Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Assessing Modality Bias in Video Question Answering Benchmarks with Multimodal Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.12763 v2 pith:M6O3COOM submitted 2024-08-22 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords modalitybiasdatasetsmllmsmultimodalexistingimportancemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can simultaneously process visual, textual, and auditory data, capturing insights that complement human analysis. However, existing video question-answering (VidQA) benchmarks and datasets often exhibit a bias toward a single modality, despite the goal of requiring advanced reasoning skills that integrate diverse modalities to answer the queries. In this work, we introduce the modality importance score (MIS) to identify such bias. It is designed to assess which modality embeds the necessary information to answer the question. Additionally, we propose an innovative method using state-of-the-art MLLMs to estimate the modality importance, which can serve as a proxy for human judgments of modality perception. With this MIS, we demonstrate the presence of unimodal bias and the scarcity of genuinely multimodal questions in existing datasets. We further validate the modality importance score with multiple ablation studies to evaluate the performance of MLLMs on permuted feature sets. Our results indicate that current models do not effectively integrate information due to modality imbalance in existing datasets. Our proposed MLLM-derived MIS can guide the curation of modality-balanced datasets that advance multimodal learning and enhance MLLMs' capabilities to understand and utilize synergistic relations across modalities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Overview of the NLPCC 2026 Shared Task 1: Difficulty-Aware Multilingual and Multimodal Medical Instructional Video Understanding Evaluation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    DA-MIVQA is a new medical video QA benchmark that labels questions by evidence type, but the paper's own results omit the crucial difficulty-split analysis.

  2. Uncertainty-Weighted Image-Event Multimodal Fusion for Video Anomaly Detection

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    IEF-VAD fuses CLIP image and synthetic-event features via learned inverse-variance weighting with Kalman-style updates and iterative refinement, reporting state-of-the-art AUC/AP on UCF-Crime, XD-Violence, ShanghaiTec...

  3. Enhanced Multimodal RAG-LLM for Accurate Visual Question Answering

    cs.CV 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A pipeline that converts an image into a scene graph, embeds the graph chunks, retrieves the most relevant chunks, and prompts an LLM with them reports high VQA accuracy, but the comparison to MLLMs is not credible.

Pith tools