pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.01707 · v1 · pith:NFGVJC34new · submitted 2026-06-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Magneto-Gravitational Regulated Streamer Accretion onto a Class 0 Protostellar System

Bo Huang , Josep M. Girart , Ian W. Stephens , Tom Megeath , Valentin J. M. Le Gouellec , Nadia M. Murillo , Paulo Cort\'es , Manuel Fern\'andez-L\'opez
show 12 more authors
Zhi-Yun Li Leslie W. Looney J. A. L\'opez-V\'azquez Jaime E. Pineda \'Alvaro S\'anchez-Monge Patricio Sanhueza Sarah Sadavoy Qizhou Zhang Charles L. H. Hull Nicole Karnath Enwei Liang Philip C. Myers
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 14:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords accretion streamersmagnetic fieldsprotostellar accretionClass 0 protostarsALMA observationsangular momentum transportHOPS-182
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic fields confine and guide infalling gas along elongated accretion streamers in a young protostellar system.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes high-resolution ALMA observations of the Class 0 triple system HOPS-182 and identifies a long, narrow stream of gas flowing inward over thousands of astronomical units. The streamer's path aligns with the local magnetic field direction inferred from dust polarization, and the gas velocities increase inward in a manner matching gravitational free-fall. By comparing gravitational and magnetic forces and examining the rotation of the gas relative to the field, the authors conclude that magnetic tension is sufficient to help channel the flow and extract angular momentum. This leads to the claim that a substantial fraction of material accreting onto young stars travels through such magnetically structured streamers rather than through a more spherical or disk-mediated path.

Core claim

In the HOPS-182 system, an elongated accretion streamer several thousand AU long carries infalling gas whose velocity profile matches gravitational free-fall while its morphology closely traces the magnetic field. Magnetic tension is comparable in strength to gravity, enabling the field both to confine the stream and to remove angular momentum efficiently as the gas rotates relative to the field lines.

What carries the argument

The magneto-gravitational balance along the streamer, where magnetic tension confines the flow and removes angular momentum as the gas's rotation is measured against the local field direction.

If this is right

  • A substantial fraction of the total mass accreted by Class 0 protostars arrives via long, magnetically guided filaments instead of isotropic infall.
  • Angular momentum removal by the magnetic field allows the streamer gas to reach small radii without building up excessive rotation.
  • Similar streamers should appear in other young systems where magnetic fields are strong enough relative to gravity.
  • The efficiency of magnetic regulation implies that the transition from envelope to disk accretion is more ordered than previously modeled.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If streamers are common, then models of protostellar growth must incorporate filamentary rather than spherical accretion channels at early stages.
  • The same magnetic guidance mechanism could operate at larger scales in molecular clouds, linking cloud filaments to individual protostars.
  • Future observations at higher resolution could test whether the streamer gas circularizes into a disk or continues inward along field lines.

Load-bearing premise

That the observed velocity increase represents pure gravitational free-fall and that the alignment between the stream and the magnetic field indicates active magnetic confinement and torque rather than projection or other effects.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the magnetic field strength inferred from polarization is too weak to provide the required tension, or a streamer whose velocity gradient deviates strongly from free-fall while still aligned with the field.

read the original abstract

How do magnetic fields shape the way young stars gather gas from their birth clouds? Using high-resolution Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array observations of a young triple protostellar system HOPS-182, we identify an elongated stream of gas, or accretion streamer, that extends over several thousand astronomical units (1 astronomical unit is the Earth-Sun distance) and carries a substantial flow of material toward the system. The gas speeds along this filament increase toward the star in a way consistent with gravitational free-fall, while the streamer's shape closely follows the magnetic field threading the region. By comparing the strengths of gravity and magnetic tension and measuring how the gas rotates compared with the local magnetic field, we show that the field is strong enough to help confine and guide the infalling gas and efficiently remove angular momentum. These results suggest that a substantial fraction of the material falling onto young protostellar systems can be funneled through elongated, magnetically structured accretion streamers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents high-resolution ALMA observations of the Class 0 triple protostellar system HOPS-182, identifying an elongated accretion streamer spanning several thousand AU. Kinematic analysis shows line-of-sight velocities increasing toward the protostar in a manner stated to be consistent with gravitational free-fall; the streamer morphology aligns with the plane-of-sky magnetic field inferred from dust polarization. Force comparisons between gravity and magnetic tension, together with rotation measurements relative to the local B-field, lead to the conclusion that magnetic tension is sufficient to confine and guide the infalling gas while removing angular momentum, implying that magnetically structured streamers can channel a substantial fraction of accreting material onto young protostars.

