Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 78 references

Impact of <3D> NLTE on GCE of oxygen with the RAdial Velocity Experiment

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that measuring oxygen with full 3D-averaged non-LTE spectral fitting, rather than 1D LTE or correction-based methods, turns the super-solar decline of [O/Fe] into a plateau, signaling mixed local and migrated stars.

desk verdict Careful first O-triplet measurement in RAVE with full <3D> NLTE fits, but the headline flattening rides on an untested macroturbulence offset. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.19875 v1 pith:NLUOVWEA submitted 2025-05-26 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

G. Guiglion This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords oxygenabundancesnon-LTEradiativetransfer3DmodelatmospheresRAVEsurveygalacticchemicalevolutionOI8446tripletstellarspectroscopyradialmigration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the standard 1D LTE analysis of stellar oxygen abundances hides part of the Milky Way's chemical-evolution story. Using intermediate-resolution spectra of 8,018 dwarf and turn-off stars from the RAVE survey, the author measures oxygen from the 8446 Å triplet with four combinations of assumptions: 1D LTE, 1D NLTE, and 3D-averaged LTE and NLTE. The 1D LTE and 1D NLTE trends show the familiar monotonic decline of $[\mathrm{O/Fe}]$ with $[\mathrm{Fe/H}]$, but fitting the spectra with 3D-averaged NLTE models turns the super-solar part of that decline into a flat plateau. The paper reads the plateau as evidence that the solar neighborhood contains a mixture of locally born metal-rich stars with low $[\mathrm{O/Fe}]$ and stars migrated from the inner Galaxy with high $[\mathrm{O/Fe}]$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the O I triplet at 8446 Å, fitted with full spectral synthesis using 1D model atmospheres and horizontally-temporally-averaged 3D model atmospheres, with NLTE departure coefficients from a tested oxygen model atom. The machinery is the paper's full spectral fitting code, which varies oxygen abundance, atmospheric parameters, and macroturbulence velocity until the synthetic spectrum matches the RAVE observation. The specific mechanism producing the claimed plateau is the floating macroturbulence: the 3D-averaged NLTE fits require velocities 1–2 km s$^{-1}$ higher than the 1D fits, broadening and shallowing the lines and lifting $[\mathrm{O/Fe}]$ at super-solar $[\mathrm{Fe/H}]$.

What would settle it

Re-fit the same RAVE spectra in 3D-averaged NLTE with macroturbulence fixed to the 1D LTE values and check whether the super-solar $[\mathrm{Fe/H}]$ plateau survives; a cleaner test would measure $[\mathrm{O/Fe}]$ in the same super-solar stars from high-resolution spectra covering the 777 nm and 6300 Å oxygen lines and see whether the plateau reproduces.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the decline of $[\mathrm{O/Fe}]$ with $[\mathrm{Fe/H}]$ in the super-solar regime changes character when abundances come from full spectral fitting in 3D-averaged NLTE rather than from 1D LTE or from applying precomputed 3D-averaged NLTE corrections. In the full fits the $[\mathrm{O/Fe}]$ trend decreases up to solar $[\mathrm{Fe/H}]$ and then flattens for $[\mathrm{Fe/H}]>0$, whereas 1D LTE and 1D NLTE continue to fall. The paper locates the cause in the fitted macroturbulence velocity, which comes out 1–2 km s$^{-1}$ higher in 3D-averaged NLTE fits (up to about 1.9 km s$^{-1}$ at $[\mathrm{Fe/H}]\sim+0.1$); the extra broadening makes the synthetic lines shallower, raising the inferred oxygen abundance at high metallicity. The same data fitted with 1D LTE agrees with the high-resolution 1D LTE trend of the 777 nm triplet, and the full 3D-averaged NLTE fitting also improves abundance precision by about 10% relative to the other approaches.

