Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

SasAgent lets plain-text prompts drive small-angle scattering analysis through a multi-agent LLM system built on SasView tools.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

SasAgent connects a large language model to SasView tools through four agents, letting users calculate SLDs, generate synthetic scattering curves, and fit experimental SAS data from text prompts.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A genuinely new integration of LLM agents with SasView whose 'high precision' claim outruns the evidence; worth refereeing with a request for revision. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.05363 v1 pith:OBK35E5H submitted 2025-09-04 cs.AI cond-mat.mtrl-scics.MA

SasAgent: Multi-Agent AI System for Small-Angle Scattering Data Analysis

Lijie Ding , Changwoo Do This is my paper
classification cs.AI cond-mat.mtrl-scics.MA
keywords small-angle scatteringmulti-agent AIlarge language modelsSasViewscattering length densitydata fittingretrieval-augmented generationscientific automation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the gap between LLM agents and SAS analysis can be closed by wrapping SasView's existing tools—model calculation, documentation, fitting, and SLD calculation—as LLM-friendly functions and organizing them under a coordinator plus three expert agents. It reports a working system, SasAgent, that a user can drive with text prompts: it computes SLDs from chemical names or formulas, creates synthetic scattering curves from model descriptions, and fits user-uploaded experimental data with fixed SLDs and initial guesses drawn from the prompt. The demonstrated examples span polymer, ellipsoid, lamellar, and paracrystalline models, plus two experimental fits, and the authors' central claim is that this lowers the expertise barrier to common SAS tasks.

Core claim

On the paper's terms, the discovery is that a two-layer LLM agent architecture can operate SasView faithfully enough to perform three everyday SAS tasks end-to-end from natural language. The coordinator agent parses the user's intent; the SLD, generation, and fitting agents each own one task; and the four tool wrappers give them ground-truth access to the full 78-model library. In the examples, the system selects flexible_cylinder for a polymer prompt, flexibly interprets a specified sigma_d value and q-range, finds and fixes SLD values before fitting, and recovers a sphere radius consistent with the literature value for the colloid data. The authors present the ladder-polymer fit as a demon

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-layer agent-tool architecture: a coordinator agent plus three expert agents (SLD, generation, fitting) over four tools—the RAG documentation tool, the model data tool, the bump fitting tool, and the SLD calculator tool—all derived from SasView. The RAG documentation tool is the critical piece because it feeds the LLM the definitions of all 78 SasView models, letting it map user language to correct model names and parameters instead of guessing from memory.

Load-bearing premise

The whole pipeline assumes the LLM reliably understands the user's prompt and picks the correct model, parameters, and documentation entries; when the request is ambiguous, novel, or outside the 78 standard SasView models, the agent can produce plausible but wrong or statistically meaningless fits.

What would settle it

Hand the system a benchmark suite of prompts with known answers—SLD queries for a dozen common solvents, generation prompts that name models both by SasView names and by colloquial descriptions, and experimental datasets with published fit results—and measure the fraction of correct tool calls and parameter recovery. The ladder-polymer fit's reported uncertainties (Kuhn length 7.79 ± 17.67 Å) already provide one concrete case where a low chi-squared value coexists with unconstrained parameters, so a direct test would be whether the system flags such a fit as unreliable.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Natural-language prompts can replace manual, menu-driven interaction with SasView for SLD lookup, synthetic curve generation, and routine fitting, reducing the expertise needed to enter the field.
  • The same wrapping pattern—exposing an existing scientific library's functions as LLM-callable tools plus a retrieval layer over its documentation—can transfer to other analysis software beyond SAS.
  • If tool-calling is reliable, a researcher can delegate the 'which model and what parameters' stage of SAS analysis to the agent and focus human effort on interpretation and sample-specific modeling.
  • The architecture is a plausible building block for wider autonomous workflows, since the agent can act as one specialist within a larger lab-automation pipeline.
  • The ladder-polymer example shows the agent's output is only as good as the model library; when no standard SasView model matches the sample, the system still produces a fit, but the user must know not to over-interpret it.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • For ambiguous prompts, the coordinator's routing decision becomes the accuracy bottleneck; a test suite of deliberately vague requests would likely expose where the system defaults to the wrong expert agent or model.
  • The examples suggest model selection in SasAgent leans on the LLM's prior knowledge rather than on an encoded selection heuristic, so accuracy is likely uneven across uncommon materials or model families.
  • The 'high precision' claim is best read as precision of the underlying SasView and bump fitting machinery, not as evidence that the LLM's chosen model is structurally correct; the ladder-polymer fit's reported uncertainties (Kuhn length 7.79 ± 17.67 Å) already show a statistically unconstrained case.
  • Adding web search and literature-reading, as the authors propose, would help for novel samples, but only if the model-selection step is validated against benchmarked fits before the new information is trusted.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents SasAgent, a multi-agent LLM system that wraps SasView tools into LLM-friendly functions and provides a Gradio-based interface. The system includes a coordinator agent that routes user requests to three expert agents for SLD calculation, synthetic scattering data generation, and experimental data fitting. Four tool wrappers (model data, RAG documentation, bump fitting, SLD calculator) are built from SasView. The authors demonstrate the system on several examples: self-guidance, SLD queries, synthetic generation for a few models, and two experimental fits (a ladder polymer and a dilute colloid). The central claim is that SasAgent can interpret complex prompts, calculate SLDs, generate accurate scattering data, and fit experimental datasets with high precision.