Significance. If the central claims are robust, the work supplies direct observational constraints on the relative importance of magnetic tension versus gravity in regulating streamer accretion, with implications for angular-momentum transport and the fraction of envelope material that reaches the protostar via ordered, field-guided flows. The combination of resolved kinematics and polarization-derived field geometry is a clear observational strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [Kinematics analysis (near Abstract and Section 3)] Kinematics section: the claim that observed velocities are 'consistent with gravitational free-fall' is presented without a formal least-squares fit, reported χ^{2} statistic, or residual map that would quantify the maximum allowed deviation from pure free-fall and thereby rule out significant magnetic or turbulent support.
  2. [Section 4] Section 4 (force comparison): the conclusion that magnetic tension dominates relies on an assumed plane-of-sky B-field strength derived from polarization and the observed column density; the manuscript does not propagate uncertainties arising from unknown inclination or unresolved turbulent contributions that could reverse the tension-versus-gravity ordering.
  3. [Discussion of field alignment and angular-momentum removal] Interpretation of alignment: the spatial coincidence between the streamer and polarization-inferred B-field is taken to demonstrate active magnetic confinement and angular-momentum removal, yet no quantitative test (e.g., Monte-Carlo projection simulations or comparison with turbulent-field realizations) is provided to exclude chance alignment or projection effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods / force-balance equations] Notation for the magnetic tension term and the precise definition of the 'local' field direction used in the rotation comparison should be stated explicitly in the text or a dedicated methods subsection.
  2. [Figures] Figure showing the velocity profile would benefit from overlaid free-fall curves with uncertainty bands and a residual panel to make the 'consistency' statement visually quantitative.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which highlight opportunities to strengthen the quantitative aspects of our analysis. We respond to each major comment below and indicate planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Kinematics analysis (near Abstract and Section 3)] Kinematics section: the claim that observed velocities are 'consistent with gravitational free-fall' is presented without a formal least-squares fit, reported χ^{2} statistic, or residual map that would quantify the maximum allowed deviation from pure free-fall and thereby rule out significant magnetic or turbulent support.

    Authors: We agree that a formal fit and statistical measures would improve rigor. In the revised manuscript we will add a least-squares fit of the line-of-sight velocities to a gravitational free-fall profile, report the resulting χ^{2} value, and include a residual map to quantify deviations and assess possible contributions from magnetic or turbulent support. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section 4] Section 4 (force comparison): the conclusion that magnetic tension dominates relies on an assumed plane-of-sky B-field strength derived from polarization and the observed column density; the manuscript does not propagate uncertainties arising from unknown inclination or unresolved turbulent contributions that could reverse the tension-versus-gravity ordering.

    Authors: This is a fair criticism of the uncertainty treatment. We will revise Section 4 to propagate uncertainties from inclination on the derived B-field strength and to discuss unresolved turbulent contributions. A sensitivity analysis will be added to demonstrate that the ordering of magnetic tension versus gravity remains robust across plausible ranges of these parameters. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion of field alignment and angular-momentum removal] Interpretation of alignment: the spatial coincidence between the streamer and polarization-inferred B-field is taken to demonstrate active magnetic confinement and angular-momentum removal, yet no quantitative test (e.g., Monte-Carlo projection simulations or comparison with turbulent-field realizations) is provided to exclude chance alignment or projection effects.

