Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Two-dimensional Anomaly, Orbifolding, and Boundary States

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single modular criterion, $\tilde{D} = I_{|G|}$, decides whether a discrete symmetry in a 2D rational conformal field theory is anomalous.

desk verdict A useful, clearly-written conjecture for detecting zero-form anomalies in 2D RCFTs, with a load-bearing truncation step that is asserted rather than proven. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02918 v2 pith:N2BYVJ6Q submitted 2019-08-08 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elquant-ph

Ken Kikuchi , Yang Zhou This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elquant-ph MSC 81T4081R10 PACS 11.25.Hf11.30.-j
keywords tHooftanomalyrationalconformalfieldtheorytopologicaldefectlinestwistedtoruspartitionfunctionmodularS-matrixWess-Zumino-Wittenmodelorbifoldingboundarystates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a direct test for whether a discrete internal symmetry $G$ of a two-dimensional rational conformal field theory (RCFT) carries a 't Hooft anomaly. The test places the theory on a torus, inserts the symmetry lines for elements $h$ and $h'$ along the two cycles, applies the modular $S$-transformation, and asks whether the twisted partition function $Z(h,h')$ is exchanged into $Z(h',h)$. The paper argues that the answer is controlled by a phase-mismatch matrix $D$, and that after truncating to the subspace spanned by topological defect lines the symmetry is anomaly-free exactly when $\tilde{D} = I_{|G|}$. Applied to Wess-Zumino-Witten models this reproduces the known anomaly-free level conditions, and applied to minimal models it detects a $\mathbb{Z}_3$ anomaly in the three-state Potts model. The criterion matters because it transplants the linking detection of one-form anomalies from three-dimensional Chern-Simons theory to two dimensions, and it ties anomaly freedom to orbifoldability and to the existence of invariant boundary states.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the twisted torus partition function $Z(h,h')$ with topological defect lines for $h$ and $h'$ inserted along the two cycles, together with the modular $S$-transformation that exchanges the cycles. The paper tracks the phase mismatch between $Z(h,h)$ and $S Z(h,h)$ as a unitary matrix $D$; because only the primaries that are topological defect lines (Verlinde lines) are expected to control the anomaly, $D$ is truncated to the block $\tilde{D}$ spanned by those primaries, and anomaly freedom is $\tilde{D} = I_{|G|}$. For WZW models, the computation reduces to scalar products of affine weights: with $A$ the outer automorphism corresponding to $h$, the phases are $e^{2\pi i(A\hat{\omega}_0, A\hat{\mu} + \hat{\mu})}$ on the truncated block, which is where the level conditions come from. The same machinery, read through modular $T$-transformations, yields the orbifolding condition, and through Cardy states it yields the invariant-boundary-state condition.

What would settle it

Compute the full, untruncated phase-mismatch matrix $D$ for a case where the criterion says anomaly-free but the full matrix is not the identity—for example, $\mathfrak{su}(3)_3$ WZW, where $\tilde{D}=I_3$ while the full $D$ contains $\omega$ and $\omega^2$ entries—and demonstrate that one of those discarded phases has a physical consequence, such as obstructing a boundary condition or a gauging. That would show the truncation misses real anomalies. Alternatively, produce a diagonal RCFT with $\tilde{D}=I_{|G|}$ whose $\mathbb{Z}_3$ gauging is inconsistent in a sector twisted by a non-generator element, which would falsify the criterion directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a consistency condition: for a diagonal RCFT with discrete Abelian symmetry $G$ realized by invertible topological defect lines, the theory is free of the anomaly if and only if $S Z(h,h')|_{\text{trunc}} = Z(h',h)|_{\text{trunc}}$, equivalently $\tilde{D} = I_{|G|}$, where $\tilde{D}$ is the phase mismatch between $Z(h,h)$ and $S Z(h,h)$ restricted to the $|G| \times |G|$ block of primaries that are topological defect lines. The anomaly is interpreted as the noncommutativity of the two symmetry-line insertions, i.e., a mixed 't Hooft anomaly between $G$ and its S-dual (the outer automorphism group in WZW models). The paper verifies the criterion on all simple WZW algebras and several minimal models, obtaining the anomaly-free levels $k \in (r+1)\mathbb{Z}$ for $\mathfrak{su}(r+1)$, $k \in \mathbb{Z}$ for $\mathfrak{so}(2r+1)$, $rk \in 2\mathbb{Z}$ for $\mathfrak{sp}(2r)$, $lk \in 2\mathbb{Z}$ for $\mathfrak{so}(4l)$, $k \in 4\mathbb{Z}$ for $\mathfrak{so}(4l+2)$, $k \in 3\mathbb{Z}$ for $E_6$, and $k \in 2\mathbb{Z}$ for $E_7$, and it detects a $\mathbb{Z}_3$ anomaly in the three-state Potts model. It also establishes a chain of relations, $H$-edgeable (admitting a boundary state preserving $H$) iff $H$-anomaly-decoupled $\subset$ $H$-anomaly-free $\subset$ $H$-orbifoldable, supporting the conjecture that an invariant boundary state implies the symmetry is decoupled from all anomalies.