Load-bearing premise

The plateau rests on the fitted macroturbulence being genuinely 1–2 km s$^{-1}$ larger in the 3D-averaged NLTE fits than in 1D fits; if that small broadening difference is a fitting artifact, the flattening disappears, and the paper does not test fixing macroturbulence to the 1D values.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the plateau is real, the super-solar $[\mathrm{Fe/H}]$ stars within about 1 kpc of the Sun are not a single population: locally born stars with negative $[\mathrm{O/Fe}]$ mix with older stars migrated from the inner disk that carry super-solar $[\mathrm{O/Fe}]$.
  • Oxygen analyses of upcoming low- and intermediate-resolution surveys with RAVE-like red spectra should use full spectral fitting with NLTE and 3D-treated models, since correction-based methods preserve the monotonic decline and are less precise.
  • A 3D-averaged NLTE treatment, not just NLTE corrections, is required to recover the flattening; the paper reports that applying precomputed 3D-averaged NLTE corrections to 1D LTE abundances still gives a monotonic decrease.
  • NLTE corrections at $R=7500$ are substantial for oxygen: 1D NLTE abundances are lower than 1D LTE by about 0.14 dex on average, with the difference roughly constant across $[\mathrm{Fe/H}]$.
  • The result directly contradicts the monotonic decline reported previously for the 777 nm triplet in full 3D NLTE, so the choice of oxygen line and fitting method matters for conclusions about Galactic chemical evolution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test the paper does not perform: split the super-solar $[\mathrm{Fe/H}]$ sample by stellar age and check whether the high-$[\mathrm{O/Fe}]$ stars are preferentially old (4–8 Gyr), as radial migration from the inner disk requires.
  • Because the plateau depends on a 1–2 km s$^{-1}$ macroturbulence difference at a resolution of about 40 km s$^{-1}$ per element, independent macroturbulence constraints from asteroseismology or high-resolution line profiles would settle whether the broadening is physical.
  • Applying the same full-fitting procedure to the 777 nm oxygen triplet in upcoming low-resolution survey spectra would show whether the flattening is specific to the 8446 Å line or a general 3D-NLTE property of oxygen in metal-rich stars.
  • If the mixed-population interpretation is correct, the high-$[\mathrm{O/Fe}]$ super-solar stars should show kinematic signatures of migration, such as a different distribution of orbital eccentricities or azimuthal velocities compared with the low-$[\mathrm{O/Fe}]$ super-solar stars.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents the first LTE and NLTE oxygen abundance measurements from the O I 8446 Å triplet in RAVE spectra (R≈7500) for 8,018 dwarf and turn-off stars, using 1D MARCS and spatially/temporally averaged 3D STAGGER model atmospheres in a full spectral fitting approach. The paper reports that 1D LTE and 1D NLTE [O/Fe] trends decline monotonically with [Fe/H] and agree with Brewer et al. (2016), while full <3D> NLTE fitting yields a flattening at super-solar [Fe/H]. The flattening is attributed to larger fitted macroturbulence velocities in <3D> NLTE fits (Section 5.2, Fig. B.1) and is interpreted as evidence for a mix of locally born and radially migrated stellar populations. The paper also compares full fitting with correction-based approaches and finds that the latter do not produce the flattening.

