REVIEW 4 cited by
OverleafCopilot: Empowering Academic Writing in Overleaf with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has facilitated a variety of applications from different domains. In this technical report, we explore the integration of LLMs and the popular academic writing tool, Overleaf, to enhance the efficiency and quality of academic writing. To achieve the above goal, there are three challenges: i) including seamless interaction between Overleaf and LLMs, ii) establishing reliable communication with the LLM provider, and iii) ensuring user privacy. To address these challenges, we present OverleafCopilot, the first-ever tool (i.e., a browser extension) that seamlessly integrates LLMs and Overleaf, enabling researchers to leverage the power of LLMs while writing papers. Specifically, we first propose an effective framework to bridge LLMs and Overleaf. Then, we developed PromptGenius, a website for researchers to easily find and share high-quality up-to-date prompts. Thirdly, we propose an agent command system to help researchers quickly build their customizable agents. OverleafCopilot (https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/overleaf-copilot/eoadabdpninlhkkbhngoddfjianhlghb ) has been on the Chrome Extension Store, which now serves thousands of researchers. Additionally, the code of PromptGenius is released at https://github.com/wenhaomin/ChatGPT-PromptGenius. We believe our work has the potential to revolutionize academic writing practices, empowering researchers to produce higher-quality papers in less time.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
TeXFix-Bench: An Empirically Grounded Multi-Format Benchmark for LLM-Based Document Source Repair
TeXFix-Bench grounds document-repair evaluation in a mined 18-category fault taxonomy, and shows that compile success alone misses content-destroying repairs in 13.6-18.5 percent of cases.
-
GenGA: Editable and Data-Grounded Graphical Abstract Generation for Academic Papers
A vector-first framework, GenGA, generates editable graphical abstracts from paper text and user images, together with a Structural Independence Coefficient metric for editing simplicity.
-
InnoEval: On Research Idea Evaluation as a Knowledge-Grounded, Multi-Perspective Reasoning Problem
Idea evaluation can be automated with LLM agents that retrieve heterogeneous online evidence, simulate diverse reviewers, and score ideas on multiple dimensions, outperforming existing judges on acceptance-label predi...
-
MathSpeech: Leveraging Small LMs for Accurate Conversion in Mathematical Speech-to-Formula
A 120M-parameter, two-stage T5 pipeline corrects ASR errors on math speech and converts them to LaTeX, outperforming one-shot GPT-4o on a new MIT OCW-derived benchmark.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.