Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Representation Learning for Online and Offline RL in Low-rank MDPs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.04652 v3 pith:N5DFXQKJ submitted 2021-10-09 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords representationlearninglow-rankalgorithmflambemdpsofflineexploration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

This work studies the question of Representation Learning in RL: how can we learn a compact low-dimensional representation such that on top of the representation we can perform RL procedures such as exploration and exploitation, in a sample efficient manner. We focus on the low-rank Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) where the transition dynamics correspond to a low-rank transition matrix. Unlike prior works that assume the representation is known (e.g., linear MDPs), here we need to learn the representation for the low-rank MDP. We study both the online RL and offline RL settings. For the online setting, operating with the same computational oracles used in FLAMBE (Agarwal et.al), the state-of-art algorithm for learning representations in low-rank MDPs, we propose an algorithm REP-UCB Upper Confidence Bound driven Representation learning for RL), which significantly improves the sample complexity from $\widetilde{O}( A^9 d^7 / (\epsilon^{10} (1-\gamma)^{22}))$ for FLAMBE to $\widetilde{O}( A^2 d^4 / (\epsilon^2 (1-\gamma)^{5}) )$ with $d$ being the rank of the transition matrix (or dimension of the ground truth representation), $A$ being the number of actions, and $\gamma$ being the discounted factor. Notably, REP-UCB is simpler than FLAMBE, as it directly balances the interplay between representation learning, exploration, and exploitation, while FLAMBE is an explore-then-commit style approach and has to perform reward-free exploration step-by-step forward in time. For the offline RL setting, we develop an algorithm that leverages pessimism to learn under a partial coverage condition: our algorithm is able to compete against any policy as long as it is covered by the offline distribution.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Augmenting Online RL with Offline Data is All You Need: A Unified Hybrid RL Algorithm Design and Analysis

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A unified framework proves that augmenting any confidence-based online RL algorithm with offline data yields order-optimal suboptimality-gap and regret bounds, with a new concentrability coefficient that separates the...

  2. Transformers as Multi-task Learners: Decoupling Features in Hidden Markov Models

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hand-constructed O(ln L + T)-layer Transformer is shown to approximate low-rank hidden Markov models in-context, with lower layers extracting local history features and upper layers performing regression-based decoding.

  3. Improving the Data-efficiency of Reinforcement Learning by Warm-starting with LLM

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Warm-starting RL with a small LLM-generated buffer and then fine-tuning online (LORO) improves cumulative reward over pure RL in six Gym environments, though the theoretical guarantee is borrowed and the coverage assu...

Pith tools