Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14387 v4 pith:LOS5CL3P submitted 2023-05-22 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords alpacafarmfeedbackhumanmodelsmethodsreferencechallengescost
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have seen widespread adoption due to their strong instruction-following abilities. Developing these LLMs involves a complex yet poorly understood workflow requiring training with human feedback. Replicating and understanding this instruction-following requires tackling three major challenges: the high cost of data collection, the lack of trustworthy evaluation, and the absence of reference method implementations. We address these challenges with AlpacaFarm, a simulator that enables research and development for learning from feedback at a low cost. First, we design LLM prompts to simulate human feedback that are 50x cheaper than crowdworkers and display high agreement with humans. Second, we propose an automatic evaluation and validate it against human instructions obtained on real-world interactions. Third, we contribute reference implementations for several methods (PPO, DPO, best-of-n, expert iteration, and more) that learn from pairwise feedback. Finally, as an end-to-end validation of AlpacaFarm, we train and evaluate eleven models on 10k pairs of real human feedback and show that rankings of models trained in AlpacaFarm match rankings of models trained on human data. As a demonstration of the research possible in AlpacaFarm, we find that methods that use a reward model can substantially improve over supervised fine-tuning and that our reference PPO implementation leads to a +10% improvement in win-rate against Davinci003. We release all components of AlpacaFarm at https://github.com/tatsu-lab/alpaca_farm.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 54 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ReOPD offline-distills multi-turn agentic LLMs via teacher-prefix replay plus step-decay sampling, matching online OPD accuracy at ≥4× speed with zero tool calls.

  2. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with High-Confidence Safety Constraints

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HC-RLHF returns an aligned language model only after a held-out safety test certifies, with probability at least 1-delta, that expected harm (as judged by a learned cost model) is below a chosen threshold.

  3. RecoWorld: Building Simulated Environments for Agentic Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A design proposal, not a tested system: a dual-view simulation loop in which an LLM-simulated user issues reflective instructions when about to disengage, and an instruction-following recommender adapts to maximize si...

  4. An Uncertainty-Driven Adaptive Self-Alignment Framework for Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A training pipeline that scores a model's own responses for semantic, factual, and safety uncertainty, builds preference pairs from those scores, and trains in three difficulty stages improves reported alignment score...

  5. Simple Prompt Injection Attacks Can Leak Personal Data Observed by LLM Agents During Task Execution

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Prompt injection can make LLM agents leak personal data they observed while executing tasks, with measured attack success rates around 15-20 percent and password leakage much rarer.

Pith tools