REVIEW 6 cited by
Decoding Compressed Trust: Scrutinizing the Trustworthiness of Efficient LLMs Under Compression
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Compressing high-capability Large Language Models (LLMs) has emerged as a favored strategy for resource-efficient inferences. While state-of-the-art (SoTA) compression methods boast impressive advancements in preserving benign task performance, the potential risks of compression in terms of safety and trustworthiness have been largely neglected. This study conducts the first, thorough evaluation of three (3) leading LLMs using five (5) SoTA compression techniques across eight (8) trustworthiness dimensions. Our experiments highlight the intricate interplay between compression and trustworthiness, revealing some interesting patterns. We find that quantization is currently a more effective approach than pruning in achieving efficiency and trustworthiness simultaneously. For instance, a 4-bit quantized model retains the trustworthiness of its original counterpart, but model pruning significantly degrades trustworthiness, even at 50% sparsity. Moreover, employing quantization within a moderate bit range could unexpectedly improve certain trustworthiness dimensions such as ethics and fairness. Conversely, extreme quantization to very low bit levels (3 bits) tends to reduce trustworthiness significantly. This increased risk cannot be uncovered by looking at benign performance alone, in turn, mandating comprehensive trustworthiness evaluation in practice. These findings culminate in practical recommendations for simultaneously achieving high utility, efficiency, and trustworthiness in LLMs. Code and models are available at https://decoding-comp-trust.github.io.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Reliability Scaling Laws for Quantized Large Language Models
Reliability of quantized LLMs peaks nonlinearly at 4-bit precision under fixed total model bits, while accuracy scales monotonically, and quantization can improve robustness to natural perturbations.
-
How Quantization Impacts Privacy Risk on LLMs for Code?
Quantizing code LLMs reduces membership inference effectiveness, with 4-bit compression giving larger privacy and performance drops than 8-bit.
-
Q-resafe: Assessing Safety Risks and Quantization-aware Safety Patching for Quantized Large Language Models
Q-resafe restores much of the safety lost in quantized LLMs by distilling the original model's responses through DPO while selectively updating only safety-critical weights.
-
Quantized but Deceptive? A Multi-Dimensional Truthfulness Evaluation of Quantized LLMs
The study introduces TruthfulnessEval and reports that 4-bit quantization preserves simple true/false accuracy, but explicit 'lie' prompts make quantized and full-precision LLMs output falsehoods even when internal pr...
-
On the transferability of Sparse Autoencoders for interpreting compressed models
Pruning a pretrained sparse autoencoder can produce an interpretability tool for a WANDA-pruned LLM that is roughly comparable to retraining an SAE on the pruned model, though with notable caveats in the reported metrics.
-
Securing LLMs in the Wild: Privacy and Security Challenges at the Edge
Edge LLM security is framed as a Security-Efficiency Paradox, with a three-wall constraint model, a composite SOES score, and a small FP/INT4 benchmark of six models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.