Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 91 references

Correspondence-Free Fast and Robust Spherical Point Pattern Registration

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that rotation between two spherical point patterns can be recovered in linear time from 1D histogram correlations alone, with median errors below one degree even at 90 percent outliers.

desk verdict Sound linear-time algorithm with a correct noiseless proof, but the '10x better than SOTA' claim is tested against one weak baseline, so the headline needs rework before it can be taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.02339 v1 pith:NT34AMVU submitted 2025-08-04 cs.CV cs.RO

Anik Sarker , Alan T. Asbeck This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.RO MSC 68T4565D18
keywords sphericalpointpatternregistrationWahbaproblemrotationestimationcorrespondence-freelineartimecomplexitycross-correlationcloudoutlierrobustness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that estimating the rotation between two spherical point patterns — the correspondence-free form of the Wahba problem — does not require searching rotation space, and can be solved in linear time, $O(n)$, through one-dimensional histogram correlations alone. Its recipe is to rotate each pattern so its mean direction points at the north pole, which reduces the unknown relative rotation to a single azimuthal shift recoverable by circular cross-correlation, then to refine the result with an iterative per-axis correlation (FRS). On a new benchmark spanning five pattern families with outlier ratios up to 90 percent, the hybrid reports median angular errors under one degree and runs over ten times faster than the feature-based FPFH+QUASAR state of the art, which the paper finds frequently fails on spherical data. The same machinery is adapted to point cloud registration, where it registers partial clouds with about 2 degrees of rotation error, and to spherical image alignment under substantial clutter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the binary 2D histogram of a spherical point set on an equirectangular grid (360 azimuth by 180 polar bins), together with the mean-direction normalization that precedes it. The mean direction is the unit vector through the arithmetic centroid of the $\mathbb{S}^2$ points; rotating the pattern so this direction becomes the north pole removes two degrees of freedom from the rotation hypothesis, leaving a single azimuthal rotation, which is then found by 1D circular cross-correlation of histograms summed over polar angle (SPMC). FRS generalizes the same correlation idea to all three axes: it forms histograms of the axis-direction angles $\theta_z=\operatorname{atan2}(y,x)$, $\theta_y=\operatorname{atan2}(x,z)$, $\theta_x=\operatorname{atan2}(z,y)$, cross-correlates each moving histogram against the template's fixed histograms, builds the rotation $R=R_z R_y R_x$ from the three winning shifts, and iterates until the shifts vanish. Because every histogram has a fixed 360-bin width, each correlation step costs $O(1)$, so the total cost is dominated by binning the $n$ points; the hybrid simply seeds FRS with the SPMC rotation.

