Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

Jets that pass through the pre-equilibrium stage of a heavy-ion collision retain a durable memory of that early phase: the emission pattern is fixed by what happens to the transport coefficients at early times, and late-time changes barely

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 23:02 UTC pith:MLIYE44W

load-bearing objection First realistic computation of medium-induced gluon spectra in pre-equilibrium EKT backgrounds, with a central non-convergence claim that is plausible but not yet asymptotic-proof. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2511.07519 v2 pith:MLIYE44W submitted 2025-11-10 hep-ph hep-exnucl-th

Jet quenching in out-of-equilibrium QCD matter

classification hep-ph hep-exnucl-th
keywords jet quenchingpre-equilibrium QCD matterimproved opacity expansionmedium-induced gluon radiationjet substructureeffective kinetic theorybottom-up thermalizationBjorken expansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether the brief, out-of-equilibrium phase of quark–gluon matter—before it hydrodynamizes—can be seen in the jets that plough through it. It computes the medium-induced gluon radiation spectrum using the Improved Opacity Expansion, fed with the jet transport parameter and screening mass extracted from QCD kinetic theory simulations. For three bulk scenarios (initially under- and over-occupied isotropic plasmas, and a Bjorken-expanding plasma), it compares the nonequilibrium spectrum with thermally matched and static-brick references. The central finding for the expanding case is that altering the transport coefficients at early times changes the emission pattern substantially, while altering them at late times does almost nothing; the ratio observables never converge to unity as the medium length grows. A sympathetic reader would conclude that jets carry a durable imprint of pre-equilibrium dynamics, and that the standard practice of switching on jet quenching only after about one fermi misses part of the signal.

Core claim

For a Bjorken-expanding QCD medium, the soft medium-induced gluon spectrum is controlled by the early-time behavior of the bare jet quenching parameter q̂0(τ) and screening mass μ∗(τ). Modifying them before τ ≲ 50/Qs changes the emission pattern substantially; modifying them later leaves it nearly unchanged. Hence the ratio observables χρ and χm, defined against an equilibrium medium of the same energy density, stay visibly different from unity even as L → ∞ and the medium dilutes. The paper's central claim is that the early out-of-equilibrium evolution fixes the radiation pattern and identical late-time evolution cannot erase it — while in isotropic non-expanding systems the ratios do conve

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pair of time-dependent transport parameters (q̂0(τ), μ∗(τ)) that determine the effective scattering potential v(x, τ) = (q̂0/4) x² log(1/(x² μ∗²)) at leading logarithmic accuracy. q̂0 and μ∗ are extracted from QCD kinetic theory by parametrizing the jet quenching parameter as q̂(Λ⊥) = a(τ) log(Λ⊥/Qs) + b(τ), identifying q̂0 = a/2, and converting b via μ∗² = (1/4) exp(−b/q̂0 + 2γE − 2). These feed the Improved Opacity Expansion, which expands the emission kernel around the harmonic-oscillator potential and treats the logarithmic tail as a correction, thereby including both multiple soft and single hard momentum exchanges. Self-consistency scales Qb and Qr fix th

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that the jet quenching parameter extracted from kinetic theory for the highly anisotropic, expanding plasma can be converted into the two parameters of the isotropic scattering potential using the equilibrium perturbative tail of the collision kernel; if that conversion is off, the screening mass—and with it the radiation spectrum—is off.

