Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Constancy of the Cluster Gas Mass Fraction in the R_h=ct Universe

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1601.04649 v1 pith:MTVPKYYV submitted 2016-01-18 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEhep-ph

Constancy of the Cluster Gas Mass Fraction in the R_h=ct Universe

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEhep-ph
keywords lcdmconstantmassfractionuniverseassumedbaryoniccluster
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The ratio of baryonic to dark matter densities is assumed to have remained constant throughout the formation of structure. With this, simulations show that the fraction f_gas(z) of baryonic mass to total mass in galaxy clusters should be nearly constant with redshift z. However, the measurement of these quantities depends on the angular distance to the source, which evolves with z according to the assumed background cosmology. An accurate determination of f_gas(z) for a large sample of hot (kT_e > 5 keV), dynamically relaxed clusters could therefore be used as a probe of the cosmological expansion up to z < 2. The fraction f_gas(z) would remain constant only when the "correct" cosmology is used to fit the data. In this paper, we compare the predicted gas mass fractions for both LCDM and the R_h=ct Universe and test them against the 3 largest cluster samples. We show that R_h=ct is consistent with a constant f_gas in the redshift range z < 2, as was previously shown for the reference LCDM model (with parameter values H_0=70 km/s/Mpc, Omega_m=0.3 and w_de=-1). Unlike LCDM, however, the R_h=ct Universe has no free parameters to optimize in fitting the data. Model selection tools, such as the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayes Information Criterion (BIC), therefore tend to favour R_h=ct over LCDM. For example, the BIC favours R_h=ct with a likelihood of ~95% versus ~5% for LCDM.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Joint constraints on $R_h=ct$ cosmology from DESI DR2 BAO, CC, and SN\textit{Ia} Pantheon$^+$ sample

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0

    ΛCDM fits the joint DESI DR2 BAO + Pantheon+ + cosmic-chronometer data better than the coasting R_h=ct model, which yields an older universe and a lower fitted H0.