Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Equilibrium mechanisms of self-limiting assembly

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.01927 v2 pith:MBZMZ2YJ submitted 2020-07-03 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-phq-bio.BM

classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-phq-bio.BM
keywords assemblyassembliesequilibriummechanismsself-limitingsubunitssystemsfinite-size
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Self-assembly is a ubiquitous process in synthetic and biological systems, broadly defined as the spontaneous organization of multiple subunits (e.g. macromolecules, particles) into ordered multi-unit structures. The vast majority of equilibrium assembly processes give rise to two states: one consisting of dispersed disassociated subunits, and the other, a bulk-condensed state of unlimited size. This review focuses on the more specialized class of {\it self-limiting assembly}, which describes equilibrium assembly processes resulting in finite-size structures. These systems pose a generic and basic question, how do thermodynamic processes involving non-covalent interactions between identical subunits ``measure'' and select the size of assembled structures? In this review, we begin with an introduction to the basic statistical mechanical framework for assembly thermodynamics, and use this to highlight the key physical ingredients that ensure equilibrium assembly will terminate at finite dimensions. Then, we introduce examples of self-limiting assembly systems, and classify them within this framework based on two broad categories: {\it self-closing assemblies} and {\it open-boundary assemblies}. These include well-known cases in biology and synthetic soft matter -- micellization of amphiphiles and shell/tubule formation of tapered subunits -- as well as less widely known classes of assemblies, such as short-range attractive/long-range repulsive systems and geometrically-frustrated assemblies. For each of these self-limiting mechanisms, we describe the physical mechanisms that select equilibrium assembly size, as well as potential limitations of finite-size selection. Finally, we discuss alternative mechanisms for finite-size assemblies, and draw contrasts with the size-control that these can achieve relative to self-limitation in equilibrium, single-species assemblies.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stochastic size control of self-assembled filaments

    cond-mat.soft 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Semiaddressable binding, where each species binds itself and the next in sequence, yields a tunable filament length distribution whose mean and width are independently controlled.

Pith tools