What would settle it

Take the same Bjorken-expanding background and compute the radiation spectrum with μ∗(τ) replaced by its thermal value while keeping the nonequilibrium q̂0(τ); if the ratios χm and χρ then converge to unity, the memory effect is an artifact of the μ∗ mapping rather than of early-time transport. Alternatively, extract v(x) directly from the anisotropic kinetic-theory background and compare its short-distance coefficient with the formula used in the paper; any substantial mismatch would invalidate the q̂0, μ∗ input.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Pre-equilibrium dynamics must be included in phenomenological jet-quenching calculations; switching q̂ on only after about 1 fm/c discards the very stage that dominates the spectrum for expanding matter.
  • Jet-substructure observables such as jet shapes and the location or maximum of the gluon spectrum can serve as tomographic probes of the thermalization history, not just of the equilibrated plasma.
  • A static-brick medium is a poor surrogate for an expanding out-of-equilibrium medium; energy-density-matched thermal references reproduce the nonequilibrium spectrum more closely.
  • The main conclusion already appears at the harmonic-oscillator (leading) order of the Improved Opacity Expansion, so the memory effect is not an artifact of the subleading hard-scattering correction.
  • In small collision systems where the medium never fully hydrodynamizes, the same framework applies and the early-stage imprint may be even more pronounced.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the non-convergence survives a full anisotropic treatment, measured jet substructure in heavy-ion and small-system collisions could discriminate between different early-time models of the initial Glasma state.
  • Beyond the paper: because late-time changes are subleading, coarse-grained models that reproduce only the early-time q̂0 and μ∗ evolution—for instance a weighted 'early dose'—may suffice for many observables; the static-brick matching used here could be improved by matching to that early dose rather than the full evolution.
  • Beyond the paper: the quantitative size of the memory effect hinges on the μ∗ conversion formula; a direct extraction of v(x) from the expanding anisotropic background would show whether the offset in the ratio observables is over- or under-estimated.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first computation of medium-induced gluon emission from jets using the Improved Opacity Expansion (IOE) with time-dependent transport coefficients q̂0(τ) and μ∗(τ) extracted from QCD effective kinetic theory (EKT) simulations. Three bulk scenarios are studied: isotropic under- and over-occupied plasmas, and a longitudinally expanding system initialized from a CGC-like distribution and evolving through the bottom-up thermalization stages. The emission spectra are compared with thermally matched and static-brick baselines through two ratio observables, χρ (jet shape ratio) and χm (peak-spectrum ratio). For the isotropic systems these ratios approach unity at large path length L, as expected. The main claim is that for the Bjorken-expanding system the ratios do not converge to unity as L→∞, implying that early pre-equilibrium stages leave a persistent, sizable imprint on jet substructure. The paper also compares IOE with the harmonic-oscillator approximation and performs a numerical experiment modifying early- versus late-time inputs to support the interpretation.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the result is significant: it would establish jets as sensitive tomographic probes of the pre-equilibrium phase and challenge the common phenomenological practice of switching on jet quenching only after ~1 fm/c. The paper has clear strengths: the numerical evaluation is careful, with continuum extrapolations and publicly available code; the conclusion is checked for consistency between the HO and IOE truncations; and the modification experiment in Fig. 8 directly addresses the role of early times. The potential impact is high, provided the two load-bearing assumptions—the validity of the μ∗ mapping and the reality of the L→∞ non-convergence—are properly secured.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III.B, Figs. 5–6; §III.D] The central claim that χm and χρ do not tend to 1 as L→∞ is inferred from finite-L runs and from the early/late modification experiment. For the Bjorken thermal tail, Eq. (33a) with Tε∝τ^{−1/3} gives q̂0(τ)∝1/τ, so the integrated broadening in Eq. (12) grows as Q_b^2∼∫dτ q̂0∼log L. A finite early-time difference is then an additive constant inside this logarithm, and a generic smooth dependence of the spectrum on accumulated transport would drive χi→1 as L→∞. The present runs are not manifestly asymptotic: for λ=10 the largest length is QsL=33.5, while for λ=0.5 the largest run has QsL=3×10^4 but remains below the relaxation scale τR. Fig. 8 only modifies inputs up to τ≈150/Qs. Please supply a quantitative asymptotic argument, a scan reaching the late-time thermally matched regime, or an analytic leading-log estimate; without this, 'persistent deviations' is an extrapolation rather than
  2. [§II.B, Eq. (31)] The input μ∗ is obtained from the EKT fit via μ∗²=(1/4) exp[−b/q̂0+2γE−2], with q̂0=a/2, by matching the small-x expansion of the potential using the isotropic perturbative tail of Eq. (26). This is exactly the step that converts the EKT output (a,b) into the time-dependent μ∗ entering q̂r and q̂b in Eqs. (12)–(13). For the anisotropic, expanding backgrounds (initial condition Eq. (19), ξ=10), the EKT simulations use an isotropic/Debye screening prescription, and Eq. (31) is not validated against a direct extraction of v(x) for these settings; the text only cites [84] for the short-distance behavior. Please validate Eq. (31) on the EKT backgrounds or demonstrate that a reasonable uncertainty in μ∗ does not alter the qualitative non-convergence of χi.
  3. [§II.A, footnote 1; §III.C] The quantitative use of the IOE truncated at NLO for time-dependent out-of-equilibrium matter rests on the assertion that leading+NLO already capture the qualitative features of the exact spectrum. Footnote 1 acknowledges that this was originally established for the energy spectrum, and the extension to jet-shape and peak ratios is stated as an expectation. The HO/IOE comparison in §III.C is a useful internal consistency check, but both truncations share the same expansion variable and do not provide a convergence estimate. I ask for a more explicit validity statement—e.g., where the matching scales Qr and Qb have real solutions and where δv in Eq. (5) remains small across the time profile in Fig. 2—or, failing that, a sensitivity study varying the truncation in a simplified time-dependent potential.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§III.A] The text says the jet-shape ratio χρ is 'shown in the central column of Fig. 3'; the correct cross-reference is Fig. 4.
  2. [§III.B] The text states that the triangle marker denotes 'where the pressure anisotropy drops below 2', but the preceding definition is PL/PT=0.5. This wording is confusing and should be corrected.
  3. [§II.A and Appendix A] The notation for the initial time is inconsistent: t0 is used in Eqs. (1)–(14), while the numerical section switches to tmin/tmax. Please unify the notation.
  4. [§II.B] The discussion of the thermal limit for b notes that Table III of [22] parametrizes the cutoff with log(Λ⊥/mD) instead of log(Λ⊥/Qs). This is important and should be stated more prominently, since the reader needs to know which b is actually used in Eq. (22).
  5. [Appendix A] The continuum extrapolation uses exponent n=4 for Simpson's rule but n=1 for the double integral. The text says the four discretizations agree, but a sentence explaining why the n=1 term is nevertheless controlled would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the χi ratios are emergent outputs of independent EKT inputs and the IOE calculation.

