pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.19430 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-23 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-th· nucl-ex· nucl-th

Bayesian Constraints on Pre-Equilibrium Jet Quenching and Predictions for Oxygen Collisions

Daniel Pablos , Adam Takacs This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 14:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-thnucl-exnucl-th
keywords jet quenchingpre-equilibriumBayesian analysisoxygen-oxygen collisionsheavy-ion collisionsenergy losselliptic flowquark-gluon plasma
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bayesian analysis shows early-time jet energy loss is compatible with large-system data and predicts sizable quenching in oxygen collisions

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper couples a semi-analytic jet quenching model to event-by-event hydrodynamics and adds pre-equilibrium energy loss for the first time via the hydrodynamic attractor. A Bayesian analysis finds that an early onset of energy loss fits RHIC and LHC measurements of jet suppression and jet elliptic flow in large systems, plus hadron suppression, but does not describe hadron elliptic flow. The same constraints are used to predict both hadron and jet observables in oxygen-oxygen collisions. Those predictions show clear energy-loss signals that exceed the no-quenching baseline. The work tests how jet quenching scales with collision system size.

Core claim

By coupling a semi-analytic jet quenching framework to event-by-event hydrodynamics and incorporating pre-equilibrium energy loss via the hydrodynamic attractor, a Bayesian analysis shows that an early-time onset of energy loss is compatible with RHIC and LHC measurements of jet suppression and jet elliptic flow in large systems, as well as hadron suppression, with the exception of hadron elliptic flow. Using these constraints, the framework predicts both hadron and jet quenching observables in oxygen-oxygen collisions, finding sizable energy loss that exceeds the no-quenching baseline.

What carries the argument

Semi-analytic jet quenching framework coupled to the hydrodynamic attractor for pre-equilibrium evolution

If this is right

  • Early-time onset of energy loss accounts for jet suppression and jet elliptic flow data in large systems
  • Hadron suppression data are described while hadron elliptic flow remains an exception
  • Oxygen-oxygen collisions are predicted to show measurable hadron and jet quenching larger than the no-quenching case
  • The framework provides quantitative forecasts for how quenching observables scale from large to intermediate systems

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Oxygen-oxygen data can serve as a direct test to separate models that include versus exclude early pre-equilibrium energy loss
  • The persistent mismatch with hadron elliptic flow may require adding medium-response effects not present in the current setup
  • The same Bayesian-constrained approach could be applied to proton-nucleus collisions to probe even smaller system sizes

Load-bearing premise

The semi-analytic jet quenching framework, when coupled to the hydrodynamic attractor for pre-equilibrium evolution, correctly captures the system-size dependence of energy loss without additional medium-response or path-length effects that would differ between large and intermediate systems.

What would settle it

A measurement in oxygen-oxygen collisions of jet suppression or elliptic flow that matches the no-quenching baseline or deviates substantially from the predicted values with early energy loss would falsify the central compatibility claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.19430 by Adam Takacs, Daniel Pablos.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Parameter posterior probability distributions and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Nuclear modification for jets and charged hadrons in OO collisions for two different centrality selections. Dark bands [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Charged hadron and jet elliptic flow in oxygen colli [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Posterior predictive distributions, the fitting performance of our model. Jet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Posterior predictive distributions for RHIC energy and for hadrons (not included in the inference). Data shown for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Nuclear modification and elliptic flow for jets and charged hadrons in minimum bias OO collisions. Different lines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The contrast between the as-yet unmeasurable energy-loss effects in proton-nucleus collisions and the striking magnitude of the so-called high-momentum flow coefficients challenges our understanding of jet quenching mechanisms in large nucleus-nucleus collisions when applied to smaller systems. Intermediate-sized, light ion collisions will offer key insight into the system-size dependence of the interplay between jet energy loss and jet flow effects. To make quantitative predictions, we extend a semi-analytic jet quenching framework by coupling it to state-of-the-art event-by-event hydrodynamics and, for the first time, incorporate pre-equilibrium energy loss via the hydrodynamic attractor. A Bayesian analysis shows that an early-time onset of energy loss is compatible with RHIC and LHC measurements of jet suppression and jet elliptic flow in large systems, as well as hadron suppression, with the exception of hadron elliptic flow. Using these constraints, we predict both hadron and jet quenching observables in oxygen-oxygen collisions, finding sizable energy loss that exceeds the no-quenching baseline.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends a semi-analytic jet quenching framework by coupling it to event-by-event hydrodynamics and, for the first time, incorporating pre-equilibrium energy loss via the hydrodynamic attractor. A Bayesian analysis constrains an early-time energy-loss onset parameter using RHIC and LHC measurements of jet suppression, jet elliptic flow, and hadron suppression in large systems, finding compatibility except for hadron elliptic flow. The constrained model is then used to predict sizable hadron and jet quenching observables in oxygen-oxygen collisions that exceed the no-quenching baseline.