    Authors: We recognize that a quantitative test would strengthen the alignment argument. Given the limited independent polarization vectors along the streamer, a full Monte-Carlo projection analysis is not feasible with the present data. We will expand the discussion to explicitly address projection effects and emphasize that the kinematic free-fall consistency and force-balance results provide independent support for magnetic guidance beyond morphology alone. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: conclusions from direct observational force and alignment comparisons

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on comparing observed velocity gradients (claimed consistent with free-fall) against magnetic field directions from polarization, and estimating gravitational vs. magnetic tension using measured column densities. No equations define a quantity in terms of itself, no fitted parameters are relabeled as independent predictions, and no uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are imported via self-citation to force the result. The derivation applies standard physical comparisons to external data without reducing to the paper's own inputs by construction. This is the common case of an observationally grounded analysis that remains self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions in radio astronomy for interpreting ALMA kinematics and polarization; no explicit free parameters or new entities are stated in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Velocity increase along the filament indicates gravitational free-fall
    Invoked to interpret gas speeds as consistent with free-fall.
  • domain assumption Polarization traces the plane-of-sky magnetic field direction
    Standard assumption used to align streamer shape with magnetic field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5815 in / 1260 out tokens · 36733 ms · 2026-06-28T14:11:52.163719+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. E. Pineda, D. M. Segura-Cox, P. Caselli, N. Cunningham, B. Zhao, A. Schmiedeke, M. Maureira, and R. Neri, A protostellar system fed by a streamer of 10,500 au length. Nature Astronomy 4, 1158–1163 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    T. J. Thieme, S. -P. Lai, S. -J. Lin, P. Cheong, C. -F. Lee, H. -W Yen, Z. -Y. Li, K. H. Lam, and B. Zhao, Accretion Flows or Outflow Cavities? Uncovering the Gas Dynamics around Lupus 3-MMS. Astrophys. J. 925, 32 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    M. T. Valdivia-Mena, J. E. Pineda, D. M. Segura-Cox, P. Caselli, R. Neri, A. López-Sepulcre, N. Cunningham, L. Bouscasse, D. Semenov, Th. Henning, V. Pítu, E. Chapillon, A. Dutrey, A. Fuente, S. Guilloteau, T. H. Hsieh, I. Jiménez-Serra, S. Marino, M. J. Maureira, G. V. Smirnov-Pinchukov, M. Tafalla, and B. Zhao, PRODIGE – envelope to disk with NOEMA. I. ...

    2022

  4. [4]

    M. T. Valdivia-Mena, J. E. Pineda, D. M. Segura-Cox, P. Caselli, A. Schmiedeke, S. Choudhury, S. S. R. Offner, R. Neri, A. Goodman, and G. A. Fuller, Flow of gas detected from beyond the filaments to protostellar scales in Barnard 5. Astron. Astrophys. 677, A92 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Flores, N

    C. Flores, N. Ohashi, J. J. Tobin, J. S. Jørgensen, S. Takakuwa, Z. -Y. Li, Z. -Y. D Lin, M. L. R. van't Hoff, A. L. Plunkett, Y. Yamato, J. Sai, P. M. Koch, H. -W. Yen, Y. Aikawa, Y. Aso, I. de Gregorio-Monsalvo, M. Kido, W. Kwon, J. -E. Lee, C. W. Lee, L. W. Looney, A. Santamaría-Miranda, R. Sharma, T. J. Thieme, J. P. Williams, I. Han, S. Narayanan. an...

