pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20913 · v1 · pith:LGHP2XXCnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· quant-ph

Chaos-Integrability Transition in the BPS Subspace of the mathcal{N}=2 SYK Model

Leon Miyahara , Shono Shibuya This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 04:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords SYK modelBPS subspacechaos-integrability transitionspectral statisticsrandom matrix theoryPoisson statisticssupersymmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spectral statistics of an operator projected onto the BPS subspace transition from random-matrix to Poisson behavior as the N=2 SYK model interpolates from chaotic to integrable.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a supersymmetric model that continuously connects the chaotic N=2 SYK model to an integrable commuting version. It isolates the analysis to the BPS subspace and examines the spectrum of one projected operator inside that subspace. Numerical results show that the level statistics start random-matrix-like near the chaotic limit and shift smoothly to Poisson-like near the integrable limit. A sympathetic reader cares because this isolates the chaos-integrability crossover to a smaller, protected sector rather than requiring the full spectrum. The work therefore supplies a concrete case where BPS states alone diagnose the transition.

Core claim

The central claim is that the spectral statistics of an operator projected onto the BPS subspace exhibit random-matrix behavior near the SYK limit and transition smoothly to Poisson statistics near the integrable limit, giving a direct example of a chaos-integrability crossover diagnosed solely from BPS states.

What carries the argument

The spectrum of an operator projected onto the BPS subspace, used to track the statistics crossover via level-spacing distributions.

If this is right

  • Chaos-integrability crossovers can be diagnosed using only BPS states without reference to the full Hilbert space.
  • The same projected-operator approach applies to other supersymmetric models that interpolate between chaotic and integrable regimes.
  • Spectral statistics remain a reliable diagnostic even after restriction to a symmetry-protected subspace.
  • The transition occurs continuously with the model parameter, implying no sharp phase boundary inside the BPS sector.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Focusing on BPS states could simplify numerical searches for chaos signatures in larger supersymmetric systems.
  • The result suggests that integrability in the commuting limit is already visible in the protected sector rather than being an artifact of the full space.
  • Similar projections might be tested in related SYK-like models to check whether the BPS subspace universally captures the crossover.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen numerical samples of the BPS subspace and the specific operator projection are representative of the full transition across the entire model.

What would settle it

A computation at larger system sizes that finds either persistent random-matrix statistics in the integrable limit or an abrupt rather than smooth change in the level-spacing distribution would contradict the claimed transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20913 by Leon Miyahara, Shono Shibuya.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The nearest level spacing distribution for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The nearest level spacing distribution for the de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The SFF for the deformed model ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Nearest level-spacing distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. SFF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study chaos-integrability transition purely within a BPS subspace of a specific supersymmetric model that interpolates between the chaotic $\mathcal{N}=2$ SYK model and an integrable $\mathcal{N}=2$ "commuting" SYK model. Using the framework of BPS chaos, we analyze the spectrum of an operator projected onto the BPS subspace. We numerically find that its spectral statistics exhibit random-matrix behavior near the SYK limit and smoothly transitions to Poisson statistics near the integrable limit. Our results provide a direct example of a chaos-integrability crossover diagnosed solely from BPS states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper studies the chaos-integrability transition purely within the BPS subspace of an N=2 SYK model interpolating between the chaotic SYK limit and an integrable commuting SYK limit. It analyzes the spectrum of an operator projected onto the BPS subspace and numerically observes random-matrix spectral statistics near the SYK limit that transition smoothly to Poisson statistics near the integrable limit, providing an example of a crossover diagnosed solely from BPS states.

