pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.21826 · v1 · pith:DBDZPNJAnew · submitted 2026-06-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA· gr-qc· hep-ph· hep-th

Dark Energy in the DESI Era: A Brief Review of Evidence, Beyond-ΛCDM Interpretations, and Tensions

Tian-Nuo Li , Guo-Hong Du , Hao Wang , Yun-He Li , Jing-Fei Zhang , Xin Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 12:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAgr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords DESIdynamical dark energyLambdaCDMquintombaryon acoustic oscillationscosmological tensionsdark energy equation of state
0
0 comments X

The pith

DESI baryon acoustic oscillation data combined with CMB and supernova measurements indicate a possible departure from the constant dark energy of LambdaCDM, favoring dynamical behavior that crosses the phantom divide.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review evaluates new baryon acoustic oscillation measurements from DESI against the standard LambdaCDM model of the Universe's expansion. When these data are paired with cosmic microwave background and type Ia supernova observations, they produce an apparent preference for dynamical dark energy whose equation of state crosses -1. The paper examines how this preference changes with different model parametrizations and dataset combinations, and it surveys alternative physical mechanisms that can generate similar expansion histories. It also traces possible connections to existing tensions in the Hubble constant and matter clustering amplitude. The central question is how to separate genuine new physics from residual systematics in the current datasets.

Core claim

Recent DESI BAO measurements, when combined with CMB and supernova data, show an apparent departure from LambdaCDM commonly interpreted as dynamical dark energy with quintom behavior in which the equation of state crosses the phantom divide; the strength of this preference depends on parametrization and dataset choice, and multiple beyond-LambdaCDM scenarios can produce equivalent background expansion while carrying different implications for cosmological tensions.

What carries the argument

DESI baryon acoustic oscillation measurements combined with CMB and supernova datasets to constrain the dark energy equation of state and test for deviations from w = -1.

If this is right

  • The strength of evidence for dynamical dark energy varies with the chosen parametrization of the equation of state.
  • Mechanisms such as interacting dark energy, non-minimally coupled gravity, and non-standard dark matter can each reproduce an effective w crossing -1.
  • These distinct scenarios affect the Hubble constant, S8, and neutrino mass sum tensions in different ways.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation would shift focus from whether dark energy evolves to which specific mechanism produces the observed expansion history.
  • Future high-precision BAO or supernova surveys could distinguish among the alternative models by measuring growth of structure rather than background expansion alone.
  • Systematic cross-checks between independent probes remain essential before interpreting the signal as new physics.

Load-bearing premise

The apparent departure from LambdaCDM is driven by the underlying data rather than residual systematics or internal inconsistencies among the DESI, CMB, and supernova datasets.