full rationale

Walk of the derivation chain: the medium parameters q̂0(τ) and μ*(τ) are not chosen to reproduce the radiation observables; they are derived from EKT simulations via the cutoff-dependence of q̂(Λ⊥) (Eqs. 20–31), with the equilibrium baseline set by Landau matching to the same energy density (Eq. 32). The radiation spectrum is then a direct numerical evaluation of the IOE expressions (Eqs. 7 and 14), and χρ, χm are output ratios (Eqs. 40–41). No quantity in those ratios is fitted to them, and no equation defines the input in terms of the output. The author-overlapping citations are to previous EKT-q̂ extraction papers [21,22], the short-distance potential identification [84], and the IOE framework [52–57]; these supply inputs or a method, not the conclusion. The assertion that χi do not approach unity is a numerical finding at finite L, and the claim that early times dominate is supported by an independent modification experiment (Fig. 8). Whether Eq. (31) is quantitatively accurate for anisotropic backgrounds or whether the largest L is sufficiently asymptotic are correctness risks, not circularity. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central computation is layered: the IOE radiation kernel (Eqs. 6–14) is fixed by prior literature [52–56], the medium inputs q̂0(t) and μ∗(t) are fixed by EKT simulation outputs imported from [21,22] and converted by the [84] bridge, and the comparison baselines are fixed by Landau matching and the static-brick matching procedure (Eqs. 35–36). Free parameters are limited to the EKT initial-condition choices and coupling values; no parameter is tuned to reproduce the final spectra or the χ ratios. The main imported physical assumptions — Gaussian/local correlations, the leading-log form of v(x), and NLO-truncation validity — are the standard BDMPS-Z/IOE package, with the truncation validity the least tested for time-dependent media. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (5)
  • Under-occupied initial-condition amplitude A (Eq. 17) = set via Q = 50 T
    Defines the starting gluon distribution for the isotropic under-occupied EKT run; controls how far below equilibrium the system starts and hence the early-time q̂0(t), μ∗(t) inputs.
  • Over-occupied attractor initial-condition parameters (Eq. 18) = coefficients 0.22, 2; exponents −4/7, −1/7; Q t0 = 1e−4
    Parametrize the non-thermal attractor initial distribution; sets the early overshoot of q̂0 above its thermal value, which drives the χ > 1 behavior.
  • Expanding/CGC initial-condition parameters (Eq. 19) = ξ = 10, A(ξ) = 5.24171, ⟨p_T⟩ = 1.8 Qs
    Glasma-inspired initial distribution for the Bjorken runs; determines the early overoccupied stage and the entire bottom-up evolution feeding q̂0(t), μ∗(t).
  • Thermal-limit coefficient b for λ ≥ 2 = Table III of ref. [22]
    Used instead of the analytic weak-coupling b of Eq. (33b) to ensure the numerically extracted q̂ approaches the correct thermal limit; a same-group calibration that shapes the thermal-matched baseline.
  • Coupling choices = λ ∈ {0.5, 2, 10}
    Three representative couplings; λ = 10 is the phenomenologically relevant case and the one used for the early-time modification study of Fig. 8.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The background fields follow Gaussian statistics with correlations local in space and time and diagonal in color (Eq. 2).
    Standard BDMPS-Z starting point; needed for the P and K evolution equations; not derived for the EKT medium.
  • domain assumption The medium is transversely homogeneous and effectively isotropic; plasma instabilities and anisotropy effects are neglected on both the EKT and IOE sides.
    Explicitly stated in Sec. II and Sec. II.C as a consistency requirement; known to be an approximation in the early, highly anisotropic stage of the Bjorken evolution.
  • domain assumption Leading-log potential v(x) ≈ (q̂0/4) x² log(1/(x² μ∗²)) with an isotropic 1/q⁴ hard tail, keeping only the x² term in the small-x expansion (Eqs. 3, 25–30).
    Underlies the identification of q̂0 and μ∗ from the EKT-extracted a and b; the truncation at order x² and the isotropic tail are uncontrolled for the anisotropic runs.
  • ad hoc to paper The IOE truncation at NLO captures the qualitative features of the exact spectrum for time-dependent media.
    Footnote 1: the extension from the energy spectrum to other observables is 'generally expected'; the paper does not benchmark the NLO-truncated spectrum against exact kernel solutions for the EKT time profiles.
  • domain assumption Weak-coupling AMY kinetic theory describes the pre-equilibrium bulk matter (Eq. 16 with elastic and inelastic kernels).
    Underlies the EKT background; valid at weak coupling and used here up to λ = 10, where its applicability is an extrapolation.
  • ad hoc to paper The mapping from cutoff-dependent q̂(Λ⊥) = a log(Λ⊥/Qs) + b to the BDMPS-Z potential parameters, q̂0 = a/2 and Eq. (31), is valid.
    Taken from same-group preprint [84] (arXiv:2509.03868); converts EKT output into the (q̂0, μ∗) inputs of the IOE; not re-derived or validated here for the anisotropic expanding backgrounds.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 23886 in / 22866 out tokens · 231897 ms · 2026-08-03T23:02:05.626273+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the first study of jet substructure modifications during the bottom-up evolution that describes the early stages of heavy-ion collisions. To this end, we study the bremsstrahlung radiation rate of soft gluons from a hard parton propagating through out-of-equilibrium QCD matter. The gluon spectrum is computed within the Improved Opacity Expansion, which accounts for both multiple soft and single hard momentum exchanges between the hard probe and the medium. The background evolution is obtained from effective kinetic theory simulations that determine the jet quenching parameter, which in turn controls the radiation rate. We compute the radiation rate for initially under- and over-occupied systems, as well as for an expanding system undergoing hydrodynamization, which typically represents the initial stages of heavy-ion collisions. The results for these dynamical backgrounds are compared to static and thermally matched scenarios, allowing to gauge the importance of bulk expansion in the evolution of the jet cascade. Our findings show that the early stages of the bulk matter evolution in heavy-ion collisions leave a sizable imprint on the radiation pattern inside jets. These results establish a basis for incorporating pre-equilibrium dynamics into realistic descriptions of jet quenching and hard-probe evolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.07519 by Andrey V. Sadofyev, Florian Lindenbauer, Jo\~ao Barata, Kirill Boguslavski.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Summary of results for single gluon production in the presence of an out-of-equilibrium QCD medium, as illustrated on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Time evolution of the bare jet quenching parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Illustration of the jet shape at leading order in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Medium-induced gluon spectrum (left column) for an isotropic initially underoccupied (top row) and overoccupied [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Medium-induced gluon spectrum (left column) for Bjorken expanding matter. In the middle and right columns, we [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The ratio quantities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Differences in the spectra obtained using the IOE and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Time evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Jet Momentum Broadening in Viscous QCD Matter: A Moment Expansion Approach