Significance. If the central claim were robustly established, SasAgent would be a genuinely useful integration of LLM agents with a widely used scientific software package, lowering the expertise barrier for SAS analysis. The paper's strengths include the availability of code and data on GitHub, the design choice of outsourcing numerical computation to SasView rather than having the LLM invent formulas, the RAG documentation tool that grounds model selection in SasView's 78-model documentation, and a user interface that exposes system logs for transparency. However, the evidence presented is anecdotal and the flagship fitting example does not support the 'high precision' wording in the abstract. The broader significance therefore depends on whether the authors either provide a more systematic evaluation or substantially qualify their claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. III.D, Fig. 6] The abstract claims that SasAgent can 'fit experimental datasets with high precision,' but the only detailed fitting example shown in Fig. 6 yields parameter uncertainties far larger than the parameter values themselves: Kuhn length 7.79 ± 17.67 Å and radius 7.56 ± 144.44 Å, with scale 0.0100 ± 1.2625. These are relative uncertainties of roughly 227% and 1910%, respectively, so the flexible_cylinder model essentially leaves these parameters unconstrained for this dataset. The reduced chi-squared value of 0.90 is a measure of residual quality, not parameter precision. The authors also explicitly note that a sample-specific model is needed for this ladder polymer sample. This example undercuts the unqualified 'high precision' claim and should be revised or replaced with a fitting demonstration where parameter precision is actually achieved.
  2. [Sec. III and Sec. IV (Summary)] The paper's evidence is limited to a small number of hand-picked examples: four SLD queries, four synthetic-generation prompts, and two experimental fits. No systematic evaluation is reported: there are no repeated runs to characterize LLM stochasticity or tool-calling reliability, no quantitative success rate for correct model selection or parameter interpretation, no baseline comparison with standard SasView/manual analysis, and no evaluation of RAG retrieval quality. The Summary's statement that 'These examples demonstrate the robustness, diversity and flexibility of our SasAgent system' overstates what the evidence supports. A modest benchmark on a set of datasets with a range of models, with repeated runs and a reported success rate, would substantially strengthen the paper and justify the robustness claim.
  3. [Sec. II.A and Sec. III.C] The system's correctness depends on the LLM interpreting prompts and correctly using the RAG documentation tool to select models and parameters. However, the paper provides no analysis of failure modes or incorrect tool calls, and the generation examples in Fig. 5 cover only four models out of the 78 available in SasView. The RAG documentation tool is a central component, yet the paper does not describe the chunking, retrieval, or verification procedures, nor does it report retrieval accuracy. The authors should add a brief reproducibility-oriented description of the RAG pipeline and, ideally, a quantitative check of model-selection accuracy on a larger set of prompts.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] There are numerous typos that should be corrected: 'specialiszd' (Sec. II.A), 'correstion' (Fig. 5 caption), 'Bellow' (Sec. II.B), 'manegement' (Fig. 2 caption), 'descibe' (Fig. 3 caption), and 'small-angel' (Sec. III.D).
  2. [Sec. III.B, Fig. 4] The SLD examples should state explicitly whether neutron or X-ray SLD is being computed. The DMSO result shows an imaginary component of 5.9719×10⁻⁶ Å⁻², which is unexpectedly large for neutron scattering; the authors should verify this value against SasView/reference outputs, since users may rely on the displayed numbers.
  3. [Sec. II.B] The default model is gpt-4o-mini, but no temperature or other sampling parameters are reported, and the paper does not state how many runs the examples took or whether the displayed outputs are representative or cherry-picked. Reporting these details would improve reproducibility, especially since LLM outputs are stochastic.
  4. [Sec. III.D, Fig. 7] The sphere-fit example reports a diameter of 115.66 nm consistent with the literature value, but no uncertainty, goodness-of-fit metric, or fit plot is shown. Adding these would make the example more convincing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: SasAgent's claimed pipeline is an external-tool wrapper with no derivation of results from its own outputs.