What would settle it

Reanalysis of the same datasets after improved systematic corrections or an independent BAO measurement from another survey that restores consistency with LambdaCDM when combined with the same CMB and supernova data would falsify the departure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21826 by Guo-Hong Du, Hao Wang, Jing-Fei Zhang, Tian-Nuo Li, Xin Zhang, Yun-He Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Two-dimensional marginalized contours for the CPL parameters (𝑤0, 𝑤𝑎) from different combinations of DESI BAO, CMB, and SN datasets (Abdul Karim et al. 2025). 2026; Li et al. 2026d; Shlivko & Poulin 2026; Gökçen et al. 2026; Wu et al. 2026a). Nevertheless, despite the excitement generated by these re￾sults, it is important to emphasize that the current evidence for DDE remains far from conclusive. First, t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Two-dimensional marginalized contours in the (𝑤0, 𝑤𝑎) plane for six DDE parametrizations (CPL, JBP, BA, EXP, LOG, and SIN). The constraints are obtained using combinations of CMB, DESI DR2 BAO, and SN data. The red star denotes the ΛCDM model at (𝑤0, 𝑤𝑎) = (−1, 0). The boundary lines, specifically the solid line (𝑤0 = −1) and the dashed line (𝑤0 + 𝑤𝑎 = −1, characterizing the EoS of DE in the early universe… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: At the same time, the 𝑧eff ≃ 0.71 LRG bin tends to pull the inferred Ωm to lower values and has been discussed as an important contributor to the departure from the Planck￾ΛCDM expectation (Naredo-Tuero et al. 2024; Colgáin et al. 2026). Thus, although the full DESI BAO dataset is internally consistent at the current precision, a small number of intermediate-redshift BAO measurements can have a dispro￾port… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Two-dimensional marginalized contours (1𝜎 and 2𝜎 confidence levels) in the 𝛽 − 𝛼 plane within the CQ model (upper panel) and in the 𝛽 − 𝑤 plane within the CF model (lower panel) from DESI, CMB, and SN data (Li et al. 2026c). logical in most applications, this framework provides a more structured field-theoretic realization of dark-sector interac￾tions and offers a useful framework between DESI-motivated de… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Reconstructed evolutionary history of 𝛽(𝑧) at 1𝜎 and 2𝜎 confidence levels in the IDE1, IDE2, IDE3, and IDE4 models. The black dashed line in each plot represents the non-interacting line 𝛽(𝑧) = 0 (Li et al. 2026a). range interaction, can yield an observable effective EoS cross￾ing 𝑤eff = −1 while keeping 𝑤𝜙 > −1. For suitable parameter choices, the crossing occurs around 𝑧 ∼ 0.5, with 𝑤eff < −1 in the past… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Reconstructed evolution of 𝛽(𝑧) with 1𝜎 and 2𝜎 confidence intervals for CMB+DESI and its combinations with individual SN datasets. Blue solid lines and shaded regions show DESI DR1-based reconstructions, red dashed lines show DESI DR2-based results, and black dashed lines denote the ΛCDM prediction (Li & Zhang 2025). Recently, Li et al. (2026a) used the DESI DR2 BAO, to￾gether with DESY5 SN and Planck CMB … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Reconstruction of the EoS of DE for the non-minimally coupled scalar field model. The shaded regions denote the confi￾dence intervals, illustrating that the EoS remains in the phantom regime at higher redshifts before sharply thawing and crossing the boundary at 𝑧 ≈ 0.5 (Wolf et al. 2025b). Furthermore, to fully realize the rapid late-time dynamical evolution preferred by DESI, Wolf et al. (2025a) introduc… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: , utilizing DESI DR2 BAO, DESY5 SN, Planck data, 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 wdm 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 P/P max DESI DESI+DESY5 P18 DESI+DESY3+DESY5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Marginalized joint 1𝜎 and 2𝜎 confidence level contours for 𝐻0 and the PMFs parameter 𝑏pmf for various data combinations (Jedamzik et al. 2026). Modified gravity theories provide a theoretical framework for reconciling observational discrepancies by geometrically altering the expansion dynamics (Kavya et al. 2025; Efstra￾tiou et al. 2025; Plaza et al. 2025; Wang et al. 2026c; Montani et al. 2026; Legner et … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The fractional difference in CDM density perturbations, Δ𝛿𝑐/𝛿𝑐, as a function of the scale factor 𝑎 for the dark axion and dark baryons interaction model (Khoury et al. 2025). Here, “model 1” and “model 2” correspond to two fiducial models with distinct parameter choices for the dark sector coupling (𝜎𝑁 /𝑚0, where 𝜎𝑁 is the pion-nucleon sigma term and 𝑚0 is the dark baryon mass), axion decay constant ( 𝑓 … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The one-dimensional marginalized posterior dis￾tributions of Í 𝑚𝜈 in the ΛCDM + Í 𝑚𝜈 + 𝑁eff, 𝑤CDM + Í 𝑚𝜈 + 𝑁eff, and 𝑤0𝑤𝑎CDM + Í 𝑚𝜈 + 𝑁eff models using the CMB+DESI+DESY5+DESY1 data (Du et al. 2025b). Therefore, as previously noted, the DDE preferred by current DESI data, characterized by an EoS crossing from 𝑤 < −1 to 𝑤 > −1, can naturally relax the neutrino mass limits and ease this tension. A comprehen… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The one-dimensional marginalized posterior distribu￾tions of Í 𝑚𝜈 in the CCBH Madau 𝜓 and CCBH Trinca 𝜓 models using the CMB+DESI DR2 BAO data (Ahlen et al. 2025). An alternative pathway to alleviate the tension involves con￾structing a physical late-time conversion mechanism where matter is actively transformed into DE, thereby carving out space for a larger neutrino mass without modifying the total ener… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent baryon acoustic oscillation measurements from DESI provide important new clues for reassessing whether the standard $\Lambda$CDM model offers a sufficient description of the late-time expansion history of the Universe. When combined with cosmic microwave background and type Ia supernova data, these measurements show an apparent departure from the $\Lambda$CDM model, commonly described as dynamical dark energy (DDE) with equation of state crossing the phantom divide (i.e., quintom behavior). This review examines the current status of the DESI-motivated indications for DDE and their possible implications for physics beyond $\Lambda$CDM. We discuss how the strength of the preference for DDE depends on the adopted parametrization and dataset combination, and how residual systematics or internal tensions among datasets may affect its interpretation. At the background level, several mechanisms beyond $\Lambda$CDM can produce similar expansion histories. We therefore further discuss how the same effective departure from $w=-1$ may arise from physically distinct scenarios, including interacting dark energy, non-minimally coupled gravity, and non-standard dark matter. Meanwhile, these different new-physics interpretations may have different implications for current cosmological tensions, especially those involving $H_0$, $S_8$, and $\sum m_\nu$. In conclusion, the question posed by DESI is not merely whether dark energy evolves with time, but rather how, within the framework of precision cosmology, to disentangle new physics scenarios from systematic errors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review summarizing recent DESI baryon acoustic oscillation measurements and their combination with CMB and type Ia supernova data, which indicate an apparent departure from ΛCDM often parametrized as dynamical dark energy with quintom behavior (equation of state crossing w=-1). It examines how the strength of this preference varies with parametrization and dataset choice, discusses residual systematics and internal dataset tensions as possible explanations, reviews alternative beyond-ΛCDM mechanisms (interacting dark energy, non-minimally coupled gravity, non-standard dark matter) that can produce similar expansion histories, and addresses implications for H0, S8, and ∑mν tensions. The conclusion reframes the issue as the need to disentangle new physics from systematics rather than asserting a definitive detection.

