REVIEW 2 cited by
Parity Property of Hexagonal Sliding Puzzles
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study the puzzle graphs of hexagonal sliding puzzles of various shapes and with various numbers of holes. The puzzle graph is a combinatorial model which captures the solvability and the complexity of sequential mechanical puzzles. Questions relating to the puzzle graph have been previously studied and resolved for the 15 Puzzle which is the most famous, and unsolvable, square sliding puzzle of all time. It is known that for square puzzles such as the 15 Puzzle, solvability depends on a parity property that splits the puzzle graph into two components. In the case of hexagonal sliding puzzles, we get more interesting parity properties that depend on the shape of the boards and on the missing tiles or holes on the board. We show that for large-enough hexagonal, triangular, or parallelogram-shaped boards with hexagonal tiles, all puzzles with three or more holes are solvable. For puzzles with two or more holes, we give a solvability criterion involving both a parity property and the placement of tiles in tight corners of the board. The puzzle graph is a discrete model for the configuration space of hard tiles (hexagons or squares) moving on different tessellation-based domains. Understanding the combinatorics of the puzzle graph could lead to understanding some aspects of the topology of these configuration spaces.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Approximately Optimal Search on a Higher-dimensional Sliding Puzzle
The paper reports that A*, evolutionary, and reinforcement-learning search can solve 3D hypercube sliding puzzles, and that the stochastic methods find approximate solutions in dimensions 4 and 5 where A* times out.
-
Insights from a workshop on gamification of research in mathematics and computer science
A workshop report describing three gamified research outreach activities and claiming new extremal fence results whose proofs are deferred to an unpublished companion paper.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.