Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

TiEBe: Tracking Language Model Recall of Notable Worldwide Events Through Time

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.07482 v2 pith:NXMDJETP submitted 2025-01-13 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords eventsfactuallanguagerecalltiebegloballlmsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As the knowledge landscape evolves and large language models (LLMs) become increasingly widespread, there is a growing need to keep these models updated with current events. While existing benchmarks assess general factual recall, few studies explore how LLMs retain knowledge over time or across different regions. To address these gaps, we present the Timely Events Benchmark (TiEBe), a dataset of over 23,000 question-answer pairs centered on notable global and regional events, spanning more than 10 years of events, 23 regions, and 13 languages. TiEBe leverages structured retrospective data from Wikipedia to identify notable events through time. These events are then used to construct a benchmark to evaluate LLMs' understanding of global and regional developments, grounded in factual evidence beyond Wikipedia itself. Our results reveal significant geographic disparities in factual recall, emphasizing the need for more balanced global representation in LLM training. We also observe a Pearson correlation of more than 0.7 between models' performance in TiEBe and various countries' socioeconomic indicators, such as HDI. In addition, we examine the impact of language on factual recall by posing questions in the native language of the region where each event occurred, uncovering substantial performance gaps for low-resource languages.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BRoverbs -- Measuring how much LLMs understand Portuguese proverbs

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BRoverbs lets researchers test whether language models understand Portuguese proverbs; commercial models nearly master it, small models often guess randomly.

  2. BLUEX Revisited: Enhancing Benchmark Coverage with Automatic Captioning

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An updated BLUEX benchmark with 1,422 questions and GPT-4o-generated captions that make image-based questions usable by text-only LLMs.

Pith tools