full rationale

The paper does not derive equations, fit a parameter and then rename it as a prediction, or invoke any uniqueness theorem. Its central claim is that an LLM-driven multi-agent system can wrap SasView functions to calculate SLDs, generate synthetic scattering curves, and fit user-uploaded data. The fitting examples use external experimental datasets (refs. 40 and 41) and user-specified models; the authors explicitly note for the ladder-polymer fit that a sample-specific model would be needed. The only self-references are citations to the authors' earlier papers for those datasets, which are data sources rather than load-bearing assumptions that force the results. The abstract's 'high precision' wording is contradicted by the large parameter uncertainties shown in Fig. 6, but that is a correctness or robustness concern, not circularity. Since the system delegates computation to the external SasView library and does not define its outputs in terms of its inputs, the analysis is self-contained and no circular step can be identified.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no physical postulates, free parameters, or new entities. The 'agents' are software components, not invented physical quantities. The main load-bearing assumptions are about the correctness and reliability of the underlying tools (SasView, RAG, LLM) rather than about new physics.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption SasView's model library and its documentation are complete and correct for SAS data analysis.
    The agent's model selection relies on RAG over SasView documentation; if the docs are incomplete or outdated, the agent may choose incorrect models or parameters (Sec. II.A, RAG documentation tool).
  • domain assumption The LLM (via OpenRouter) can reliably interpret user prompts and tool outputs with high accuracy.
    The coordinator and expert agents depend on LLM reasoning, and no formal correctness guarantees are provided (Sec. II.A). The demonstrated examples assume this reliability.
  • domain assumption The bump fitting tool from SasView converges to physically meaningful fits when given user-specified SLD values and initial guesses.
    Fitting results in Sec. III.D are taken as evidence of system ability, but the ladder polymer fit shows that model choice and fitting convergence are not guaranteed.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SasAgent: Multi-Agent AI System for Small-Angle Scattering Data Analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OBK35E5H

@misc{pith2026250905363,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SasAgent: Multi-Agent AI System for Small-Angle Scattering Data Analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OBK35E5H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.05363}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We introduce SasAgent, a multi-agent AI system powered by large language models (LLMs) that automates small-angle scattering (SAS) data analysis by leveraging tools from the SasView software and enables user interaction via text input. SasAgent features a coordinator agent that interprets user prompts and delegates tasks to three specialized agents for scattering length density (SLD) calculation, synthetic data generation, and experimental data fitting. These agents utilize LLM-friendly tools to execute tasks efficiently. These tools, including the model data tool, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) documentation tool, bump fitting tool, and SLD calculator tool, are derived from the SasView Python library. A user-friendly Gradio-based interface enhances user accessibility. Through diverse examples, we demonstrate SasAgent's ability to interpret complex prompts, calculate SLDs, generate accurate scattering data, and fit experimental datasets with high precision. This work showcases the potential of LLM-driven AI systems to streamline scientific workflows and enhance automation in SAS research.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.05363 by Changwoo Do, Lijie Ding.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Architecture of the multi agent system that consists of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. User interface of the SasAgent system consisting 5 blocks. (a) The chatting window in which the user can send prompt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. self-awareness of the SasAgent system, it provide [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Generating scattering data with the SasAgent. (a) Asking the agent to generate the scattering of flexible polymer chain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Fitting user provided scattering data with the SasAgent. With user provided specific model choice and the description [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Fitting user provided scattering data for the colloids [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CogEEGAgent: Toward Autonomous Cognitive EEG Analysis with Grounded Execution and Selection-Aware Verification

