REVIEW 3 cited by
Improving Weak PINNs for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws: Dual Norm Computation, Boundary Conditions and Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We consider the approximation of entropy solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws using neural networks. We provide explicit computations that highlight why classical PINNs will not work for discontinuous solutions to nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws and show that weak (dual) norms of the PDE residual should be used in the loss functional. This approach has been termed "weak PINNs" recently. We suggest some modifications to weak PINNs that make their training easier, which leads to smaller errors with less training, as shown by numerical experiments. Additionally, we extend wPINNs to scalar conservation laws with weak boundary data and to systems of hyperbolic conservation laws. We perform numerical experiments in order to assess the accuracy and efficiency of the extended method.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Efficient Weak-Entropy PINN for Solving Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
WEPINN enforces weak formulation and entropy condition with trigonometric test functions and fast Fourier transform integration, resolving shocks and rarefactions in conservation laws more accurately than Diff-PINN, V...
-
Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Speech Production
A physics-informed neural network with differentiable glottal closure, learnable period, and hard glottis-tract coupling solves forward and inverse two-mass vocal fold plus vocal-tract problems.
-
Discontinuity-aware KAN-based physics-informed neural networks
A discontinuity-aware PINN with adaptive Fourier features, DyT-plus-spline KAN activations, and learned local viscosity captures shocks with errors between 0.9% and 5% on benchmark PDEs and airfoil flows.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.