Significance. As a timely review in the DESI era, the paper is significant for providing a balanced synthesis of the literature that explicitly flags parametrization and dataset dependence, residual systematics, and the multi-interpretation nature of the effective w≠-1 signal. It gives credit to the community for identifying these issues and productively reframes the question around disentangling effects, which is valuable for guiding future work on cosmological tensions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript as a timely and balanced review. We appreciate the recognition of its value in synthesizing the DESI results, parametrization dependence, and multi-interpretation aspects while reframing the discussion around disentangling new physics from systematics. No major comments requiring response were raised.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper performs no derivations or fits; no circularity possible

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly a review summarizing external DESI+CMB+SN literature on apparent DDE signals. It contains no original equations, fits, predictions, or derivations of its own. All discussed results, parametrizations, and interpretations are attributed to prior works. The text flags dependence on dataset choice and parametrization and treats systematics/tensions as open issues rather than asserting new claims. No self-citation chain or input-equals-output reduction exists because there is no derivation chain to inspect.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; it introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. All discussed models and tensions originate from the cited literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5835 in / 1110 out tokens · 22050 ms · 2026-06-26T12:11:21.546876+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 261 canonical work pages · 119 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Astronomical Journal 116(3), 1009–1038 (1998)

    Riess, Adam G. and others. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. Astron. J. 1998. doi:10.1086/300499. arXiv:astro-ph/9805201

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/300499 1998

  2. [2]

    The Astrophysical Journal517(2), 565–586 (1999)

    Perlmutter, S. and others. Measurements of and from 42 High Redshift Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 1999. doi:10.1086/307221. arXiv:astro-ph/9812133

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/307221 1999

  3. [3]

    Spergel, D. N. and others. First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Determination of cosmological parameters. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2003. doi:10.1086/377226. arXiv:astro-ph/0302209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/377226 2003

  4. [4]