What would settle it

A concrete experiment would take the paper's A2-style pattern (sharp features concentrated on one cap), add 90 percent outliers, and search many random rotations for a case where SPMC's mean-direction alignment is pulled far enough off that FRS locks onto a wrong local rotation; any such case with median error far above 1 degree would show that the robust-performance claim does not hold uniformly over the A2 family. A second check is the iteration count itself: if a large-sample run ever exceeds the 50-iteration cap, the constant behind the linear-time claim breaks, since the complexity bound treats FRS iterations as $O(1)$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that rotation estimation between two spherical point sets collapses to a 1D shift problem. Rotating each set so that its mean direction coincides with the north pole leaves any residual relative rotation as a rotation about the z-axis; the peak of a 1D circular cross-correlation between the two azimuthal histograms then gives that rotation exactly, and the supplement proves this recovery is exact in the noise-free, outlier-free case (SPMC). Since outliers bias the mean, SPMC alone degrades, so the paper adds FRS, an iterative algorithm that builds histograms of axis-direction angles around the x-, y-, and z-axes, cross-correlates each against the template's fixed histograms, and multiplies the resulting rotations until the shifts stop changing. The hybrid SPMC+FRS — SPMC as initialization, FRS as refinement — is what the paper claims achieves under one degree median rotation error across five pattern datasets with up to 90 percent outliers, in linear time, against a baseline pipeline that takes roughly 23 seconds and often misses by more than 100 degrees on the same inputs.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the iterative FRS refinement, seeded by SPMC, reliably converges to the correct rotation: the paper offers empirical iteration counts (average 11, maximum 34) rather than a convergence proof, and acknowledges that FRS alone is initialization-sensitive for patterns whose sharp features cluster on one side of the sphere (Dataset A2).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Rotation estimation for correspondence-free spherical patterns becomes $O(n)$, compared with super-cubic $O(N_r^3 \log N_r)$ scaling for spherical-harmonic cross-correlation as rotation-space sampling grows.
  • The paper's experiments imply the hybrid reaches median rotation errors under 1 degree at outlier contamination up to 90 percent, while the FPFH+QUASAR baseline exceeds 100 degrees on the same spherical patterns, showing that feature-descriptor correspondences are the bottleneck on the sphere.
  • Embedding point clouds on the sphere (EGI or the new CASE embedding) turns point cloud registration into spherical registration: roughly 0.13 degree median error on complete-to-complete cases and roughly 2 degrees on partial-to-complete cases, with success for overlaps down to 65 percent.
  • Spherical image pairs can be registered by thresholding pixel intensities into a spherical point cloud, yielding median rotation errors near 0.9 degrees even with roughly 19 percent clutter and large initial offsets.
  • The linear-time guarantee holds because FRS iteration counts stay bounded in practice (average 11, maximum 34 in the reported runs); a 50-iteration cap keeps that constant small.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If mean alignment really collapses the rotation search to an azimuthal shift, the same collapse generalizes to higher dimensions: in $\mathbb{R}^d$, aligning means leaves the residual in $SO(d-1)$, so a recursive per-axis histogram correlation should extend the method to unit-vector alignment beyond 3D, as the authors mention but do not pursue.
  • The paper's own A5 finding — SPMC accuracy falls from 0.24 to 11.32 degrees as outliers reach 90 percent because the mean shifts toward the outliers — points to a direct enhancement the paper does not test: substituting a robust directional mean (trimmed or median direction) would likely recover the lost accuracy while keeping the algorithm linear-time.
  • The reported 65 percent overlap threshold and the supplementary failure case at roughly 20 percent overlap suggest the practical envelope of the method is set not by rotation search but by how well the spherical embedding preserves shared structure; embedding design, which the conclusion explicitly leaves open, is the highest-leverage next step.
  • A convergence proof for FRS — bounding the iteration count by a measure of pattern sharpness rather than by the empirical cap of 50 — would close the only gap between the demonstrated method and a fully certified linear-time algorithm.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper addresses correspondence-free rotation estimation between two spherical (S^2) point patterns, formulated as the Wahba problem with unknown correspondences. It proposes three algorithms: SPMC, which aligns the mean directions of the two sets and then finds the residual z-rotation by 1D circular cross-correlation of azimuthal histograms; FRS, an iterative histogram-shift procedure over axis-direction angles; and a hybrid SPMC+FRS that initializes FRS with the SPMC output. The authors claim O(n) time complexity for all three algorithms and, in the abstract and Section 1, that their methods are over 10x faster and over 10x more accurate than current state-of-the-art methods for the Wahba problem with outliers. Experiments cover a synthetic Robust Vector Alignment Dataset, point cloud registration on ModelNet40 (with EGI and a proposed CASE embedding), and rotation estimation from spherical images. The supplementary material contains an exact-recovery proof of SPMC in the noiseless, outlier-free case, iteration statistics for FRS, and additional real-world dataset results.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper makes a useful contribution: a simple histogram-correlation formulation of spherical rotation search with linear-time scaling, a new synthetic benchmark, and a released dataset/code are all valuable for the correspondence-free registration community. The exact-recovery proof of SPMC in the supplementary material is a genuine strength, as is the reproducible experimental setup. However, the central '10x faster and 10x more accurate than current SOTA' claim is currently evidenced only against a single correspondence-based baseline, FPFH+QUASAR, while the methods motivating the paper (spherical cross-correlation and other correspondence-free searches) are not benchmarked. The robustness claims also outrun the formal proof, which covers only the no-no/no-outlier case, and the FRS convergence behavior is supported only by empirical iteration counts. The contribution is therefore promising but not yet fully substantiated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5.1, Fig. 4; abstract and Sec. 1] The headline accuracy and speed claim ('over 10x faster and over 10x more accurate than current state-of-the-art methods for the Wahba problem with outliers') is tested only against FPFH+QUASAR, a correspondence-based pipeline that the paper itself shows fails on several spherical datasets (e.g., A3B1, A4B1, A5B1 median errors above 100 degrees). No spherical cross-correlation method, no PHASER or other correspondence-free rotation search, no Go-ICP/branch-and-bound baseline, and no QUASAR run with true correspondences is included. Because the paper motivates its contribution against spherical cross-correlation, the absence of any such baseline leaves the 'SOTA' comparison untested. The authors should add at least one spherical cross-correlation baseline and one global SO(3) search baseline, and report the comparison on the same R100 rotations.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Algorithm 2; Sec. 5.1; Supp. Sec. 9.2] The FRS algorithm has no convergence proof; the paper states only empirical iteration counts (average 11, maximum 34) and acknowledges that FRS alone is initialization-sensitive for shapes with sharp localized features (Dataset A2). Since the hybrid SPMC+FRS relies on FRS to refine the initial SPMC estimate, the robustness of the hybrid under high outlier ratios is not fully explained. The authors should either provide a convergence/descent analysis for the alternating histogram-shift updates or, at minimum, present a detailed ablation showing how much of the final accuracy is attributable to FRS and how the initialization error propagates.
