REVIEW 2 cited by
TradExpert: Revolutionizing Trading with Mixture of Expert LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the financial domain has opened new avenues for quantitative trading, particularly through the use of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the challenge of effectively synthesizing insights from diverse data sources and integrating both structured and unstructured data persists. This paper presents TradeExpert, a novel framework that employs a mix of experts (MoE) approach, using four specialized LLMs, each analyzing distinct sources of financial data, including news articles, market data, alpha factors, and fundamental data. The insights of these expert LLMs are further synthesized by a General Expert LLM to make a final prediction or decision. With specific prompts, TradeExpert can be switched between the prediction mode and the ranking mode for stock movement prediction and quantitative stock trading, respectively. In addition to existing benchmarks, we also release a large-scale financial dataset to comprehensively evaluate TradeExpert's effectiveness. Our experimental results demonstrate TradeExpert's superior performance across all trading scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
From Bias to Behavior: Learning Bull-Bear Market Dynamics with Contrastive Modeling
A contrastive model, B4, jointly learns price and news representations split into bullish and bearish camps, claiming better trend prediction and interpretable bias dynamics.
-
To Trade or Not to Trade: An Agentic Approach to Estimating Market Risk Improves Trading Decisions
LLM-discovered stochastic models of price paths provide risk metrics that improve trader-agent decisions, raising average Sharpe ratios from 0.88 to 1.40 in the paper's backtests.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.