Load-bearing premise

The whole test rests on the assumption that restricting the phase-mismatch matrix to the topological-defect-line subspace is sufficient to detect the anomaly; if an anomaly can hide in the discarded primaries, or if the ordering of the two line insertions that underlies the criterion is not well defined in some RCFT, every derived anomaly-free condition could be wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every simple WZW algebra the criterion pins anomaly freedom to a single divisibility condition on the level, e.g., $k\in(r+1)\mathbb{Z}$ for $\mathfrak{su}(r+1)$ and $k\in 4\mathbb{Z}$ for $\mathfrak{so}(4l+2)$, so anomaly detection becomes a modular arithmetic question.
  • Anomaly freedom is strictly stronger than orbifoldability: the modular $T$-consistency condition $Z(h^N,h)=Z(1,h)$ can be satisfied while the $S$-based condition fails, as happens for some center subgroups.
  • The criterion detects anomalies in minimal models too: the three-state Potts model's $\mathbb{Z}_3$ is judged anomalous, matching the entropic criterion $\ln 3$ from the reduced modular $S$-matrix.
  • Existence of an $H$-invariant boundary state implies $H$ is anomaly-decoupled; for the full center of WZW models, edgeable with $\Gamma$ is equivalent to $\Gamma$ anomaly-free.
  • For $\mathfrak{so}(4l)$ WZW models, turning on nondiagonal twisted sectors isolates a purely mixed anomaly between the two $\mathbb{Z}_2$ factors when $l$ is even and $k$ is odd.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Our inference: if the truncation is justified, the criterion gives a cheap anomaly detector for any diagonal RCFT with Verlinde lines—only the $|G|^2$ character products on the topological block need to be computed.
  • Our inference: the S-dual interpretation suggests that in any diagonal RCFT the anomaly-free levels are exactly those for which the gauged (orbifolded) theory preserves the outer automorphism group; checking this in coset or orbifold models beyond WZW would test the picture.
  • Our inference: the paper only claims the chain of relations for symmetries captured by Verlinde lines; extending the criterion to non-invertible or non-Abelian defect lines, or to non-diagonal modular invariants, would require a definition of ordering that the current argument does not supply.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a criterion for detecting 't Hooft anomalies of discrete internal symmetries in two-dimensional diagonal rational conformal field theories. The criterion is that a symmetry G is anomaly-free iff the modular S-transformation preserves the twisted torus partition function restricted to the topological defect lines of G, equivalently the truncated phase-mismatch matrix satisfies ~D = I_{|G|} (Eqs. (1.1) and (2.17)). The authors test this criterion on WZW models for all simple Lie algebras, obtaining the level conditions k in (r+1)Z for su(r+1), k in Z for so(2r+1), rk in 2Z for sp(2r), lk in 2Z for so(4l), k in 4Z for so(4l+2), k in 3Z for E6, and k in 2Z for E7, and on minimal models, including a claimed Z3 anomaly in the three-state Potts model. They also relate the anomaly-free condition to orbifoldability and to the existence of invariant Cardy boundary states, and they argue for the chain of implications H-edgeable iff H-anomaly-decoupled, which implies H-anomaly-free, which implies H-orbifoldable.