  3. [Sec. 5.1, Dataset A5; Sec. 4.1] The authors acknowledge that SPMC's mean-direction alignment causes performance degradation as outlier ratios increase: for Dataset A5, the median error rises from 0.24 degrees to 11.32 degrees going from B1 to B7 (90% outliers), because the mean shifts toward the outliers. This directly limits the claimed robustness of the correspondence-free formulation in the high-outlier regime. The exact-recovery proof in Supp. Sec. 8 assumes no noise and no outliers, so it does not cover this case. The paper should quantify how the hybrid SPMC+FRS restores accuracy in the high-outlier configurations (e.g., report per-dataset median errors for SPMC vs. SPMC+FRS for B7) and state precisely under what data conditions the 'less than 1 degree median error' claim holds.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, Algorithm 2] The termination condition on line 10 tests whether x shift, y shift, and z shift equal the initial target shifts sT (initialized to 0); this is not a standard convergence criterion and should be clarified, since the loop may terminate when the current shift happens to match a previously stored value rather than when the histograms are aligned.
  2. [Sec. 3, Eq. (1)] There is a typo in the text: 'more specifically where where latitude angle is +90◦' should be 'more specifically where the latitude angle is +90◦'.
  3. [Sec. 5.3] The notation R100 is used for the 100 random rotations but is defined only in the caption of Fig. 4; the main text should define it where the dataset is described.
  4. [Sec. 5.1, Fig. 4 and Fig. 5] The box plots report medians only; for a robustness claim, it would be more informative to show interquartile ranges or full error distributions, especially for the B7 (90% outlier) cases and for the FRS iteration counts.
  5. [Supp. Sec. 9.1] The degradation of SPMC in Dataset A5 is attributed to mean shift; a formal or quantitative analysis of the mean direction under outlier contamination (e.g., the Fisher mean under a noise model) would make the limitation more precise and would help the reader understand the empirical threshold beyond which SPMC alone fails.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: SPMC's derivation is self-contained; the residual rotation is a z-rotation and the histogram shift directly recovers it.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce any claimed prediction to a fitted input or to a load-bearing self-citation. SPMC is justified by an explicit exact-recovery proof (Supplementary Sec. 8): after rotations RA and RB align the mean directions of the two spherical sets to the north pole, the residual rotation fixes the north pole and is therefore a z-axis rotation Rz(theta); the 1D circular cross-correlation over azimuthal histogram bins (Eqs. 2-3) recovers that angle, and Eq. 5 composes the rotations to obtain Ropt = Rtrue. No target quantity is fitted into the derivation; the histogram resolution, binarization threshold, and intensity threshold are fixed implementation choices, not parameters optimized against the ground-truth rotations. FRS is an iterative refinement whose convergence is reported empirically (Supplementary Sec. 9.2), but its update rule is not derived by assuming the desired rotation, and the hybrid simply uses SPMC as an initialization. There are no author self-citations, no imported uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz smuggled in via citation. The main evidence-quality weakness is that the headline 'over 10x faster and over 10x more accurate' claim is benchmarked only against FPFH+QUASAR, a correspondence-based baseline that the paper itself shows fails on spherical data; this is a correctness-of-evidence concern about the comparison, not circularity, because the compared errors come from independent runs rather than from the method's own assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The core SPMC derivation is self-contained and uses only standard properties of rotations and histograms. The method does depend on hand-set hyperparameters (histogram resolution, thresholds, iteration bound, voxel size) and on unproved convergence of the FRS refinement. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • Histogram bin resolution = 360 x 180 (1 degree)
    Chosen in Sec 4.1 as the bin resolution for all experiments. Coarser bins improve robustness to noise, finer bins help dense clouds, so this is a hand-set trade-off affecting accuracy.
  • Binary histogram threshold = 0
    Sec 3: bins with count at least this threshold are set to 1, otherwise 0. The paper sets threshold to 0 because point clouds have many empty bins, making this a hand-chosen binarization parameter.
  • SphImg2SphPoints intensity threshold = 0.21
    Sec 5.3: pixels above this intensity become points. Lower thresholds capture more features and clutter; the value was chosen for the spherical-image experiments.
  • FRS max iterations K = 50
    Algorithm 2: an upper bound set conservatively from observed convergence. Experiments show mean 11 and maximum 34 iterations, so K is a hand-set stopping bound.
  • FRS bin multiplier k = 1
    Algorithm 2: histogram resolution for FRS is k x 360 bins, with k set to 1. This multiplier affects discretization and is chosen by hand.
  • Voxel size for translation voting = 0.2 units
    Supp Sec 10.3: used in coarse translation estimation for point cloud registration. Chosen by hand, not derived.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Spherical patterns are adequately represented as discrete point sets on the unit sphere, so rotation estimation can be reduced to Wahba-style vector alignment.
    Sec 1 and Sec 4 define the problem this way; this excludes spherical-function representations used by prior cross-correlation methods.
  • domain assumption The mean direction of each point set is well-defined and, in the no-outlier case, transforms correctly under the true rotation.
    Used in SPMC Step 1 and the exact-recovery proof in Supp Sec 8. If the centroid is at the origin or outliers move the mean, SPMC degrades, as the paper notes for Dataset A5 (Sec 5.1).
  • standard math A rotation that fixes the north pole is a rotation about the z-axis.
    Used to reduce the residual rotation after mean alignment to a single azimuthal shift; a standard property of SO(3).
  • standard math The 1D azimuthal histogram of a spherically rotated point set is a circularly shifted version of the original histogram.
    Underlies SPMC Step 4; true for exact rigid rotations of points on the sphere.
  • ad hoc to paper The iterative FRS updates converge to the optimal rotation from the SPMC initialization.
    Algorithm 2 has no convergence proof. The paper reports empirical iteration counts (Supp Sec 9.2) and notes FRS alone is initialization-sensitive (Sec 5.1). This is a load-bearing unproved premise for the hybrid algorithm.
  • domain assumption For point cloud registration, the chosen spherical embedding (EGI or CASE) preserves enough rotational information for the registration to succeed.
    Sec 5.2 and Supp 10.2. CASE assumes a known centroid for complete-to-complete registration, and the conclusion states that robust spherical embeddings remain a critical factor.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Correspondence-Free Fast and Robust Spherical Point Pattern Registration." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NT34AMVU

