pith. sign in

arxiv: 1608.01219 · v4 · pith:NKSRQFSCnew · submitted 2016-08-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph· hep-th

Constraining neutrino mass and extra relativistic degrees of freedom in dynamical dark energy models using Planck 2015 data in combination with low-redshift cosmological probes: basic extensions to ΛCDM cosmology

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords darkenergycosmologicaldatalambdamodelmodelsparameters
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We investigate how the properties of dark energy affect the cosmological measurements of neutrino mass and extra relativistic degrees of freedom. We limit ourselves to the most basic extensions of $\Lambda$ cold dark matter (CDM) model, i.e. the $w$CDM model with one additional parameter $w$, and the $w_{0}w_{a}$CDM model with two additional parameters, $w_{0}$ and $w_{a}$. In the cosmological fits, we employ the 2015 cosmic microwave background temperature and polarization data from the Planck mission, in combination with low-redshift measurements such as the baryon acoustic oscillations, Type Ia supernovae and the Hubble constant ($H_{0}$). Given effects of massive neutrinos on large-scale structure, we further include weak lensing, redshift space distortion, Sunyaev--Zeldovich cluster counts and Planck lensing data. We show that, though the cosmological constant $\Lambda$ is still consistent with the current data, a phantom dark energy ($w<-1$) or an early phantom dark energy (i.e. quintom evolving from $w<-1$ to $w>-1$) is slightly more favoured by current observations, which leads to the fact that in both $w$CDM and $w_0w_a$CDM models we obtain a larger upper limit of $\sum m_\nu$. We also show that in the three dark energy models, the constraints on $N_{\rm eff}$ are in good accordance with each other, all in favour of the standard value 3.046, which indicates that the dark energy parameters almost have no impact on constraining $N_{\rm eff}$. Therefore, we conclude that the dark energy parameters can exert a significant influence on the cosmological weighing of neutrinos, but almost cannot affect the constraint on dark radiation.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Constraints on the Sum of Neutrino Masses from ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 Considering Isocurvature Initial Conditions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Including neutrino density isocurvature in fits to ACT DR6, DESI DR2, and DES data yields ∑m_ν < 0.057 eV at 95% CL in ΛCDM with no detection of the isocurvature mode.

  2. Measuring neutrino mass in light of ACT DR6 and DESI DR2

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New ACT and DESI data yield model-dependent upper limits on sum of neutrino masses, with holographic dark energy giving the tightest bounds and a consistent preference for degenerate hierarchy.

  3. Neutrino mass constraints in interacting dark energy models after DESI DR2

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Upper bounds on total neutrino mass in four phenomenological interacting dark energy models are derived from DESI DR2 BAO plus CMB and SNIa data, showing strong dependence on the interaction term form and statistical ...

  4. Dark Energy in the DESI Era: A Brief Review of Evidence, Beyond-$\Lambda$CDM Interpretations, and Tensions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    Review of DESI evidence for dynamical dark energy, its dependence on parametrization and datasets, and alternative beyond-LambdaCDM interpretations that may address cosmological tensions.