Significance. If the criterion (2.17) is correct, this is a useful and practical way to detect mixed 't Hooft anomalies in a large class of RCFTs directly from modular data, and the paper's many explicit WZW and minimal-model computations give strong evidence for it. The relation between invariant boundary states and anomaly decoupling is also valuable and is supported by a case-by-case proof for WZW models. The principal caveats are that the criterion is proposed, not derived; that the truncation to the defect-line subspace is not proved; and that one row of Table 1 depends on an unpublished companion paper. The explicit computations and the boundary-state equivalence are real strengths, but the central claim needs additional support before the paper can be accepted as a definitive result.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.1.2, §2.2, Eq. (2.17)] The central criterion (2.17) is applied not to the full phase-mismatch matrix D but to the truncated matrix ~D restricted to primaries that are topological defect lines. The only justification offered is that this truncation is 'in the same spirit as [17]' (Sec. 2.1.2), and no proof is given that phases in the discarded non-defect sectors cannot contribute to or mix with the anomaly. The SU(3)_3 example is a direct illustration: the full D matrix is non-identity on several non-defect primaries while the truncated ~D is the identity, so the anomaly-free conclusion is entirely determined by the truncation. Since all level conditions in Table 1 and the Z3 result for the three-state Potts model rest on (2.17), the truncation step is load-bearing and should be either proved or replaced by an independent full-Hilbert-space invariant.
  2. [§3.4, Appendix C, Eqs. (3.10)-(3.13)] The D_{2l} row of Table 1 and the mixed-anomaly interpretation for so(4l) models depend on the 'nondiagonally twisted partition functions' Z(h,~h) and Z(~h,h) in Eqs. (3.10)-(3.13), which are obtained from the generalized orbifolding formalism of the unpublished reference [43]. These expressions are necessary for the claimed anomaly-free condition k in 2Z and for the equivalence (3.14), but a referee cannot verify them from the present text. The authors should either include a self-contained derivation in the paper or cite a publicly available version of [43].
  3. [§1, §2.4, Eqs. (1.1), (2.17)] The paper presents (1.1)/(2.17) as a proposal motivated by a picture of ordering of defect-line insertions, not as a derived equivalence with a standard definition of an 't Hooft anomaly. The interpretation of the failure of S-invariance as a mixed anomaly between G and its 'S-dual' is supported only by the orbifold examples (2.42)-(2.44) and by consistency with [17,22]. Since this is the central claim, the manuscript should either provide a derivation from an accepted anomaly invariant (for example a group-cohomology or inflow construction) or explicitly frame (2.17) as a conjecture and supply independent checks that do not rely primarily on the same group's earlier work.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.3.3, §2.3.4] Both subsections are titled with 'M(6,5)' even though one is labelled tetracritical Ising and the other three-state Potts; this looks like a mislabelling and should be corrected or clarified.
  2. [Eqs. (2.15), (2.16), (2.23), (2.40)] Several matrices are printed as vertical lists of entries rather than as standard matrices, which makes them very hard to read; the authors should use conventional diagonal-matrix or full-matrix notation.
  3. [§3.7, Table 1] The column header 'CS3' in Table 1 is never defined; if it denotes the orbifold consistency condition, this should be stated explicitly.
  4. [§2.3.4, Eq. (2.41)] Equation (2.41) appears without an introductory sentence immediately after the entropy computation; please explain what ~Z_Z3 represents and why it is displayed at that point.
  5. [§2.4, 'S-dual'] The term 'S-dual' is used in quotes but never precisely defined; since it is central to the proposed interpretation, a concise definition or a reference to the mechanism by which it acts on states would help.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central criterion relies on a truncation imported from the authors' own prior work, and the D_{2l} row depends on an unpublished self-citation; independent boundary-state checks keep the result partially grounded.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 2.1.2 (SU(3)_k WZW), around Eq. (2.17)]
    "How should we detect the anomaly from this result? As mentioned earlier we should truncate our matrix D to ~D in the current case. This is in the same spirit as [17]. Truncation means that examining only those characters of primaries corresponding to topological defect lines of Z3 symmetry."