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    An MNE-grounded EEG agent separates LLM semantic routing from deterministic commitment, participant-disjoint confirmation, and evidence-bound release, outperforming a matched lexical router and blocking adaptive-searc...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Lindner \ and\ author J

    author author P. Lindner \ and\ author J. Oberdisse ,\ @noop title Neutrons, X-rays, and light: scattering methods applied to soft condensed matter \ ( publisher Elsevier ,\ year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    author author C. G. \ Windsor ,\ title title An introduction to small-angle neutron scattering , \ @noop journal journal Applied Crystallography \ volume 21 ,\ pages 582--588 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    work page 1988

  3. [3]

    author author S.-H. \ Chen ,\ title title Small angle neutron scattering studies of the structure and interaction in micellar and microemulsion systems , \ @noop journal journal Annual Review of Physical Chemistry \ volume 37 ,\ pages 351--399 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    work page 1986

  4. [4]

    Chu \ and\ author B

    author author B. Chu \ and\ author B. S. \ Hsiao ,\ title title Small-angle x-ray scattering of polymers , \ @noop journal journal Chemical reviews \ volume 101 ,\ pages 1727--1762 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Nierlich , author C

    author author M. Nierlich , author C. Williams , author F. Bou \'e , author J. Cotton , author M. Daoud , author B. Famoux , author G. Jannink , author C. Picot , author M. Moan , author C. Wolff , et al. ,\ title title Small angle neutron scattering by semi-dilute solutions of polyelectrolyte , \ @noop journal journal Journal de Physique \ volume 40 ,\ p...

    work page 1979

  6. [6]

    author author M. H. \ Koch , author P. Vachette ,\ and\ author D. I. \ Svergun ,\ title title Small-angle scattering: a view on the properties, structures and structural changes of biological macromolecules in solution , \ @noop journal journal Quarterly reviews of biophysics \ volume 36 ,\ pages 147--227 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    \ Guilbaud \ and\ author A

    author author J.-B. \ Guilbaud \ and\ author A. Saiani ,\ title title Using small angle scattering (sas) to structurally characterise peptide and protein self-assembled materials , \ @noop journal journal Chemical Society Reviews \ volume 40 ,\ pages 1200--1210 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    author author H. D. \ Mertens \ and\ author D. I. \ Svergun ,\ title title Structural characterization of proteins and complexes using small-angle x-ray solution scattering , \ @noop journal journal Journal of structural biology \ volume 172 ,\ pages 128--141 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Li , author A

    author author T. Li , author A. J. \ Senesi ,\ and\ author B. Lee ,\ title title Small angle x-ray scattering for nanoparticle research , \ @noop journal journal Chemical reviews \ volume 116 ,\ pages 11128--11180 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    author author C. L. \ Farrow \ and\ author S. J. \ Billinge ,\ title title Relationship between the atomic pair distribution function and small-angle scattering: implications for modeling of nanoparticles , \ @noop journal journal Foundations of Crystallography \ volume 65 ,\ pages 232--239 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    Gerold \ and\ author G

    author author V. Gerold \ and\ author G. Kostorz ,\ title title Small-angle scattering applications to materials science , \ @noop journal journal Applied Crystallography \ volume 11 ,\ pages 376--404 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    work page 1978

  12. [12]

    author author P. Fratzl ,\ title title Small-angle scattering in materials science-a short review of applications in alloys, ceramics and composite materials , \ @noop journal journal Applied Crystallography \ volume 36 ,\ pages 397--404 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    work page 2003

  13. [13]

    author author Y. B. \ Melnichenko \ and\ author G. D. \ Wignall ,\ title title Small-angle neutron scattering in materials science: Recent practical applications , \ @noop journal journal Journal of applied physics \ volume 102 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    author author G. D. \ Wignall \ and\ author Y. B. \ Melnichenko ,\ title title Recent applications of small-angle neutron scattering in strongly interacting soft condensed matter , \ @noop journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 68 ,\ pages 1761 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    author author R. K. \ Archibald , author M. Doucet , author T. Johnston , author S. R. \ Young , author E. Yang ,\ and\ author W. T. \ Heller ,\ title title Classifying and analyzing small-angle scattering data using weighted k nearest neighbors machine learning techniques , \ @noop journal journal Applied Crystallography \ volume 53 ,\ pages 326--334 ( y...

