alez, Fractional Laplacian in conformal geometry , Adv. Math., 226 (2011), pp. 1410–1432

    2011

  5. [11]

    Clapp, J

    M. Clapp, J. Faya, and A. Salda ˜na, Optimal pinwheel partitions for the Yamabe equation , Nonlinearity, 37 (2024), p. 105004

    2024

  6. [12]

    Clapp, J

    M. Clapp, J. C. Fern ´andez, and A. Salda ˜na, Critical polyharmonic systems and optimal partitions , Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 20 (2021), pp. 4007–4023

    2021

  7. [13]

    Clapp and A

    M. Clapp and A. Pistoia , Existence and phase separation of entire solutions to a pure critical competitive elliptic system, Calc. Var., 57, 23 (2018)

    2018

  8. [14]

    Clapp, A

    M. Clapp, A. Pistoia, and H. Tavares , Yamabe systems, optimal partitions and nodal solutions to the Yamabe equation, J. Eur. Math. Soc., (2024)

    2024

  9. [15]

    Clapp, A

    M. Clapp, A. Salda ˜na, M. Soares, and V. A. Vicente-Ben ´ıtez, Optimal pinwheel partitions and pinwheel solutions to a nonlinear Schr¨ odinger system, To appear in Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.04448, (2024). 28

    2024 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Clapp, A

    M. Clapp, A. Salda˜na, and A. Szulkin, Phase separation, optimal partitions, and nodal solutions to the Yamabe equation on the sphere , International Mathematics Research Notices, 2021 (2021), pp. 3633–3652

    2021

  11. [18]

    Conti, S

    M. Conti, S. Terracini, and G. Verzini , Nehari’s problem and competing species systems , in Annales de l’IHP Analyse non lin´ eaire, vol. 19, 2002, pp. 871–888

    2002

  12. [19]

    del Mar Gonz ´alez, Recent Progress on the Fractional Laplacian in Conformal Geometry , De Gruyter Open Poland, Warsaw, Poland, 2017, pp

    M. del Mar Gonz ´alez, Recent Progress on the Fractional Laplacian in Conformal Geometry , De Gruyter Open Poland, Warsaw, Poland, 2017, pp. 236–273

    2017

  13. [20]

    Ding, On a conformally invariant elliptic equation on Rn, Commun

    W. Ding, On a conformally invariant elliptic equation on Rn, Commun. Math. Phys, 107 (1986), pp. 331–335

    1986

  14. [21]

    L. C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations (Second edition), vol. 19 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, 2010

    2010

  15. [23]

    J. C. Fern ´andez, O. Palmas, and J. Torres Orozco , Equivariant solutions to the optimal partition problem for the prescribed Q-curvature equation, J. Geom. Anal., 34 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    J. C. Fern ´andez and J. Petean , Low energy nodal solutions to the Yamabe equation , J. Differential Equations, 268 (2020), pp. 6576–6597

    2020

  17. [25]

    C. R. Graham, R. Jenne, L. J. Mason, and G. A. J. Sparling, Conformally invariant powers of the Laplacian. I. Existence, J. London Math. Soc. (2), 46 (1992), pp. 557–565

    1992

  18. [26]

    C. R. Graham and M. Zworski , Scattering matrix in conformal geometry , Invent. Math., 152 (2003), pp. 89–118

    2003

  19. [27]

    Grisvard, Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains , SIAM, 2011

    P. Grisvard, Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains , SIAM, 2011

    2011

  20. [28]

    Hebey and M

    E. Hebey and M. Vaugon , Sobolev spaces in the presence of symmetries , Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees, 76 (1997), pp. 859–881

    1997

  21. [29]

    Henry and J

    G. Henry and J. Petean , Isoparametric hypersurfaces and metrics of constant scalar curvature , Asian J. Math., 18 (2014), pp. 53–68

    2014

  22. [30]

    Hern´andez-Santamar´ıa and A

    V. Hern´andez-Santamar´ıa and A. Salda ˜na, Existence and convergence of solutions to fractional pure critical exponent problems, Advanced Nonlinear Studies, 21 (2021), pp. 827–854

