Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Just rephrase it! Uncertainty estimation in closed-source language models via multiple rephrased queries

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.13907 v2 pith:N72QQCAZ submitted 2024-05-22 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords uncertaintymodelsclosed-sourcemultipleestimatequeriesrephrasedcalibration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

State-of-the-art large language models are sometimes distributed as open-source software but are also increasingly provided as a closed-source service. These closed-source large-language models typically see the widest usage by the public, however, they often do not provide an estimate of their uncertainty when responding to queries. As even the best models are prone to ``hallucinating" false information with high confidence, a lack of a reliable estimate of uncertainty limits the applicability of these models in critical settings. We explore estimating the uncertainty of closed-source LLMs via multiple rephrasings of an original base query. Specifically, we ask the model, multiple rephrased questions, and use the similarity of the answers as an estimate of uncertainty. We diverge from previous work in i) providing rules for rephrasing that are simple to memorize and use in practice ii) proposing a theoretical framework for why multiple rephrased queries obtain calibrated uncertainty estimates. Our method demonstrates significant improvements in the calibration of uncertainty estimates compared to the baseline and provides intuition as to how query strategies should be designed for optimal test calibration.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Aligned Query Expansion: Efficient Query Expansion for Information Retrieval through LLM Alignment

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AQE uses retrieval rank as a preference signal to fine-tune T0 with RSFT and DPO, beating generate-then-filter baselines on four QA datasets.

  2. B-score: Detecting biases in large language models using response history

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs self-correct toward uniform answers in multi-turn repetition, and the gap between single-turn and multi-turn answer rates (B-score) flags biased answers better than verbalized confidence.

  3. Evaluating Prompt Engineering Techniques for Accuracy and Confidence Elicitation in Medical LLMs

    cs.CY 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Across 156 configurations on Persian medical board questions, Chain-of-Thought prompting raised accuracy while increasing overconfidence, and emotional prompting inflated confidence without accuracy gains.

  4. Towards Harmonized Uncertainty Estimation for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    CUE combines a supervised correctness classifier with existing LLM uncertainty scores to improve indication, balance, and calibration, reporting AUROC and ECE gains across models and datasets.

Pith tools