REVIEW 3 cited by
Fraud Dataset Benchmark and Applications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Fraud Dataset Benchmark and Applications
read the original abstract
Standardized datasets and benchmarks have spurred innovations in computer vision, natural language processing, multi-modal and tabular settings. We note that, as compared to other well researched fields, fraud detection has unique challenges: high-class imbalance, diverse feature types, frequently changing fraud patterns, and adversarial nature of the problem. Due to these, the modeling approaches evaluated on datasets from other research fields may not work well for the fraud detection. In this paper, we introduce Fraud Dataset Benchmark (FDB), a compilation of publicly available datasets catered to fraud detection FDB comprises variety of fraud related tasks, ranging from identifying fraudulent card-not-present transactions, detecting bot attacks, classifying malicious URLs, estimating risk of loan default to content moderation. The Python based library for FDB provides a consistent API for data loading with standardized training and testing splits. We demonstrate several applications of FDB that are of broad interest for fraud detection, including feature engineering, comparison of supervised learning algorithms, label noise removal, class-imbalance treatment and semi-supervised learning. We hope that FDB provides a common playground for researchers and practitioners in the fraud detection domain to develop robust and customized machine learning techniques targeting various fraud use cases.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
SAGE: An LLM-driven Self Reflective Agentic Framework for Fraud Detection
SAGE is the first end-to-end LLM-driven multi-agent fraud detection system using a Data Diagnostic Tree and MDP optimization, achieving 40.86% average F1 gain and winning 96% of comparisons across five datasets and fi...
-
High Performance, Low Reliability: Uncertainty Benchmarking for Tabular Foundation Models
TFMs achieve top AUC on TALENT but lower conditional coverage (SSCS) than GBDTs under conformal prediction, revealing a performance-uncertainty trade-off.
-
SilIF: Silhouette-Augmented Isolation Forest for Unsupervised Transaction Fraud Detection
SilIF blends Isolation Forest path lengths with silhouette scores from clustered fingerprints, yielding +0.008 AUC-PR gain on IEEE-CIS fraud data but no gain on synthetic credit-card data.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.