    Eq. (2.17) defines anomaly-freedom by the truncated matrix ~D, restricted to topological-defect-line primaries. No proof is given that discarded non-defect sectors are irrelevant; the paper instead says the truncation is 'in the same spirit as [17]', and [17] (Hung-Wu-Zhou) shares an author with this paper. This is load-bearing: in SU(3)_3 the full D has non-identity entries on discarded primaries while ~D is identity, so the anomaly-free verdict is fixed by the truncation choice. The criterion thus rests on a self-citation rather than on an independent derivation.

  2. self citation load bearing [Sec. 3.4 (D_{2l} WZW), Eqs. (3.10)-(3.13), with reference [43]]
    "All twisted partition functions one can compute in the conventional formulation [35] is of the form Z(h^l,h) where h∈Z_N and l=0,1,...,N−1. That is why we have so far only computed 'diagonally twisted partition functions' Z(h,h). However, using the generalized formalism [43], one can also compute twisted partition functions including 'nondiagonally twisted partition functions' Z(h_t,h_x)."

    The D_{2l} row of Table 1 is computed from Z(h,~h) and Z(~h,h), which are imported from reference [43], an unpublished 'to appear' paper by one of the present authors. The paper does not derive these partition functions, so the k∈2Z mixed-anomaly conclusion cannot be checked from the text; the row inherits its content from the author's own unpublished citation.

full rationale

The paper is not circular in its boundary-state and orbifold sections: the Cardy-state analysis is standard technology and independently reproduces the level conditions, giving the central claim genuine external grounding. The anomaly-free conditions are computed, not fitted, and no parameters are tuned. However, the proposed criterion (2.17) is made operational by a truncation to topological-defect-line primaries whose sufficiency is asserted 'in the same spirit as [17]' — a paper by Hung, Wu, and Zhou, overlapping with the present authors — without proof. In the SU(3)_3 example, the full phase-mismatch matrix is non-identity away from the truncated subspace, so the anomaly-free conclusion is entirely determined by the truncation. Additionally, the D_{2l} mixed-anomaly computation relies on twisted partition functions from the authors' own unpublished paper [43]. These are load-bearing self-citations. Because the criterion still has independent support from invariant boundary states and from explicit S-matrix computations in the untruncated formulas, the circularity is partial, not total.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central criterion is a proposed definition backed by examples, not a derived theorem. It relies on standard RCFT technology (modular S-matrix, Verlinde lines, Cardy states), on the phases from [35], on the unproven sufficiency of truncation to defect lines, and on the unpublished generalized orbifolding formalism [43]. No free parameters are fitted.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Modular S-transformations and the Verlinde formula for diagonal RCFTs are valid.
    Used throughout Sec. 2 to compute SZ(h,h) and to identify topological defect lines with primaries; see Eqs. (2.19), (2.20), and Sec. 2.3.
  • standard math The phase relation b_i A' = A' b_i exp(-2 pi i k (A_i omega_0, A' omega_0)) from [35] (Eq. (17.31)) holds.
    Used in Sec. 3.7 and Appendix B to prove anomaly decoupling from invariant boundary states; Eq. (3.16).
  • domain assumption An existence of an H-invariant Cardy state implies H is anomaly-decoupled (conjecture of [22]); this paper proves the direction (=>) for WZW and assumes the physical identification of boundary states with Cardy states.
    Sec. 3 and Appendix B support the conjecture; the identification of edgeable with existence of invariant Cardy state is assumed following [20,21].
  • ad hoc to paper The generalized orbifolding formalism of [43] (to appear) correctly describes nondiagonally twisted partition functions for D2l WZW models.
    Sec. 3.4.1 relies on Eqs. (3.10)-(3.13) from [43] to compute the mixed Z2 x Z2 anomaly; the reference is unpublished and by one of the authors.
  • ad hoc to paper The anomaly criterion can be truncated to the defect-line subspace without losing information.
    The criterion (2.17) uses the truncated matrix ~D; the sufficiency of truncation is stated 'in the same spirit as [17]' (Sec. 2.2) but not proven.
  • domain assumption The 'totalitarian principle': all affine dominant weights in P+^k are present in the spectrum and can be used to build boundary states.
    Used in Appendix B to argue that once the level satisfies the anomaly-free condition, an invariant boundary state necessarily exists because P+^k is exhaustive; Eq. (2.8).
invented entities (1)
  • 'S-dual' global symmetry (dual of the internal discrete symmetry G)
    purpose: To interpret the anomaly detected by criterion (1.1) as a mixed anomaly between G and its S-dual; in WZW the S-dual is the outer automorphism group O(g-hat), in minimal models it is inferred from fusion rules.
    Sec. 2.4 proposes the interpretation; for minimal models the S-dual is constructed by analogy (fusion-rule automorphisms), but no independent observable or measurement is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two-dimensional Anomaly, Orbifolding, and Boundary States." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N2BYVJ6Q