Significance. If the central assumptions hold, the work provides timely, quantitative predictions for light-ion collisions that can test the system-size dependence of jet quenching and the role of pre-equilibrium dynamics. The Bayesian approach to parameter constraint is a methodological strength that allows for uncertainty quantification in the forecasts.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and results on Bayesian constraints: the reported incompatibility with hadron elliptic flow is a load-bearing issue for the OO predictions. Elliptic flow is sensitive to path-length and medium-response effects; the mismatch in large systems raises the possibility that the semi-analytic model omits contributions whose relative weight changes in intermediate-size systems, potentially affecting the claimed sizable quenching signal.
  2. [Bayesian analysis] Bayesian analysis section: it is unclear whether the posterior fully marginalizes over uncertainties in the hydrodynamic attractor implementation and the semi-analytic quenching framework itself. Without explicit treatment of these model uncertainties, the constraint on the early-time onset parameter and the subsequent OO extrapolations may be over-optimistic.
minor comments (2)
  1. Ensure all OO prediction figures and tables explicitly show the no-quenching baseline for direct visual comparison with the quenched results.
  2. Clarify the precise definition and implementation of the 'hydrodynamic attractor' for pre-equilibrium energy loss in the methods section to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results on Bayesian constraints: the reported incompatibility with hadron elliptic flow is a load-bearing issue for the OO predictions. Elliptic flow is sensitive to path-length and medium-response effects; the mismatch in large systems raises the possibility that the semi-analytic model omits contributions whose relative weight changes in intermediate-size systems, potentially affecting the claimed sizable quenching signal.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the incompatibility with measured hadron elliptic flow in large systems is a notable limitation and could signal missing contributions (e.g., medium response or additional path-length dependence) whose importance may shift in smaller systems. Our Bayesian constraints are nevertheless driven by the combination of jet R_AA, jet v2, and hadron R_AA, all of which are described consistently within the model. The OO predictions therefore represent the quenching signal under these constraints. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit discussion of this tension and its possible implications for intermediate-size systems, while retaining the quantitative forecasts as model-specific results. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Bayesian analysis] Bayesian analysis section: it is unclear whether the posterior fully marginalizes over uncertainties in the hydrodynamic attractor implementation and the semi-analytic quenching framework itself. Without explicit treatment of these model uncertainties, the constraint on the early-time onset parameter and the subsequent OO extrapolations may be over-optimistic.

    Authors: The reported posterior marginalizes over the jet-quenching parameters (including the early-time onset) given the chosen likelihood and data. We do not perform a full marginalization over alternative implementations of the hydrodynamic attractor or over variations in the semi-analytic framework, as these are fixed modeling choices that define the scope of the present study. This is a standard limitation when working within a specific framework. We have revised the Bayesian analysis section to state these assumptions explicitly and to qualify the resulting uncertainties as conditional on the chosen setup. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; Bayesian constraints on AA data yield independent OO predictions

full rationale

The paper constrains jet-quenching parameters via Bayesian analysis on RHIC/LHC AA data (jet R_AA, jet v2, hadron R_AA) and then applies the posterior to predict observables in a distinct OO system. This constitutes a standard extrapolation rather than a reduction of the OO outputs to the AA inputs by construction. No self-definitional equations, fitted quantities renamed as predictions within the same dataset, or load-bearing self-citations that close the derivation loop are present in the described chain. The framework's compatibility with most but not all AA observables is a correctness issue, not a circularity issue. The OO forecasts remain falsifiable against future measurements and do not collapse to tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the semi-analytic quenching model, the hydrodynamic attractor description of pre-equilibrium, and the assumption that the same parameters fitted to large systems apply to oxygen collisions without additional system-size-dependent corrections.