Significance. If the flattening is real, it challenges the standard interpretation of the [O/Fe]–[Fe/H] decline in the super-solar regime and supports radial migration scenarios. The work is also a useful test bed for 4MOST low-resolution analyses. Strengths include a solar calibration, cross-validation against Brewer et al. (2016) and VUES 777 nm spectra, and a public catalog of abundances. However, the headline result depends on a subtle fitted broadening parameter that is not independently validated, so the significance is conditional on additional robustness tests.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.2, Fig. B.1, abstract] The central claim of a flat [O/Fe] trend at super-solar [Fe/H] in <3D> NLTE rests entirely on the fitted macroturbulence velocity offset between <3D> NLTE and 1D LTE fits. The paper states that this offset increases from ~1 km/s at [Fe/H]~−0.5 to ~1.9 km/s at [Fe/H]~+0.1 and is 'the origin of systematically increasing ⟨3D⟩ NLTE [O/Fe] values.' At RAVE's resolution (R≈7500, about 40 km/s per resolution element at 8446 Å), a 1–2 km/s difference is only a few percent of a resolution element and is within the expected fitting noise. No test is presented with macroturbulence fixed to the 1D values or with a conservative prior; without such a test, the plateau is not distinguishable from a degeneracy with continuum placement, Fe I blend strength, or microturbulence.
  2. [Appendix A.1, Fig. A.1] The correction-based <3D> NLTE [O/Fe] ratios (red curve in Fig. A.1) decrease monotonically with [Fe/H], as the paper states explicitly. This means the flattening is not a property of the <3D> NLTE model atmospheres or NLTE physics alone, but rather of the full-fitting procedure and its macroturbulence adjustment. The paper acknowledges this comparison but does not reconcile it; the abstract's general statement that 'the decrease of [O/Fe] in the super-solar [Fe/H] regime is rather characterised by a flat trend when [O/Fe] is computed in ⟨3D⟩ NLTE from full spectral fitting' is therefore conditional on the specific fitting method.
  3. [Section 5.2] The assertion that the higher <3D> NLTE macroturbulence values are 'more realistic' is not supported by independent evidence. The paper notes that averaged 3D models lack horizontal inhomogeneities and large-scale velocities, but it does not demonstrate that the required extra broadening matches the velocity power spectra of the STAGGER simulations or that it is recovered when fitting high-resolution spectra of the same stars. The VUES comparison in Appendix A.3 validates the 8446/777 nm consistency, not the macroturbulence scale. Given that the flattening hinges on this parameter, an external validation or a robustness test is necessary before the chemical-evolution interpretation can be accepted.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 5.3] The sentence beginning 'For [Fe/H]>, we propose...' is missing the threshold value; it should read 'For [Fe/H] > 0'.
  2. [Section 7] The DOI is given as 'doi:0.17876/rave/dr.6/101', which appears to be missing a digit; it should likely be 'doi:10.17876/rave/dr.6/101'.
  3. [Table 1] The column numbering is incorrect: two columns are labelled '4' (ofe_3d_nlte and e_ofe_3d_nlte); the numbers should be sequential.
  4. [Appendix A.1] 'overploted' should be 'overplotted'.
  5. [General] Many words contain spurious spaces (e.g., 'di fferent', 'e ffects', 'a ffected', 'turn-o ff'), likely from LaTeX/OCR artifacts; a careful proofread is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the [O/Fe] trend is an externally anchored measurement; the macroturbulence coupling is disclosed, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—the flat [O/Fe] trend at super-solar [Fe/H] in full <3D> NLTE fitting—is presented as an abundance measurement, not as a prediction derived from the models. The abundance scale is anchored to external data: the solar atlas of Neckel (1999), the high-resolution 1D LTE comparison with Brewer et al. (2016), and the VUES 777 nm cross-check in Appendix A.3. The 1D LTE trend agrees with Brewer et al. (2016), providing an external consistency check that is independent of the paper's fitting choices. The flattening is explicitly traced by the authors to the fitted macroturbulence offset (Sect. 5.2, Fig. B.1): 'Since increasing macroturbulence corresponds to shallower profiles, the abundance increases and this effect is the origin of systematically increasing <3D> NLTE [O/Fe] values obtained from the full spectrum synthesis.' This is a disclosed degeneracy rather than a circular definition: macroturbulence is fitted simultaneously with the oxygen abundance, and the flat trend is not defined in terms of the macroturbulence input. The absence of a robustness test with macroturbulence fixed to the 1D values is a correctness/robustness risk, not a circularity. Appendix A.1 openly shows that correction-based <3D> NLTE yields a monotonic decline, which weakens the headline interpretation but again is not a circular step. Self-citations are present (Guiglion et al. 2020 for atmospheric parameters and labels; Guiglion et al. 2024 as a procedure reference) but are not load-bearing: the label catalogue is trained on APOGEE/Gaia data and the 1D LTE results are validated against an external survey. No equation or fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction; no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. I therefore find no significant circularity and assign score 2 only for the minor self-citation and the close coupling of the headline trend to a sensitive fitted broadening parameter.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim (flattening at super-solar [Fe/H]) rests on model atmospheres and departure grids from prior literature, plus a fitted macroturbulence. The interpretation as a mixed population is an inference, not an invented entity.

