Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MISIM: A Neural Code Semantics Similarity System Using the Context-Aware Semantics Structure

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.05265 v6 pith:ON6SIJLQ submitted 2020-06-05 cs.LG cs.SEstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.SEstat.ML
keywords codemisimsemanticssimilarityneuralsystemaccuracyconsisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Code semantics similarity can be used for many tasks such as code recommendation, automated software defect correction, and clone detection. Yet, the accuracy of such systems has not yet reached a level of general purpose reliability. To help address this, we present Machine Inferred Code Similarity (MISIM), a neural code semantics similarity system consisting of two core components: (i)MISIM uses a novel context-aware semantics structure, which was purpose-built to lift semantics from code syntax; (ii)MISIM uses an extensible neural code similarity scoring algorithm, which can be used for various neural network architectures with learned parameters. We compare MISIM to four state-of-the-art systems, including two additional hand-customized models, over 328K programs consisting of over 18 million lines of code. Our experiments show that MISIM has 8.08% better accuracy (using MAP@R) compared to the next best performing system.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How the Misuse of a Dataset Harmed Semantic Clone Detection

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A manual review of 406 sampled Weak Type-3/Type-4 clone pairs from BigCloneBench found 93.3% mislabeled as functionally similar, threatening the validity of 139 published semantic clone detection evaluations.

Pith tools