Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

LiteSearch: Efficacious Tree Search for LLM

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.00320 v1 pith:LUGG2DU6 submitted 2024-06-29 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords searchtreecomputationalalgorithmbudgetnodeperformancealgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent research suggests that tree search algorithms (e.g. Monte Carlo Tree Search) can dramatically boost LLM performance on complex mathematical reasoning tasks. However, they often require more than 10 times the computational resources of greedy decoding due to wasteful search strategies, making them difficult to be deployed in practical applications. This study introduces a novel guided tree search algorithm with dynamic node selection and node-level exploration budget (maximum number of children) calculation to tackle this issue. By considering the search progress towards the final answer (history) and the guidance from a value network (future) trained without any step-wise annotations, our algorithm iteratively selects the most promising tree node before expanding it within the boundaries of the allocated computational budget. Experiments conducted on the GSM8K and TabMWP datasets demonstrate that our approach not only offers competitive performance but also enjoys significantly lower computational costs compared to baseline methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Plan Then Action:High-Level Planning Guidance Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A plan-then-reason SFT plus a plan-quality reward in GRPO improves math-reasoning accuracy by small but consistent margins over GRPO and DAPO.

  2. CDE: Curiosity-Driven Exploration for Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding actor perplexity and multi-head critic variance as intrinsic exploration bonuses improves RLVR math reasoning accuracy by roughly +2 to +3 points on AIME benchmarks.

  3. Dual-Stage Value-Guided Inference with Margin-Based Reward Adjustment for Fast and Faithful VLM Captioning

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A two-stage, value-guided decoding strategy with a margin-based reward adjustment is claimed to yield more faithful, detailed VLM captions at about a quarter of VisVM's inference cost.

  4. PATS: Process-Level Adaptive Thinking Mode Switching

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    PATS adapts the number of beam-search candidates per reasoning step using process reward model scores, improving accuracy-efficiency tradeoffs on math benchmarks.

  5. Reward Model Generalization for Compute-Aware Test-Time Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper claims PRM generalization error controls test-time compute efficiency and that the proposed CATS controller improves accuracy on MATH-500 and AIME24.

Pith tools