Difference-in-Differences Estimators with Continuous Treatments and no Stayers
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:MYESOEFVrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Many treatments or policy interventions are continuous in nature. Examples include prices, taxes or temperatures. Empirical researchers have usually relied on two-way fixed effect regressions to estimate treatment effects in such cases. However, such estimators are not robust to heterogeneous treatment effects in general; they also rely on the linearity of treatment effects. We propose estimators for continuous treatments that do not impose those restrictions, and that can be used when there are no stayers: the treatment of all units changes from one period to the next. We start by extending the nonparametric results of de Chaisemartin et al. (2023) to cases without stayers. We also present a parametric estimator, and use it to revisit Desch\^enes and Greenstone (2012).
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.