free parameters (1)
  • Macroturbulence velocity per star = Not listed per star; mean difference vs 1D LTE is 1.7 km/s (Appendix B)
    Fitted in TSFitPy; the central flattening trend in <3D> NLTE arises because fitted macroturbulence is higher than in 1D, shallowing the lines and raising oxygen abundances at super-solar [Fe/H] (Section 5.2).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Bergemann et al. (2021) oxygen model atom and Gerber et al. (2023) NLTE departure grids are accurate for the 8446 Å triplet.
    Used in 1D NLTE and <3D> NLTE spectrum synthesis (Sections 2.2-2.3); errors propagate into all NLTE abundances.
  • domain assumption STAGGER <3D> averaged model atmospheres are parameter-free realistic thermodynamic structures.
    Section 2.3 states this, citing prior literature; the <3D> results rest on this.
  • domain assumption CNN atmospheric parameters (Teff, log g, [Fe/H]) from Guiglion et al. (2020) are accurate within quoted uncertainties.
    Adopted in Section 4; parameter uncertainties dominate the error budget (Fig. 6).
  • domain assumption Atomic data (log gf, damping) for the O triplet and Fe blends from Heiter et al. (2021) are correct.
    Used in all fits; a systematic error here shifts all abundances.
  • domain assumption NLTE departure coefficients for Fe blends are correctly computed by TSFitPy/Turbospectrum NLTE.
    The <3D> NLTE fits apply NLTE corrections to Fe blends; errors affect the blend subtraction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Impact of <3D> NLTE on GCE of oxygen with the RAdial Velocity Experiment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NLUOVWEA

@misc{pith2026250519875,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Impact of <3D> NLTE on GCE of oxygen with the RAdial Velocity Experiment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NLUOVWEA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.19875}
}
read the original abstract