    2023

  6. [6]

    Galli, and F

    D. Galli, and F. H. Shu, Collapse of Magnetized Molecular Cloud Cores. I. Semianalytical Solution. Astrophys. J. 417, 220 (1993)

    1993

  7. [7]

    Allen, F

    A. Allen, F. H. Shu, and Z.-Y. Li, Collapse of Magnetized Singular Isothermal Toroids. I. The Nonrotating Case. Astrophys. J. 599, 351 (2003)

    2003

  8. [8]

    Hennebelle, and S

    P. Hennebelle, and S. Fromang, Magnetic processes in a collapsing dense core. I. Accretion and ejection. Astron. Astrophys. 477, 9 (2008)

    2008

  9. [9]

    J. E. Pineda, D. Arzoumanian, P. Andre, R. K. Friesen, A. Zavagno, S. D. Clarke, T. Inoue, C. Chen, Y. Lee, J. D. Soler, and M. Kuffmeier, From Bubbles and Filaments to Cores and Disks: Gas Gathering and Growth of Structure Leading to the Formation of Stellar Systems. Protostars and Planets VII 534, 233 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials

  11. [11]

    Huang, J

    B. Huang, J. M. Girart, I. W. Stephens, M. Fernández-López, H. G. Hector, J. M. Carpenter, P. Cortes, E. G. Erin, R. Fiensen, V. J. M. Le Gouellec, C. L. H. Hull, N. Karnath, W. Kwon, Z. -Y. Li, L. W. Looney, S. T. Megeath, P. C. Myers, N. M. Murillo, J. E. Pineda, S. Sadavoy, A. Sánchez-Monge, P. Sanhueza, J. J. Tobin, Q. Zhang, J. M. Jackson, and D. Seg...

    2024

  12. [12]

    Huang, J

    B. Huang, J. M. Girart, I. W. Stephens, M. Fernández-López, P. C. Myers, Q. Zhang, J. J. Tobin, P. Cortes, N. M. Murillo, S. Sadavoy, H. G. Hector, J. M. Carpenter, W. Kwon, V. J. M. Le Gouellec, Z. -Y. Li, L. W. Looney, S. T. Megeath, E. G. Erin, N. Karnath, and D. Segura-Cox, The Protostars in Orion: Characterizing the Properties of Their Magnetized Env...

    2025

  13. [13]

    Hoang, and A

    T. Hoang, and A. Lazarian, Grain Alignment Induced by Radiative Torques: Effects of Internal Relaxation of Energy and Complex Radiation Field. Astrophys. J. 697 (2), 1316–1333 (2009)

    2009

  14. [14]

    B. G. Andersson, A. Lazarian, and J. E. Vaillancourt, Interstellar Dust Grain Alignment. Annu. Science Advances Page 17 of 20 Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 53, 501–539 (2015)

    2015

  15. [15]

    J. J. Tobin, P. D. Sheehan, S. T. Megeath, A. K. Díaz-Rodríguez, S. S. R. Offner, N. M. Murillo, M. L. R. van't Hoff, E. F. van Dishoeck, M. Osorio, G. Anglada, E. Furlan, A. M. Stutz, N. Reynolds, N. Karnath, W. J. Fischer, M. Persson, L. W. Looney, Z. -Y. Li, I. W. Stephens, C. J. Chandler, E. Cox, M. M. Dunham, Ł. Tychoniec, M. Kama, K. Kratter, M. Kou...

    2020

  16. [16]

    Kounkel, L

    M. Kounkel, L. Hartmann, L. Loinard, G. N. Ortiz-León, A. J. Mioduszewski, L. F. Rodríguez, S. A. Dzib, R. M. Torres, G. Pech, P. A. B. Galli, J. L. Rivera, A. F. Boden, N. J. Evans II, C. Briceño, and J. J. Tobin, The Gould’s Belt Distances Survey (GOBELINS) II. Distances and Structure toward the Orion Molecular Clouds. Astrophys. J. 834 (2), 142 (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    W. J. Fischer, S. T. Megeath, E. Furlan, B. Ali, A. M. Stutz, J. J. Tobin, M. Osorio, T. Stanke, P. Manoj, C. A. Poteet, J. J. Booker, L. Hartmann, T. L. Wilson, P. C. Myers, and D. M. Watson, The Herschel Orion Protostar Survey: Luminosity and Envelope Evolution. Astrophys. J. 840 (2), 69 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    Furlan, W

