The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2409.05247 · v1 · pith:OL5QRLJT · submitted 2024-09-08 · cs.CL

Socially Responsible Data for Large Multilingual Language Models

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:OL5QRLJTrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL
keywords languagesdatalanguagellmsculturalmanymodelsbeen
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly increased in size and apparent capabilities in the last three years, but their training data is largely English text. There is growing interest in multilingual LLMs, and various efforts are striving for models to accommodate languages of communities outside of the Global North, which include many languages that have been historically underrepresented in digital realms. These languages have been coined as "low resource languages" or "long-tail languages", and LLMs performance on these languages is generally poor. While expanding the use of LLMs to more languages may bring many potential benefits, such as assisting cross-community communication and language preservation, great care must be taken to ensure that data collection on these languages is not extractive and that it does not reproduce exploitative practices of the past. Collecting data from languages spoken by previously colonized people, indigenous people, and non-Western languages raises many complex sociopolitical and ethical questions, e.g., around consent, cultural safety, and data sovereignty. Furthermore, linguistic complexity and cultural nuances are often lost in LLMs. This position paper builds on recent scholarship, and our own work, and outlines several relevant social, cultural, and ethical considerations and potential ways to mitigate them through qualitative research, community partnerships, and participatory design approaches. We provide twelve recommendations for consideration when collecting language data on underrepresented language communities outside of the Global North.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Challenges and Recommendations for LLMs-as-a-Judge in Multilingual Settings and Low-Resource Languages

    cs.CL 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Meta-analysis of 33 ACL papers shows inconsistent LLM-as-a-Judge results, overtrust, and single-model reliance in multilingual/low-resource settings, with recommendations for better practice.

  2. Can Data Work be Reparative?

    cs.CY 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Ethnographic study of feminist civic-tech data work argues reparative AI dataset production requires resetting accountability ties to center those harmed by current practices.