Significance. If the numerical evidence is robust, the work supplies a concrete demonstration that chaos-integrability diagnostics can be performed entirely within the BPS sector of a supersymmetric SYK model. This is potentially useful for understanding protected subspaces and BPS chaos in holographic or supersymmetric contexts, as it avoids the full Hilbert space while still capturing the crossover.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim rests on numerical observation of a smooth RMT-to-Poisson transition in the level statistics of the projected operator. However, the abstract (and by extension the reported results) provides no information on the dimension of the BPS subspace, the number of disorder realizations, the system sizes employed, the unfolding procedure, or error bars on the spacing distributions. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the observed crossover is statistically robust or could arise from finite-size or sampling artifacts, which directly undermines in the smoothness of the transition.
minor comments (1)
  1. Clarify the precise definition of the projected operator and the choice of basis for the BPS subspace; the current description leaves open whether the projection is unique or operator-dependent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comment on the abstract. We address the point below and will incorporate revisions to improve the presentation of our numerical results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim rests on numerical observation of a smooth RMT-to-Poisson transition in the level statistics of the projected operator. However, the abstract (and by extension the reported results) provides no information on the dimension of the BPS subspace, the number of disorder realizations, the system sizes employed, the unfolding procedure, or error bars on the spacing distributions. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the observed crossover is statistically robust or could arise from finite-size or sampling artifacts, which directly undermines in the smoothness of the transition.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this issue. The detailed numerical setup—including the dimension of the BPS subspace for each system size, the number of disorder realizations, the range of system sizes studied, the unfolding procedure (standard local density fitting), and error bars estimated from disorder-to-disorder fluctuations—is described in the main text and figure captions. We agree that the abstract would benefit from a concise reference to these elements to allow readers to immediately gauge robustness. In the revised manuscript we will update the abstract to include a brief statement on the system sizes, number of realizations, and the presence of error bars on the spacing distributions, while preserving the overall length and focus. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on a direct numerical observation of spectral statistics for an operator projected onto the BPS subspace, showing a smooth transition from random-matrix to Poisson behavior as the model interpolates between SYK and integrable limits. No load-bearing analytical steps, self-definitions, or fitted inputs are invoked that reduce the reported transition to the paper's own inputs by construction. The framework of BPS chaos provides context for the subspace projection but does not substitute for or force the numerical result, which remains externally falsifiable via independent sampling of the same model. This is the most common honest finding for a purely numerical study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes the existence of a well-defined BPS subspace and the validity of random-matrix and Poisson diagnostics for chaos and integrability. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract itself.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The BPS subspace is well-defined and the projected operator spectrum faithfully captures the chaos-integrability transition.
    Invoked when the authors state they analyze the spectrum of an operator projected onto the BPS subspace.
  • standard math Random-matrix statistics diagnose chaos and Poisson statistics diagnose integrability.
    Standard assumption in quantum chaos literature used to interpret the numerical spectral statistics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5627 in / 1292 out tokens · 20449 ms · 2026-05-21T04:09:58.376107+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Fast Scramblers

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast Scramblers, JHEP10, 065, arXiv:0808.2096 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2096

  2. [2]

    A bound on chaos

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, JHEP08, 106, arXiv:1503.01409 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    Sachdev and J

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum heisenberg magnet, Physical Review Letters70, 3339–3342 (1993)

    work page 1993

  4. [4]

    Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, Talks at KITP, April 7, 2015 and May 27, 2015, available at:http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/ entangled15/kitaev/

    A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, Talks at KITP, April 7, 2015 and May 27, 2015, available at:http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/ entangled15/kitaev/

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Comments on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev- Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D94, 106002 (2016), arXiv:1604.07818 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Chaos in AdS$_2$ holography

    K. Jensen, Chaos in AdS 2 Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 111601 (2016), arXiv:1605.06098 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Confor- mal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space, PTEP2016, 12C104 (2016), arXiv:1606.01857 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    A. M. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, B. Loureiro, A. Romero-Berm´ udez, and M. Tezuka, Chaotic-Integrable Transition in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 241603 (2018), arXiv:1707.02197 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Thouless time for mass-deformed SYK

    T. Nosaka, D. Rosa, and J. Yoon, The Thouless time for mass-deformed SYK, JHEP09, 041, arXiv:1804.09934 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    A. M. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, Y. Jia, D. Rosa, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Sparse Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, quan- tum chaos and gravity duals, Phys. Rev. D103, 106002 (2021), arXiv:2007.13837 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Tezuka, O

    M. Tezuka, O. Oktay, E. Rinaldi, M. Hanada, and F. Nori, Binary-coupling sparse Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model: An improved model of quantum chaos and holography, Phys. Rev. B107, L081103 (2023), arXiv:2208.12098 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    H. W. Lin, J. Maldacena, L. Rozenberg, and J. Shan, Holography for people with no time, SciPost Phys.14, 150 (2023), arXiv:2207.00407 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    H. W. Lin, J. Maldacena, L. Rozenberg, and J. Shan, Looking at supersymmetric black holes for a very long time, SciPost Phys.14, 128 (2023), arXiv:2207.00408 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Y. Chen, H. W. Lin, and S. H. Shenker, BPS chaos, Sci- Post Phys.18, 072 (2025), arXiv:2407.19387 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes,

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes, (2024), arXiv:2402.10129 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    W. Fu, D. Gaiotto, J. Maldacena, and S. Sachdev, Su- persymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. D 95, 026009 (2017), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 069904 (2017)], arXiv:1610.08917 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Complete random matrix classification of SYK models with $\mathcal{N}=0$, $1$ and $2$ supersymmetry