    E. Furlan, W. J. Fischer, B. Ali, A. M. Stutz, T. Stanke, J. J. Tobin, S. T. Megeath, M. Osorio, L. Hartmann, N. Calvet, C. A. Poteet, J. Booker, P. Manoj, D. M. Watson, and L. Allen, The Herschel Orion Protostar Survey: Spectral Energy Distributions and Fits Using a Grid of Protostellar Models. Astrophys. J. Suppl. S. 224, 5 (2016)

    2016

  19. [19]

    Gupta, A

    A. Gupta, A. Miotello, J. P. Williams, T. Birnstiel, M. Kuffmeier, and H. -W. Yen, TIPSY: Trajectory of Infalling Particles in Streamers around Young stars. Dynamical analysis of the streamers around S CrA and HL Tau. Astron. Astrophys. 683, A133 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Mendoza, E

    S. Mendoza, E. Tejeda, and E. Nagel, Analytic solutions to the accretion of a rotating finite cloud towards a central object - I. Newtonian approach. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 393 (2), 579–586 (2009)

    2009

  21. [21]

    P. M. Koch, Y. -W. Tang, P. T. P. Ho, P. -Y. Hsieh, J. -W. Wang, H. -W. Yen, A. Duarte- Cabral, N. Peretto, and Y. -N. Su, A Multiscale Picture of the Magnetic Field and Gravity from a Large-scale Filamentary Envelope to Core-accreting Dust Lanes in the High-mass Star-forming Region W51. Astrophys. J. 940 (1), 89 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    D. A. Schleuning, Far-Infrared and Submillimeter Polarization of OMC-1: Evidence for Magnetically Regulated Star Formation. Astrophys. J. 493 (2), 811–825 (1998)

    1998

  23. [23]

    J. M. Girart, P. Frau, Q. Zhang, P. M. Koch, K. Qiu, Y. -W. Tang, S. -P. Lai, P. T. P. Ho, DR 21(OH): A Highly Fragmented, Magnetized, Turbulent Dense Core. Astrophys. J. 772 (1), 69 (2013)

    2013

  24. [24]

    Heitsch, E

    F. Heitsch, E. G. Zweibel, M. -M. Mac Low, P. Li, and M. L. Norman, Magnetic Field Diagnostics Based on Far-Infrared Polarimetry: Tests Using Numerical Simulations. Astrophys. J. 561, 800 (2001)

    2001

  25. [25]

    Lazarian, K

    A. Lazarian, K. H. Yuen, and D. Pogosyan, Gradient Technique Theory: Tracing Magnetic Field and Obtaining Magnetic Field Strength. Astrophys. J. 974, 237 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Huang, J

    B. Huang, J. M. Girart, I. W. Stephens, P. C. Myers, Q. Zhang, P. Cortes, Á. Sánchez-Monge, M. Fernández-López, V. J. M. Le Gouellec, T. Megeath, N. M. Murillo, J. M. Carpenter, Z. - Y. Li, J. Liu, L. W. Looney, S. Sadavoy, N. Karnath, and W. Kwon, Characterizing Magnetic Properties of Young Protostars in Orion. Astrophys. J. 984 (1), 29 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    M. N. Machida, T. Matsumoto, K. Tomisaka, and T. Hanawa, Collapse and fragmentation of rotating magnetized clouds - I. Magnetic flux-spin relation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 362 (2), 369–381 (2005)

    2005

  28. [28]

    Galli, S

    D. Galli, S. Lizano, F. H. Shu, and A. Allen, Gravitational Collapse of Magnetized Clouds. I. Ideal Magnetohydrodynamic Accretion Flow. Astrophys. J. 493 (1), 374–381 (2006). Science Advances Page 18 of 20

    2006

  29. [29]

    J. P. McMullin, B. Waters, D. Schiebel, W. Young, and K. Golap, CASA Architecture and Applications, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, R. A. Shaw, F. Hill, D. J. Bell, Eds., vol. 376 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series (2007)

    2007

  30. [30]

    CASA Team, B. Bean, S. Bhatnagar, S. Castro, J. Donovan Meyer, B. Emonts, E. Garcia, R. Garwood, K. Golap, J. Gonzalez Villalba, P. Harris, Y. Hayashi, J. Hoskins, M. Hsieh, P. Jagannathan, W. Kawasaki, A. Keimpema, M. Kettenis, J. Lopez, J. Marvil, J. Masters, A. McNichols, D. Mehringer, R. Miel, G. Moellenbrock, F. Montesino, T. Nakazato, J. Ott, D. Pet...