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    author author N. C. \ Drucker , author T. Liu , author Z. Chen , author R. Okabe , author A. Chotrattanapituk , author T. Nguyen , author Y. Wang ,\ and\ author M. Li ,\ title title Challenges and opportunities of machine learning on neutron and x-ray scattering , \ @noop journal journal Synchrotron Radiation News \ volume 35 ,\ pages 16--20 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Tomaszewski , author S

    author author P. Tomaszewski , author S. Yu , author M. Borg ,\ and\ author J. R \"o nnols ,\ title title Machine learning-assisted analysis of small angle x-ray scattering , \ in\ @noop booktitle 2021 Swedish Workshop on Data Science (SweDS) \ ( organization IEEE ,\ year 2021 )\ pp.\ pages 1--6 NoStop

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Do , author W.-R

    author author C. Do , author W.-R. \ Chen ,\ and\ author S. Lee ,\ title title Small angle scattering data analysis assisted by machine learning methods , \ @noop journal journal MRS Advances \ volume 5 ,\ pages 1577--1584 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Radford , author J

    author author A. Radford , author J. Wu , author R. Child , author D. Luan , author D. Amodei , author I. Sutskever , et al. ,\ title title Language models are unsupervised multitask learners , \ @noop journal journal OpenAI blog \ volume 1 ,\ pages 9 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Xiao \ and\ author J

    author author T. Xiao \ and\ author J. Zhu ,\ title title Foundations of large language models , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09223 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    author author J. S. \ Park , author J. O'Brien , author C. J. \ Cai , author M. R. \ Morris , author P. Liang ,\ and\ author M. S. \ Bernstein ,\ title title Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior , \ in\ @noop booktitle Proceedings of the 36th annual acm symposium on user interface software and technology \ ( year 2023 )\ pp.\ pages 1...

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Durante , author Q

    author author Z. Durante , author Q. Huang , author N. Wake , author R. Gong , author J. S. \ Park , author B. Sarkar , author R. Taori , author Y. Noda , author D. Terzopoulos , author Y. Choi , et al. ,\ title title Agent ai: Surveying the horizons of multimodal interaction , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03568 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Xie , author Z

    author author J. Xie , author Z. Chen , author R. Zhang , author X. Wan ,\ and\ author G. Li ,\ title title Large multimodal agents: A survey , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15116 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Yang , author C

    author author J. Yang , author C. E. \ Jimenez , author A. Wettig , author K. Lieret , author S. Yao , author K. Narasimhan ,\ and\ author O. Press ,\ title title Swe-agent: Agent-computer interfaces enable automated software engineering , \ @noop journal journal Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems \ volume 37 ,\ pages 50528--50652 ( year 20...

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    author author M. C. \ Ramos , author C. J. \ Collison ,\ and\ author A. D. \ White ,\ title title A review of large language models and autonomous agents in chemistry , \ @noop journal journal Chemical science \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    author author O. A. \ Mendible-Barreto , author M. D \' az-Maldonado , author F. J. C. \ Esteva , author J. E. \ Torres , author U. M. \ C \'o rdova-Figueroa ,\ and\ author Y. J. \ Col \'o n ,\ title title Dynamate: leveraging ai-agents for customized research workflows , \ @noop journal journal Molecular Systems Design & Engineering \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Kim , author C

    author author Y. Kim , author C. Park , author H. Jeong , author Y. S. \ Chan , author X. Xu , author D. McDuff , author H. Lee , author M. Ghassemi , author C. Breazeal ,\ and\ author H. W. \ Park ,\ title title Mdagents: An adaptive collaboration of llms for medical decision-making , \ @noop journal journal Advances in Neural Information Processing Syst...