@misc{pith2026250802339,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Correspondence-Free Fast and Robust Spherical Point Pattern Registration},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NT34AMVU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.02339}
}
abstract

Existing methods for rotation estimation between two spherical ($\mathbb{S}^2$) patterns typically rely on spherical cross-correlation maximization between two spherical function. However, these approaches exhibit computational complexities greater than cubic $O(n^3)$ with respect to rotation space discretization and lack extensive evaluation under significant outlier contamination. To this end, we propose a rotation estimation algorithm between two spherical patterns with linear time complexity $O(n)$. Unlike existing spherical-function-based methods, we explicitly represent spherical patterns as discrete 3D point sets on the unit sphere, reformulating rotation estimation as a spherical point-set alignment (i.e., Wahba problem for 3D unit vectors). Given the geometric nature of our formulation, our spherical pattern alignment algorithm naturally aligns with the Wahba problem framework for 3D unit vectors. Specifically, we introduce three novel algorithms: (1) SPMC (Spherical Pattern Matching by Correlation), (2) FRS (Fast Rotation Search), and (3) a hybrid approach (SPMC+FRS) that combines the advantages of the previous two methods. Our experiments demonstrate that in the $\mathbb{S}^2$ domain and in correspondence-free settings, our algorithms are over 10x faster and over 10x more accurate than current state-of-the-art methods for the Wahba problem with outliers. We validate our approach through extensive simulations on a new dataset of spherical patterns, the ``Robust Vector Alignment Dataset. "Furthermore, we adapt our methods to two real-world tasks: (i) Point Cloud Registration (PCR) and (ii) rotation estimation for spherical images.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Outlier-robust estimation: Hardness, mini- mally tuned algorithms, and applications.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 38(1):281–301, 2021

    Pasquale Antonante, Vasileios Tzoumas, Heng Yang, and Luca Carlone. Outlier-robust estimation: Hardness, mini- mally tuned algorithms, and applications.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 38(1):281–301, 2021. 2

    2021

  2. [2]

    Pointnetlk: Robust & efficient point cloud registration using pointnet

    Yasuhiro Aoki, Hunter Goforth, Rangaprasad Arun Srivat- san, and Simon Lucey. Pointnetlk: Robust & efficient point cloud registration using pointnet. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 7163–7172, 2019. 3, 6

    2019

  3. [3]

    Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets

    K Somani Arun, Thomas S Huang, and Steven D Blostein. Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets. IEEE Transac- tions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , PAMI-9 (5):698–700, 1987. 2, 3

    1987

  4. [4]

    Pointdsc: Ro- bust point cloud registration using deep spatial consistency

    Xuyang Bai, Zixin Luo, Lei Zhou, Hongkai Chen, Lei Li, Zeyu Hu, Hongbo Fu, and Chiew-Lan Tai. Pointdsc: Ro- bust point cloud registration using deep spatial consistency. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 15859–15869, 2021. 3

    2021

  5. [5]

    Reagent: Point cloud registration using imitation and rein- forcement learning

    Dominik Bauer, Timothy Patten, and Markus Vincze. Reagent: Point cloud registration using imitation and rein- forcement learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14586–14594, 2021. 3

    2021

  6. [6]

    Globally optimal inlier set maximization with unknown rotation and focal length

    Jean-Charles Bazin, Yongduek Seo, Richard Hartley, and Marc Pollefeys. Globally optimal inlier set maximization with unknown rotation and focal length. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part II 13, pages 803–817. Springer, 2014. 2

    2014

  7. [7]

    Phaser: A robust and correspondence- free global pointcloud registration

    Lukas Bernreiter, Lionel Ott, Juan Nieto, Roland Siegwart, and Cesar Cadena. Phaser: A robust and correspondence- free global pointcloud registration. IEEE Robotics and Au- tomation Letters, 6(2):855–862, 2021. 2, 3

    2021

  8. [8]

    Method for registration of 3-d shapes

    Paul J Besl and Neil D McKay. Method for registration of 3-d shapes. In Sensor fusion IV: control paradigms and data structures, pages 586–606. Spie, 1992. 2

    1992

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    G ´erard Blais and Martin D. Levine. Registering multiview range data to create 3d computer objects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 17(8):820– 824, 1995. 2

    1995

  2. [10]

    Guaranteed outlier removal for point cloud registration with correspondences

    Alvaro Parra Bustos and Tat-Jun Chin. Guaranteed outlier removal for point cloud registration with correspondences. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelli- gence, 40(12):2868–2882, 2017. 2

    2017

  3. [11]

    Gogma: Globally- optimal gaussian mixture alignment

    Dylan Campbell and Lars Petersson. Gogma: Globally- optimal gaussian mixture alignment. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recogni- tion, pages 5685–5694, 2016. 3

    2016

  4. [12]

    Spherical correla- tion as a similarity measure for 3-d radiation patterns of mu- sical instruments

    Thibaut Carpentier and Aaron Einbond. Spherical correla- tion as a similarity measure for 3-d radiation patterns of mu- sical instruments. Acta Acustica, 7:40, 2023. 2

    2023

  5. [13]