Stellar abundances, coupled with kinematics are a unique way to understand the chemo-dynamical processes that occurred to build the Milky Way and its local volume as we observe today. However, measuring abundances is challenging as one needs to properly address the effect of departure from the Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium (LTE), as well as the commonly used 1-dimensional model atmosphere. In this work, we constrain the chemical evolution of [O/Fe] in FG stars of the RAVE survey with [O/Fe] abundances derived in non-LTE (NLTE) and with horizontally-temporally-averaged 3D (<3D>) model atmospheres. Using standard spectral fitting method, we determine for the first time LTE and NLTE [O/Fe] ratios from the O triplet at 8446A in turn-off and dwarf stars thanks to intermediate-resolution RAVE spectra, assuming both 1D and <3D> model atmosphere. NLTE effects play a significant role when determining oxygen even at a resolution of R= 7500. Typical NLTE-LTE corrections of the order of -0.12 dex are measured in dwarfs and turn-off stars using 1D MARCS models. In contrast to applying <3D> NLTE abundance corrections or the classical 1D LTE, the full <3D> NLTE spectral fitting yields improving the precision of abundances by nearly 10%. We show that the decrease of [O/Fe] in the super-solar [Fe/H] regime is rather characterised by a flat trend when [O/Fe] is computed in <3D> NLTE from full spectral fitting. We attribute this flattening at super-solar [Fe/H] to the interplay between locally born stars with negative [O/Fe] and stars migrated from the inner MW regions with super-solar [O/Fe], supporting the complex chemo-dynamical history of the Solar neighbourhood. Our results are key for understanding the effects of <3D> and NLTE when measuring [O/Fe]. This work is a test bed for the analysis of 4MOST low-resolution spectra that will share similar properties as RAVE in the red wavelength domain.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.19875 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left row: synthetic spectra computed at Teff = 6 000 K, log(g)=4.2, [O/Fe]=0, in 1D LTE (dashed), 1D NTLE (dotted), and ⟨3D⟩ (solid) at RAVE resolution. Full synthesis is shown in blue, while molecules, O, and Fe blend are shown in red, orange, and green, respectively. Computation was done at [Fe/H]= +0.0 (top), and [Fe/H]= +0.2 (bottom). Right column: sensitivity curves of derived A(O) as a function of a change in … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. High-resolution observation of the Sun from Neckel (1999) (blue), together with its degraded version to RAVE spectral resolution (orange). The best fit spectrum, corresponding to [O/Fe] = −0.03 (1D LTE), is shown in green. The spectral fitting window is shown in light purple. 3. Characterizing the NLTE and ⟨3D⟩ effects on Solar oxygen at RAVE resolution 3.1. 1D LTE We used the ultra-high resolution Solar atlas from … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Synthetic spectra computed with Teff = 5 777 K, log(g) = 4.44, and [O/Fe] = 0.0; LTE and NLTE spectra are shown with dashed and solid lines, respectively. 1D and ⟨3D⟩ computations are shown in blue and orange respectively. Left: [Fe/H] = −1. Middle: [Fe/H] = −0.5. Right: [Fe/H] = 0.0. We also add in each panel synthetic spectra computed at [O/Fe] = ±0.2 in 1D LTE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Surface gravity vs. effective temperature of the 8 018 RAVE stars. DR2 magnitudes. The author demonstrated that such a combi￾nation of data allows to break the spectral degeneracies inherent to the RAVE spectral range, and provided improved labels com￾pared to RAVE DR6…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example of spectral fit (orange) around the oxygen triplet at 8 446 Å (vertical grey dashed lines) in RAVE spectra (blue). In this figure, the RAVE spectra are characterised by 50<S/N<60. The atmospheric parameters of a given star are indicated at the top of each panel…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a) χ 2 between RAVE observation and best fit spectrum in ⟨3D⟩ NLTE around the oxygen triplet at 8 446 Å, provided by TSFitPy, as a function of S/N for 8 018 RAVE stars. b) ⟨3D⟩ NlTE [O/Fe] uncertainty distribution (solid black line). We also show the individual distrib…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Average [O/Fe] abundances as a func￾tion of LTE [Fe/H] ratios for 8 018 RAVE stars. The blue dots show 1D abundances, in LTE (blue dashed line) and NLTE (blue solid line). The orange crosses show ⟨3D⟩ abundances, in LTE (orange dashed line) and NLTE (orange solid line)…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: 2D histogram of the difference in [O/Fe] abundances 1D NLTE - 1D LTE (left), ⟨3D⟩ NLTE - ⟨3D⟩ LTE (middle), and ⟨3D⟩ NLE - 1D LTE, as a function of LTE [Fe/H]. 5.2. Effect of ⟨3D⟩ on [O/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] diagram In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Z., Santos, N

    Adibekyan, V . Z., Santos, N. C., Sousa, S. G., & Israelian, G. 2011, A&A, 535, L11

    2011

  2. [2]

    M., Lind, K., Osorio, Y ., et al

    Amarsi, A. M., Lind, K., Osorio, Y ., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A62

    2020

  3. [3]

    M., Nissen, P

    Amarsi, A. M., Nissen, P. E., & Skúladóttir, Á. 2019, A&A, 630, A104

    2019

  4. [4]

    2017, A&A, 600, A70

    Anders, F., Chiappini, C., Minchev, I., et al. 2017, A&A, 600, A70

    2017

  5. [5]

    2019, The Messenger, 175, 35

    Bensby, T., Bergemann, M., Rybizki, J., et al. 2019, The Messenger, 175, 35

    2019

  6. [6]

    2017, ApJ, 847, 16

    Bergemann, M., Collet, R., Schönrich, R., et al. 2017, ApJ, 847, 16

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    J., Eitner, P., et al

    Bergemann, M., Gallagher, A. J., Eitner, P., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A80

    2019

  8. [8]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 2236

    Bergemann, M., Hoppe, R., Semenova, E., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 2236