    T. Kanazawa and T. Wettig, Complete random matrix classification of SYK models withN= 0, 1 and 2 super- symmetry, JHEP09, 050, arXiv:1706.03044 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    For the classification of general pairs of (N, f), see (6.13) in [17]

    work page

  19. [19]

    In order to compare with the random matrix predictions, we must unfold the spectrum, i.e., rescale the spectrum so that the mean level spacing becomes one

    work page

  20. [20]

    Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux, Distribution of the ratio of consecutive level spacings in random matrix ensembles, Physical Review Letters110, 10.1103/physrevlett.110.084101 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.084101 2013

  21. [21]

    Gao, Commuting SYK: a pseudo-holographic model, JHEP01, 149, arXiv:2306.14988 [hep-th]

    P. Gao, Commuting SYK: a pseudo-holographic model, JHEP01, 149, arXiv:2306.14988 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    In our numerics, the smooth transition occurs aroundg= 1 due to thisNdependence

    The exponentialNdependence of the coefficient is cho- sen in analogy with the generalized Rosenzweig-Porter model [35, 36], where the strength of off-diagonal mixing scales as a power of the Hilbert-space dimension. In our numerics, the smooth transition occurs aroundg= 1 due to thisNdependence

    work page

  23. [23]

    However, these block quantum numbers are not pre- served once theQ SYK is turned on, and hence the same refinement cannot be employed for the deformed model (12)

    If one further resolves the Hilbert space using the addi- tional conserved block quantum numbers ofH com, the remaining level statistics are expected to become Pois- son. However, these block quantum numbers are not pre- served once theQ SYK is turned on, and hence the same refinement cannot be employed for the deformed model (12)

    work page

  24. [24]

    Fortuity in SYK Models,

    C.-M. Chang, Y. Chen, B. S. Sia, and Z. Yang, Fortuity in SYK models, JHEP08, 003, arXiv:2412.06902 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    We can instead use a simple operator with degeneracies

    The use of the operator (14) may be justified from our result showing clear crossover from GUE to Poisson. We can instead use a simple operator with degeneracies. They lead to the same qualitative crossover from WD 6 to Poisson-like statistics, similar to those in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4

    work page

  26. [26]

    Onset of Random Matrix Behavior in Scrambling Systems

    H. Gharibyan, M. Hanada, S. H. Shenker, and M. Tezuka, Onset of Random Matrix Behavior in Scrambling Sys- tems, JHEP07, 124, [Erratum: JHEP 02, 197 (2019)], arXiv:1803.08050 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Berkooz, N

    M. Berkooz, N. Brukner, V. Narovlansky, and A. Raz, The double scaled limit of Super–Symmetric SYK mod- els, JHEP12, 110, arXiv:2003.04405 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2003

  28. [28]

    Berkooz, N

    M. Berkooz, N. Brukner, Y. Jia, and O. Mamroud, From Chaos to Integrability in Double Scaled Sachdev- Ye-Kitaev Model via a Chord Path Integral, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 221602 (2024), arXiv:2403.01950 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    G. J. Turiaci and E. Witten,N= 2 JT supergravity and matrix models, JHEP12, 003, arXiv:2305.19438 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Fortuity with a single matrix,

    Y. Chen, Fortuity with a single matrix, (2025), arXiv:2511.00790 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    L. V. Iliesiu, M. Mezei, and G. S´ arosi, The volume of the black hole interior at late times, JHEP07, 073, arXiv:2107.06286 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Miyaji, S.-M

    M. Miyaji, S.-M. Ruan, S. Shibuya, and K. Yano, Non- perturbative overlaps in JT gravity: from spectral form factor to generating functions of complexity, JHEP06, 251, arXiv:2502.12266 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Universal Time Evolution of Holographic and Quantum Complexity

    M. Miyaji, S.-M. Ruan, S. Shibuya, and K. Yano, Universal Time Evolution of Holographic and Quan- tum Complexity, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 151602 (2026), arXiv:2507.23667 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Y. Chen, S. Colin-Ellerin, O. Mamroud, and K. Pa- padodimas, Chaos of Berry curvature for BPS mi- crostates, (2026), arXiv:2604.23287 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Rosenzweig and C

    N. Rosenzweig and C. E. Porter, ”repulsion of energy levels” in complex atomic spectra, Phys. Rev.120, 1698 (1960)

    work page 1960

  36. [36]

    V. E. Kravtsov, I. M. Khaymovich, E. Cuevas, and M. Amini, A random matrix model with localization and ergodic transitions, New Journal of Physics17, 122002 (2015)

    work page 2015