@misc{pith2026190802918,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two-dimensional Anomaly, Orbifolding, and Boundary States},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N2BYVJ6Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02918}
}
abstract

We study anomalies of discrete internal global symmetry $G$ in two-dimensional rational conformal field theories based on twisted torus partition functions. The anomaly of $G$ can be seen from the noncommutativity of two symmetry lines inserted along the nontrivial cycles of two-torus and we propose a criterion to detect the anomaly, which agrees with the truncated modular $S$-matrix approach. The obstruction for orbifolding has been recently interpreted as a mixed anomaly between $G$ and large diffeomorphisms. We clarify the relations among anomaly-free conditions, orbifoldable conditions, and invariant boundary state condition, focusing on Wess-Zumino-Witten models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gauging or extending bulk and boundary conformal field theories: Application to bulk and domain wall problem in topological matter and their descriptions by (mock) modular covariant

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    New classes of boundary and coupled conformal field theories are constructed from Z_N gauging, with a proposed dictionary to topological order, nonchiral anyons, and domain walls.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [17]

    Linking Entanglement and Discrete Anomaly,

    L. Y. Hung, Y. S. Wu and Y. Zhou, “Linking Entanglement and Discrete Anomaly,” JHEP 1805, 008 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2018)008 [arXiv:1801.04538 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2018

  2. [43]

    Orbifolding D2l type WZW model,

    K. Kikuchi, “Orbifolding D2l type WZW model,” to appear

    work page

  3. [18]

    Anomalies and Bounds on Charged Operators,

    Y. H. Lin and S. H. Shao, “Anomalies and Bounds on Charged Operators,” arXiv:1904.04833 [hep-th]. – 42 –

    arXiv 1904

  4. [1]

    Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,” NATO Sci. Ser. B 59, 135 (1980). doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7571-5 9

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7571-5 1980

  5. [2]

    Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature,

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, Z. Komargodski and N. Seiberg, “Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature,” JHEP 1705, 091 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)091 [arXiv:1703.00501 [hep-th]]. – 41 –

    arXiv 2017

  6. [3]

    t Hooft anomalies and boundaries,

    K. Jensen, E. Shaverin and A. Yarom, “t Hooft anomalies and boundaries,” JHEP 1801, 085 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2018)085 [arXiv:1710.07299 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [4]

    Time-reversal breaking in QCD 4, walls, and dualities in 2 + 1 dimensions,

    D. Gaiotto, Z. Komargodski and N. Seiberg, “Time-reversal breaking in QCD 4, walls, and dualities in 2 + 1 dimensions,” JHEP 1801, 110 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2018)110 [arXiv:1708.06806 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2018

  8. [5]

    Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group,

    X. Chen, Z. C. Gu, Z. X. Liu and X. G. Wen, “Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group,” Phys. Rev. B 87, no. 15, 155114 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.155114 [arXiv:1106.4772 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    arXiv 2013

Show all 43 references
  1. [6]

    Quantized topological terms in weak-coupling gauge theories with a global symmetry and their connection to symmetry-enriched topological phases,

    L. Y. Hung and X. G. Wen, “Quantized topological terms in weak-coupling gauge theories with a global symmetry and their connection to symmetry-enriched topological phases,” Phys. Rev. B 87, no. 16, 165107 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.165107 [arXiv:1212.1827 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    2013 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,” Phys. Lett. 37B, 95 (1971). doi:10.1016/0370-2693(71)90582-X