    Bennett, C. L. and others. First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Preliminary maps and basic results. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2003. doi:10.1086/377253. arXiv:astro-ph/0302207

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/377253 2003

  5. [5]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Aghanim, N. and others. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2020. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910. arXiv:1807.06209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2018

  6. [6]

    Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies

    Eisenstein, Daniel J. and others. Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2005. doi:10.1086/466512. arXiv:astro-ph/0501171

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/466512 2005

  7. [7]

    The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample

    Alam, Shadab and others. The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2017. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx721. arXiv:1607.03155

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stx721 2017

  8. [8]

    The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological Implications from two Decades of Spectroscopic Surveys at the Apache Point observatory

    Alam, Shadab and others. Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083533. arXiv:2007.08991

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.083533 2021

  9. [9]

    Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration

    Weinberg, David H. and Mortonson, Michael J. and Eisenstein, Daniel J. and Hirata, Christopher and Riess, Adam G. and Rozo, Eduardo. Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration. Phys. Rept. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.001. arXiv:1201.2434

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.001 2013

  10. [10]

    Dark energy two decades after: Observables, probes, consistency tests

    Huterer, Dragan and Shafer, Daniel L. Dark energy two decades after: observables, probes, consistency tests. Rept. Prog. Phys. 2018. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa997e. arXiv:1709.01091

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa997e 2018

  11. [11]

    The Case for a Positive Cosmological Lambda-term

    Sahni, Varun and Starobinsky, Alexei A. The Case for a positive cosmological Lambda term. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D. 2000. doi:10.1142/S0218271800000542. arXiv:astro-ph/9904398

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271800000542 2000

  12. [12]

    Quintessence, Cosmic Coincidence, and the Cosmological Constant

    Zlatev, Ivaylo and Wang, Li-Min and Steinhardt, Paul J. Quintessence, cosmic coincidence, and the cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.896. arXiv:astro-ph/9807002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.896 1999

  13. [13]

    Testing the Cosmic Coincidence Problem and the Nature of Dark Energy

    Dalal, Neal and Abazajian, Kevork and Jenkins, Elizabeth Ellen and Manohar, Aneesh V. Testing the cosmic coincidence problem and the nature of dark energy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.141302. arXiv:astro-ph/0105317

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.141302 2001

  14. [14]

    Planck Constraints on Holographic Dark Energy

    Li, Miao and Li, Xiao-Dong and Ma, Yin-Zhe and Zhang, Xin and Zhang, Zhenhui. Planck Constraints on Holographic Dark Energy. JCAP. 2013. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/09/021. arXiv:1305.5302

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/09/021 2013

  15. [15]

    Search for sterile neutrinos in holographic dark energy cosmology: Reconciling Planck observation with the local measurement of the Hubble constant

    Zhao, Ming-Ming and He, Dong-Ze and Zhang, Jing-Fei and Zhang, Xin. Search for sterile neutrinos in holographic dark energy cosmology: Reconciling Planck observation with the local measurement of the Hubble constant. Phys. Rev. D. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.043520. arXiv:1703.08456

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.043520 2017

  16. [16]

    Can the $H_0$ tension be resolved in extensions to $\Lambda$CDM cosmology?

    Guo, Rui-Yun and Zhang, Jing-Fei and Zhang, Xin. Can the H_0 tension be resolved in extensions to CDM cosmology?. JCAP. 2019. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/054. arXiv:1809.02340

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/054 2019

  17. [17]

    Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe

    Verde, L. and Treu, T. and Riess, A. G. Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe. Nature Astron. 2019. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0. arXiv:1907.10625

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0 2019

  18. [18]

    New physics in light of the H_0 tension: An alternative view

    Vagnozzi, Sunny. New physics in light of the H_0 tension: An alternative view. Phys. Rev. D. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.023518. arXiv:1907.07569

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.023518 2020

  19. [19]

    Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension

    Di Valentino, Eleonora and others. Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension. Astropart. Phys. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102605. arXiv:2008.11284

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102605 2021

  20. [20]

