Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Advancing Large Language Models to Capture Varied Speaking Styles and Respond Properly in Spoken Conversations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.12786 v2 pith:NTKXNOZE submitted 2024-02-20 cs.CL eess.AS

classification cs.CLeess.AS
keywords stylesspokendifferentspeakingllmsresponsesspoken-llmcurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In spoken dialogue, even if two current turns are the same sentence, their responses might still differ when they are spoken in different styles. The spoken styles, containing paralinguistic and prosodic information, mark the most significant difference between text and speech modality. When using text-only LLMs to model spoken dialogue, text-only LLMs cannot give different responses based on the speaking style of the current turn. In this paper, we focus on enabling LLMs to listen to the speaking styles and respond properly. Our goal is to teach the LLM that "even if the sentences are identical if they are spoken in different styles, their corresponding responses might be different". Since there is no suitable dataset for achieving this goal, we collect a speech-to-speech dataset, StyleTalk, with the following desired characteristics: when two current speeches have the same content but are spoken in different styles, their responses will be different. To teach LLMs to understand and respond properly to the speaking styles, we propose the Spoken-LLM framework that can model the linguistic content and the speaking styles. We train Spoken-LLM using the StyleTalk dataset and devise a two-stage training pipeline to help the Spoken-LLM better learn the speaking styles. Based on extensive experiments, we show that Spoken-LLM outperforms text-only baselines and prior speech LLMs methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AV-EMO-Reasoning: Benchmarking Emotional Reasoning Capabilities in Omni-modal LLMS with Audio-visual Cues

    cs.MM 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Current omni-modal LLMs underperform on audio-visual emotional reasoning, and automatic scores diverge from human perceptual judgments; AV-EMO-Reasoning provides a benchmark to measure this.

  2. X$^3$-OPD: Distilling Reasoning into Large Audio-Language Models via On-Policy Alignment

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    X3-OPD improves audio-grounded reasoning by training the audio student on its own rollouts with token-level teacher feedback, using a three-tier paired text-audio corpus.

  3. Incorporating Contextual Paralinguistic Understanding in Large Speech-Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Training a speech-LLM on question-answer pairs generated with both discrete and continuous emotion labels improves its contextual emotion reasoning as scored by an LLM judge.

  4. MERaLiON-GR: Speech Gender Recognition Model for English and SEA Languages

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A LoRA-tuned speech encoder with an ECAPA-TDNN head outperforms prior gender-recognition systems on most English and Southeast Asian test sets.

Pith tools