    2021

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    2013, ApJ, 764, 115

    Bergemann, M., Kudritzki, R.-P., Würl, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 764, 115

    2013

  2. [10]

    R., Serenelli, A., et al

    Bergemann, M., Ruchti, G. R., Serenelli, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 565, A89

    2014

  3. [11]

    2014, MNRAS, 439, 1231

    Binney, J., Burnett, B., Kordopatis, G., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 1231

    2014

  4. [12]

    2014, A&A, 568, A71

    Boeche, C., Siebert, A., Piffl, T., et al. 2014, A&A, 568, A71

    2014

  5. [13]

    2011, AJ, 142, 193

    Boeche, C., Siebert, A., Williams, M., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 193

    2011

  6. [14]

    M., Fischer, D

    Brewer, J. M., Fischer, D. A., Valenti, J. A., & Piskunov, N. 2016, ApJS, 225, 32

    2016

  7. [15]

    G., Steffen, M., et al

    Caffau, E., Ludwig, H. G., Steffen, M., et al. 2008, A&A, 488, 1031

    2008

  8. [16]

    2011, A&A, 530, A138

    Casagrande, L., Schönrich, R., Asplund, M., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, A138

    2011

  9. [17]

    R., Hawkins, K., Hogg, D

    Casey, A. R., Hawkins, K., Hogg, D. W., et al. 2017, ApJ, 840, 59

    2017

  10. [18]

    2001, ApJ, 554, 1044

    Chiappini, C., Matteucci, F., & Romano, D. 2001, ApJ, 554, 1044

    2001

  11. [19]

    2019, The Messenger, 175, 30

    Chiappini, C., Minchev, I., Starkenburg, E., et al. 2019, The Messenger, 175, 30

    2019

  12. [20]

    2003, MNRAS, 339, 63

    Chiappini, C., Romano, D., & Matteucci, F. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 63

    2003

  13. [21]

    2011, A&A, 535, A22

    Chiavassa, A., Freytag, B., Masseron, T., & Plez, B. 2011, A&A, 535, A22

    2011

  14. [22]

    Cioni, M. . R. L., Storm, J., Bell, C. P. M., et al. 2019, The Messenger, 175, 54

    2019

  15. [23]

    D., Kharchenko, N

    Conrad, C., Scholz, R. D., Kharchenko, N. V ., et al. 2017, A&A, 600, A106

    2017

  16. [24]

    Dantas, M. L. L., Guiglion, G., Smiljanic, R., et al. 2022, A&A, 668, L7

    2022

  17. [25]

    Dantas, M. L. L., Smiljanic, R., Boesso, R., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A96 de Jong, R. S., Agertz, O., Berbel, A. A., et al. 2019, The Messenger, 175, 3 Delgado Mena, E., Adibekyan, V ., Santos, N. C., et al. 2021, A&A, 655, A99

    2023

  18. [26]

    2022, MNRAS, 513, 5920

    Feldmeier-Krause, A. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 5920

    2022

  19. [27]

    M., Magg, E., Plez, B., et al

    Gerber, J. M., Magg, E., Plez, B., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A43

    2023

  20. [28]

    2024, A&A, 683, A73

    Guiglion, G., Bergemann, M., Storm, N., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A73

    2024

  21. [29]

    2019, A&A, 623, A99

    Guiglion, G., Chiappini, C., Romano, D., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A99

    2019

  22. [30]

    2018, A&A, 619, A143

    Guiglion, G., de Laverny, P., Recio-Blanco, A., & Prantzos, N. 2018, A&A, 619, A143

    2018

  23. [31]

    2016, A&A, 595, A18

    Guiglion, G., de Laverny, P., Recio-Blanco, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A18

    2016

  24. [32]

    Guiglion, G., Matijeviˇc, G., Queiroz, A. B. A., et al. 2020, A&A, 644, A168

    2020

  25. [33]

    2008, A&A, 486, 951

    Gustafsson, B., Edvardsson, B., Eriksson, K., et al. 2008, A&A, 486, 951

    2008

  26. [34]

