REVIEW 2 cited by
GPT Can Solve Mathematical Problems Without a Calculator
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Previous studies have typically assumed that large language models are unable to accurately perform arithmetic operations, particularly multiplication of >8 digits, and operations involving decimals and fractions, without the use of calculator tools. This paper aims to challenge this misconception. With sufficient training data, a 2 billion-parameter language model can accurately perform multi-digit arithmetic operations with almost 100% accuracy without data leakage, significantly surpassing GPT-4 (whose multi-digit multiplication accuracy is only 4.3%). We also demonstrate that our MathGLM, fine-tuned from GLM-10B on a dataset with additional multi-step arithmetic operations and math problems described in text, achieves similar performance to GPT-4 on a 5,000-samples Chinese math problem test set. Our code and data are public at https://github.com/THUDM/MathGLM.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Explaining and Tuning Transformer-based LLMs in Arithmetic Tasks with Human Strategies
A small transformer learns addition, multiplication, and division by mastering simple digit subtasks first, and human teaching strategies lift its arithmetic accuracy to ~100%.
-
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge?
Tool-augmented LLM annotators improve agreement with ground-truth preferences on long-form factual and coding tasks, with mixed results on math, compared to standard LLM-as-a-judge baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.