free parameters (1)
  • early-time energy-loss onset parameter
    The Bayesian analysis adjusts the timing and strength of pre-equilibrium energy loss to fit data; this parameter is fitted rather than derived from first principles.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The hydrodynamic attractor accurately models the pre-equilibrium stage for the purpose of jet energy loss.
    Invoked when extending the jet quenching framework to include early-time loss.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5706 in / 1439 out tokens · 28222 ms · 2026-05-18T14:27:24.269013+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nuclear Modification of $\pi^0$ Production in OO Collisions with ALICE

    nucl-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    ALICE presents the first R_OO for π⁰ in OO collisions, finding up to 4σ suppression relative to pp collisions and 2.4σ deviation from cold nuclear matter model predictions.

  2. Light-front Hamiltonian jet evolution in the Glasma

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A light-front Hamiltonian method evolves a quark through Glasma fields to obtain transverse momentum broadening and jet quenching consistent with classical scaling in saturation momentum.

  3. Observation of suppressed charged-particle production in ultrarelativistic oxygen-oxygen collisions

    nucl-ex 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First measurement of the nuclear modification factor R_AA in OO collisions at 5.36 TeV shows suppression with a minimum of 0.69 at p_T around 6 GeV, favoring models with parton energy loss.

  4. Kinetic and canonical momentum broadening in the Glasma

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Derives gauge-invariant equations of motion for kinetic and canonical momentum of particles in a classical non-Abelian background, finding that transverse fields contribute to kinetic momentum broadening even in the e...

  5. Geometric bias and centrality dependence of jet quenching in high-energy nuclear collisions

    nucl-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A refined HIJING initial-condition model with geometric bias from impact-parameter effects, combined with Boltzmann jet transport, describes the centrality dependence of charged-hadron suppression in 5.02 TeV Pb+Pb co...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

136 extracted references · 136 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers · 50 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of Long-Range Near-Side Angular Correlations in Proton-Proton Collisions at the LHC

    V. Khachatryanet al.(CMS), Observation of Long- Range Near-Side Angular Correlations in Proton- Proton Collisions at the LHC, JHEP09, 091, arXiv:1009.4122 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Observation of Associated Near-side and Away-side Long-range Correlations in sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV Proton-lead Collisions with the ATLAS Detector

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Observation of Associated Near-Side and Away-Side Long-Range Correlations in√sN N=5.02 TeV Proton-Lead Collisions with the AT- LAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 182302 (2013), arXiv:1212.5198 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  3. [3]

    Long-range angular correlations on the near and away side in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

    B. Abelevet al.(ALICE), Long-range angular corre- lations on the near and away side inp-Pb collisions at √sN N = 5.02TeV, Phys. Lett. B719, 29 (2013), arXiv:1212.2001 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    Observation of long-range near-side angular correlations in proton-lead collisions at the LHC

    S. Chatrchyanet al.(CMS), Observation of Long-Range Near-Side Angular Correlations in Proton-Lead Col- lisions at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B718, 795 (2013), arXiv:1210.5482 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    J. L. Nagle and W. A. Zajc, Small System Collectivity in Relativistic Hadronic and Nuclear Collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68, 211 (2018), arXiv:1801.03477 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    J.Noronha, B.Schenke, C.Shen,andW.Zhao,Progress and challenges in small systems, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33, 2430005 (2024), arXiv:2401.09208 [nucl-th]. 7 101 102 103 pjet T [GeV] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0Rjet AA 0 10% PbPb 5.02 TeV | jet| < 2.8, Rakt = 0.4 no preeq best fit early preeq ATLAS 101 102 103 pjet T [GeV] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0Rjet AA 10 20% PbPb ...