    In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

    Di Valentino, Eleonora and Mena, Olga and Pan, Supriya and Visinelli, Luca and Yang, Weiqiang and Melchiorri, Alessandro and Mota, David F. and Riess, Adam G. and Silk, Joseph. In the realm of the Hubble tension a review of solutions. Class. Quant. Grav. 2021. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d. arXiv:2103.01183

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d 2021

  21. [21]

    A buyer s guide to the Hubble constant

    Shah, Paul and Lemos, Pablo and Lahav, Ofer. A buyer s guide to the Hubble constant. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 2021. doi:10.1007/s00159-021-00137-4. arXiv:2109.01161

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-021-00137-4 2021

  22. [22]

    Consistency tests of CDM from the early integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect: Implications for early-time new physics and the Hubble tension

    Vagnozzi, Sunny. Consistency tests of CDM from the early integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect: Implications for early-time new physics and the Hubble tension. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063524. arXiv:2105.10425

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.063524 2021

  23. [23]

    Relieving the H 0 tension with a new interacting dark energy model

    Gao, Li-Yang and Zhao, Ze-Wei and Xue, She-Sheng and Zhang, Xin. Relieving the H 0 tension with a new interacting dark energy model. JCAP. 2021. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/005. arXiv:2101.10714

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/005 2021

  24. [24]

    A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team

    Riess, Adam G. and others. A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s ^ -1 Mpc ^ -1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2022. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b. arXiv:2112.04510

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b 2022

  25. [25]

    Challenges for CDM: An update

    Perivolaropoulos, Leandros and Skara, Foteini. Challenges for CDM: An update. New Astron. Rev. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659. arXiv:2105.05208

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659 2022

  26. [26]

    The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models

    Sch. The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models. Phys. Rept. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.07.001. arXiv:2107.10291

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.07.001 2022

  27. [27]

    Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

    Abdalla, Elcio and others. Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies. JHEAp. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002. arXiv:2203.06142

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 2022

  28. [28]

    Challenges of the Standard Cosmological Model

    Di Valentino, Eleonora. Challenges of the Standard Cosmological Model. Universe. 2022. doi:10.3390/universe8080399

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8080399 2022

  29. [29]

    The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy

    Kamionkowski, Marc and Riess, Adam G. The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2023. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-111422-024107. arXiv:2211.04492

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-111422-024107 2023

  30. [31]

    Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics

    Hu, Jian-Ping and Wang, Fa-Yin. Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics. Universe. 2023. doi:10.3390/universe9020094. arXiv:2302.05709

    work page doi:10.3390/universe9020094 2023

  31. [32]

    Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension

    Vagnozzi, Sunny. Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension. Universe. 2023. doi:10.3390/universe9090393. arXiv:2308.16628

    work page doi:10.3390/universe9090393 2023

  32. [33]

    , keywords =

    Asgari, Marika and others. KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics. Astron. Astrophys. 2021. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039070. arXiv:2007.15633

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039070 2021

  33. [34]

    Astroparticle Physics , keywords =

    Di Valentino, Eleonora and others. Cosmology Intertwined III: f _8 and S_8. Astropart. Phys. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102604. arXiv:2008.11285

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102604 2021

  34. [35]

    KiDS-Legacy: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear with the complete Kilo-Degree Survey

    Wright, Angus H. and others. KiDS-Legacy: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear with the complete Kilo-Degree Survey. Astron. Astrophys. 2025. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554908. arXiv:2503.19441

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554908 2025

  35. [36]

    Status of the S_8 Tension: A 2026 Review of Probe Discrepancies

    Pantos, Ioannis and Perivolaropoulos, Leandros. Status of the S_8 Tension: A 2026 Review of Probe Discrepancies. Phys. Dark Univ. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102286. arXiv:2602.12238

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102286 2026

  36. [37]

    Ratra, Bharat and Peebles, P. J. E. Cosmological Consequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field. Phys. Rev. D. 1988. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.3406 1988

  37. [38]

    Dynamics of dark energy

    Copeland, Edmund J. and Sami, M. and Tsujikawa, Shinji. Dynamics of dark energy. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D. 2006. doi:10.1142/S021827180600942X. arXiv:hep-th/0603057