    1971 doi

  3. [8]

    Algebraic and Hamiltonian Methods in the Theory of Nonabelian Anomalies,

    L. D. Faddeev and S. L. Shatashvili, “Algebraic and Hamiltonian Methods in the Theory of Nonabelian Anomalies,” Theor. Math. Phys. 60, 770 (1985) [Teor. Mat. Fiz. 60, 206 (1984)]. doi:10.1007/BF01018976

    1985 doi

  4. [9]

    Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls,

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and J. A. Harvey, “Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls,” Nucl. Phys. B 250, 427 (1985). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90489-4

    1985 doi

  5. [10]

    Anomalies of discrete symmetries in various dimensions and group cohomology,

    A. Kapustin and R. Thorngren, “Anomalies of discrete symmetries in various dimensions and group cohomology,” arXiv:1404.3230 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  6. [11]

    Generalized Global Symmetries,

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,” JHEP 1502, 172 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)172 [arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,

    C. M. Chang, Y. H. Lin, S. H. Shao, Y. Wang and X. Yin, “Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,” JHEP 1901, 026 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)026 [arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [13]

    On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions,

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, “On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions,” JHEP 1803, 189 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2018)189 [arXiv:1704.02330 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [14]

    Exploring 2-Group Global Symmetries,

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu and K. Intriligator, “Exploring 2-Group Global Symmetries,” JHEP 1902, 184 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)184 [arXiv:1802.04790 [hep-th]]; F. Benini, C. Cordova and P. S. Hsin, “On 2-Group Global Symmetries and their Anomalies,” JHEP 1903, 118 (201...

    2019 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity,

    D. Harlow and H. Ooguri, “Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity,” arXiv:1810.05338 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  11. [16]

    Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,

    E. Witten, “Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,” Commun. Math. Phys. 121, 351 (1989). doi:10.1007/BF01217730

    1989 doi

  12. [19]

    Non-invertible anomalies and mapping-class-group transformation of anomalous partition functions,

    W. Ji and X. G. Wen, “Non-invertible anomalies and mapping-class-group transformation of anomalous partition functions,” arXiv:1905.13279 [cond-mat.str-el]

    1905 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Mixed global anomalies and boundary conformal field theories,

    T. Numasawa and S. Yamaguch, “Mixed global anomalies and boundary conformal field theories,” JHEP 1811, 202 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2018)202 [arXiv:1712.09361 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Boundary conformal field theory and symmetry protected topological phases in 2 + 1 dimensions,

    B. Han, A. Tiwari, C. T. Hsieh and S. Ryu, “Boundary conformal field theory and symmetry protected topological phases in 2 + 1 dimensions,” Phys. Rev. B 96, no. 12, 125105 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.125105 [arXiv:1704.01193 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [22]

    3 d One-form Mixed Anomaly and Entanglement Entropy,

    Y. Zhou, “3 d One-form Mixed Anomaly and Entanglement Entropy,” arXiv:1904.06924 [hep-th]

    1904 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D Conformal Field Theory,

    E. P. Verlinde, “Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D Conformal Field Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 300, 360 (1988). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90603-7

    1988 doi

  17. [24]

    Generalized twisted partition functions,

    V. B. Petkova and J. B. Zuber, “Generalized twisted partition functions,” Phys. Lett. B 504, 157 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00276-3 [hep-th/0011021]

    2001 arXiv

  18. [25]

    TFT construction of RCFT correlators 1. Partition functions,

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, “TFT construction of RCFT correlators 1. Partition functions,” Nucl. Phys. B 646, 353 (2002) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00744-7 [hep-th/0204148]

    2002 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Kramers-Wannier duality from conformal defects,

    J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, “Kramers-Wannier duality from conformal defects,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 070601 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.070601 [cond-mat/0404051]

    2004 arXiv

  20. [27]

    TFT construction of RCFT correlators. 2. Unoriented world sheets,

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, “TFT construction of RCFT correlators. 2. Unoriented world sheets,” Nucl. Phys. B 678, 511 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2003.11.026 [hep-th/0306164]