    A total least-squares es- timate for attitude determination

    Yang Cheng and John L Crassidis. A total least-squares es- timate for attitude determination. In AIAA Scitech 2019 Fo- rum, page 1176, 2019. 2

    2019

  6. [14]

    The trimmed iterative closest point algorithm

    Dmitry Chetverikov, Dmitry Svirko, Dmitry Stepanov, and Pavel Krsek. The trimmed iterative closest point algorithm. In 2002 International Conference on Pattern Recognition , pages 545–548. IEEE, 2002. 2

    2002

  7. [15]

    Guaranteed outlier removal with mixed integer linear programs

    Tat-Jun Chin, Yang Heng Kee, Anders Eriksson, and Frank Neumann. Guaranteed outlier removal with mixed integer linear programs. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 5858– 5866, 2016. 3

    2016

  8. [16]

    Star tracking using an event camera

    Tat-Jun Chin, Samya Bagchi, Anders Eriksson, and Andre Van Schaik. Star tracking using an event camera. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 0–0, 2019. 2

    2019

  9. [17]

    Fully convolutional geometric features

    Christopher Choy, Jaesik Park, and Vladlen Koltun. Fully convolutional geometric features. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages 8958–8966, 2019. 2

    2019

  10. [18]

    Deep global registration

    Christopher Choy, Wei Dong, and Vladlen Koltun. Deep global registration. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 2514–2523, 2020. 3

    2020

  11. [19]

    A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration

    Haili Chui and Anand Rangarajan. A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 89(2-3):114–141, 2003. 2

    2003

  12. [20]

    Spherical cnns

    Taco S Cohen, Mario Geiger, Jonas K ¨ohler, and Max Welling. Spherical cnns. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.10130,

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Model globally, match locally: Efficient and robust 3d object recognition

    Bertram Drost, Markus Ulrich, Nassir Navab, and Slobodan Ilic. Model globally, match locally: Efficient and robust 3d object recognition. In 2010 IEEE computer society confer- ence on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 998–

    2010

  14. [22]

    Scaling spherical cnns

    Carlos Esteves, Jean-Jacques Slotine, and Ameesh Makadia. Scaling spherical cnns. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05420 ,

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography.Communications of the ACM, 24(6):381–395, 1981

    Martin A Fischler and Robert C Bolles. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography.Communications of the ACM, 24(6):381–395, 1981. 2

    1981

  16. [24]

    Linear- matrix-inequality-based solution to wahba’s problem

    James Richard Forbes and Anton HJ de Ruiter. Linear- matrix-inequality-based solution to wahba’s problem. Jour- nal of guidance, control, and dynamics , 38(1):147–151,

  17. [25]

    Vision meets robotics: The kitti dataset

    Andreas Geiger, Philip Lenz, Christoph Stiller, and Raquel Urtasun. Vision meets robotics: The kitti dataset. The in- ternational journal of robotics research, 32(11):1231–1237,

  18. [26]

    Procrustes prob- lems

    John C Gower and Garmt B Dijksterhuis. Procrustes prob- lems. OUP Oxford, 2004. 2

    2004

  19. [27]

    Shape registration with spherical cross correlation

    Boris Gutman, Yalin Wang, Tony Chan, Paul M Thomp- son, and Arthur W Toga. Shape registration with spherical cross correlation. In 2nd MICCAI Workshop on Mathemat- ical Foundations of Computational Anatomy , pages 56–67,

  20. [28]

    Global optimization through rotation space search

    Richard I Hartley and Fredrik Kahl. Global optimization through rotation space search. International Journal of Com- puter Vision, 82(1):64–79, 2009. 2

    2009

  21. [29]

    B.K.P. Horn. Extended gaussian images. Proceedings of the IEEE, 72(12):1671–1686, 1984. 2, 6

    1984

  22. [30]

    Closed-form solution of absolute orien- tation using unit quaternions

    Berthold KP Horn. Closed-form solution of absolute orien- tation using unit quaternions. Josa a, 4(4):629–642, 1987. 2, 3

    1987

  23. [31]

    Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices

    Berthold KP Horn, Hugh M Hilden, and Shahriar Negah- daripour. Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices. Josa a, 5(7):1127–1135, 1988. 2

    1988

  24. [32]

    Predator: Registration of 3d point clouds with low overlap

    Shengyu Huang, Zan Gojcic, Mikhail Usvyatsov, Andreas Wieser, and Konrad Schindler. Predator: Registration of 3d point clouds with low overlap. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4267–4276, 2021. 3

    2021

  25. [33]

    Robust point set registra- tion using gaussian mixture models

    Bing Jian and Baba C Vemuri. Robust point set registra- tion using gaussian mixture models. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 33(8):1633–1645,

  26. [34]

    A solution for the best rotation to re- late two sets of vectors

    Wolfgang Kabsch. A solution for the best rotation to re- late two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallographica Section A: Crystal Physics, Diffraction, Theoretical and General Crys- tallography, 32(5):922–923, 1976. 2, 3

    1976

  27. [35]

    Closed-form solutions for estimating a rigid motion from plane correspondences extracted from point clouds

    Kourosh Khoshelham. Closed-form solutions for estimating a rigid motion from plane correspondences extracted from point clouds. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114:78–91, 2016. 2

    2016

  28. [36]

    A time delay estimator based on the signal integral: Theoretical performance and testing on ECG signals

