Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A survey of deep learning optimizers -- first and second order methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.15596 v2 pith:N5E46Q4T submitted 2022-11-28 cs.LG cs.CVmath.OC

classification cs.LGcs.CVmath.OC
keywords optimizationdeeplearningdifficultiesmethodsassessmentcomprehensivecompute
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Deep Learning optimization involves minimizing a high-dimensional loss function in the weight space which is often perceived as difficult due to its inherent difficulties such as saddle points, local minima, ill-conditioning of the Hessian and limited compute resources. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of $14$ standard optimization methods successfully used in deep learning research and a theoretical assessment of the difficulties in numerical optimization from the optimization literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Accelerated Training of Federated Learning via Second-Order Methods

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that categorizes second-order federated learning methods and argues they reduce communication rounds, based on results borrowed from the cited papers rather than new experiments.

Pith tools