Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

New Fairness Metrics for Recommendation that Embrace Differences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1706.09838 v2 pith:OGUXMHBT submitted 2017-06-29 cs.CY cs.AI

classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords fairnessmetricsdataunfairnessaddingaddressbaselinebetter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study fairness in collaborative-filtering recommender systems, which are sensitive to discrimination that exists in historical data. Biased data can lead collaborative filtering methods to make unfair predictions against minority groups of users. We identify the insufficiency of existing fairness metrics and propose four new metrics that address different forms of unfairness. These fairness metrics can be optimized by adding fairness terms to the learning objective. Experiments on synthetic and real data show that our new metrics can better measure fairness than the baseline, and that the fairness objectives effectively help reduce unfairness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generative Ghost: Investigating Ranking Bias Hidden in AI-Generated Videos

    cs.IR 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Text-video retrieval models systematically rank AI-generated videos above semantically matched real videos, driven by both visual and temporal cues and amplified by AI content in training data.

Pith tools