    Pablo Laguna et al. A time delay estimator based on the signal integral: Theoretical performance and testing on ECG signals. IEEE Trans. on Sig. Proc., 42(11):3224–3229, 1994. 1

    1994

  29. [37]

    Modern directional statistics

    Christophe Ley and Thomas Verdebout. Modern directional statistics. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017. 3

    2017

  30. [38]

    Weak sharp minima on riemannian manifolds

    Chong Li, Boris S Mordukhovich, Jinhua Wang, and Jen- Chih Yao. Weak sharp minima on riemannian manifolds. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 21(4):1523–1560, 2011. 3

    2011

  31. [39]

    The 3d-3d registration problem revisited

    Hongdong Li and Richard Hartley. The 3d-3d registration problem revisited. In 2007 IEEE 11th international confer- ence on computer vision, pages 1–8. IEEE, 2007. 2

    2007

  32. [40]

    Gesac: Robust graph enhanced sample consensus for point cloud registra- tion

    Jiayuan Li, Qingwu Hu, and Mingyao Ai. Gesac: Robust graph enhanced sample consensus for point cloud registra- tion. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sens- ing, 167:363–374, 2020. 2

    2020

  33. [41]

    Point cloud reg- istration based on one-point ransac and scale-annealing bi- weight estimation

    Jiayuan Li, Qingwu Hu, and Mingyao Ai. Point cloud reg- istration based on one-point ransac and scale-annealing bi- weight estimation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 59(11):9716–9729, 2021. 2

    2021

  34. [42]

    An efficient globally optimal algorithm for asymmetric point matching

    Wei Lian, Lei Zhang, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. An efficient globally optimal algorithm for asymmetric point matching. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelli- gence, 39(7):1281–1293, 2016. 3

    2016

  35. [43]

    Self-localization of mobile robots using a single catadioptric camera with line feature extraction

    Huei-Yung Lin, Yuan-Chi Chung, and Ming-Liang Wang. Self-localization of mobile robots using a single catadioptric camera with line feature extraction. Sensors, 21(14):4719,

  36. [44]

    Efficient global point cloud registration by matching rotation invariant features through translation search

    Yinlong Liu, Chen Wang, Zhijian Song, and Manning Wang. Efficient global point cloud registration by matching rotation invariant features through translation search. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , pages 448–463, 2018. 3

    2018

  37. [45]

    Fast and accurate registration of structured point clouds with small overlaps

    Yanxin Ma, Yulan Guo, Jian Zhao, Min Lu, Jun Zhang, and Jianwei Wan. Fast and accurate registration of structured point clouds with small overlaps. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition Workshops, pages 1–9, 2016. 3

    2016

  38. [46]

    Direct 3d-rotation estimation from spherical images via a generalized shift the- orem

    Ameesh Makadia and Kostas Daniilidis. Direct 3d-rotation estimation from spherical images via a generalized shift the- orem. In 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings. , pages II–217. IEEE, 2003. 2, 7

    2003

  39. [47]

    Rotation recovery from spherical images without correspondences.IEEE trans- actions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 28(7): 1170–1175, 2006

    Ameesh Makadia and Kostas Daniilidis. Rotation recovery from spherical images without correspondences.IEEE trans- actions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 28(7): 1170–1175, 2006. 2

    2006

  40. [48]

    Ro- tation estimation from spherical images

    Ameesh Makadia, Lorenzo Sorgi, and Kostas Daniilidis. Ro- tation estimation from spherical images. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition,

  41. [49]

    Fully automatic registration of 3d point clouds

    Ameesh Makadia, Alexander Patterson, and Kostas Dani- ilidis. Fully automatic registration of 3d point clouds. In 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’06), pages 1297–1304. IEEE, 2006. 2, 3

    2006

  42. [50]

    Directional statistics

    Kanti V Mardia and Peter E Jupp. Directional statistics. John Wiley & Sons, 2009. 3

    2009

  43. [51]

    Attitude determination using vector ob- servations and the singular value decomposition

    F Landis Markley. Attitude determination using vector ob- servations and the singular value decomposition. Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 36(3):245–258, 1988. 2

    1988

  44. [52]

    Point set registration: Coherent point drift

    Andriy Myronenko and Xubo Song. Point set registration: Coherent point drift. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 32(12):2262–2275, 2010. 2

    2010

  45. [53]

    A practical maximum clique algorithm for matching with pairwise constraints

    Alvaro Parra, Tat-Jun Chin, Frank Neumann, Tobias Friedrich, and Maximilian Katzmann. A practical maximum clique algorithm for matching with pairwise constraints. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.01534, 2019. 2

    1902 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Guaranteed outlier re- moval for rotation search

    Alvaro Parra Bustos and Tat-Jun Chin. Guaranteed outlier re- moval for rotation search. In Proceedings of the IEEE Inter- national Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2165–2173,

  47. [55]

    Fast rotation search with stereographic projections for 3d regis- tration

    Alvaro Parra Bustos, Tat-Jun Chin, and David Suter. Fast rotation search with stereographic projections for 3d regis- tration. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3930–3937, 2014. 3

    2014

  48. [56]

    Arcs: Accurate rotation and correspondence search

    Liangzu Peng, Manolis C Tsakiris, and Ren ´e Vidal. Arcs: Accurate rotation and correspondence search. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11153–11163, 2022. 2