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s021827180600942x 2006

  38. [39]

    Caldwell, R. R. and Dave, Rahul and Steinhardt, Paul J. Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1582. arXiv:astro-ph/9708069

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1582 1998

  39. [40]

    Reconstructing holographic quintessence

    Zhang, Xin. Reconstructing holographic quintessence. Phys. Lett. B. 2007. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.02.069. arXiv:astro-ph/0604484

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.02.069 2007

  40. [41]

    Agegraphic dark energy as a quintessence

    Zhang, Jingfei and Zhang, Xin and Liu, Hongya. Agegraphic dark energy as a quintessence. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2008. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0532-7. arXiv:0801.2809

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0532-7 2008

  41. [42]

    Quintessence: A Review

    Tsujikawa, Shinji. Quintessence: A Review. Class. Quant. Grav. 2013. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/21/214003. arXiv:1304.1961

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/21/214003 2013

  42. [43]

    Caldwell, R. R. A Phantom menace?. Phys. Lett. B. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02589-3. arXiv:astro-ph/9908168

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)02589-3 2002

  43. [44]

    Dark Energy Constraints from the Cosmic Age and Supernova

    Feng, Bo and Wang, Xiu-Lian and Zhang, Xin-Min. Dark energy constraints from the cosmic age and supernova. Phys. Lett. B. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.12.071. arXiv:astro-ph/0404224

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.12.071 2005

  44. [45]

    Cosmological Evolution of a Quintom Model of Dark Energy

    Guo, Zong-Kuan and Piao, Yun-Song and Zhang, Xin-Min and Zhang, Yuan-Zhong. Cosmological evolution of a quintom model of dark energy. Phys. Lett. B. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.01.017. arXiv:astro-ph/0410654

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.01.017 2005

  45. [46]

    An interacting two-fluid scenario for quintom dark energy

    Zhang, Xin. An interacting two-fluid scenario for quintom dark energy. Commun. Theor. Phys. 2005. doi:10.1088/6102/44/4/762

    work page doi:10.1088/6102/44/4/762 2005

  46. [47]

    Statefinder diagnostic for holographic dark energy model

    Zhang, Xin. Statefinder diagnostic for holographic dark energy model. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D. 2005. doi:10.1142/S0218271805007243. arXiv:astro-ph/0504586

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271805007243 2005

  47. [48]

    Dynamical vacuum energy, holographic quintom, and the reconstruction of scalar-field dark energy

    Zhang, Xin. Dynamical vacuum energy, holographic quintom, and the reconstruction of scalar-field dark energy. Phys. Rev. D. 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.103505. arXiv:astro-ph/0609699

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.103505 2006

  48. [49]

    Possible theoretical limits on holographic quintessence from weak gravity conjecture

    Ma, Yin-Zhe and Zhang, Xin. Possible Theoretical limits on holographic quintessence from weak gravity conjecture. Phys. Lett. B. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.02.028. arXiv:0709.1517

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.02.028 2008

  49. [50]

    Quintom Cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations

    Cai, Yi-Fu and Saridakis, Emmanuel N. and Setare, Mohammad R. and Xia, Jun-Qing. Quintom Cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations. Phys. Rept. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.04.001. arXiv:0909.2776

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.04.001 2010

  50. [51]

    Dark Energy and Fate of the Universe

    Li, Xiao-Dong and Wang, Shuang and Huang, Qing-Guo and Zhang, Xin and Li, Miao. Dark Energy and Fate of the Universe. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 2012. doi:10.1007/s11433-012-4748-z. arXiv:1202.4060

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s11433-012-4748-z 2012

  51. [52]

    The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2

    Cai, Yifu and Ren, Xin and Qiu, Taotao and Li, Mingzhe and Zhang, Xinmin. The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2. 2025. doi:10.1093/nsr/nwag115. arXiv:2505.24732

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/nsr/nwag115 2025

  52. [53]

    A Dynamical Solution to the Problem of a Small Cosmological Constant and Late-time Cosmic Acceleration