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    J. F. Grosse-Oetringhaus and U. A. Wiedemann, A Decade of Collectivity in Small Systems, (2024), arXiv:2407.07484 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    R. D. Weller and P. Romatschke, One fluid to rule them all: viscous hydrodynamic description of event-by-event central p+p, p+Pb and Pb+Pb collisions at√s= 5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B774, 351 (2017), arXiv:1701.07145 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    C. Aidalaet al.(PHENIX), Creation of quark–gluon plasma droplets with three distinct geometries, Nature 8 101 102 103 pjet T [GeV] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0Rjet AA 0 10% AuAu 200 GeV | | < 1 Rakt, Rakt = 0.2 no preeq best fit early preeq STAR 101 102 103 pjet T [GeV] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0Rjet AA 0 10% AuAu 200 GeV | | < 1 Rakt, Rakt = 0.3 no preeq best fi...

    work page arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Investigations of Anisotropic Flow Using Multiparticle Azimuthal Correlations in pp, p-Pb, Xe-Xe, and Pb-Pb Collisions at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 142301 (2019), arXiv:1903.01790 [nucl- ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    G. Nijs, W. van der Schee, U. Gürsoy, and R. Snellings, Bayesian analysis of heavy ion collisions with the heavy ion computational framework Trajectum, Phys. Rev. C 103, 054909 (2021), arXiv:2010.15134 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    The Angantyr model for Heavy-Ion Collisions in PYTHIA8

    C. Bierlich, G. Gustafson, L. Lönnblad, and H. Shah, The Angantyr model for Heavy-Ion Collisions in PYTHIA8, JHEP10, 134, arXiv:1806.10820 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Kurkela, A

    A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Törnkvist, Collec- tive flow in single-hit QCD kinetic theory, JHEP11, 216, arXiv:2104.08179 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Bierlich, P

    C. Bierlich, P. Christiansen, G. Gustafson, L. Lönnblad, R. Törnkvist, and K. Zapp, Going against the flow: Re- vealing the QCD degrees of freedom in hadronic colli- sions, (2024), arXiv:2409.16093 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    M. S. Torres, Y. Feng, and F. Wang, Azimuthal Cor- relation Anisotropies inp+pCollisions Simulated by Pythia, (2024), arXiv:2410.13143 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Soudi and A

    I. Soudi and A. Majumder, T-odd parton distribution functions and azimuthal anisotropy at high transverse momentum in p-p and p-A collisions, Phys. Rev. C111, 024901 (2025), arXiv:2404.05287 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Soudiet al.(JETSCAPE), Soft-hard framework with exact four-momentum conservation for small systems, Phys

    I. Soudiet al.(JETSCAPE), Soft-hard framework with exact four-momentum conservation for small systems, Phys. Rev. C112, 014905 (2025), arXiv:2407.17443 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Heavy-ion collisions at the Large Hadron Collider: a review of the results from Run 1

    N. Armesto and E. Scomparin, Heavy-ion collisions at the Large Hadron Collider: a review of the re- sults from Run 1, Eur. Phys. J. Plus131, 52 (2016), arXiv:1511.02151 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Review of Jet Measurements in Heavy Ion Collisions

    M. Connors, C. Nattrass, R. Reed, and S. Salur, Jet measurements in heavy ion physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025005 (2018), arXiv:1705.01974 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Cunqueiro and A

    L. Cunqueiro and A. M. Sickles, Studying the QGP with JetsattheLHCandRHIC,Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys.124, 103940 (2022), arXiv:2110.14490 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Introductory lectures on jet quenching in heavy ion collisions

    J. Casalderrey-Solana and C. A. Salgado, Introductory lectures on jet quenching in heavy ion collisions, Acta Phys. Polon. B38, 3731 (2007), arXiv:0712.3443 [hep- 9 10 20 50 100 200 400 pT [GeV] 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 RAA 0-100% OO/pp @ 5.36 TeV inclusive jets / charged hadrons Rakt = 0.4, |η|< 2.1 EPPS21 + NLO QCD + coherent energy loss (+ NPC23) No...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  22. [22]

    Jet quenching

    D. d’Enterria, Jet quenching, Landolt-Bornstein23, 471 (2010), arXiv:0902.2011 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  23. [23]

    Jet physics in heavy-ion collisions

    Y. Mehtar-Tani, J. G. Milhano, and K. Tywoniuk, Jet physics in heavy-ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28, 1340013 (2013), arXiv:1302.2579 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    S. Cao, A. Majumder, R. Modarresi-Yazdi, I. Soudi, and Y. Tachibana, Jet Quenching: From Theory to Simulation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33, 2430002 (2024), arXiv:2401.10026 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Centrality and rapidity dependence of inclusive jet production in $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV proton-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Centrality and rapidity depen- dence of inclusive jet production in√sNN = 5.02TeV proton-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B748, 392 (2015), arXiv:1412.4092 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    Centrality dependence of charged jet production in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