    J., Bergemann, M., Cescutti, G., et al

    Hansen, C. J., Bergemann, M., Cescutti, G., et al. 2013, A&A, 551, A57

    2013

  27. [35]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    2020

  28. [36]

    2021, A&A, 645, A106

    Heiter, U., Lind, K., Bergemann, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 645, A106

    2021

  29. [37]

    2019, The Messenger, 175, 23

    Helmi, A., Irwin, M., Deason, A., et al. 2019, The Messenger, 175, 23

    2019

  30. [38]

    1991, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics, 24, 3943

    Hibbert, A., Biemont, E., Godefroid, M., & Vaeck, N. 1991, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics, 24, 3943

    1991

  31. [39]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90 Jofré, P., Heiter, U., Soubiran, C., et al. 2015, A&A, 582, A81 Jofré, P., Traven, G., Hawkins, K., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 2517

    2007

  32. [40]

    N., Xie, J

    Kirby, E. N., Xie, J. L., Guo, R., Kovalev, M., & Bergemann, M. 2018, ApJS, 237, 18

    2018

  33. [41]

    2013, AJ, 146, 134

    Kordopatis, G., Gilmore, G., Steinmetz, M., et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 134

    2013

  34. [42]

    Kordopatis, G., Wyse, R. F. G., & Binney, J. 2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 904

    2016

  35. [43]

    Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team

    Kramida, A., Yu. Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team. 2024, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.12), [Online]. Available: https://physics.nist.gov/asd [2025, April 3]. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD

    2024

  36. [44]

    S., Beers, T

    Lee, Y . S., Beers, T. C., An, D., et al. 2011, ApJ, 738, 187 9 https://www.overleaf.com/

    2011

  37. [45]

    & Amarsi, A

    Lind, K. & Amarsi, A. M. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.00697

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    S., & Belyaev, A

    Lind, K., Asplund, M., Barklem, P. S., & Belyaev, A. K. 2011, A&A, 528, A103

    2011

  39. [47]

    2022, A&A, 661, A140

    Magg, E., Bergemann, M., Serenelli, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A140

    2022

  40. [48]

    2013, A&A, 557, A26

    Magic, Z., Collet, R., Asplund, M., et al. 2013, A&A, 557, A26

    2013

  41. [49]

    2008, A&A, 478, 529 Matijeviˇc, G., Chiappini, C., Grebel, E

    Mashonkina, L., Zhao, G., Gehren, T., et al. 2008, A&A, 478, 529 Matijeviˇc, G., Chiappini, C., Grebel, E. K., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, A19

    2008

  42. [50]

    & Brocato, E

    Matteucci, F. & Brocato, E. 1990, ApJ, 365, 539

    1990

  43. [51]

    & Greggio, L

    Matteucci, F. & Greggio, L. 1986, A&A, 154, 279

    1986

  44. [52]

    2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, ed

    McKinney, W. 2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, ed. Stéfan van der Walt & Jarrod Millman, 56 – 61

    2010

  45. [53]

    J., Kordopatis, G., Kunder, A., et al

    McMillan, P. J., Kordopatis, G., Kunder, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 5279 Mikolaitis, Š., Drazdauskas, A., Minkeviˇci¯ut˙e, R., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A49 Mikolaitis, Š., Hill, V ., Recio-Blanco, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 572, A33

    2018

  46. [54]

    2018, MNRAS, 481, 1645

    Minchev, I., Anders, F., Recio-Blanco, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 1645

    2018

  47. [55]

    2013, A&A, 558, A9

    Minchev, I., Chiappini, C., & Martig, M. 2013, A&A, 558, A9

    2013

  48. [56]

    2014, ApJ, 781, L20

    Minchev, I., Chiappini, C., Martig, M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 781, L20

    2014

  49. [57]

    V ., Korotin, S

    Mishenina, T. V ., Korotin, S. A., Klochkova, V . G., & Panchuk, V . E. 2000, A&A, 353, 978

    2000

  50. [58]

    1999, Sol

    Neckel, H. 1999, Sol. Phys., 184, 421

    1999

  51. [59]