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Tang , author L

    author author J. Tang , author L. Xia , author Z. Li ,\ and\ author C. Huang ,\ title title Ai-researcher: Autonomous scientific innovation , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18705 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Abid , author A

    author author A. Abid , author A. Abdalla , author A. Abid , author D. Khan , author A. Alfozan ,\ and\ author J. Zou ,\ title title Gradio: Hassle-free sharing and testing of ml models in the wild , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.02569 \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  30. [30]

    u ttler , author M. Lewis , author W.-t. \ Yih , author T. Rockt \

    author author P. Lewis , author E. Perez , author A. Piktus , author F. Petroni , author V. Karpukhin , author N. Goyal , author H. K \"u ttler , author M. Lewis , author W.-t. \ Yih , author T. Rockt \"a schel , et al. ,\ title title Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks , \ @noop journal journal Advances in neural information ...

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Gao , author Y

    author author Y. Gao , author Y. Xiong , author X. Gao , author K. Jia , author J. Pan , author Y. Bi , author Y. Dai , author J. Sun , author H. Wang ,\ and\ author H. Wang ,\ title title Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10997 \ volume 2 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    https://www.sasview.org/docs/user/qtgui/Perspectives/Fitting/models/index.html title Model functions --- SasView 6.1.0 documentation , \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    ,\ @noop title CrewAI : Framework for orchestrating role-playing, autonomous ai agents , \ howpublished https://github.com/crewaiinc/crewai ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    author author CrewAI Inc. ,\ @noop title CrewAI : Framework for orchestrating role-playing, autonomous ai agents , \ howpublished https://github.com/crewaiinc/crewai ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Richardson ,\ @noop title Beautiful soup documentation , \ ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    author author L. Richardson ,\ @noop title Beautiful soup documentation , \ ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    author author V. G. \ Nair ,\ @noop title Getting started with beautiful soup \ ( publisher Packt Publishing Ltd ,\ year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    author author OpenRouter Team ,\ @noop title Openrouter examples , \ howpublished https://github.com/OpenRouterTeam/openrouter-examples ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Achiam , author S

    author author J. Achiam , author S. Adler , author S. Agarwal , author L. Ahmad , author I. Akkaya , author F. L. \ Aleman , author D. Almeida , author J. Altenschmidt , author S. Altman , author S. Anadkat , et al. ,\ title title Gpt-4 technical report , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 \ ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    author author Anthropic ,\ @noop title System card: Claude opus 4 & claude sonnet 4 , \ howpublished https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/4263b940cabb546aa0e3283f35b686f4f3b2ff47.pdf ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Comanici , author E

    author author G. Comanici , author E. Bieber , author M. Schaekermann , author I. Pasupat , author N. Sachdeva , author I. Dhillon , author M. Blistein , author O. Ram , author D. Zhang , author E. Rosen , et al. ,\ title title Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities ,...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Ding , author C.-H

    author author L. Ding , author C.-H. \ Tung , author Z. Cao , author Z. Ye , author X. Gu , author Y. Xia , author W.-R. \ Chen ,\ and\ author C. Do ,\ title title Machine learning-assisted profiling of a kinked ladder polymer structure using scattering , \ @noop journal journal Digital Discovery \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    \ Tung , author L

    author author C.-H. \ Tung , author L. Ding , author M.-C. \ Chang , author G.-R. \ Huang , author L. Porcar , author Y. Wang , author J.-M. Y. \ Carrillo , author B. G. \ Sumpter , author Y. Shinohara , author C. Do , et al. ,\ title title Scattering-based structural inversion of soft materials via kolmogorov--arnold networks , \ @noop journal journal Th...

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    author author N. J. \ Szymanski , author B. Rendy , author Y. Fei , author R. E. \ Kumar , author T. He , author D. Milsted , author M. J. \ McDermott , author M. Gallant , author E. D. \ Cubuk , author A. Merchant , et al. ,\ title title An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials , \ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 62...

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Dai , author S

    author author T. Dai , author S. Vijayakrishnan , author F. T. \ Szczypi \'n ski , author J.-F. \ Ayme , author E. Simaei , author T. Fellowes , author R. Clowes , author L. Kotopanov , author C. E. \ Shields , author Z. Zhou , et al. ,\ title title Autonomous mobile robots for exploratory synthetic chemistry , \ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 635 ...

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Schmidgall , author Y

    author author S. Schmidgall , author Y. Su , author Z. Wang , author X. Sun , author J. Wu , author X. Yu , author J. Liu , author M. Moor , author Z. Liu ,\ and\ author E. Barsoum ,\ title title Agent laboratory: Using llm agents as research assistants , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04227 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.