    J. Adamet al.(ALICE), Centrality dependence of charged jet production in p-Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4107-8 (2016), arXiv:1603.03402 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4107-8 2016

  27. [27]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Measurement of inclu- sive charged-particle b-jet production in pp and p- Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, JHEP01, 178, arXiv:2110.06104 [nucl-ex]

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Measurement of inclu- sive charged-particle b-jet production in pp and p- Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, JHEP01, 178, arXiv:2110.06104 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Measurement of inclusive charged-particle jetproduction inppandp-Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, JHEP05, 041, arXiv:2307.10860 [nucl-ex]

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Measurement of inclusive charged-particle jetproduction inppandp-Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, JHEP05, 041, arXiv:2307.10860 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Transverse momentum and pro- cess dependent azimuthal anisotropies in√sNN = 8.16 TeVp+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector, Eur

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Transverse momentum and pro- cess dependent azimuthal anisotropies in√sNN = 8.16 TeVp+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 73 (2020), arXiv:1910.13978 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of the Sensitiv- ity of Two-Particle Correlations in pp Collisions to the Presence of Hard Scatterings, Phys

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of the Sensitiv- ity of Two-Particle Correlations in pp Collisions to the Presence of Hard Scatterings, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 162301 (2023), arXiv:2303.17357 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Chekhovskyet al.(CMS), Evidence for similar col- lectivity of high transverse momentum particles in pPb andPbPbcollisions, (2025),arXiv:2502.07525[nucl-ex]

    V. Chekhovskyet al.(CMS), Evidence for similar col- lectivity of high transverse momentum particles in pPb andPbPbcollisions, (2025),arXiv:2502.07525[nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    High $p_T$ Azimuthal Asymmetry in Non-central A+A at RHIC

    M. Gyulassy, I. Vitev, and X. N. Wang, High p(T) az- imuthal asymmetry in noncentral A+A at RHIC, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 2537 (2001), arXiv:nucl-th/0012092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  33. [33]

    Wang, Jet quenching and azimuthal anisotropy of large p(T) spectra in noncentral high-energy heavy ion collisions, Phys

    X.-N. Wang, Jet quenching and azimuthal anisotropy of large p(T) spectra in noncentral high-energy heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C63, 054902 (2001), arXiv:nucl- th/0009019

    work page arXiv 2001

  34. [34]

    Future physics opportunities for high-density QCD at the LHC with heavy-ion and proton beams

    Z. Citronet al., Report from Working Group 5: Future physics opportunities for high-density QCD at the LHC with heavy-ion and proton beams, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.7, 1159 (2019), arXiv:1812.06772 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Brewer, A

    J. Brewer, A. Mazeliauskas, and W. van der Schee, Op- portunities of OO andpO collisions at the LHC, inOp- portunities of OO and pO collisions at the LHC(2021) arXiv:2103.01939 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Loizides and A

    C. Loizides and A. Morsch, Absence of jet quenching in peripheral nucleus–nucleus collisions, Phys. Lett. B 773, 408 (2017), arXiv:1705.08856 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    J. Park, J. L. Nagle, D. V. Perepelitsa, S. Lim, and C. Loizides, Selection bias effects on high-p T yield and correlation measurements in Oxygen+Oxygen col- lisions, (2025), arXiv:2507.03603 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    U. Heinz and R. Snellings, Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.63, 123 (2013), arXiv:1301.2826 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  39. [39]

    C. Gale, S. Jeon, and B. Schenke, Hydrodynamic Mod- eling of Heavy-Ion Collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28, 1340011 (2013), arXiv:1301.5893 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  40. [40]

    Imprints of fluctuating proton shapes on flow in proton-lead collisions at the LHC

    H. Mäntysaari, B. Schenke, C. Shen, and P. Tribedy, Imprints of fluctuating proton shapes on flow in proton- lead collisions at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B772, 681 (2017), arXiv:1705.03177 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium -- Ten Years of Progress in Theory and Numerical Simulations of Nuclear Collisions

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke,Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium, Cambridge Mono- graphs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2019) arXiv:1712.05815 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    Mehtar-Tani, D

