REVIEW 1 cited by
Exploring Historical and Emerging Phishing Techniques and Mitigating the Associated Security Risks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Organizations invest heavily in technical controls for their Information Assurance (IA) infrastructure. These technical controls mitigate and reduce the risk of damage caused by outsider attacks. Most organizations rely on training to mitigate and reduce risk of non-technical attacks such as social engineering. Organizations lump IA training into small modules that personnel typically rush through because the training programs lack enough depth and creativity to keep a trainee engaged. The key to retaining knowledge is making the information memorable. This paper describes common and emerging attack vectors and how to lower and mitigate the associated risks.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
AI-Powered Spearphishing Cyber Attacks: Fact or Fiction?
In a 44-person test, 66% of audio and 43% of video answers about AI-generated clips were wrong, but those rates include errors on genuine clips and are not clean measures of missed fakes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.