    2004 arXiv

  21. [28]

    TFT construction of RCFT correlators. 3. Simple currents,

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, “TFT construction of RCFT correlators. 3. Simple currents,” Nucl. Phys. B 694, 277 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.05.014 [hep-th/0403157]

    2004 arXiv

  22. [29]

    TFT construction of RCFT correlators IV: Structure constants and correlation functions,

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, “TFT construction of RCFT correlators IV: Structure constants and correlation functions,” Nucl. Phys. B 715, 539 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.03.018 [hep-th/0412290]

    2005 arXiv

  23. [30]

    TFT construction of RCFT correlators. V. Proof of modular invariance and factorisation,

    J. Fjelstad, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, “TFT construction of RCFT correlators. V. Proof of modular invariance and factorisation,” Theor. Appl. Categor. 16, 342 (2006) [hep-th/0503194]

    2006 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Topological and conformal field theory as Frobenius algebras,

    I. Runkel, J. Fjelstad, J. Fuchs and C. Schweigert, “Topological and conformal field theory as Frobenius algebras,” Contemp. Math. 431, 225 (2007) [math/0512076 [math-ct]]

    2007 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Invertible Defects and Isomorphisms of Rational CFTs,

    A. Davydov, L. Kong and I. Runkel, “Invertible Defects and Isomorphisms of Rational CFTs,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 15, no. 1, 43 (2011) doi:10.4310/ATMP.2011.v15.n1.a2 [arXiv:1004.4725 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Defect lines, dualities, and generalised orbifolds,

    J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, “Defect lines, dualities, and generalised orbifolds,” doi:10.1142/9789814304634-0056 arXiv:0909.5013 [math-ph]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Conformal Field Theory,

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal, “Conformal Field Theory,” doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9 – 43 –

    doi

  28. [36]

    Classical and Quantum Conformal Field Theory,

    G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg, “Classical and Quantum Conformal Field Theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 123, 177 (1989). doi:10.1007/BF01238857

    1989 doi

  29. [37]

    Taming the Conformal Zoo,

    G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg, “Taming the Conformal Zoo,” Phys. Lett. B 220, 422 (1989). doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)90897-6

    1989 doi

  30. [38]

    Lectures On Rcft,

    G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg, “Lectures On Rcft,” RU-89-32, YCTP-P13-89

  31. [39]

    Duality and defects in rational conformal field theory,

    J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, “Duality and defects in rational conformal field theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 763, 354 (2007) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.11.017 [hep-th/0607247]

    2007 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Boundary Conditions, Fusion Rules and the Verlinde Formula,

    J. L. Cardy, “Boundary Conditions, Fusion Rules and the Verlinde Formula,” Nucl. Phys. B 324, 581 (1989). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90521-X

    1989 doi

  33. [41]

    The Boundary and Crosscap States in Conformal Field Theories,

    N. Ishibashi, “The Boundary and Crosscap States in Conformal Field Theories,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4, 251 (1989). doi:10.1142/S0217732389000320; T. Onogi and N. Ishibashi, “Conformal Field Theories on Surfaces With Boundaries and Crosscaps,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4, 161 (1989) Erra...

    1989 doi

  34. [42]

    Modular Invariance and Discrete Torsion on Orbifolds,

    C. Vafa, “Modular Invariance and Discrete Torsion on Orbifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B 273, 592 (1986). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90379-2; K. S. Narain, M. H. Sarmadi and C. Vafa, “Asymmetric Orbifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B 288, 551 (1987). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90228-8

    1986 doi

  35. [44]

    Anomaly and global inconsistency matching: θ-angles, SU (3)/U(1)2 nonlinear sigma model, SU (3) chains and its generalizations,

    Y. Tanizaki and T. Sulejmanpasic, “Anomaly and global inconsistency matching: θ-angles, SU (3)/U(1)2 nonlinear sigma model, SU (3) chains and its generalizations,” Phys. Rev. B 98, no. 11, 115126 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.115126 [arXiv:1805.11423 [cond-mat.str-el]]. – 44 –

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.