    Y. Mehtar-Tani, D. Pablos, and K. Tywoniuk, Cone- Size Dependence of Jet Suppression in Heavy-Ion 10 Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 252301 (2021), arXiv:2101.01742 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Takacs and K

    A. Takacs and K. Tywoniuk, Quenching effects in the cumulative jet spectrum, JHEP10, 038, arXiv:2103.14676 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    Mehtar-Tani, D

    Y. Mehtar-Tani, D. Pablos, and K. Tywoniuk, Jet sup- pression and azimuthal anisotropy from RHIC to LHC, Phys. Rev. D110, 014009 (2024), arXiv:2402.07869 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Mal- toni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07, 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

    C. Bierlichet al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codeb.2022, 8 (2022), arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune

    P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo, Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune, Eur. Phys. J. C74, 3024 (2014), arXiv:1404.5630 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  48. [48]

    Infrared safe definition of jet flavour

    A. Banfi, G. P. Salam, and G. Zanderighi, Infrared safe definition of jet flavor, Eur. Phys. J. C47, 113 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0601139

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  49. [49]

    K. J. Eskola, P. Paakkinen, H. Paukkunen, and C. A. Salgado, EPPS21: a global QCD analysis of nuclear PDFs, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 413 (2022), arXiv:2112.12462 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era

    A. Buckley, J. Ferrando, S. Lloyd, K. Nordström, B. Page, M. Rüfenacht, M. Schönherr, and G. Watt, LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 132 (2015), arXiv:1412.7420 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    J. Gao, C. Liu, X. Shen, H. Xing, and Y. Zhao, Global analysis of fragmentation functions to charged hadrons with high-precision data from the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 110, 114019 (2024), arXiv:2407.04422 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Mehtar-Tani, arXiv:1903.00506 [hep-ph]

    Y. Mehtar-Tani, Gluon bremsstrahlung in finite media beyond multiple soft scattering approximation, JHEP 07, 057, arXiv:1903.00506 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1903

  53. [53]

    J. a. Barata, Y. Mehtar-Tani, A. Soto-Ontoso, and K. Tywoniuk, Revisiting transverse momentum broad- ening in dense QCD media, Phys. Rev. D104, 054047 (2021), arXiv:2009.13667 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Jet Structure in Heavy Ion Collisions

    J.-P. Blaizot and Y. Mehtar-Tani, Jet Structure in Heavy Ion Collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E24, 1530012 (2015), arXiv:1503.05958 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    Conical Flow induced by Quenched QCD Jets

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, E. V. Shuryak, and D. Teaney, Conical flow induced by quenched QCD jets, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.27, 22 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0411315

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  56. [56]

    P. M. Chesler and L. G. Yaffe, The Wake of a quark moving through a strongly-coupled plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 152001 (2007), arXiv:0706.0368 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  57. [57]

    Vacuum-like jet fragmentation in a dense QCD medium

    P. Caucal, E. Iancu, A. H. Mueller, and G. Soyez, Vacuum-like jet fragmentation in a dense QCD medium, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 232001 (2018), arXiv:1801.09703 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Sudakov suppression of jets in QCD media

    Y. Mehtar-Tani and K. Tywoniuk, Sudakov suppression of jets in QCD media, Phys. Rev. D98, 051501 (2018), arXiv:1707.07361 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Antiangular Ordering of Gluon Radiation in QCD Media

    Y. Mehtar-Tani, C. A. Salgado, and K. Tywoniuk, Anti- angular ordering of gluon radiation in QCD media, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 122002 (2011), arXiv:1009.2965 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  60. [60]

    Jets in QCD media: from color coherence to decoherence

    Y. Mehtar-Tani, C. A. Salgado, and K. Tywoniuk, Jets in QCD Media: From Color Coherence to Decoherence, Phys. Lett. B707, 156 (2012), arXiv:1102.4317 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  61. [61]

    Interference effects in medium-induced gluon radiation

    J. Casalderrey-Solana and E. Iancu, Interference ef- fectsinmedium-inducedgluonradiation,JHEP08,015, arXiv:1105.1760 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    Mäntysaari, B

    H. Mäntysaari, B. Schenke, C. Shen, and W. Zhao, Collision-Energy Dependence in Heavy-Ion Collisions from Nonlinear QCD Evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 022302 (2025), arXiv:2502.05138 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    An Impact Parameter Dipole Saturation Model