    2022

  49. [57]

    Learning general and dis- tinctive 3d local deep descriptors for point cloud registration

    Fabio Poiesi and Davide Boscaini. Learning general and dis- tinctive 3d local deep descriptors for point cloud registration. IEEE TPAMI, 45(3):3979–3985, 2022. 4, 7

    2022

  50. [58]

    Spherical parametrization and remeshing

    Emil Praun and Hugues Hoppe. Spherical parametrization and remeshing. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) , 22 (3):340–349, 2003. 3

    2003

  51. [59]

    Efficient variants of the icp algorithm

    Szymon Rusinkiewicz and Marc Levoy. Efficient variants of the icp algorithm. In Proceedings third international confer- ence on 3-D digital imaging and modeling , pages 145–152. IEEE, 2001. 2, 6

    2001

  52. [60]

    Fast point feature histograms (fpfh) for 3d registration

    Radu Bogdan Rusu, Nico Blodow, and Michael Beetz. Fast point feature histograms (fpfh) for 3d registration. In 2009 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation , pages 3212–3217. IEEE, 2009. 2, 5

    2009

  53. [61]

    Learning3D: A Modern Library for Deep Learn- ing on 3D Point Clouds Data

    Vinit Saini. Learning3D: A Modern Library for Deep Learn- ing on 3D Point Clouds Data. https://github.com/ vinits5/learning3d, 2020. Accessed: 2024-11-12. 7

    2020

  54. [62]

    Pcrnet: Point cloud registration network using point- net encoding

    Vinit Sarode, Xueqian Li, Hunter Goforth, Yasuhiro Aoki, Rangaprasad Arun Srivatsan, Simon Lucey, and Howie Choset. Pcrnet: Point cloud registration network using point- net encoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.07906, 2019. 3, 6

    1908 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Semidefinite descriptions of the convex hull of rotation ma- trices

    James Saunderson, Pablo A Parrilo, and Alan S Willsky. Semidefinite descriptions of the convex hull of rotation ma- trices. SIAM Journal on Optimization , 25(3):1314–1343,

  56. [64]

    A generalized solution of the orthog- onal procrustes problem

    Peter H Sch ¨onemann. A generalized solution of the orthog- onal procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 31(1):1–10, 1966. 2

    1966

  57. [65]

    Robin: a graph-theoretic approach to reject outliers in robust estima- tion using invariants

    Jingnan Shi, Heng Yang, and Luca Carlone. Robin: a graph-theoretic approach to reject outliers in robust estima- tion using invariants. In2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pages 13820–13827. IEEE, 2021. 2

    2021

  58. [66]

    Normalized cross- correlation for spherical images

    Lorenzo Sorgi and Kostas Daniilidis. Normalized cross- correlation for spherical images. In Computer Vision- ECCV 2004: 8th European Conference on Computer Vi- sion, Prague, Czech Republic, May 11-14, 2004. Proceed- ings, Part II 8, pages 542–553. Springer, 2004. 2, 3

    2004

  59. [67]

    Efficient global point cloud alignment us- ing bayesian nonparametric mixtures

    Julian Straub, Trevor Campbell, Jonathan P How, and John W Fisher. Efficient global point cloud alignment us- ing bayesian nonparametric mixtures. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion, pages 2941–2950, 2017. 3

    2017

  60. [68]

    Ransic: Fast and highly robust estimation for rota- tion search and point cloud registration using invariant com- patibility

    Lei Sun. Ransic: Fast and highly robust estimation for rota- tion search and point cloud registration using invariant com- patibility. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(1):143– 150, 2021. 2

    2021

  61. [69]

    Peng, and Luca Carlone

    Rajat Talak, Lisa R. Peng, and Luca Carlone. Certifiable object pose estimation: Foundations, learning models, and self-training. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , 39(4):2805– 2824, 2023. 2, 3, 5

    2023

  62. [70]

    Per- formance evaluation of 3d keypoint detectors

    Federico Tombari, Samuele Salti, and Luigi Di Stefano. Per- formance evaluation of 3d keypoint detectors. International Journal of Computer Vision, 102(1):198–220, 2013. 2

    2013

  63. [71]

    A least squares estimate of satellite attitude

    Grace Wahba. A least squares estimate of satellite attitude. SIAM review, 7(3):409–409, 1965. 1

    1965

  64. [72]

    3d shapenets: A deep representation for volumetric shapes

    Zhirong Wu, Shuran Song, Aditya Khosla, Fisher Yu, Lin- guang Zhang, Xiaoou Tang, and Jianxiong Xiao. 3d shapenets: A deep representation for volumetric shapes. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1912–1920, 2015. 6, 3

    1912

  65. [73]

    A quaternion-based certifi- ably optimal solution to the wahba problem with outliers

    Heng Yang and Luca Carlone. A quaternion-based certifi- ably optimal solution to the wahba problem with outliers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1665–1674, 2019. 2, 3, 5

    2019

  66. [74]

    Graduated non-convexity for robust spatial perception: From non-minimal solvers to global outlier re- jection

    Heng Yang, Pasquale Antonante, Vasileios Tzoumas, and Luca Carlone. Graduated non-convexity for robust spatial perception: From non-minimal solvers to global outlier re- jection. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 5(2):1127– 1134, 2020. 2