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The jet broadening tensor qhat^ij in near-equilibrium QCD is controlled by the medium shear-stress tensor within the 14-moment approximation.

  2. Quantum simulating multi-particle processes in high energy nuclear physics: dijet production and color (de)coherence

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A framework is developed that encodes leading-order QCD antenna and dipole processes as quantum circuits, with benchmarks against analytic limits in simplified media.

  3. Quantum simulating multi-particle processes in high energy nuclear physics: dijet production and color (de)coherence

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A quantum-circuit framework maps partonic cross-sections for multi-particle QCD processes in media, benchmarked on dipole formation and antenna radiation at leading order.

  4. Kinetic and canonical momentum broadening in the Glasma

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Derives gauge-invariant equations of motion for kinetic and canonical momentum of particles in a classical non-Abelian background, finding that transverse fields contribute to kinetic momentum broadening even in the e...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Ques- tions

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal & W. van der Schee,“Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Ques- tions”, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68, 339 (2018), arXiv:1802.04801

  2. [2]

    QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas & R. Venu- gopalan,“QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035003 (2021),arXiv:2005.12299

  3. [3]

    Heavy quarks and jets as probes of the QGP

    L. Apolinário, Y.-J. Lee & M. Winn,“Heavy quarks and jets as probes of the QGP”, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.127, 103990 (2022), arXiv:2203.16352

  4. [4]

    Computing quark and gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei

    L. D. McLerran & R. Venugopalan,“Computing quark and gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei”, Phys. Rev. D49, 2233 (1994), hep-ph/9309289

  5. [5]

    Gluon production at high transverse momentum in the McLerran-Venugopalan model of nuclear struc- ture functions

    A. Kovner, L. D. McLerran & H. Weigert, “Gluon production at high transverse momentum in the McLerran-Venugopalan model of nuclear struc- ture functions”, Phys. Rev. D52, 3809 (1995), hep-ph/9505320

  6. [6]

    The Initial energy density of gluons produced in very high-energy nu- clear collisions

    A. Krasnitz & R. Venugopalan,“The Initial energy density of gluons produced in very high-energy nu- clear collisions”, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 4309 (2000), hep-ph/9909203

  7. [7]

    Some features of the glasma

    T. Lappi & L. McLerran,“Some features of the glasma”, Nucl. Phys. A772, 200 (2006), hep-ph/0602189

  8. [8]

    ’Bottom up’ thermalization in heavy ion collisions

    R. Baier, A. H. Mueller, D. Schiff & D. T. Son, “’Bottom up’ thermalization in heavy ion collisions”, Phys. Lett. B502, 51 (2001),hep-ph/0009237

  9. [9]

    Turbulent thermalization process in heavy-ion collisions at ultrarelativistic energies

    J. Berges, K. Boguslavski, S. Schlichting & R. Venugopalan,“Turbulent thermalization process in heavy-ion collisions at ultrarelativistic energies”, Phys. Rev. D89, 074011 (2014),arXiv:1303.5650

  10. [10]