    Armendariz-Picon, C. and Mukhanov, Viatcheslav F. and Steinhardt, Paul J. A Dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late time cosmic acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4438. arXiv:astro-ph/0004134

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.4438 2000

  53. [54]

    Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter

    Chevallier, Michel and Polarski, David. Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D. 2001. doi:10.1142/S0218271801000822. arXiv:gr-qc/0009008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271801000822 2001

  54. [55]

    Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe

    Linder, Eric V. Exploring the expansion history of the universe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.091301. arXiv:astro-ph/0208512

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 2003

  55. [56]

    Adame, A. G. and others. DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations. JCAP. 2025. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021. arXiv:2404.03002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 2024

  56. [57]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    Abdul Karim, M. and others. DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/tr6y-kpc6. arXiv:2503.14738

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/tr6y-kpc6 2025

  57. [58]

    The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: A Reanalysis Of Cosmology Results And Evidence For Evolving Dark Energy With An Updated Type Ia Supernova Calibration

    Popovic, B. and others. The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: A Reanalysis Of Cosmology Results And Evidence For Evolving Dark Energy With An Updated Type Ia Supernova Calibration. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2026. doi:10.1093/mnras/stag632. arXiv:2511.07517

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stag632 2026

  58. [59]

    Jassal, Harvinder Kaur and Bagla, J. S. and Padmanabhan, T. Observational constraints on low redshift evolution of dark energy: How consistent are different observations?. Phys. Rev. D. 2005. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.103503. arXiv:astro-ph/0506748

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.103503 2005

  59. [60]

    Barboza, Jr., E. M. and Alcaniz, J. S. A parametric model for dark energy. Phys. Lett. B. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.08.012. arXiv:0805.1713

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.08.012 2008

  60. [61]

    Probing the dynamics of dark energy with novel parametrizations

    Ma, Jing-Zhe and Zhang, Xin. Probing the dynamics of dark energy with novel parametrizations. Phys. Lett. B. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.013. arXiv:1102.2671

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.013 2011

  61. [62]

    General Analytic Solutions of Scalar Field Cosmology with Arbitrary Potential

    Dimakis, N. and Karagiorgos, A. and Zampeli, Adamantia and Paliathanasis, Andronikos and Christodoulakis, T. and Terzis, Petros A. General Analytic Solutions of Scalar Field Cosmology with Arbitrary Potential. Phys. Rev. D. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.123518. arXiv:1604.05168

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.123518 2016

  62. [63]

    Imprints of an extended Chevallier Polarski Linder parametrization on the large scale of our universe

    Pan, Supriya and Yang, Weiqiang and Paliathanasis, Andronikos. Imprints of an extended Chevallier Polarski Linder parametrization on the large scale of our universe. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2020. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7832-y. arXiv:1902.07108

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7832-y 2020

  63. [64]

    Robust preference for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN measurements

    Giar \`e , William and Najafi, Mahdi and Pan, Supriya and Di Valentino, Eleonora and Firouzjaee, Javad T. Robust preference for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN measurements. JCAP. 2024. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/035. arXiv:2407.16689

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/035 2024

  64. [65]

    Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements

    Lodha, K. and others. Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/w4c6-1r5j. arXiv:2503.14743

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/w4c6-1r5j 2025

  65. [66]

    Ormondroyd, A. N. and Handley, W. J. and Hobson, M. P. and Lasenby, A. N. Comparison of dynamical dark energy with CDM in light of DESI DR2. 2025. arXiv:2503.17342

    arXiv 2025

  66. [67]

    Robust evidence for dynamical dark energy in light of DESI DR2 and joint ACT, SPT, and Planck data

    Li, Tian-Nuo and Du, Guo-Hong and Zhou, Sheng-Han and Li, Yun-He and Zhang, Jing-Fei and Zhang, Xin. Robust evidence for dynamical dark energy in light of DESI DR2 and joint ACT, SPT, and Planck data. Phys. Dark Univ. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102254. arXiv:2511.22512

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102254 2026

  67. [68]

    An overview of what current data can (and cannot yet) say about evolving dark energy