    2020

  67. [75]

    Teaser: Fast and certifiable point cloud registration

    Heng Yang, Jingnan Shi, and Luca Carlone. Teaser: Fast and certifiable point cloud registration. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 37(2):314–333, 2020. 7, 6

    2020

  68. [76]

    Go-icp: A globally optimal solution to 3d icp point- set registration

    Jiaolong Yang, Hongdong Li, Dylan Campbell, and Yunde Jia. Go-icp: A globally optimal solution to 3d icp point- set registration. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 38(11):2241–2254, 2015. 3

    2015

  69. [77]

    Rpm-net: Robust point matching using learned features

    Zi Jian Yew and Gim Hee Lee. Rpm-net: Robust point matching using learned features. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11824–11833, 2020. 3, 6

    2020

  70. [78]

    EGST: Enhanced geometric structure transformer for point cloud registration

    Yongzhe Yuan et al. EGST: Enhanced geometric structure transformer for point cloud registration. IEEE Trans. on Vis. and Comp. Graphics, 30(9):6222–6234, 2024. 4, 7

    2024

  71. [79]

    3dmatch: Learning local geometric descriptors from rgb-d reconstruc- tions

    Andy Zeng, Shuran Song, Matthias Nießner, Matthew Fisher, Jianxiong Xiao, and Thomas Funkhouser. 3dmatch: Learning local geometric descriptors from rgb-d reconstruc- tions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1802–1811, 2017. 6

    2017

  72. [80]

    Unsupervised learning for spherical surface registration

    Fenqiang Zhao, Zhengwang Wu, Li Wang, Weili Lin, Shun- ren Xia, Dinggang Shen, Gang Li, and UNC/UMN Baby Connectome Project Consortium. Unsupervised learning for spherical surface registration. In Machine Learning in Med- ical Imaging: 11th International Workshop, MLMI 2020, H...

    2020

  73. [81]

    S3reg: superfast spherical surface registration based on deep learn- ing

    Fenqiang Zhao, Zhengwang Wu, Fan Wang, Weili Lin, Shunren Xia, Dinggang Shen, Li Wang, and Gang Li. S3reg: superfast spherical surface registration based on deep learn- ing. IEEE transactions on medical imaging , 40(8):1964– 1976, 2021. 2

    1964

  74. [82]

    Centroidreg: A global-to-local framework for partial point cloud registration

    Hengwang Zhao, Zhidong Liang, Chunxiang Wang, and Ming Yang. Centroidreg: A global-to-local framework for partial point cloud registration. IEEE Robotics and Automa- tion Letters, 6(2):2533–2540, 2021. 7 Correspondence-Free Fast and Robust Spherical Point Pattern Registration ...

    2021

  75. [84]

    special orthogonal group

    Mathematical Preliminaries This section contains additional mathematical background needed for the algorithms in our paper. 7.1. Rotations The set of all rotations in three dimensions is denoted as SO(3), known as the “special orthogonal group.” Rotations can be represented by...

  76. [85]

    Our method is analogous to this idea in the spherical domain, where the azimuthal shift—after mean alignment and projec- tion—corresponds to a 1D phase shift

    Formal Justification of SPMC: Centroid-based alignment is a classical strategy for esti- mating temporal shifts in noisy 1D signals, with theoreti- cal performance bounds established in [36]. Our method is analogous to this idea in the spherical domain, where the azimuthal shi...

  77. [86]

    Ro- bust Vector Alignment Dataset

    Experiment 1: Robust Alignment 9.1. Dataset Description In the first experiment, we evaluate the robustness, accu- racy, and time complexity of our algorithm using the “Ro- bust Vector Alignment Dataset.” This dataset contains five template spherical patterns, labeled A1, A2, ...

  78. [87]

    Dataset Preparation From the ModelNet40 dataset [72], we selected 166 ob- jects from 35 object classes

    Experiment 2: Point Cloud Registration 10.1. Dataset Preparation From the ModelNet40 dataset [72], we selected 166 ob- jects from 35 object classes. We chose to exclude classes containing highly symmetric objects, such as bowls, cones, vases, bottles, and glass boxes. These ob...

  79. [88]

    Compute the vector from the centroid to the point: ⃗ v=   x1−xc y1−yc z1−zc  

  80. [89]

    Normalize this vector to have a unit norm: ⃗ vunit = ⃗ v ∥⃗ v∥ =   x1−xc y1−yc z1−zc   p (x1−xc)2 + (y1−yc)2 + (z1−zc)2

  81. [90]

    No correlation and No Noise

    The coordinates of the point projected onto the unit sphere are:   x y z   =⃗ vunit Fig. 13(a) illustrates a sample point cloud (red) and its projection (green) onto the unit sphere from the centroid. Fig. 13(b) depicts the bunny point cloud, highlighting its original stru...

  82. [91]

    5.3 in the main text), the choice of threshold value is crucial

    Experiment 3: Rotation Estimation From Spherical Images While converting spherical images to spherical points (see Sec. 5.3 in the main text), the choice of threshold value is crucial. A lower threshold captures more features but in- cludes more clutter, while a higher thresho...

  83. [2004]

    IEEE, 2004

    ICPR 2004., pages 590–593. IEEE, 2004. 2, 3, 7

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.