    Isotropization and hy- drodynamization in weakly coupled heavy-ion col- lisions

    A. Kurkela & Y. Zhu,“Isotropization and hy- drodynamization in weakly coupled heavy-ion col- lisions”, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 182301 (2015), arXiv:1506.06647

  11. [11]

    Anisotropic momentum broadening in the 2+1D Glasma: an- alytic weak field approximation and lattice sim- ulations

    A. Ipp, D. I. Müller & D. Schuh,“Anisotropic momentum broadening in the 2+1D Glasma: an- alytic weak field approximation and lattice sim- ulations”, Phys. Rev. D102, 074001 (2020), arXiv:2001.10001

  12. [12]

    Jet mo- mentum broadening in the pre-equilibrium Glasma

    A. Ipp, D. I. Müller & D. Schuh,“Jet mo- mentum broadening in the pre-equilibrium Glasma”, Phys. Lett. B810, 135810 (2020), arXiv:2009.14206

  13. [13]

    Simulating jets and heavy quarks in the glasma using the colored particle-in- cell method

    D. Avramescu, V. Baran, V. Greco, A. Ipp, D. I. Müller & M. Ruggieri,“Simulating jets and heavy quarks in the glasma using the colored particle-in- cell method”, Phys. Rev. D107, 114021 (2023), arXiv:2303.05599

  14. [14]

    Heavy Quarks Embedded in Glasma

    M. E. Carrington, A. Czajka & S. Mrowczynski, 17 “Heavy Quarks Embedded in Glasma”, Nucl. Phys. A 1001, 121914 (2020),arXiv:2001.05074

  15. [15]

    Jet quenching in glasma

    M. E. Carrington, A. Czajka & S. Mrowczynski,“Jet quenching in glasma”, Phys. Lett. B834, 137464 (2022),arXiv:2112.06812

  16. [16]

    Transport of hard probes through glasma

    M. E. Carrington, A. Czajka & S. Mrowczyn- ski,“Transport of hard probes through glasma”, Phys. Rev. C105, 064910 (2022), arXiv:2202.00357

  17. [17]

    Initial stage jet momentum broadening in tBLFQ formalism

    D. Avramescu, C. Lamas, T. Lappi, M. Li & C. A. Salgado,“Initial stage jet momentum broadening in tBLFQ formalism”, in“Proceedings of the Quark Matter 2025 Conference”

  18. [18]

    Heavy- quark diffusion in 2+1D and glasmalike plasmas: Evidence of a transport peak

    L. Backfried, K. Boguslavski & P. Hotzy,“Heavy- quark diffusion in 2+1D and glasmalike plasmas: Evidence of a transport peak”, Phys. Rev. D110, 114013 (2024),arXiv:2408.12646

  19. [19]

    Parton energy loss in glasma

    P. Aurenche & B. G. Zakharov,“Parton energy loss in glasma”, Phys. Lett. B718, 937 (2013), arXiv:1205.6462

  20. [20]

    Effective kinetic theory for high temperature gauge theories

    P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore & L. G. Yaffe,“Effective kinetic theory for high temperature gauge theories”, JHEP0301, 030 (2003),hep-ph/0209353

  21. [22]

    Jet quenching parameter in QCD kinetic theory

    K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, F. Linden- bauer & J. Peuron,“Jet quenching parameter in QCD kinetic theory”, Phys. Rev. D110, 034019 (2024),arXiv:2312.00447

  22. [23]

    Limiting attractors in heavy- ion collisions

    K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, F. Linden- bauer & J. Peuron,“Limiting attractors in heavy- ion collisions”, Phys. Lett. B852, 138623 (2024), arXiv:2312.11252

  23. [24]

    Jet quenching in the glasma phase: Medium- induced radiation

    J. Barata, S. Hauksson, X. Mayo López & A. V. Sad- ofyev,“Jet quenching in the glasma phase: Medium- induced radiation”, Phys. Rev. D110, 094055 (2024), arXiv:2406.07615

  24. [25]

    High p(T) hadron spectra, azimuthal anisotropy and back to back correlations in high- energy heavy ion collisions

    X.-N. Wang,“High p(T) hadron spectra, azimuthal anisotropy and back to back correlations in high- energy heavy ion collisions”, Phys. Lett. B595, 165 (2004),nucl-th/0305010

  25. [26]

    Bayesian Constraints on Pre-Equilibrium Jet Quenching and Predictions for Oxygen Collisions

    D. Pablos & A. Takacs,“Bayesian Constraints on Pre-Equilibrium Jet Quenching and Predictions for Oxygen Collisions”,arXiv:2509.19430

  26. [27]

    Sensitivity of jet quenching to the initial state in heavy-ion collisions

    S. P. Adhya & K. Tywoniuk,“Sensitivity of jet quenching to the initial state in heavy-ion collisions”, arXiv:2409.04295

  27. [28]

    Medium-induced radiation with vacuum propagation in the pre-hydrodynamics phase

    C. Andres, L. Apolinário, F. Dominguez, M. G. Mar- tinez & C. A. Salgado,“Medium-induced radiation with vacuum propagation in the pre-hydrodynamics phase”, JHEP2303, 189(2023),arXiv:2211.10161