    S., et al

    Nepal, S., Guiglion, G., de Jong, R. S., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, A61

    2023

  52. [60]

    W., Rix, H

    Ness, M., Hogg, D. W., Rix, H. W., Ho, A. Y . Q., & Zasowski, G. 2015, ApJ, 808, 16

    2015

  53. [61]

    M., Lind, K., et al

    Nordlander, T., Amarsi, A. M., Lind, K., et al. 2017, A&A, 597, A6 Nordström, B., Mayor, M., Andersen, J., et al. 2004, A&A, 418, 989

    2017

  54. [62]

    S., Lind, K., et al

    Osorio, Y ., Barklem, P. S., Lind, K., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A53

    2015

  55. [63]

    V ., Jenkins, J

    Pavlenko, Y . V ., Jenkins, J. S., Jones, H. R. A., Ivanyuk, O., & Pinfield, D. J. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 542

    2012

  56. [64]

    2012, Turbospectrum: Code for spectral synthesis, Astrophysics Source Code Library

    Plez, B. 2012, Turbospectrum: Code for spectral synthesis, Astrophysics Source Code Library

    2012

  57. [65]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.01706

    Rix, H.-W., Chandra, V ., Zasowski, G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.01706

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    2022, A&A Rev., 30, 7 Roškar, R., Debattista, V

    Romano, D. 2022, A&A Rev., 30, 7 Roškar, R., Debattista, V . P., Quinn, T. R., Stinson, G. S., & Wadsley, J. 2008, ApJ, 684, L79 Schönrich, R. & Binney, J. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 203

    2022

  59. [67]

    2020, A&A, 643, A164

    Semenova, E., Bergemann, M., Deal, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A164

    2020

  60. [68]

    2024, A&A, 691, A160

    Sharma, A., Stonkut˙e, E., Drazdauska, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A160

    2024

  61. [69]

    M., Mashonkina, L

    Sitnova, T. M., Mashonkina, L. I., Tatarnikov, A. M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 1183

    2021

  62. [70]

    2006, AJ, 132, 1645 Stonkut˙e, E., Chorniy, Y ., Tautvaišien˙e, G., et al

    Steinmetz, M., Zwitter, T., Siebert, A., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1645 Stonkut˙e, E., Chorniy, Y ., Tautvaišien˙e, G., et al. 2020, AJ, 159, 90

    2006

  63. [71]

    & Bergemann, M

    Storm, N. & Bergemann, M. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 3718 Tautvaišien˙e, G., Mikolaitis, Š., Drazdauskas, A., et al. 2020, ApJS, 248, 19 Tautvaišien˙e, G., Viscasillas Vázquez, C., Mikolaitis, Š., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A126

    2023

  64. [72]

    2011, A&A, 535, A42

    Trevisan, M., Barbuy, B., Eriksson, K., et al. 2011, A&A, 535, A42

    2011

  65. [73]

    R., et al

    Valentini, M., Chiappini, C., Davies, G. R., et al. 2017, A&A, 600, A66

    2017

  66. [74]

    2014, ApJ, 794, 173

    Vera-Ciro, C., D’Onghia, E., Navarro, J., & Abadi, M. 2014, ApJ, 794, 173

    2014

  67. [75]

    X., Nordlander, T., Buder, S., et al

    Wang, E. X., Nordlander, T., Buder, S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 5394

    2024

  68. [76]

    Waskom, M. L. 2021, Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3021

    2021

  69. [77]

    2018, MNRAS, 477, 5612

    Wojno, J., Kordopatis, G., Steinmetz, M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 5612

    2018

  70. [78]

    E., Hartmann, D

    Woosley, S. E., Hartmann, D. H., Hoffman, R. D., & Haxton, W. C. 1990, ApJ, 356, 272 Article number, page 9 of 11 A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa53526-24 Fig. A.1. Same Figure as Fig. 7, together with [O /Fe] ratios computed in RA VE from⟨3D⟩ NLTE corrections (in red). Appendix ...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.