Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Language Model with Limited Memory Capacity Captures Interference in Human Sentence Processing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.16142 v1 pith:L75MJAPN submitted 2023-10-24 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords memoryattentionhumanmodelretrievalinterferencelanguageprocessing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Two of the central factors believed to underpin human sentence processing difficulty are expectations and retrieval from working memory. A recent attempt to create a unified cognitive model integrating these two factors relied on the parallels between the self-attention mechanism of transformer language models and cue-based retrieval theories of working memory in human sentence processing (Ryu and Lewis 2021). While Ryu and Lewis show that attention patterns in specialized attention heads of GPT-2 are consistent with similarity-based interference, a key prediction of cue-based retrieval models, their method requires identifying syntactically specialized attention heads, and makes the cognitively implausible assumption that hundreds of memory retrieval operations take place in parallel. In the present work, we develop a recurrent neural language model with a single self-attention head, which more closely parallels the memory system assumed by cognitive theories. We show that our model's single attention head captures semantic and syntactic interference effects observed in human experiments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Surprisal Theory is Tautological (without Rational Grounding)

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Unconstrained surprisal theory is a tautology: for any non-negative difficulty measure, a language model exists whose surprisal matches it affinely.

Pith tools