  28. [29]

    Approach to Equi- librium in Weakly Coupled Non-Abelian Plas- mas

    A. Kurkela & E. Lu,“Approach to Equi- librium in Weakly Coupled Non-Abelian Plas- mas”, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 182301 (2014), arXiv:1405.6318

  29. [30]

    Radiative energy loss of high-energy quarks and gluons in a finite volume quark - gluon plasma

    R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, S. Peigne & D. Schiff,“Radiative energy loss of high-energy quarks and gluons in a finite volume quark - gluon plasma”, Nucl. Phys. B483, 291 (1997), hep-ph/9607355

  30. [31]

    Fully quantum treatment of the Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal effect in QED and QCD

    B. G. Zakharov,“Fully quantum treatment of the Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal effect in QED and QCD”, JETP Lett.63, 952 (1996),hep-ph/9607440

  31. [32]

    Radiative energy loss and p(T) broaden- ing of high-energy partons in nuclei

    R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, S. Peigne &D.Schiff,“Radiative energy loss and p(T) broaden- ing of high-energy partons in nuclei”, Nucl. Phys. B 484, 265 (1997),hep-ph/9608322

  32. [33]

    Radiative energy loss of high- energy quarks in finite size nuclear matter and quark - gluon plasma

    B. G. Zakharov,“Radiative energy loss of high- energy quarks in finite size nuclear matter and quark - gluon plasma”, JETP Lett.65, 615 (1997), hep-ph/9704255

  33. [34]

    NonAbelian en- ergy loss at finite opacity

    M. Gyulassy, P. Levai & I. Vitev,“NonAbelian en- ergy loss at finite opacity”, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 5535 (2000),nucl-th/0005032

  34. [35]

    Reaction operator approach to nonAbelian energy loss

    M. Gyulassy, P. Levai & I. Vitev,“Reaction operator approach to nonAbelian energy loss”, Nucl. Phys. B 594, 371 (2001),nucl-th/0006010

  35. [36]

    Ab initio coupling of jets to collective flow in the opacity ex- pansion approach

    A. V. Sadofyev, M. D. Sievert & I. Vitev,“Ab initio coupling of jets to collective flow in the opacity ex- pansion approach”, Phys.Rev.D104, 094044(2021), arXiv:2104.09513

  36. [37]

    Jet drift and collective flow in heavy- ion collisions

    L. Antiporda, J. Bahder, H. Rahman & M. D. Sievert,“Jet drift and collective flow in heavy- ion collisions”, Phys. Rev. D105, 054025 (2022), arXiv:2110.03590

  37. [38]

    Jet broadening in flowing matter: Re- summation

    C. Andres, F. Dominguez, A. V. Sadofyev & C. A. Salgado,“Jet broadening in flowing matter: Re- summation”, Phys. Rev. D106, 074023 (2022), arXiv:2207.07141

  38. [39]

    Jet broadening in dense inhomogeneous matter

    J. Barata, A. V. Sadofyev & C. A. Sal- gado,“Jet broadening in dense inhomogeneous matter”, Phys. Rev. D105, 114010 (2022), arXiv:2202.08847

  39. [40]

    Quantum partonic transport in QCD matter

    J. Barata, A. V. Sadofyev & X.-N. Wang,“Quantum partonic transport in QCD matter”, Phys. Rev. D 107, L051503 (2023),arXiv:2210.06519

  40. [41]

    Medium induced gluon spectrum in dense inhomogeneous matter

    J. Barata, X. Mayo López, A. V. Sadofyev & C. A. Salgado,“Medium induced gluon spectrum in dense inhomogeneous matter”, Phys. Rev. D108, 034018 (2023),arXiv:2304.03712

  41. [42]

    Pictur- ing QCD jets in anisotropic matter: from jet shapes to energy energy correlators

    J. Barata, J. G. Milhano & A. V. Sadofyev,“Pictur- ing QCD jets in anisotropic matter: from jet shapes to energy energy correlators”, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 174 (2024),arXiv:2308.01294

  42. [43]

    Jet quenching in anisotropic flow- ing matter

    M. V. Kuzmin, X. Mayo López, J. Reiten & A. V. Sadofyev,“Jet quenching in anisotropic flow- ing matter”, Phys. Rev. D109, 014036 (2024), arXiv:2309.00683

  43. [44]

    Gluon to qq antenna in anisotropic QCD matter: spin-polarized and azimuthal jet observables

    J. Barata, C. A. Salgado & J. M. Silva,“Gluon to qq antenna in anisotropic QCD matter: spin-polarized and azimuthal jet observables”, JHEP2412, 023 (2024),arXiv:2407.04774

  44. [45]

    Gluon radiation 18 inside a flowing medium

    M. V. Kuzmin & X. Mayo López,“Gluon radiation 18 inside a flowing medium”,arXiv:2406.14628

  45. [46]

