REVIEW 3 cited by
Representation Learning for Online and Offline RL in Low-rank MDPs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
This work studies the question of Representation Learning in RL: how can we learn a compact low-dimensional representation such that on top of the representation we can perform RL procedures such as exploration and exploitation, in a sample efficient manner. We focus on the low-rank Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) where the transition dynamics correspond to a low-rank transition matrix. Unlike prior works that assume the representation is known (e.g., linear MDPs), here we need to learn the representation for the low-rank MDP. We study both the online RL and offline RL settings. For the online setting, operating with the same computational oracles used in FLAMBE (Agarwal et.al), the state-of-art algorithm for learning representations in low-rank MDPs, we propose an algorithm REP-UCB Upper Confidence Bound driven Representation learning for RL), which significantly improves the sample complexity from $\widetilde{O}( A^9 d^7 / (\epsilon^{10} (1-\gamma)^{22}))$ for FLAMBE to $\widetilde{O}( A^2 d^4 / (\epsilon^2 (1-\gamma)^{5}) )$ with $d$ being the rank of the transition matrix (or dimension of the ground truth representation), $A$ being the number of actions, and $\gamma$ being the discounted factor. Notably, REP-UCB is simpler than FLAMBE, as it directly balances the interplay between representation learning, exploration, and exploitation, while FLAMBE is an explore-then-commit style approach and has to perform reward-free exploration step-by-step forward in time. For the offline RL setting, we develop an algorithm that leverages pessimism to learn under a partial coverage condition: our algorithm is able to compete against any policy as long as it is covered by the offline distribution.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Augmenting Online RL with Offline Data is All You Need: A Unified Hybrid RL Algorithm Design and Analysis
A unified framework proves that augmenting any confidence-based online RL algorithm with offline data yields order-optimal suboptimality-gap and regret bounds, with a new concentrability coefficient that separates the...
-
Transformers as Multi-task Learners: Decoupling Features in Hidden Markov Models
A hand-constructed O(ln L + T)-layer Transformer is shown to approximate low-rank hidden Markov models in-context, with lower layers extracting local history features and upper layers performing regression-based decoding.
-
Improving the Data-efficiency of Reinforcement Learning by Warm-starting with LLM
Warm-starting RL with a small LLM-generated buffer and then fine-tuning online (LORO) improves cumulative reward over pure RL in six Gym environments, though the theoretical guarantee is borrowed and the coverage assu...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.