    2022

  31. [31]

    J. E. Vaillancourt, Placing Confidence Limits on Polarization Measurements. Pub. Astron. Soc. Pac. 118 (847), 1340–1343 (2006)

    2006

  32. [32]

    R. K. Ulrich, An infall model for the T Tauri phenomenon. Astrophys. J. 210, 377–391 (1976)

    1976

  33. [33]

    Mendoza, J

    S. Mendoza, J. Cantó, and A. C. Raga, Hydrodynamical Interaction between an Accretion Flow and a Stellar Wind. Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis. 40, 147–165 (2004)

    2004

  34. [34]

    L. D. Landau, and E. M. Lifshitz, Mechanics, Course of theoretical physics, vol. 1 (3rd edn. Pergamon, London) (1989)

    1989

  35. [35]

    Pedregosa, G

    F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, A. Müller, J. Nothman, G. Louppe, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and É. Duchesnay, Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. J. Mach. Learning Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    2011

  36. [36]

    Ankerst, M

    M. Ankerst, M. M. Breunig, H.-P. Kriegel, and J. Sander, OPTICS: Ordering points to identify the clustering structure. ACM Sigmod record 28 (2), 49–60 (1999)

    1999

  37. [37]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, I. Polat, Y. Feng, E. W. Moore, J. VanderPlas, D. Laxalde, J. Perktold, R. Cimrman, I. Henriksen, E. ...

    2020

  38. [38]

    Ossenkopf, and T

    V. Ossenkopf, and T. Henning, Dust opacities for protostellar cores. Astron. Astrophys. 291, 943–959 (1994)

    1994

  39. [39]

    W. Kwon, L. W. Looney, L. G. Mundy, H. -F. Chiang, and A. J. Kemball, Grain Growth and Density Distribution of the Youngest Protostellar Systems. Astrophys. J. 696 (1), 841 (2009)

    2009

  40. [40]

    P. D. Sheehan, J. J. Tobin, L. W. Looney, and S. T. Megeath, The VLA/ALMA Nascent Disk and Multiplicity (VANDAM) Survey of Orion Protostars. VI. Insights from Radiative Transfer Modeling. Astrophys. J. 929 (1), 76 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    J. K. Jørgensen, R. Visser, J. P. Williams, and E. A. Bergin, Molecule sublimation as a tracer of protostellar accretion. Evidence for accretion bursts from high angular resolution C18O images. Astron. Astrophys. 579, A23 (2015)

    2015

  42. [42]

    Davis, The Strength of Interstellar Magnetic Fields

    L. Davis, The Strength of Interstellar Magnetic Fields. Phys. Rev. 81, 890–891 (1951)

    1951

  43. [43]

    Chandrasekhar, and E

    S. Chandrasekhar, and E. Fermi, Problems of Gravitational Stability in the Presence of a Magnetic Field. Astrophys. J. 118, 116 (1953)

    1953

  44. [44]

    E. C. Ostriker, J. M. Stone, and C. F. Gammie, Density, Velocity, and Magnetic Field Structure in Turbulent Molecular Cloud Models. Astrophys. J. 546 (2), 980–1005 (2001)

    2001

  45. [45]

    energy crisis

    J. Kauffmann, F. Bertoldi, T. L. Bourke, and N. J. Evans, II, C. W. Lee, MAMBO mapping of Spitzer c2d small clouds and cores. Astron. Astrophys. 487 (3), 993–1017 (2008). Science Advances Page 19 of 20 Acknowledgments: We thank the ALMA staff for performing the observations and quality assessment of the data. Funding: BH, JMG, and AS-M acknowledge support...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033 2008