Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Exploring the Limits of Differentially Private Deep Learning with Group-wise Clipping

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.01539 v1 pith:KZNPLCJN submitted 2022-12-03 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords clippinglearningprivatedifferentiallydeepemphper-layertask
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Differentially private deep learning has recently witnessed advances in computational efficiency and privacy-utility trade-off. We explore whether further improvements along the two axes are possible and provide affirmative answers leveraging two instantiations of \emph{group-wise clipping}. To reduce the compute time overhead of private learning, we show that \emph{per-layer clipping}, where the gradient of each neural network layer is clipped separately, allows clipping to be performed in conjunction with backpropagation in differentially private optimization. This results in private learning that is as memory-efficient and almost as fast per training update as non-private learning for many workflows of interest. While per-layer clipping with constant thresholds tends to underperform standard flat clipping, per-layer clipping with adaptive thresholds matches or outperforms flat clipping under given training epoch constraints, hence attaining similar or better task performance within less wall time. To explore the limits of scaling (pretrained) models in differentially private deep learning, we privately fine-tune the 175 billion-parameter GPT-3. We bypass scaling challenges associated with clipping gradients that are distributed across multiple devices with \emph{per-device clipping} that clips the gradient of each model piece separately on its host device. Privately fine-tuning GPT-3 with per-device clipping achieves a task performance at $\epsilon=1$ better than what is attainable by non-privately fine-tuning the largest GPT-2 on a summarization task.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FlashDP: Private Training Large Language Models with Efficient DP-SGD

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FlashDP fuses per-sample gradient computation, norm calculation, clipping, and noise addition into a cache-friendly block-wise all-reduce workflow that avoids explicit per-sample gradient storage and redundant recomputation.

  2. Differentially Private Synthetic Data via APIs 3: Using Simulators Instead of Foundation Model

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Sim-PE plugs non-neural simulators into Private Evolution to create differentially private images, improving downstream accuracy over foundation-model PE by up to 3x on MNIST.

Pith tools