Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Queueing, Predictions, and LLMs: Challenges and Open Problems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.07545 v1 pith:M2MHJIQR submitted 2025-03-10 cs.AI cs.DS

classification cs.AIcs.DS
keywords predictionsschedulingsystemsopenperformanceimproveinferencequeueing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Queueing systems present many opportunities for applying machine-learning predictions, such as estimated service times, to improve system performance. This integration raises numerous open questions about how predictions can be effectively leveraged to improve scheduling decisions. Recent studies explore queues with predicted service times, typically aiming to minimize job time in the system. We review these works, highlight the effectiveness of predictions, and present open questions on queue performance. We then move to consider an important practical example of using predictions in scheduling, namely Large Language Model (LLM) systems, which presents novel scheduling challenges and highlights the potential for predictions to improve performance. In particular, we consider LLMs performing inference. Inference requests (jobs) in LLM systems are inherently complex; they have variable inference times, dynamic memory footprints that are constrained by key-value (KV) store memory limitations, and multiple possible preemption approaches that affect performance differently. We provide background on the important aspects of scheduling in LLM systems, and introduce new models and open problems that arise from them. We argue that there are significant opportunities for applying insights and analysis from queueing theory to scheduling in LLM systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Accuracy and Cost: Latency-Aware LLM Query Routing for Dynamic Workloads

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A serving-framework simulation that predicts time-to-first-token lets LLM routers jointly optimize accuracy, cost, and latency, improving accuracy-cost utility by up to 40% at matched latency.

  2. Queue-Theoretic Admission Control for Multi-Tenant GPU Clusters

    cs.DC 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Pending GPU-cluster workloads partition into quotable (finite wait under stability) and unfeasible sets; quotable waits scale as O(1/(1-ρ)) under an M/G/k domination assumption with vector-packing k_eff.

  3. LLM Inference Under Bursty Workload Distribution: Modifying the WAIT Algorithm

    cs.LG 2026-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A modified WAIT scheduler with online arrival-rate estimation matches or improves throughput over Sarathi-Serve, ORCA, and vLLM in low-shift bursty workloads.

Pith tools