REVIEW 2 cited by
Chain-of-Discussion: A Multi-Model Framework for Complex Evidence-Based Question Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Open-ended question answering requires models to find appropriate evidence to form wellreasoned, comprehensive and helpful answers. In practical applications, models also need to engage in extended discussions on potential scenarios closely relevant to the question. With augmentation of retrieval module, open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) can produce coherent answers often with different focuses, but are still sub-optimal in terms of reliable evidence selection and in-depth question analysis. In this paper, we propose a novel Chain-ofDiscussion framework to leverage the synergy among multiple open-source LLMs aiming to provide more correct and more comprehensive answers for open-ended QA, although they are not strong enough individually. Our experiments show that discussions among multiple LLMs play a vital role in enhancing the quality of answers.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MinosEval: Distinguishing Factoid and Non-Factoid for Tailored Open-Ended QA Evaluation with LLMs
MinosEval improves open-ended QA evaluation by sorting questions into factoid and non-factoid and applying tailored scoring, outperforming baselines on four datasets.
-
An Empirical Study of Evaluating Long-form Question Answering
In long-form QA, LLM-based evaluators correlate with human judgments better than ROUGE or BERTScore, but they are biased by answer length, question type, self-reinforcement, and rare-word usage, and fine-grained promp...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.