    2021

  23. [31]

    Hern´andez Santamar´ıa and A

    V. Hern´andez Santamar´ıa and A. Salda˜na, Small order asymptotics for nonlinear fractional problems, Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 61 (2022), p. 92

    2022

  24. [32]

    Hora and A

    R. Hora and A. S ´a Barreto , Inverse scattering with disjoint source and observation sets on asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 43 (2018), pp. 1363–1376

    2018

  25. [33]

    Jarohs, A

    S. Jarohs, A. Salda˜na, and T. Weth, A new look at the fractional Poisson problem via the logarithmic Laplacian , Journal of Functional Analysis, 279 (2020), p. 108732

    2020

  26. [34]

    , Differentiability of the nonlocal-to-local transition in fractional Poisson problems , Potential Analysis, (2024), pp. 1–23

    2024

  27. [35]

    Lang, Differential and Riemannian manifolds , vol

    S. Lang, Differential and Riemannian manifolds , vol. 160 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 1995

    1995

  28. [36]

    S. A. Molcanov and E. Ostrovskii, Symmetric stable processes as traces of degenerate diffusion processes , Teor. Verojatnost. i Primenen., 14 (1969), pp. 127–130

    1969

  29. [37]

    R. S. Palais , On the existence of slices for actions of non-compact Lie groups , Ann. of Math. (2), 73 (1961), pp. 295–323

    1961

  30. [38]

    , The principle of symmetric criticality , Comm. Math. Phys., 69 (1979), pp. 19–30. 29

    1979

  31. [39]

    Ritorto, Optimal partition problems for the fractional Laplacian , Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata (1923-), 197 (2018), pp

    A. Ritorto, Optimal partition problems for the fractional Laplacian , Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata (1923-), 197 (2018), pp. 501–516

    2018

  32. [40]

    Rudin, Functional Analysis, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991

    W. Rudin, Functional Analysis, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991

    1991

  33. [41]

    E. M. Stein and G. Weiss , Introduction to Fourier analysis on Euclidean spaces , vol. No. 32 of Princeton Mathe- matical Series, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1971

    1971

  34. [42]

    Struwe, Variational methods, vol

    M. Struwe, Variational methods, vol. 34 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second ed., 1996. Applications to nonlinear partial differential equations and Hamiltonian systems

    1996

  35. [43]

    Szego, Orthogonal Polynomials, vol

    G. Szego, Orthogonal Polynomials, vol. XXIII of American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, Ameri- can Mathematical Society, 1975

    1975

  36. [44]

    Tavares, Topics in elliptic problems: from semilinear equations to shape optimization , Communications in Math- ematics, 32 (2024)

    H. Tavares, Topics in elliptic problems: from semilinear equations to shape optimization , Communications in Math- ematics, 32 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    K. Teng, K. Wang, and R. Wang , A sign-changing solution for nonlinear problems involving the fractional Laplacian, Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, 2015 (2015), pp. 1–12

    2015

  38. [46]

    Terracini, G

    S. Terracini, G. Verzini, and A. Zilio , Uniform H¨ older bounds for strongly competing systems involving the square root of the Laplacian , Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 18 (2016), pp. 2865–2924

    2016

  39. [47]

    Tortone and A

    G. Tortone and A. Zilio, Regularity results for segregated configurations involving fractional Laplacian, Nonlinear Analysis, 193 (2020), p. 111532

    2020

  40. [48]

    Willem , Minimax theorems, vol

    M. Willem , Minimax theorems, vol. 24 of Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications, Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1996

    1996

  41. [49]

    Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2 (1998), pp. 253–291

    1998

  42. [50]

    Zilio, Optimal regularity results related to a partition problem involving the half-Laplacian , New Trends in Shape Optimization, (2015), pp

    A. Zilio, Optimal regularity results related to a partition problem involving the half-Laplacian , New Trends in Shape Optimization, (2015), pp. 301–314. H´ ector A. Chang-Lara Matem´ aticas B´ asicas, Centro de Investigaci´ on en Matem´ aticas Jalisco S/N, Col. Valenciana C.P...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.