    Signatures of Jet Drift in QGP Hard Probe Observ- ables

    J. Bahder, H. Rahman, M. D. Sievert & I. Vitev, “Signatures of Jet Drift in QGP Hard Probe Observ- ables”,arXiv:2412.05474

  46. [47]

    Nonlocal high-pt transport in anisotropic QCD matter

    J.Barata, X.Du&A.V.Sadofyev,“Nonlocal high-pt transport in anisotropic QCD matter”, Phys. Rev. D 111, 114017 (2025),arXiv:2502.13205

  47. [48]

    Plasma instability at the ini- tial stage of ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions

    S. Mrowczynski,“Plasma instability at the ini- tial stage of ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions”, Phys. Lett. B314, 118 (1993)

  48. [49]

    Collective modes of an anisotropic quark gluon plasma

    P. Romatschke & M. Strickland,“Collective modes of an anisotropic quark gluon plasma”, Phys. Rev. D 68, 036004 (2003),hep-ph/0304092

  49. [50]

    Color instabilities in the quark–gluon plasma

    S. Mrowczynski, B. Schenke & M. Strickland,“Color instabilities in the quark–gluon plasma”, Phys. Rept. 682, 1 (2017),arXiv:1603.08946

  50. [51]

    EKTqhat - Effective kinetic theory solver with jet quenching parameter

    A. Kurkela & F. Lindenbauer,“EKTqhat - Effective kinetic theory solver with jet quenching parameter”, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10409474

  51. [52]

    Gluon bremsstrahlung in finite me- dia beyond multiple soft scattering approximation

    Y. Mehtar-Tani,“Gluon bremsstrahlung in finite me- dia beyond multiple soft scattering approximation”, JHEP1907, 057 (2019),arXiv:1903.00506

  52. [53]

    Improved opac- ity expansion for medium-induced parton splitting

    Y. Mehtar-Tani & K. Tywoniuk,“Improved opac- ity expansion for medium-induced parton splitting”, JHEP2006, 187 (2020),arXiv:1910.02032

  53. [54]

    Revisiting transverse momentum broadening in dense QCD media

    J. a. Barata, Y. Mehtar-Tani, A. Soto-Ontoso & K. Tywoniuk,“Revisiting transverse momentum broadening in dense QCD media”, Phys. Rev. D104, 054047 (2021),arXiv:2009.13667

  54. [55]

    Improved opacity expansion at NNLO for medium induced gluon radi- ation

    J. a. Barata & Y. Mehtar-Tani,“Improved opacity expansion at NNLO for medium induced gluon radi- ation”, JHEP2010, 176 (2020),arXiv:2004.02323

  55. [56]

    Medium-induced radiative kernel with the Improved Opacity Expansion

    J. a. Barata, Y. Mehtar-Tani, A. Soto-Ontoso & K. Tywoniuk,“Medium-induced radiative kernel with the Improved Opacity Expansion”, JHEP2109, 153 (2021),arXiv:2106.07402

  56. [57]

    QCD antenna ra- diative spectrum in dense media: accounting for full jet-medium interactions

    M. V. Kuzmin & J. M. Silva,“QCD antenna ra- diative spectrum in dense media: accounting for full jet-medium interactions”,arXiv:2507.00143

  57. [58]

    Gluon radiation off hard quarks in a nuclear environment: Opacity expansion

    U. A. Wiedemann,“Gluon radiation off hard quarks in a nuclear environment: Opacity expansion”, Nucl. Phys. B588, 303 (2000),hep-ph/0005129

  58. [59]

    Jet physics in heavy-ion collisions

    Y. Mehtar-Tani, J. G. Milhano & K. Tywoniuk,“Jet physics in heavy-ion collisions”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1340013 (2013),arXiv:1302.2579

  59. [60]

    Introduc- tory lectures on jet quenching in heavy ion col- lisions

    J. Casalderrey-Solana & C. A. Salgado,“Introduc- tory lectures on jet quenching in heavy ion col- lisions”, Acta Phys. Polon. B38, 3731 (2007), arXiv:0712.3443

  60. [61]

    Precise descrip- tion of medium-induced emissions

    J. H. Isaksen & K. Tywoniuk,“Precise descrip- tion of medium-induced emissions”, JHEP2309, 049 (2023),arXiv:2303.12119

  61. [62]

    The strong interaction at the frontier of knowledge: fundamental research and applica- tions

    and references therein, expanding in powers ofv(x, t) (so-called opacity expansion), or consider the resummed form under the harmonic oscillator (HO) approximation forv(x, t), see [60], accounting only for the leading contri- butions in Eq. (3). Although one can attempt to solve for this kernel in general, the range of the solutions is limited by the inhe...