    Giar \`e , William and Mahassen, Tariq and Di Valentino, Eleonora and Pan, Supriya. An overview of what current data can (and cannot yet) say about evolving dark energy. Phys. Dark Univ. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101906. arXiv:2502.10264

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101906 2025

  68. [69]

    Consistency tests between SDSS and DESI BAO measurements

    Ghosh, Basundhara and Bengaly, Carlos. Consistency tests between SDSS and DESI BAO measurements. Phys. Dark Univ. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101699. arXiv:2408.04432

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101699 2024

  69. [70]

    Dynamical dark energy beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO, and type-Ia supernovae

    Giar \`e , William. Dynamical dark energy beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO, and type-Ia supernovae. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/ss37-cxhn. arXiv:2409.17074

    work page doi:10.1103/ss37-cxhn 2025

  70. [71]

    Probing Dynamical Dark Energy with Late-Time Data: Evidence, Tensions, and the Limits of the w_0w_a CDM Framework

    Xu, Tengpeng and Kumar, Suresh and Chen, Yun and Capistrano, Abra. Probing Dynamical Dark Energy with Late-Time Data: Evidence, Tensions, and the Limits of the w_0w_a CDM Framework. 2026. arXiv:2602.11936

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  71. [72]

    Evolving dark energy or supernovae systematics?

    Efstathiou, George. Evolving dark energy or supernovae systematics?. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2025. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf301. arXiv:2408.07175

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf301 2025

  72. [73]

    Coupled Quintessence

    Amendola, Luca. Coupled quintessence. Phys. Rev. D. 2000. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.043511. arXiv:astro-ph/9908023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.043511 2000

  73. [74]

    Interacting Dark Matter and Dark Energy

    Farrar, Glennys R. and Peebles, P. James E. Interacting dark matter and dark energy. Astrophys. J. 2004. doi:10.1086/381728. arXiv:astro-ph/0307316

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/381728 2004

  74. [75]

    Super-acceleration as Signature of Dark Sector Interaction

    Das, Subinoy and Corasaniti, Pier Stefano and Khoury, Justin. Super-acceleration as signature of dark sector interaction. Phys. Rev. D. 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.083509. arXiv:astro-ph/0510628

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.083509 2006

  75. [76]

    Coupled Quintessence in a Power-Law Case and the Cosmic Coincidence Problem

    Zhang, Xin. Coupled quintessence in a power-law case and the cosmic coincidence problem. Mod. Phys. Lett. A. 2005. doi:10.1142/S0217732305017597. arXiv:astro-ph/0503072

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217732305017597 2005

  76. [77]

    Avelino, P. P. and da Silva, H. M. R. Effective dark energy equation of state in interacting dark energy models. Phys. Lett. B. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.06.063. arXiv:1201.0550

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.06.063 2012

  77. [78]

    Large-scale stable interacting dark energy model: Cosmological perturbations and observational constraints

    Li, Yun-He and Zhang, Xin. Large-scale stable interacting dark energy model: Cosmological perturbations and observational constraints. Phys. Rev. D. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.083009. arXiv:1312.6328

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.083009 2014

  78. [79]

    Parametrized Post-Friedmann Framework for Interacting Dark Energy

    Li, Yun-He and Zhang, Jing-Fei and Zhang, Xin. Parametrized Post-Friedmann Framework for Interacting Dark Energy. Phys. Rev. D. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.063005. arXiv:1404.5220

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.063005 2014

  79. [80]

    Dark Matter and Dark Energy Interactions: Theoretical Challenges, Cosmological Implications and Observational Signatures

    Wang, B. and Abdalla, E. and Atrio-Barandela, F. and Pavon, D. Dark Matter and Dark Energy Interactions: Theoretical Challenges, Cosmological Implications and Observational Signatures. Rept. Prog. Phys. 2016. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/9/096901. arXiv:1603.08299

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/9/096901 2016

  80. [81]

    and Nunes, Rafael C

    Giar \`e , William and Sabogal, Miguel A. and Nunes, Rafael C. and Di Valentino, Eleonora. Interacting Dark Energy after DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.251003. arXiv:2404.15232

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.251003 2024

Showing first 80 references.