    H. Kowalski and D. Teaney, An Impact parameter dipole saturation model, Phys. Rev. D68, 114005 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0304189

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  64. [64]

    Schlichting and D

    S. Schlichting and D. Teaney, The First fm/c of Heavy- IonCollisions,Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci.69,447(2019), arXiv:1908.02113 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    Berges, M

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venu- gopalan, QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035003 (2021), arXiv:2005.12299 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    Andres, N

    C. Andres, N. Armesto, H. Niemi, R. Paatelainen, and C. A. Salgado, Jet quenching as a probe of the initial stages in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B803, 135318 (2020), arXiv:1902.03231 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    Stojku, J

    S. Stojku, J. Auvinen, M. Djordjevic, P. Huovinen, and M. Djordjevic, Early evolution constrained by high-p⊥ quark-gluon plasma tomography, Phys. Rev. C105, L021901 (2022), arXiv:2008.08987 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    A. Ipp, D. I. Müller, and D. Schuh, Jet momentum broadening in the pre-equilibrium Glasma, Phys. Lett. B810, 135810 (2020), arXiv:2009.14206 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    Avramescu, V

    D. Avramescu, V. Băran, V. Greco, A. Ipp, D. I. Müller, and M. Ruggieri, Simulating jets and heavy quarks in the glasma using the colored particle-in-cell method, Phys. Rev. D107, 114021 (2023), arXiv:2303.05599 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Boguslavski, A

    K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, F. Lindenbauer, and J. Peuron, Jet momentum broadening during initial stages in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B850, 138525 (2024), arXiv:2303.12595 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Boguslavski, A

    K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, F. Linden- bauer, and J. Peuron, Jet quenching parameter in QCD kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. D110, 034019 (2024), arXiv:2312.00447 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Matching the Nonequilibrium Initial Stage of Heavy Ion Collisions to Hydrodynamics with QCD Kinetic Theory

    A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, S. Schlicht- ing, and D. Teaney, Matching the Nonequilibrium Ini- tial Stage of Heavy Ion Collisions to Hydrodynamics withQCDKineticTheory,Phys.Rev.Lett.122,122302 (2019), arXiv:1805.01604 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    Effective kinetic description of event-by-event pre-equilibrium dynamics in high-energy heavy-ion collisions

    A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, S. Schlicht- ing, and D. Teaney, Effective kinetic description of event-by-event pre-equilibrium dynamics in high-energy heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C99, 034910 (2019), arXiv:1805.00961 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    Prescaling and far-from-equilibrium hydrodynamics in the quark-gluon plasma

    A. Mazeliauskas and J. Berges, Prescaling and far-from- equilibrium hydrodynamics in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 122301 (2019), arXiv:1810.10554 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  75. [75]

    Kurkela, W

    A. Kurkela, W. van der Schee, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, Early- and Late-Time Behavior of Attractors in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 102301 (2020), arXiv:1907.08101 [hep-ph]. 11

    work page arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    Almaalol, A

    D. Almaalol, A. Kurkela, and M. Strickland, Nonequi- librium Attractor in High-Temperature QCD Plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 122302 (2020), arXiv:2004.05195 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    Soloviev, Hydrodynamic attractors in heavy ion collisions: a review, Eur

    A. Soloviev, Hydrodynamic attractors in heavy ion col- lisions: a review, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 319 (2022), arXiv:2109.15081 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Giacalone, A

    G. Giacalone, A. Mazeliauskas, and S. Schlichting, Hy- drodynamic attractors, initial state energy and particle production in relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 262301 (2019), arXiv:1908.02866 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  79. [79]

    Garcia-Montero, A

    O. Garcia-Montero, A. Mazeliauskas, P. Plaschke, and S. Schlichting, Pre-equilibrium photons from the early stages of heavy-ion collisions, JHEP03, 053, arXiv:2308.09747 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    Initial conditions for hydrodynamics from weakly coupled pre-equilibrium evolution

    L. Keegan, A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, and D. Teaney, Initial conditions for hydrodynamics from weakly coupled pre-equilibrium evolution, JHEP08, 171, arXiv:1605.04287 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.