  62. [63]

    Quark branching in QCD matter to any order in opacity beyond the soft gluon emission limit

    M. D. Sievert & I. Vitev,“Quark branching in QCD matter to any order in opacity beyond the soft gluon emission limit”, Phys. Rev. D98, 094010 (2018), arXiv:1807.03799

  63. [64]

    Finite-size effects on the radiative energy loss of a fast parton in hot and dense strongly interacting matter

    S. Caron-Huot & C. Gale,“Finite-size effects on the radiative energy loss of a fast parton in hot and dense strongly interacting matter”, Phys. Rev. C82, 064902 (2010),arXiv:1006.2379

  64. [65]

    The Boltzmann equation for glu- ons at early times after a heavy ion collision

    A. H. Mueller,“The Boltzmann equation for glu- ons at early times after a heavy ion collision”, Phys. Lett. B475, 220 (2000),hep-ph/9909388

  65. [66]

    Chemical Equilibra- tion in Hadronic Collisions

    A. Kurkela & A. Mazeliauskas,“Chemical Equilibra- tion in Hadronic Collisions”, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 142301 (2019),arXiv:1811.03040

  66. [67]

    Equilibration of the Quark- Gluon Plasma at Finite Net-Baryon Density in QCD Kinetic Theory

    X. Du & S. Schlichting,“Equilibration of the Quark- Gluon Plasma at Finite Net-Baryon Density in QCD Kinetic Theory”, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 122301 (2021),arXiv:2012.09068

  67. [68]

    Ther- malization of non-Abelian gauge theories at next-to- leading order

    Y. Fu, J. Ghiglieri, S. Iqbal & A. Kurkela,“Ther- malization of non-Abelian gauge theories at next-to- leading order”, Phys. Rev. D105, 054031 (2022), arXiv:2110.01540

  68. [69]

    Matching the Nonequilibrium Initial Stage of Heavy Ion Colli- sions to Hydrodynamics with QCD Kinetic The- ory

    A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, S. Schlichting & D. Teaney,“Matching the Nonequilibrium Initial Stage of Heavy Ion Colli- sions to Hydrodynamics with QCD Kinetic The- ory”, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 122302 (2019), arXiv:1805.01604

  69. [70]

    Pre-equilibrium photons from the early stages of heavy-ion collisions

    O. Garcia-Montero, A. Mazeliauskas, P. Plaschke & S. Schlichting,“Pre-equilibrium photons from the early stages of heavy-ion collisions”, JHEP2403, 053 (2024),arXiv:2308.09747

  70. [71]

    Scaling of pre-equilibrium dilepton production in QCD kinetic theory

    O. Garcia-Montero, P. Plaschke & S. Schlichting, “Scaling of pre-equilibrium dilepton production in QCD kinetic theory”, Phys. Rev. D111, 034036 (2025),arXiv:2403.04846

  71. [72]

    Minijet quenching in non-equilibrium quark-gluon plasma

    F. Zhou, J. Brewer & A. Mazeliauskas,“Minijet quenching in non-equilibrium quark-gluon plasma”, JHEP2406, 214 (2024),arXiv:2402.09298

  72. [73]

    Minijet thermalization and jet transport coefficients in QCD kinetic theory

    K. Boguslavski, F. Lindenbauer, A. Mazeliauskas, A. Takacs & F. Zhou,“Minijet thermalization and jet transport coefficients in QCD kinetic theory”, arXiv:2510.25669

  73. [74]

    UV Cascade in Clas- sical Yang-Mills Theory

    A. Kurkela & G. D. Moore,“UV Cascade in Clas- sical Yang-Mills Theory”, Phys. Rev. D86, 056008 (2012),arXiv:1207.1663

  74. [75]

    Turbulent thermalization of weakly coupled non-abelian plasmas

    S. Schlichting,“Turbulent thermalization of weakly coupled non-abelian plasmas”, Phys. Rev. D86, 065008 (2012),arXiv:1207.1450

  75. [76]

    Universal attractor in a highly occupied non-Abelian plasma

    J. Berges, K. Boguslavski, S. Schlichting & R. Venu- gopalan,“Universal attractor in a highly occupied non-Abelian plasma”, Phys. Rev. D89, 114007 (2014),arXiv:1311.3005

  76. [77]

    QCD plasma insta- bilities: The NonAbelian cascade

    P. B. Arnold & G. D. Moore,“QCD plasma insta- bilities: The NonAbelian cascade”, Phys. Rev. D73, 025006 (2006),hep-ph/0509206

  77. [78]

    Turbulence in nonabelian gauge theory

    J. Berges, S. Scheffler & D. Sexty,“Turbulence in nonabelian gauge theory”, Phys. Lett. B681, 362 (2009),arXiv:0811.4293

  78. [79]

    UV cascade in classical Yang-Mills theory via kinetic theory

    M. C. Abraao York, A. Kurkela, E. Lu & G. D. Moore,“UV cascade in classical Yang-Mills theory via kinetic theory”, Phys. Rev. D89, 074036 (2014), arXiv:1401.3751

  79. [80]

    Data and anal- 19 ysis code for arXiv:2303.12595

    F. Lindenbauer,“Data and anal- 19 ysis code for arXiv:2303.12595”, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10419537

  80. [81]

    Gluon spectrum in the glasma from JIMWLK evolution

    T. Lappi,“Gluon spectrum in the glasma from JIMWLK evolution”, Phys. Lett. B703, 325 (2011), arXiv:1105.5511

Showing first 80 references.